&w=3840&q=100)
Preamble of Constitution like parenthood, cannot be changed: V-P Dhankhar
"There have been a lot of issues about the preamble to the Constitution. The Preamble of the Indian Constitution is something like parenthood to children. Howsoever you may try, you can't change your parenthood. That is not possible," he said.
While interacting with students and faculty at the National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS), Kochi, he also said that, historically, no country's preamble has ever been changed, but lamented that the Preamble of the Indian Constitution was altered during the Emergency era.
"The Preamble of our Constitution was changed during a time when hundreds and thousands of people were behind bars, the darkest period of our democracy--emergency era," he said.
His statement comes against the backdrop of the RSS calling for a review of the words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble of the Constitution, stating that these were included during the Emergency and were never part of the Constitution drafted by B R Ambedkar.
Addressing an event on 50 years of Emergency in New Delhi on June 26, RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabole said, "Babasaheb Ambedkar never used these words in the preamble of the Constitution. The words were added during Emergency, when fundamental rights were suspended, Parliament did not function, and the judiciary became lame.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Mizoram's Chakma council has had 7 heads since 2018. Why VK Singh won't have the 8th as BJP loses power
The latest round of instability hit the council on 16 June, when a no-confidence motion was passed against CEM Molin Kumar Chakma, who had formed the first BJP-led executive committee of the CADC, which is made up of 20 elected and four nominated members, in February this year. The executive committee of the council, formed in 1972 under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution for the welfare of the ethnic Chakma people, has been in a state of flux, with the Chief Executive Member (CEM), the head of the body, changing seven times since May 2018. New Delhi: Mizoram's Chakma Autonomous District Council (CADC), which had emerged as a symbol of the region's ever-shifting political loyalties after the BJP joined hands with the Congress to govern it in May 2018, has been placed under Governor's Rule for the second time in just over three years, due to 'constant political instability'. The motion was passed as 12 BJP members of the council quit the party, switching over to the ruling Zoram People's Movement (ZPM), which secured the support of 16 members—five more than the halfway mark of 11. Lakkhan Chakma of the ZPM staked claim to the post of the CEM. However, despite having the required numbers, the ZPM will not be able to govern the council, located in south Mizoram's Lawngtlai district, as Governor VK Singh took over. The ZPM had dislodged the Mizo National Front from power in Mizoram in December 2023. 'Hon'ble Governor is of the firm opinion that the constant political instability is extremely detrimental for the CADC, and is certainly not what is intended by the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution of India, which envisions the effective administration of the tribal areas for the good of the people,' read the 7 July notification of the Mizoram District Council and Minority Affairs, declaring the Governor's move. 'And whereas, opinion of the Council of Ministers was obtained and whereas, as provided under Para 16(2) of the Sixth Schedule, the Hon'ble Governor is satisfied that the administration of the CADC cannot be carried on in accordance with provisions of the Sixth Schedule.' The ZPM hit back at Gen Singh (Retd), with Mizoram Home Minister K. Sapdanga calling the imposition of Governor's Rule a 'breach of democratic principles'. When contacted by ThePrint, Mizoram Chief Minister Lalduhoma's office said that Sapdenga had already spelt out the ZPM's position on the issue. Sapdenga told reporters that following a request from the Governor, the council of ministers held a meeting and unanimously disapproved the dissolution of the CADC. On 4 July, it also recommended to the Governor that the ZPM be allowed to form the next executive committee in the council. 