Here's how the House plans to cut $300 million from the disability services agency
The Minnesota House passed a bill Monday with significant cuts to the Department of Human Services through 2027.
DHS programs account for nearly one-third of state spending, and are expected to get more expensive in the coming years due to the aging population and increasing health care costs. Most of the spending is on Medical Assistance, Minnesota's Medicaid program, which allocates more money per participant than nearly any other state.
Because DHS is such a large portion of the budget — rivaled only by education — state leaders have targeted the agency for cuts in the coming years to avert a looming deficit.
With the House tied 67-67, Republican and Democratic-Farmer-Labor leaders agreed to find $300 million in savings.
The cuts to Medical Assistance come ahead of proposed cuts at the federal level. Because the federal government pays for more than half of Medical Assistance, any federal spending reductions would likely force additional state cuts.
Republicans in the U.S. House are prepared to reduce Medicaid spending to pay for tax cuts; Senate Republicans are wary of the move. Party leaders are considering eliminating a tax loophole that allows states, including Minnesota, to get extra Medicaid money from the federal government.
The state Senate has not yet passed its DHS budget bill. Any discrepancies between the two budgets must be hashed out in a conference committee and re-passed by both chambers before the session ends on May 19; without a budget by June 30, the government will shut down.
House budget cuts spending on services, pushes costs onto counties and federal government
The biggest piece of savings in the two year, $17.7 billion DHS budget bill (HF2434) comes from changes to 'rate exceptions,' or higher-than-usual payments to providers who care for people with extraordinary needs. The bill requires extra documentation from providers, and limits what can be considered when determining if a patient and their provider qualify for the exception.
The bill also shifts part of the cost of rate exceptions to county governments, which could lead to higher taxes for property owners across the state.
Together, the changes would save the state around $200 million in the next budget cycle.
The bill would also increase costs on county governments by increasing how much they pay for substance use disorder treatment, and for certain people detained at the Minnesota Sex Offender Program starting in 2027.
The budget would limit the inflation adjustments for some Medical Assistance reimbursements to 4% per year, saving $162 million over the next two years, and even more in future years. (Gov. Tim Walz proposed limiting that inflation adjustment to 2% per year.)
The move is expected to squeeze providers, as their reimbursements may not keep up with the real cost of providing care.
The bill contains a maneuver that would save the state money by pushing costs onto the federal government. It more than doubles the annual per-bed licensing fees for nursing facilities, from $2,815 to $5,900, and also more than doubles one component of the facilities' reimbursement rates. In short: the state would collect licensing fees from the nursing homes, then return it using a mix of state and federal resources. This saves the state $73 million over two years.
The budget would also raise licensing fees for home and community-based service providers, substance use disorder treatment centers, and detox and withdrawal facilities.
It would also eliminate payments made to providers to cover the cost of unplanned absences, saving around $67 million in the next budget.
Medical Assistance currently pays providers the same amount for night supervision duties whether the worker is asleep or awake; the bill would create a new category for 'asleep night supervision,' with lower payouts, saving $23 million over two years.
It's not all cuts
The House bill codifies raises for nursing home workers set by the Nursing Home Workforce Standards Board. The new minimum wage for all nursing home workers would be $19 per hour, which would increase to $20.50 per hour starting in 2027. Specialists like certified nurse assistants, trained medication aides and nurses all have higher minimum wages.
It also codifies raises for disability services workers as part of a contract agreement with SEIU, the workers' union.
The Trump administration is cutting funding for HIV research and prevention efforts, and the House bill would allocate $6 million to community-based HIV/AIDS services providers to replace the lost federal funds.
The bill would direct $5.5 million to preventing fraud by autism services providers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
a few seconds ago
- Bloomberg
Canada Talks Up Pension Funds' Financial Muscle as Lever in US Trade Talks
Canada's major pension funds could boost their investments in the US, a top Canadian cabinet minister said, as the country looks to negotiate a trade agreement with the Trump administration. Dominic LeBlanc, the minister responsible for US trade, is in Washington for talks with US lawmakers. He brought up Canada's pension funds when asked if President Donald Trump will seek a specific pledge for more investment into the US.


USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
President Trump issues college sports executive order addressing NIL and pay-for-play
President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Thursday, July 24 that attempts to create a national standard for NCAA name, image and likeness programs. The order is Trump's latest entry into a debate that has embroiled the NCAA since NIL rules went into effect in 2021, ushering in a wild-west era of college sports that has come under increasing scrutiny by local and national legislators. Broadly focused on efforts to 'save college athletics,' the order also seeks to preserve and support "expansion of opportunities for scholarships and collegiate athletic competition in women's and non-revenue sports." Most of the NIL money is given to athletes in football and men's and women's basketball. The settlement in the long-running House v. NCAA case went into effect July 1 and allowed schools to directly pay college athletes through a revenue-sharing model. In May, Trump appeared poised to create a commission co-chaired by former Alabama coach Nick Saban and influential Texas Tech booster Cody Campbell with a directive to explore and address major issues facing college sports. But there have been no announcements regarding that directive. This week, a bill in the U.S. House of Representatives aimed at restructuring rules around the administration of college athletics passed two committees and is expected to move to the House floor when the summer recess is over in September. Speaking at a National Press Club event in Washington earlier the day, before the order was signed, NCAA President Charlie Baker was asked about possible executive order on college sports. He said he was open to ideas, but 'our focus needs to be on the legislative process.' SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, who along with many in college sports has been advocating for federal intervention, told USA TODAY Sports last week, 'The President is going to do what he wants to do.' 'I've read things on social media, but I also read that there would be a presidential commission,' Sankey added. 'So the question with an executive order is if (Trump) does, and then what it is, and then we'll go from there.'

USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Trump's visit to Fed is latest twist in feud over interest rates that has long history
President Donald Trump's visit to the Federal Reserve on July 24 marks the latest turn in his increasingly vitriolic campaign to pressure Fed Chair Jerome Powell into cutting interest rates or resigning. For months, Trump has berated the Fed chief for his wait-and-see approach to lowering the central bank's key rate, calling him a 'numbskull,' a 'moron,' and his customized moniker – "Too Late" - among other derogatory epithets, and hinting he was considering firing him. The attacks came from new quarters earlier this month, with Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought saying Powell has 'grossly mismanaged the Fed' and misled Congress about an 'ostentatious' renovation of its headquarters in Washington. How much does the Fed's building renovation cost? The project's original cost was pegged at $1.9 billion but cost overruns pushed it to $2.5 billion. Trump has accused Powell of potential fraud that could be grounds to remove him, though he backed off the threat last week. Powell has said he can only be fired for cause. During testimony before the Senate Banking Committee, Powell called some of the descriptions of the remodeling 'misleading and inaccurate.' Trump is expected to join other White House officials in a tour of the renovation's construction site. It's unclear if he'll meet with Powell. Why has Trump criticized Powell? During his first term, Trump repeatedly lambasted the Fed chair for failing to slash rates quickly and aggressively enough, but his offensive has been far more strident in his current tenure. In January, just days after his inauguration, Trump said in a video appearance at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland that Saudi Arabia and OPEC should take steps to lower oil prices. 'With oil prices going down, I'll demand that interest rates drop immediately,' Trump said, suggesting that lower crude prices would mean softer inflation that would give the Fed leeway to lower rates. Asked about his remarks later in the Oval Office, the president said, 'I think I know interest rates much better than (Fed officials) do. 'And I think I know it's certainly much better than the one who's primarily in charge of making that decision,' he added, alluding to Powell. In April, after Powell warned that Trump's tariffs likely would push up inflation, making it tougher for the Fed to chop rates, the President told reporters that Powell's 'termination cannot come fast enough!" 'I'm not happy with him… if I want him out, he'll be out of there real fast, believe me," Trump told during a White House event. Trump further pressed his case at a late May meeting he requested with Powell at the White House, but the Fed chief repeated that officials wouldn't take politics into account in setting monetary policy, according to a Fed statement and the White House press secretary. Days later, after a weak report on private-sector job growth by payroll processor ADP, Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "'Too Late' Powell must now LOWER THE RATE. He is unbelievable!!! Europe has lowered NINE TIMES!" The following week, after a report showed inflation easing, Trump called Powell 'a numbskull,' but said he wouldn't try to dismiss him.'We can't get this guy to do it," Trump told reporters about his pleas to drop rates. "And the fake news is saying 'Oh if you fired him it would be so bad.' I don't know why it would be so bad, but I'm not going to fire him.' Trump, tried another tack on June 30, saying the Fed's refusal to slice rates was costing the federal government nearly $1 trillion in interest on its debt. On his Truth Social site, Trump shared a handwritten note he wrote to Powell. 'You are, as usual, 'Too Late,' he wrote. 'You have cost the USA a fortune and continue to do so. You should lower the interest rate by a lot! Hundreds of billions of dollars being lost! No inflation.' Attaching a list of central bank interest rates, Trump drew two arrows pointing to a rate between Japan's 0.5% and the 1.75% shared by Denmark, Seychelles and Thailand. That suggested Trump thinks the Fed should chop its key short term interest rate by a whopping 3 percentage points or so, from a range of 4.25% to 4.5% to about 1.25%. Economists previously told USA TODAY lower rates would reduce the government's borrowing costs but the $900 billion figure was likely exaggerated. Who controls the Fed? The Fed was established as an independent agency so its decisions about interest rates would be based on what's best for the economy and insulated from politics. Forecasters have said that if Powell acquiesced to Trump's demands and lowered rates without a sound basis, the move would erode confidence in the Fed's autonomy and push up long-term rates, such as for mortgages, because investors would worry about hotter inflation. Also, Powell alone doesn't control rates, which are set by the Fed's policymaking committee, though he can influence other panel members. Asked at a European Central Bank forum several weeks ago if he's bothered by Trump's criticisms, Powell said, "I'm very focused on just doing my job." It's not unprecedented for U.S. presidents to push for lower interest rates boost the economy. But no president has tried to bully a Fed chief as persistently and overtly. Trump appointed Powell to be Fed chief in November 2018, but quickly soured on his choice. In August 2018, Fed officials were raising rates to a more historically normal level after years of near-zero rates following the 2008 financial crisis. Trump told wealthy donors he thought Powell favored 'cheap money,' and was dismayed to see him embrace rate hikes, according to the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg Several months later, trump told the Washington Post he was 'not even a little bit happy' with his pick of Powell. 'I'm doing deals, and I'm not being accommodated by the Fed,' Trump told the Post. 'They're making a mistake because I have a gut and my gut tells me more sometimes than anybody else's brain can ever tell me.' In early 2019, The Fed had stopped raising rates but wasn't yet cutting. 'We have the potential to grow up like a rocket ship if we did some lowering of rates,' in addition to resuming bond purchases to bring down long term rates, Trump posted to social media at the time.