Top enlisted leader of Air Force Special Operations Command fired amid investigation
An AFSOC spokesperson told Task & Purpose that Chief Master Sgt. Anthony Green was fired Monday as the command chief and reassigned outside of AFSOC headquarters at Hurlburt Field, Florida, pending the outcome of an investigation. Officials would not comment on the nature of the investigation.
AFSOC commander Lt. Gen. Mike Conley relieved Green, the official said.
As the command chief master sergeant, Green was the senior advisor to Conley on policies and matters related to enlisted airmen's professional and personal lives in the command.
A memo written by Conley and distributed AFSOC-wide said he had made the move 'after careful consideration of the circumstances.'
An AFSOC official confirmed the memo's authenticity to Task & Purpose. The memo was first posted to the popular Air Force amn/nco/snco Facebook page.
'As airmen, we are entrusted with incredible responsibilities and held to the highest standards of conduct,' the memo said. 'Upholding these standards is non-negotiable, and maintaining good order and discipline is fundamental to who we are.'
A command chief master sergeant in the Air Force is a duty assignment held by airmen with the rank of chief master sergeant. Command chiefs serve as senior advisors to commanders in the upper echelons of Air Force command structures. Green's role was one of the most senior in the Air Force as one of 11 chiefs at the top of each of the service's 11 major commands.
Green entered the Air Force in 1995, according to his official biography. He spent his early years in the service as a maintenance technician on the C-130 and various other non-standard aircraft within AFSOC. He served as a flying crew chief — a specially selected mechanic who accompanies planes on long missions — as well as a combat aviation advisor, maintenance superintendent, and senior enlisted advisor.
Green took over the position as AFSOC's command chief in May 2023 in a ceremony at Hurburt Field during which he spoke on the title of 'Air Commandos' used by AFSOC personnel.
'[The meaning of Air Commando] is not the planes. It's not the cool kits,' said Green, according to an Air Force release on the ceremony. 'It's what we're called to do. It's the mission. It's the people. It's the team.'
AFSOC oversees all of the Air Force's special operations personnel and equipment across five wings at Hurlburt, Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico and RAF Mildenhall in England, along with units at Kadena Air Base, Japan.
The 1st Special Operations Wing at Hurlburt Field and the 27th Special Operations Wing at Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico, are composed of specialized aircraft to support special operations worldwide. Together, the wings operate AC-130J/W, MC-130H, CV-22 and U-28A, MQ-9 and C-146A aircraft.
Navy fires commanding officer, command master chief of expeditionary security squadron
The Marine Corps has settled the debate over the size of a rifle squad
Leg day: Army cuts down on number of paid parachutists
Navy commissions its newest submarine, the USS Iowa
Why veterans are the real target audience for 'Helldivers 2'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
The Coast Guard wants to remove hundreds of buoys. Local boaters say: Don't take mine!