'It is unfortunate that the Governor, despite seeking an opinion, made a decision ignoring the views of the council of ministers. Though we are fully aware of the governor's discretionary power over the ADC, we see his action as a breach of democratic principles,' Sapdenga said. According to the Sixth Schedule, 'if at any time the Governor is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the administration of an autonomous district or region cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Schedule, he may, by public notification, assume to himself all or any of the functions or powers vested in or exercisable by the District Council'. The last time CADC was placed under Governor's Rule was in December 2022. The 'constant change of administration due to political maneuvering is extremely damaging for the welfare of the CADC and its people, and is certainly not what is intended by the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution of India, which envisions the effective administration of the tribal areas', read the notification then. The previous four years had been politically tumultuous for the CADC. The BJP-Congress alliance, formed in 2018, had lasted for about five months, collapsing a month before the assembly elections in the state in November 2018. Following that, the council went on to be led by four more CEM's. The CADC is among the 10 autonomous district councils spread across Sixth Schedule areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Tripura. In Mizoram, apart from one for the Chakmas, there are two councils for the Lai and Mara ethnic tribes. (Edited by Mannat Chugh) Also Read: Congress, TMC oppose EC's 'special intensive revision' of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar
India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
Bihar Election: Supreme Court agrees fresh pleas challenging ECI's voter revision drive
New Delhi [India], July 9 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to hear two more pleas challenging the Election Commission of India's move to conduct a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi agreed to hear the pleas on July 10, along with other pending petitions. Advocate Vrinda Grover and another advocate mentioned for urgent listing. Grover said the plea filed by two social activists, Arshad Ajmal and Rupesh Kumar, challenged the poll panel's June 24 decision to conduct the SIR of electoral rolls in the state and urged for listing it with other matters. On July 7, the apex court agreed to hear on July 10 petitions challenging the ECI's decision. The petitions challenging the ECI decision were filed by RJD MP Manoj Jha, the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), PUCL, activist Yogendra Yadav, Trinamool MP Mahua Moitra, and former Bihar MLA Mujahid Alam. The petitions sought a direction to quash the ECI's June 24 directive, which requires large sections of voters in Bihar to submit proof of citizenship to remain on the electoral rolls. ADR, in its petition, has submitted that the ECI order imposes fresh documentation requirements and shifts the burden of proof from the state to the citizen. The petition also raised concerns over the exclusion of widely held documents like Aadhaar and ration cards, stating that this would disproportionately affect the poor and marginalised voters, especially in rural Bihar. 'The SIR order, if not set aside, can arbitrarily and without due process disenfranchise lakhs of voters from electing their representatives, thereby disrupting free and fair elections and democracy in the country, which are part of the basic structure of the Constitution,' the petition submitted. RJD MP said the decision, which has been taken without any consultation with the political parties, is 'being used to justify aggressive and opaque revisions of electoral rolls that disproportionately target Muslim, Dalit and poor migrant communities, as such, they are not random patterns but are engineered exclusions.' (ANI)
India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
Pawan Khera questions ECI's independence amid revision of electoral rolls in Bihar
New Delhi [India], July 9 (ANI): Congress leader Pawan Khera on Wednesday questioned the independence of the Election Commission amid revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, accusing it of acting in favour of the ruling party. This comes amid the ongoing row over the electoral roll revision in Bihar and the Opposition-led Bihar Bandh.. Taking to the social media platform X, Khera wrote, 'Baba Saheb Ambedkar on the role of 'Central Election Commission' in protecting every Indian's Right to Vote.' To support his argument, Khera, in a post on his X handle, quoted Baba Saheb Ambedkar: 'Franchise is the most fundamental thing in prevent injustice to those racially, linguistically, or culturally different from the dominant people in Province, the election machinery must be under a Central Election that no injustice may be done to any citizen in India.' Meanwhile, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has reaffirmed its commitment to protecting every Indian's right to vote by highlighting Article 326 of the Constitution, which guarantees universal adult suffrage. This move comes amid tensions over the ongoing Bihar Bandh and debates surrounding revisions to the voter list. Article 326 ensures that every Indian citizen above 18 years of age can vote unless disqualified due to non-residence, unsoundness of mind, crime, or corrupt practices. This provision underscores India's commitment to broader democratic participation and was instrumental in lowering the voting age from 21 to 18 years in 1989. The ECI has emphasised its dedication to upholding constitutional principles by adhering to Article 326 and Section 16 of the Representation of People Act, 1950. The commission has stated that it will 'scrupulously' follow these provisions during the revision of electoral rolls, ensuring that no eligible citizen is disenfranchised. The Election Commission of India (ECI) has posted an image on its 'X' account highlighting Article 326 of the Constitution of India, which mandates universal adult suffrage, ensuring every Indian citizen above 18 years of age can vote unless disqualified. 