Most high schoolers want to learn about personal finance. Pennsylvania will soon require it.
"When it comes to other classes, we might not need those classes depending on what we do after high school, but this class, I feel like everybody will need it after high school," she said.
The senior at Northeast High School is talking about her financial literacy course. On the day CBS News Philadelphia was there, teacher Steve Novosel was talking taxes and walking students through how to navigate a W-2 form.
"It's probably one of the most gratifying experiences I've had as a teacher," Novosel said.
He started teaching the course three years ago and said he's already seeing a return on his investment.
"The first year I had one class, the second year I had two, this year I had four," Novosel said. "Next year I'm going to have a full roster of financial classes. So it's growing, kids are talking about it, and it's amazing to teach with them."
The students start by making vision boards of what they want their life to look like by the time they're 30 years old. Those posters hang on the ceiling of the classroom. Novosel says students then spend the semester learning the money skills they need to make their vision a reality.
But this is about way more than budgeting. The class starts with lessons on the psychology of money. Then students are taught about saving, investing, building credit, managing debt and how to financially advocate for themselves.
"A student went to his supervisor and asked for a raise, and got a $4 raise just by speaking up and trying to give credit to his work," Novosel said. "So all those life lessons that they're learning now is 10 years ahead of where I was at their age."
Studies show requiring financial education improves credit scores, lowers loan delinquency rates and reduces the likelihood of falling behind on credit card payments.
But
several
surveys
in
recent years
also reveal widespread regret among Americans who say they wish they'd learned more about finances growing up. Nationwide, 85% of high schoolers say they want to learn about financial topics,
according to business software company Intuit
.
As support for financial literacy education has grown, more high schools have begun offering courses on the topic, and soon it will be a graduation requirement for Pennsylvania students.
The Commonwealth is now among 26 states to enact a personal finance requirement,
according to Next Gen
, a nonprofit that advocates for personal finance education. The law was passed in 2023.
Starting in the 2026-27 school year, Pennsylvania high schools must provide a financial literacy course that students will have to take to graduate.
Similar requirements vary by district in New Jersey and Delaware, according to Next Gen data.
In schools like Northeast High,
Philadelphia Financial Scholars
has been working to bridge the gap. Since 2016, the nonprofit has partnered with interested schools to provide curriculum and training for teachers like Novosel, for free.
"We've taken some teachers who have never thought they would be teaching personal finance," said Danielle Hernandez, a specialist with the nonprofit who offers guidance to teachers. "We provide them with everything so that all they really need to do is decide what works best for their students."
Brian Varughese is one of those students. The Northeast senior is headed to Temple in the fall, now with a new major.
"My major is finance, and I chose that because of this class," he said.
It's a class these students believe will pay off.
Do you have a money question, a consumer issue, or a scam story you want to share? Email InYourCorner@cbs.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
21 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
South Floridians spend more on transportation than almost anyone else in U.S.
