Council defends three-year rates rise of 55%
Council chairman Peter Haddock says the figures are flawed.
The West Coast Regional Council's [WCRC] total rates increase this year was in fact 18% — higher than the Taxpayers Union figure of 12%, he said.
The council itself previously reported the increase as 12%, but the figure did not include targeted rates and charges for Civil Defence and the new District Plan.
But the total rate rise over three years was lower than the Taxpayers' Union figure of 65%, Mr Haddock said.
"Our cumulative rate increase was more than 10% less than that ... it was still high at 55% over three years but there are very good reasons why Coast rates have increased," he said.
The council had previously started to fail on delivering mandatory work programmes because of cost cutting in previous years, and it was running an unbalanced budget, using mining bond deposits and prudent flood protection reserves held on behalf of ratepayers, to cover operational costs, Mr Haddock said.
The cost of administering the new combined district plan had also landed on the council, along with the cost of upgrading flood protection for Westport, Franz Josef and Hokitika.
"I know West Coasters are doing it tough, and I know average incomes for many people are considerably less than the rest of the country. But I also know kicking the can along isn't good business practice," Mr Haddock said.
The impact of the 18% rate rise on individual ratepayers would vary.
"Those with properties with a higher capital value will pay more rates than those with a lower capital value, that is fair."
"We will not ... live beyond our means. The government expects us to be financially prudent, and more importantly, so do Coasters. We've worked hard to rebuild council and ensure it is positioned to deliver for the community."
The WCRC's job was to create the environment for the community and businesses to thrive, the Chair said.
Striking the right balance between development and management of effects was difficult when those effects took a long time to appear or were not fully understood, but the council had to ensure future generations did not have to pay for its mistakes, Mr Haddock said.
As the council completed the flood protection schemes, the costs passed on to the community would significantly reduce, he said. -
■LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
- By Lois Williams
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Revealed: $218,000 Reo App Free-For-All Across Government
The New Zealand Taxpayers' Union can reveal through Official Information request that seven government departments and councils have spent $218,012 developing their own separate Māori language and cultural training apps despite the existence of a national Māori Language Commission and multiple taxpayer-funded training programmes already in place. Taxpayers' Union Investigations Coordinator, Rhys Hurley, said: 'We've got a Māori Language Commission, we've got staff training programmes, we've got online learning tools - so why is every agency now building its own apps?' 'This is a perfect example of bureaucratic duplication. Every department wants its own badge, its own brand, its own slice of the cultural competency pie, all funded by the public purse.' 'Some of these apps cost more than $35,000 and reached fewer than 2,000 people. Waikato Regional Council knew other apps already existed before building its own. That's not helping Māori, it's just self-indulgence.' "With this many apps found via tips alone, imagine how many more exist. A centralised, shared platform for the public service instead of this wasteful agency-by-agency approach is needed." "We don't need seven apps, we just need one that works."
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Council defends three-year rates rise of 55%
The West Coast Regional Council is defending its rate rises, and contesting figures put out by Taxpayers' Union showing the council topped the country for rate hikes over the past three years. Council chairman Peter Haddock says the figures are flawed. The West Coast Regional Council's [WCRC] total rates increase this year was in fact 18% — higher than the Taxpayers Union figure of 12%, he said. The council itself previously reported the increase as 12%, but the figure did not include targeted rates and charges for Civil Defence and the new District Plan. But the total rate rise over three years was lower than the Taxpayers' Union figure of 65%, Mr Haddock said. "Our cumulative rate increase was more than 10% less than that ... it was still high at 55% over three years but there are very good reasons why Coast rates have increased," he said. The council had previously started to fail on delivering mandatory work programmes because of cost cutting in previous years, and it was running an unbalanced budget, using mining bond deposits and prudent flood protection reserves held on behalf of ratepayers, to cover operational costs, Mr Haddock said. The cost of administering the new combined district plan had also landed on the council, along with the cost of upgrading flood protection for Westport, Franz Josef and Hokitika. "I know West Coasters are doing it tough, and I know average incomes for many people are considerably less than the rest of the country. But I also know kicking the can along isn't good business practice," Mr Haddock said. The impact of the 18% rate rise on individual ratepayers would vary. "Those with properties with a higher capital value will pay more rates than those with a lower capital value, that is fair." "We will not ... live beyond our means. The government expects us to be financially prudent, and more importantly, so do Coasters. We've worked hard to rebuild council and ensure it is positioned to deliver for the community." The WCRC's job was to create the environment for the community and businesses to thrive, the Chair said. Striking the right balance between development and management of effects was difficult when those effects took a long time to appear or were not fully understood, but the council had to ensure future generations did not have to pay for its mistakes, Mr Haddock said. As the council completed the flood protection schemes, the costs passed on to the community would significantly reduce, he said. - ■LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air. - By Lois Williams
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
FamilyBoost Or Fiscal Blowout? Taxpayer Handouts Shouldn't Go To The Top Earners
Responding to news that the Government is extending childcare subsidies to families earning up to $229,100 a year, the Taxpayers' Union is calling the move completely out of touch. Taxpayers' Union spokesperson Tory Relf said: 'If you're pulling in nearly double the average household income, you do not need a handout from other working taxpayers to help pay for daycare. The average household income is around $120,000.' 'It's not often we find ourselves agreeing with the CTU and Craig Renney, but they're absolutely right to call this out. The Government should be focusing support on families genuinely doing it tough, not those who are objectively well-off by any national measure.' 'The whole point of FamilyBoost was to ease pressure on low- and middle-income families. Creep the threshold high enough and suddenly it's just free cash for the comfortable.' 'If the Government thinks someone on $229,000 needs help with childcare, maybe they should spend a day living on the median household income instead. When you're earning more than $200k, taxpayers don't need to be picking up the bill.'
