UK's New Age Verification Requirement Thwarted in the Simplest Way Imaginable
Here's the deal: Ofcom, the UK's telecom regulator, requires online platforms to verify the age of their users if they are accessing a site that either publishes or allows users to publish pornographic material. Previously, a simple click of an 'I am over 18' button would get you in. Now, platforms are mandated to use a verification method that is 'strong' and 'highly effective.' A few of those acceptable methods include verifying with a credit card, uploading a photo ID, or submitting to a 'facial age estimation' in which you upload a selfie so a machine can determine if you look old enough to pleasure yourself responsibly.
Those options vary from annoying to creepily intrusive, but there's a little hitch in the plan: Currently, most platforms are determining a user's location based on IP address. If you have an IP that places you in the UK, you have to verify. But if you don't, you're free to browse without interruption. And all you need to change your IP address is a VPN.
Ofcom seems aware of this very simple workaround. According to the BBC, the regulator has rules that make it illegal for platforms to host, share, or allow content that encourages people to use a VPN to bypass the age authentication page. It also encouraged parents to block or control VPN usage by their children to keep them from dodging the age checkers.
It seems that people are aware of this option. Google Trends shows that searches for the term 'VPN' have skyrocketed in the UK since the age verification requirement went into effect.
There are certainly valid arguments for limiting the access of adult material online to keep kids from seeing it, including the fact that accessing such material has been shown in studies to increase sexual objectification of partners, produce more stereotypical beliefs about gender roles, and lead to more sexual aggression.
But the thing about Ofcom's implementation here is that it's not just blocking kids from seeing harmful material—it's exposing everyone to invasive, privacy-violating risks. When the methods for accomplishing the stated goal require people to reveal sensitive data, including their financial information, or give up pictures of their face to be scanned and processed by AI, it's kinda hard to blame anyone for just wanting to avoid that entirely. Whether they're horny teens trying to skirt the system or adults, getting a face scan before opening Pornhub kinda kills the mood.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A More Affordable EV Won't Save Tesla
Key Points Tesla fell 5% after hours on its second-quarter earnings report. Some investors saw production of a new, more affordable vehicle as a positive sign. The company launched its robotaxi network in June. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) issued another disappointing earnings report on Tuesday. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You The Insurance Savings You Expect Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The leading electric vehicle (EV) maker finished the after-hours session down 5%, but the sell-off could have been worse. The company reported a decline in both sales and profit. Revenue was down 12% to $22.5 billion, and adjusted net income was down 23% to $1.39 billion, or $0.40 per share. Those numbers actually topped a muted revenue estimate at $22.13 billion, while the bottom-line consensus matched the results at $0.40. Tesla's problems have been well-documented at this point. CEO Elon Musk's turn in the political spotlight seemed to backfire after his relationship with President Donald Trump went sour. Due in part to Musk's involvement with politics, the brand has become unappealing in the eyes of some potential buyers, leading to a 16% decline in automotive revenue. Sales have plunged in Europe, and the company is losing ground to more affordable Chinese EVs. One seemingly bright spot Musk has a long history of overcoming weak results by telling investors what they want to hear on the earnings call, including making big promises about its robotaxi network and other initiatives in autonomy like its Optimus robot. He seemed to do that again on the latest earnings call, with some comments about the more affordable model he has long promised, which some have dubbed the Tesla Model 2. Musk said that the company started production of the vehicle in June and is ramping up production now. He added: "The goal with those products was not to negatively impact revenue or gross margin, but just to make a car that everyone loves and wants at a more affordable price." Musk has long argued that price competition was one of the biggest headwinds facing the company, but the brand crisis seems to have overshadowed that. By introducing its own lower-priced model, Tesla may end up cannibalizing its more expensive vehicles. Customers may be choosing between a more expensive Tesla and that lower-priced model, rather than another brand. The new vehicle is just a cheaper Model Y, rather than a brand-new vehicle model. The robotaxi initiative The biggest reason Tesla has maintained its premium valuation even as sales and profits have tumbled is that investors believe that Tesla's robotaxi network could go mainstream, fulfilling Musk's long-term vision. However, the robotaxi has gotten off to only a modest start after launching in June, and it seemed to get less attention on Tuesday's earnings call, though Musk reminded the audience: "As you can tell, autonomy is the story." Management said that robotaxis in Austin, Texas have topped 7,000 miles with no significant safety interventions. The company is aiming to launch the robotaxi in the San Francisco Bay Area next. Tesla needs growth in its core business Investors have bid up Tesla stock on hopes for its initiatives in robotaxis and more affordable vehicles, but the company needs to return to growth in selling EVs for the stock to be successful over the long term. The decline in EV sales is a reflection of a backlash against Tesla's brand. The company is also expected to struggle over the next few quarters due to the elimination of the EV tax credit and a change in other federal policies that supported EV adoption. The company also faces a $300 million effect from tariffs. Tesla could get back on track, especially if the robotaxi network takes off. But the current valuation in the stock leaves little room for upside if it does, especially given the persistent challenges in EV sales. While a more affordable vehicle might be a step in the right direction, it seems more likely to undercut demand for Tesla's more expensive vehicles, rather than competing with alternatives. Should you buy stock in Tesla right now? The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Jeremy Bowman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. A More Affordable EV Won't Save Tesla was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