Driving in South Florida can be harrowing — and costly. Of residents in the 10 largest U.S. metropolitan areas, Miamians tie Houstonians for spending the most on transportation. Roughly 20% of what people residing in Greater Miami spend each year goes toward getting around, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. On average, that's more than $14,400 per household in the tri-county area of Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach. Americans in general are spending more on cars now than almost ever before. According to Kelley Blue Book, new car buyers paid almost $50,000 per purchase at the end of 2024, just under 2022 highs, when supply chain disruptions led to shortages of new vehicles on the market. And that number doesn't yet take into account the Trump administration's 15% tariffs on auto imports from Japan and the European Union, said Chairman Howard Dvorkin. Those costs hit especially hard in Greater Miami, where residents generally earn less than their counterparts across the country. Tri-county residents' net automobile expenditures — the difference between what they paid for their cars and what they recouped by selling their old ones — accounted for nearly half of Miamians' transportation costs and 9% of their total annual expenses, again tying Houston, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Necessity explains part of that expenditure, said Cathy Dos Santos, director of Transit Alliance Miami, a local nonprofit promoting walkability, bikeability and better public transit. Greater Miami, she noted, offers few practical alternatives to driving. 'We're asking people to choose between paying really high costs for transportation by having to own or lease their car,' Dos Santos said, 'versus spending sometimes twice as long using public transit to get around.' Unsurprisingly, most stick to their cars. And given how far many South Floridians have to travel to get to work, it's hard to blame them. Census data shows that more than half of tri-county workers commute at least 10 miles to get to work. Nearly 15% have a 50-plus mile commute. Compounding those distances is often-grinding traffic. According to INRIX, a traffic-data analytics company, Miami is the 14th most car-congested city on Earth, with local drivers spending the equivalent of nearly three days a year stuck in traffic. And those cars, whether they're actually moving or idling, need fuel — another big line-item for locals. Gas eats up roughly 4% of Greater Miamians' annual household spending, one of the highest shares among major U.S. metro areas, according to the Census Bureau. They also need to be insured. Due largely to the higher risk of severe weather conditions and rates of uninsured drivers, Floridians pay more than $3,200 in car insurance premiums — the second most in the country behind Louisianians — according to MarketWatch. But beyond necessity, culture can explain some of those high costs, says Dvorkin. 'A lot has to do with image,' he said, observing that South Floridians tend to 'like fancy cars,' even if their checking accounts are dwindling. Fancy or not, South Floridians need cars to get around because much of where they live is built for and around automobiles, said Dos Santos. That's something local governments can take steps to correct. Low-density, sprawling housing — a large portion of the tri-county's housing stock — makes it difficult for people to live within walking or biking distance of work, or even regular errands, she said. Denser, multi-use zoning can make it easier for people to meet their needs within a walk or short public transit commute of where they live, Dos Santos noted. That, along with investment in capital projects that can improve public transit across South Florida, could ultimately reduce what residents pay. But they're longer-term projects. In the immediate future, Dos Santos said, local governments can invest in cheaper, high-impact 'small infrastructure' — bike lanes, sidewalks and improved pedestrian street crossings to make non-car transit, which is the cheapest way to get around, more attractive, especially for short trips. But for those who drive dozens of miles just to get to work, as many South Floridians do, their employers can play an important role in reducing transportation costs, said United Way of Florida CEO Melissa Nelson. By providing gas or bus cards — if employees have convenient access to mass transit — for example, employers can help ease their workers' transportation cost burdens. For workers receiving government assistance, those perks can help offset costs without increasing their taxable income. That distinction is crucial. Sometimes, slight increases in income can cost assistance recipients thousands of dollars in lost benefits by pushing them over eligibility thresholds — a phenomenon known as a 'benefits cliff.' But perhaps most critically, offering flexibility — especially for work that doesn't necessarily need to be done in person or at a specific time — is key to reducing time and money spent on transportation, Nelson said. Such adaptability is especially invaluable for families with children that need to be picked up from childcare or school. Ultimately, she said, helping workers remove transportation barriers opens doors to personal and professional development. 'People who are stuck in their car for three hours a day' can't invest in themselves, said Nelson. 'They're not doing any continuing education, which means they're not training for the job that you might like them to move into.' This story was produced with financial support from supporters including The Green Family Foundation Trust and Ken O'Keefe, in partnership with Journalism Funding Partners. The Miami Herald maintains full editorial control of this work.
