
Meatworks, council clam up over effluent breach
Owners of the Kokiri meatworks are refusing to answer questions about the latest breach of its resource consent while the matter is under investigation by the West Coast Regional Council.
ANZCO Foods Ltd was prosecuted by the council and fined $60,000 in the Greymouth District Court this month for submitting false and misleading monitoring reports about its effluent discharges.
Kokiri is permitted to release 6100 cubic metres of wastewater a day from its oxidation pond into the Arnold River.
The effluent includes wastewater from toilets, stock wash-down facilities and the plant itself.
The company told the council this month that it had exceeded that limit on April 7.
But it has declined to answer further questions about why it was unable to stick to the consented limit.
Local Democracy Reporting asked the company how the excess effluent release happened, whether the oxidation pond flooded and whether it had plans to enlarge its system or take other steps to avoid repeats.
In court, the company said its previous misreporting was down to "a serious lapse of judgement" by one employee and it had new systems in place to ensure accurate monitoring and reporting.
LDR has asked if that meant Kokiri would simply do a better job of reporting its consent breaches in future rather than take steps to prevent them.
The company's communications manager Janet Wright responded: 'The event you're inquiring about is an open event with the Regional Council and as such we're unable to comment on it.'
The council has declined to say by how much Kokiri exceeded its allowable effluent discharge on April 7, because it is in the throes of investigating the breach.
It did say that its records showed the company had exceeded E.coli counts in its releases three times between 2017 and 2023.
LDR has asked under the LGOIMA (Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act) whether the West Coast Regional Council will review the conditions of Kokiri's resource consent.
- By Lois Williams
Local Democracy Reporter
• LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
5 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Council defends three-year rates rise of 55%
The West Coast Regional Council is defending its rate rises, and contesting figures put out by Taxpayers' Union showing the council topped the country for rate hikes over the past three years. Council chairman Peter Haddock says the figures are flawed. The West Coast Regional Council's [WCRC] total rates increase this year was in fact 18% — higher than the Taxpayers Union figure of 12%, he said. The council itself previously reported the increase as 12%, but the figure did not include targeted rates and charges for Civil Defence and the new District Plan. But the total rate rise over three years was lower than the Taxpayers' Union figure of 65%, Mr Haddock said. "Our cumulative rate increase was more than 10% less than that ... it was still high at 55% over three years but there are very good reasons why Coast rates have increased," he said. The council had previously started to fail on delivering mandatory work programmes because of cost cutting in previous years, and it was running an unbalanced budget, using mining bond deposits and prudent flood protection reserves held on behalf of ratepayers, to cover operational costs, Mr Haddock said. The cost of administering the new combined district plan had also landed on the council, along with the cost of upgrading flood protection for Westport, Franz Josef and Hokitika. "I know West Coasters are doing it tough, and I know average incomes for many people are considerably less than the rest of the country. But I also know kicking the can along isn't good business practice," Mr Haddock said. The impact of the 18% rate rise on individual ratepayers would vary. "Those with properties with a higher capital value will pay more rates than those with a lower capital value, that is fair." "We will not ... live beyond our means. The government expects us to be financially prudent, and more importantly, so do Coasters. We've worked hard to rebuild council and ensure it is positioned to deliver for the community." The WCRC's job was to create the environment for the community and businesses to thrive, the Chair said. Striking the right balance between development and management of effects was difficult when those effects took a long time to appear or were not fully understood, but the council had to ensure future generations did not have to pay for its mistakes, Mr Haddock said. As the council completed the flood protection schemes, the costs passed on to the community would significantly reduce, he said. - ■LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air. - By Lois Williams


Scoop
15-07-2025
- Scoop
West Coast Regional Council Chair Defends Rate Rises
The West Coast Regional Council is defending its rate rises, and contesting figures put out by Taxpayers' Union showing the council topped the country for rate hikes over the past three years. Council chair Peter Haddock said the figures were flawed. The West Coast Regional Council's [WCRC] total rates increase this year was in fact 18 percent - higher than the Taxpayers Union figure of 12 percent, he said. The council itself previously reported the increase as 12 percent, but the figure did not include targeted rates and charges for Civil Defence and the new District Plan. But the total rate rise over three years was lower than the Taypayers' Union figure of 65 percent, Haddock said. "Our cumulative rate increase was more than 10 percent less than that … it was still high at 55 percent over three years but there are very good reasons why Coast rates have increased," he said. The council had previously started to fail on delivering mandatory work programmes because of cost cutting in previous years, and it was running an unbalanced budget, using mining bond deposits and prudent flood protection reserves held on behalf of ratepayers, to cover operational costs, Haddock said. "As a council, we couldn't continue this approach which amounted to kicking the can down the road," he said. "It would mean the next generation had to pay for unbalanced budgets just to make increases in WCRC rate requirements look better on paper." The cost of administering the new combined District Plan had also landed on the regional council, along with the cost of upgrading flood protection for Westport, Franz Josef and Hokitika. "I know West Coasters are doing it tough, and I know average incomes for many people are considerably less than the rest of the country. But I also know kicking the can along isn't good business practice," Haddock said. The impact of the 18 percent rate rise on individual ratepayers would vary. "Those with properties with a higher capital value will pay more rates than those with a lower capital value, that is fair." "We will not … live beyond our means. The government expects us to be financially prudent, and more importantly, so do Coasters. We've worked hard to rebuild council and ensure it is positioned to deliver for the community." The WCRC's job was to create the environment for the community and businesses to thrive, the chair said. "Our environment is dynamic … we've been investing heavily in flood protection work to ensure our communities remain safe and businesses can keep operating." Striking the right balance between development and management of effects was difficult when those effects took a long time to appear or were not fully understood, but the council had to ensure future generations did not have to pay for its mistakes, Haddock said. As the council completed the flood protection schemes, the costs passed on to the community would significantly reduce, he said.


Otago Daily Times
09-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Praise for keeping consultant fees low
Invercargill City Council chief executive Michael Day has given a shoutout to his staff for keeping consultant fees down. Mr Day made the comments during the council's extraordinary meeting last week when he was speaking to his pre-election report. Previously, Invercargill mayor Nobby Clark hit out at the council, saying its aversion to risk had resulted in an "eyewatering" consultants bill. His comments followed an information request revealing the council had spent more than $7.3 million on consultants in less than three years between July 2022 and December last year. The numbers were made public on the back of a Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act request from the Taxpayers' Union, which released the data recently. It showed $2.58m was spent on consultants for the 12 months to June 2023, $3.23m was spent for the 12 months to June last year and $1.52m was spent for the six months to December last year. The document showed more than 160 companies were used during the two and a-half years. Deloitte topped the spending with more than $424,000 for work on reviewing rates, contract compliance, internal audit support and risk and assurance support. Stantec was next with a figure of more than $396,000 for support with the Bluff wastewater consent. Mr Clark said the only way to change the situation was to tell staff not to spend large amounts on advice, and for councillors to accept the risk. "And if we get it wrong, we get it wrong." At a meeting last week, Mr Day said he was proud to praise staff for being able to absorb costs to keep consultants' fees as low as possible. Now the figure had been made public, he highlighted the amount was only "2% of our overall spend over the same period". The council was in a good position financially but there was always room for improvement, he said. "We are very much focused on efficiency and effectiveness going forward as an organisation. "Have been for some time." — Additional reporting Matthew Rosenberg, Local Democracy Reporting