'Article 326 - Elections to the House of the People and to the Legislative Assemblies of States to be on the basis of adult suffrage. The elections to the House of the People and the Legislative Assembly of every State shall be on the basis of adult suffrage, that is to say, every person who is a citizen of India and who is not less than eighteen years of age on such date as may be fixed in that behalf by or under any law made by the appropriate Legislature and is not otherwise disqualified under this Constitution or any law made by the appropriate Legislature on the ground of non-residence, unsoundness of mind, crime or corrupt or illegal practice, shall be entitled to be registered as a voter at any such election,' posted by ECI on X. On June 24, the Election Commission of India (ECI) announced that it would begin a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the state's assembly elections. The exercise aims to revise the electoral rolls in the state to include all eligible voters and eliminate those who are ineligible from the voter list. The notification stated that the ECI would 'scrupulously' adhere to the Constitutional provisions regarding the eligibility and disqualification of voters during the revision of the electoral roll. This, the ECI said, was clearly laid down under Article 326 of the Constitution of India and Section 16 of the Representation of People Act, 1950 (RPA). Article 326 states that any person above the age of 18 is eligible to vote. Section 16 sets out the criteria for a person who is disqualified from voting. These criteria include not being a citizen of India, being of unsound mind, or being disqualified from voting under any law related to corrupt practices and other election offences. In early July, the Association for Democratic Reforms, Swaraj Party member and activist Yogendra Yadav, moved the Supreme Court under Article 32, challenging the ECI's notification. They claim that the SIR is arbitrary and violative of the universal right to adult suffrage. The petitions note that the identification process shifts the burden of proof onto individual citizens, requiring them to submit fresh applications and provide documentary evidence of citizenship by 25 July 2025. The petitions argue that the exercise excludes indicators such as Aadhaar and ration cards, and makes the proof of parents' identity mandatory. Given Bihar's high rates of poverty and migration, such requirements may disenfranchise millions. The petitions also criticise the short timeframe and absence of prior consultation, arguing that the exercise undermines democracy, equality, and the right to vote, particularly for the most vulnerable. The petitions request an immediate stay of the SIR. In the meantime, the ECI has published notices on the smooth implementation of the SIR in the State on July 4 and 5 on its official website. On July 6, the ECI issued a press release stating that the initial phase of the SIR has been completed. Notably, the release clarifies that there has been no change in the SIR process, and it will continue as per the notification released on June 24. Moreover, it carries the phrase: 'No changes made in SIR as being rumoured by some'. On July 7, 2025, the Supreme Court agreed to hear petitions challenging the SIR. The matter will be taken up on 10 July 2025. Earlier today, Congress MP and Leader of Opposition (LoP) in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, along with Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav, led the 'Bihar Bandh' protest in Patna against the Election Commission of India's (ECI) decision to undertake the Special Intensive Revision SIR) of the electoral rolls ahead of the Bihar Assembly elections. Several senior leaders of the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance INDIA) Bloc members, including CPI General Secretary D. Raja, CPI (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation leader Dipankar Bhattacharya, Bihar Congress President Rajesh Ram, Kanhaiya Kumar, and Sanjay Yadav, also participated in the protest. Independent MP from Purnea, Pappu Yadav, joined the demonstrators at the Sachiwalay Halt railway station, raising slogans such as 'Chunav Aayog hosh mein aao' (Election Commission, come to your senses). As part of the protest, Congress workers blocked the railway track at Sachiwalay Halt station, demanding a rollback of the ECI's move. (ANI)