Google says it's working to fix voice commands for your smart lights
Lil Katz / Android Authority TL;DR Google has acknowledged a bug affecting voice commands for smart lights. The company says it is aware of the issue and will share an update soon. Many users say they can still control lights via the Google Home app, but not through Assistant voice commands. Google has confirmed it's investigating a bug preventing users from controlling their smart lights through Google Assistant voice commands. We first reported on the issue over the weekend, as user complaints have continued to pile up on Reddit and Google's support forums in recent days. Android Authority's Rita El Khoury also experienced the problem firsthand, noting that her Nest Audio speaker stopped responding to voice commands to turn off the lights. In a comment posted on Reddit, the official Google Nest account has now addressed the problem: We're aware of an issue with using voice commands to control some lights. We'll share an update as soon as possible, thanks for your patience. While Google hasn't provided a timeline for a fix, it's clear the issue is more than a small glitch. Affected users report various problems, including Google not recognizing light groups, turning off the wrong lights, or responding with silence when given commands like 'Hey Google, turn off the lights.' Most users say the lights can still be controlled via the Google Home app, suggesting that the issue lies specifically with Assistant voice functionality. Some users have found workarounds, such as syncing devices again or removing and re-adding their lighting services, but results vary. 'I had this problem too. I saw someone else post a fix earlier today (Google must have done something that messed things up). You just need to reconnect the service you use for your lights. Go to Google Home app, click the + button to add a new device. Go to the works with Google section and reconnect any of the services you use for the lights. That should work… Maybe,' a user noted on Reddit. However, this may not be an easy fix for those who have multiple lights connected throughout their home. The bug comes at a difficult time for Google's smart home ecosystem, which has been under increased scrutiny from users citing reliability issues. Google has also promised major improvements to the platform in the fall. Until then, users will have to wait for an official fix for this particular problem related to voice commands for connected lights or rely on manual controls as a workaround.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Car expert reveals which next-gen EVs are giving Tesla a run for its money in 2025: 'Competing automakers have caught up'
A car expert has revealed which electric vehicles could soon lap Tesla, whose reign as a tastemaker and EV pioneer has appeared to be on shaky ground over the first half of 2025. At the beginning of the year, InsideEVs' Andrei Nedelea broke down the best Tesla alternatives for consumers who are intrigued by the benefits of driving an EV. According to Nedelea, a competitive EV market may also pique the interest of drivers who already own a Tesla. "Although [Tesla's] EVs are still among the best, competing automakers have caught up and have even surpassed Tesla in some areas," Nedelea wrote. "Buying the best EV isn't as simple as just loading up the Tesla site and ordering one anymore." For drivers interested in a Model 3, Nedelea recommended considering the BMW i4, which features a range of up to 307 miles on a single battery charge. One downside, however, is that the BMW i4 is heavier than the Model 3, so its navigation on winding roads isn't as smooth. The aerodynamic Hyundai Ioniq 6 and the upgraded Polestar 2 are other options to look into. For Model Y enthusiasts, Nedelea suggested considering the Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6, Ford Mustang Mach-E, Chevrolet Equinox EV, and Polestar 4. Those interested in a Model S may appreciate the BMW i5, Audi A6 e-tron, and Lucid Air. Nedelea also listed pricier models such as the Porsche Taycan. Meanwhile, automakers such as Rivian, Polestar, BMW, Kia, and Ford offer alternatives for consumers interested in a Model X or a Cybertruck. Nedelea provided a more detailed breakdown of the pros and cons, but regardless of the EV brand, there are undeniable perks to saying goodbye to a gas-powered vehicle, including reduced maintenance and energy costs. Installing solar panels can further maximize these savings because charging with them at home is cheaper than using public stations or the grid. EnergySage can help homeowners compare quotes from trusted installers and save up to $10,000 on installation costs. There's an important caveat, though. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed on July 4, is eliminating many green tax credits by the end of 2025, including the 30% savings on solar panels. Acting now could save you major money on solar in the long run. Yet while tax incentives for green home improvements are on the way out, the Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates program has remained intact. Would you be more likely to get an EV if it came with a free home charger? Definitely Depends what the car costs Depends how fast it charges Not really Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. For instance, you'll still have access to up to $840 off the cost of an induction range. These next-gen stovetops are gaining buzz among home cooks and professional chefs due to their faster cooking times, energy efficiency, safety features, and affordability — particularly when compared with gas stoves. If installing a full induction range isn't for you, you can still gain access to one with a plug-in induction burner, which is more along the lines of a hot plate. Some models start as low as $50. Regardless of how you choose to go green, ditching technologies that rely heavily on gas will contribute to healthier air quality and a cleaner future for all. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