San Francisco Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
In his own words: Trump's comments over the past year on the jobs report
WASHINGTON (AP) — In firing the head of the agency that produces monthly jobs figures, President Donald Trump alleged that the recent weaker-than-expected numbers were phony and that positive numbers reported before the 2024 election were manipulated to make him look bad. It's a familiar cadence Trump has adopted in reacting to jobs reports: He treats the figures as legitimate when they are favorable to him and fraudulent when they are less than stellar or seem to benefit his opponent. Aug. 5, 2024 'STOCK MARKETS ARE CRASHING, JOBS NUMBERS ARE TERRIBLE, WE ARE HEADING TO WORLD WAR lll, AND WE HAVE TWO OF THE MOST INCOMPETENT 'LEADERS' IN HISTORY. THIS IS NOT GOOD!!!' — Trump post on Truth Social Suggesting President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris were responsible, Trump was reacting to the news that U.S. employees had added 114,000 jobs in July — 35% fewer than expected — and that the unemployment rate was at its highest level in nearly three years. Nov. 1, 2024 'Today's jobs report is a great embarrassment for our Nation. Kamala has lied for years about their pathetic job growth, which has never been real. Kamala killed 46,000 manufacturing jobs, while 773,000 Americans have lost employment in just the last year — all while their jobs have been taken by foreign-born workers. America is a Nation in Decline because Sleepy Joe, and Lyin' Kamala, didn't do their job. 'TRUMP' WILL FIX IT! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! GO VOTE!' — Trump post on Truth Social Days ahead of the presidential election, Trump blasted news that U.S. employers had added just 12,000 jobs in October, a total that economists say had been held down by the effects of strikes and hurricanes that left many workers temporarily off payrolls. Nov. 4, 2024 'Nearly 250,000 people dropped out of the labor force. They dropped out because they couldn't get a job. Can you imagine that? Can you imagine? These are the numbers, and they don't want to talk about it, but that's OK. These numbers are disqualifying.' — Trump campaign rally in Raleigh, North Carolina According to Bureau of Labor Statistics data, around 220,000 people left the civilian U.S. workforce from September to October 2024 during Biden's presidency. April 4, 2025 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, FAR BETTER THAN EXPECTED. IT'S ALREADY WORKING. HANG TOUGH, WE CAN'T LOSE!!!" — Trump post on Truth Social Trump quickly praised news that in March, U.S. employers had added a surprising 228,000 jobs, showing that the American labor market was in solid shape as he embarked on a risky trade war with the rest of the world. The hiring numbers were up from 117,000 in February and were nearly double the 130,000 that economists had expected. June 6, 2025 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG! AT THE SAME TIME, BILLIONS POURING IN FROM TARIFFS!!!' — Trump post on Truth Social Trump responded enthusiastically to the initial numbers on the May jobs report, which indicated that the economy added 139,000 jobs. That estimate was later revised down to 125,000 jobs, prior to the most recent revision down to just 19,000. Aug. 1, 2025 'I was just informed that our Country's 'Jobs Numbers' are being produced by a Biden Appointee, Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of Labor Statistics, who faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory. ... I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY." — Trump post on Truth Social Trump ousted McEntarfer following a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported, taking issue in subsequent days to the revisions of jobs figures that are a regular occurrence with the monthly reporting.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can Buffered ETFs Reshape Portfolio Management?
Financial advisors love the nuance. Investors love the guardrails. With an estimated 11,000 Americans entering retirement every day, financial advisors are leaning hard into the fast-evolving buffered ETF category to offer a more predictable investment ride for seniors and cautious investors. Introduced seven years ago when issuers employed options strategies to limit downside losses in exchange for caps on upside returns, the overall buffered ETF space has grown to $70 billion and includes more than a dozen ETF issuers, according to TMX VettaFi. Buffered ETFs, which are also called defined-outcome strategies because they have preset issue and maturity dates, have emerged as one of the most innovative areas of the ETF space. The innovation, which includes a wide range of downside protection and upside performance parameters, is part of the reason the category took in more than $8 billion during the first half of 2025. But the rapid evolution is also the reason financial advisors need to stay nimble while allocating client assets into these strategies. READ ALSO: Women Advisors Now Make Up 24% of Workforce. There's a Long Way to Go and Art Might Be Beautiful, but Where Does it Fit in Portfolios? We Can Buff That Out In the most basic terms, a buffered ETF will track a broad market index like the S&P 500 and limit the downside loss to a certain percentage while capping the upside return at a certain percentage. But the key is that these ETFs are typically issued monthly and have maturity dates that can range from a few months to a year. In order to receive the full benefit of the guardrails, investors need to hold the ETF for the full duration. And nuances beyond that basic example abound because issuers are constantly innovating. For some ETFs, the downside limit includes protecting the investor from the first 10%, leaving exposure beyond that point. With that structure, if the underlying index was down 15% over the full period, the investor would only suffer a 5% loss. Up, Up and Away. Creativity is also prevalent on the upside caps, which are set based on multiple factors, including market volatility, interest rates and the cost of the options being used. For example, the TrueShares Structured Outcome July ETF (JULZ) does not place limits on the upside return of the underlying S&P 500 during the period, but due to the cost of the options the fund uses, it only pays about 87% of the index return to investors whether the return is low, high or somewhere in the middle. Another example of where this category is heading comes from Innovator ETFs, which offers a kind of hedged downside protection that will pay investors if the underlying index declines. The Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF (DDFL) will take almost 50% of the performance on the upside. But if the index is down 15% during the period, the investor will be up 15%, thanks to the inverse performance capture. 'The main reason these products are so popular is we're seeing a move away from the traditional stock and bond portfolio,' said Matt Kaufman, global head of ETFs at Calamos Investments. 'This is about advisors being able to deliver certainty to their clients,' he added. 'The sky's the limit in terms of innovation because there are infinite ways to carve up exposures to a broad underlying index.' Can You Stop Correlating? Brian Storey, head of Multi-Asset Strategies at Brinker Capital Investments, cites the highly correlated market performance of 2022 as an example of why buffered ETFs are gaining appeal among financial advisors and investors. 'Stocks and bonds both delivered negative returns, and that shook the faith of many investors that core bonds could effectively serve as the ballast in their portfolios,' he said. 'This dovetailed with a period of significant innovation and product proliferation in the ETF industry.' The increased correlation between traditional stock and bond allocations is what steered Clark Randall, director of financial planning at Creekmur Wealth Advisors, toward buffered ETFs. 'We have been using buffered ETFs for quite a while in place of fixed income, which has become much higher correlated to equities over the past few years,' he said. 'We have found that buffered ETFs are not as volatile as equities, and they outperform fixed income.' Todd Rosenbluth, head of research at TMX VettaFi, is also seeing a pattern of advisors using buffered ETF strategies as replacements for core portfolio holdings. 'These products are good for people who want equity exposure, but are nervous about the markets,' he said. While Rosenbluth gives ETF issuers credit for providing plenty of detail on their websites about the respective upside and downside limits, he advises: 'These products work best when they are held for the entire period they are set for.' Liquid Diet In essence, even though buffered ETFs have preset maturities, they have daily liquidity, which is something that could trip up less sophisticated inventors. 'I love buffered ETFs, but there is a steep learning curve if you don't buy and hold them, which I don't,' said Paul Schatz, president of Heritage Capital. 'There are nuances in when to sell after the asset rises near the cap and falls near the buffer,' he added. 'There are many ways to use these products, and some behave more like bond proxies.' Brinker Capital's Storey said the pace of evolution in the buffered ETF space requires increasing advisor due diligence. 'One of the drawbacks is that, under the hood, these ETFs are still fairly complex structured products,' he said. 'Without adequately understanding the risks, an investor could just read the headline and not fully appreciate the ways in which the ultimate outcome could deviate from the expectations.' The best thing about buffered ETFs is the 'non-reliance on diversification and the ability to calibrate in deterministic fashion to a desired risk tolerance,' said Ron Piccinini, head of investment research at Amplify. The tradeoff is more work for the advisor because buffered ETFs effectively create a more dynamic portfolio. 'The main negative is that advisors have to manage distance-to-caps during the life of the investment,' Piccinini said. 'If the underlying index rallies and is 1% below the cap, the investor has almost no upside left and is exposed to downside all the way down to the original risk protection level.' Pay Up. Of course, all the sophisticated portfolio engineering required to create those more predictable outcomes doesn't come cheap. Investors can expect to pay expense ratios in the range of 50 basis points or more, which is hefty when considering there are ETFs offering long-only exposure to the S&P 500 Index for just a few basis points. 'You are paying a premium for the ability to control your destiny and for confidence that you will not get hurt in the market,' said Rosenbluth of TMX VettaFi. If investors think that markets will rise over the next 12 months, these are not the products for you, he added. 'But if you're nervous, then it's worth paying the price.' This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive financial advisor news, market insights, and practice management essentials, subscribe to our free Advisor Upside newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