But we no longer need to navigate the way our ancestors did, and so the US Coast Guard says it's time to update it for the present, launching a massive review of nearly each buoy along the New England coast to determine how many can be removed. 'We're several decades into the GPS era,' said Matt Stuck, the Coast Guard's chief of waterways management for the Northeast district, who explained that the buoy system has never undergone a wholesale review in the turn-by-turn-world. Advertisement In May, the Coast Guard put out a proposal to review 4,700 buoys, which it classifies as 'Aids to Navigation,' that dot the coastline from New Jersey to the Canadian border in Maine. That proposal listed all buoys under consideration for potential removal, and it was shockingly long, sparing no corner of the Northeast district in the first round of discussion. Big-boy ocean buoys — there are 1,700 of them in the district, serviced by a fleet of just six buoy tenders — are certainly on the list, but so are a surprisingly high number of buoys in recreational areas. Advertisement 'To get good feedback, you have to give the public something good to chew on,' said Stuck, whose agency received 2,800 comments — from yachts and paddleboarders, jet skis and sailboats, aluminum Lunds and skipping Boston Whalers. 'It's fair to say that few to none said this is a great idea,' he said. The first round of nominees made news first in the boating world, with everyone agreeing: Don't take mine. But it's happening, and so a smaller list will be released later this summer, with the Coast Guard getting more specific about what it is thinking and why. 'It's a fair question by the Coast Guard to ask,' said David Kennedy, the manager of governmental affairs for the 700,000-member Boat Owners Association of the United States. 'What do we have out there, what do people need? They are resource-constrained like everyone else.' Kennedy said there are some that make sense to eliminate, like the 10 deep-sea buoys lining the straight-line channel into New York City, primarily used by giant boats that just crossed an ocean with sophisticated electronics. We can get rid of some of those. But so many of the nominees were in smaller harbors that are primarily used by recreational boaters, including notoriously rocky entrances like Woods Hole. 'We are not there yet. You really need to be in the channel,' Kennedy said. 'It's a challenging place based on the tide.' Nine of the Woods Hole buoys that currently allow for that to happen safely did not escape the first list. But it doesn't mean all or any of them will go, just that this is a Northeast-wide conversation, the Coast Guard insists. Advertisement 'We need to right-size the system for the way people are navigating,' Stuck said. 'This is not a cost-cutting measure. This is the first time we've looked at it from a wholesale perspective. The buoy system will never go away. This is about targeting the resources to the buoys that reduce the most risk for mariners.' On the elbow of Cape Ann, there are six in a row along the coast connecting Rockport to Gloucester, whose harbormaster, Christopher Lucido, rallied local input with an email that argued good seamanship emphasizes avoiding reliance on one system, and that there is still significant value and reassurance to confirm a vessel's proximity to underwater hazards such as ledges and rock piles. The Coast Guard has emphasized that it's not interested in getting rid of buoys that mark a danger hidden beneath. 'Eighty-five percent of the buoys we have do the highest-level risk reduction for mariners,' Stuck said, 'like directly mark a rock or shoal, or the inside of a channel so people don't cut a corner.' There are some hazards that GPS already navigates better, and this, he said, is a conversation about those. But for some boaters, it's a conversation about erasing parts of a map across our oceans and into our harbors, built over the centuries. About undoing a system that's a gift from the past, whispering to just remember 'red, right, returning,' and all will be safe. An interactive map showing all the buoys under consideration can be found at: Advertisement Billy Baker can be reached at
Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
US-Allied Military Planes Involved in Airspace Scare
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. South Korea's military has launched an investigation after one of its transport planes entered Japan's air defense identification zone (ADIZ) without prior notice, leading Japan to scramble fighters to carry out an interception. Newsweek has reached out to South Korea's defense ministry by email with a request for comment. Why It Matters An ADIZ is a designated area of airspace where foreign aircraft are required to identify themselves. Failure to do so typically prompts the claimant nation to dispatch military aircraft. Japan and South Korea—both key U.S. security partners in the Asia-Pacific—have a history of uneasy relations, shaped by Japan's colonial rule over the Korean Peninsula and a territorial dispute over a group of islets. Still, recent years have seen increased security cooperation between the uneasy partners in response to perceived threats posed by North Korea and China. A Republic of Korea Air Force C-130 takes off at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska on June 9, 2023. A Republic of Korea Air Force C-130 takes off at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska on June 9, 2023. Airman 1st Class Julia Lebens/U.S. Air Force What To Know On July 13, a South Korean Lockheed C-130 Hercules, en route to a large-scale U.S.-led military exercise in Guam, was forced to reroute to Kadena Air Base in Japan's Okinawa Prefecture to refuel. While officials did not name the exercise, it was likely the ongoing Resolute Force Pacific, billed as the largest combat exercise ever held in the Pacific. The diversion occurred after the plane burned through more fuel than expected while navigating bad weather, a South Korean military spokesperson told the media Thursday. The plane entered Japan's ADIZ without first obtaining clearance, prompting Japan to dispatch fighter jets to intercept the aircraft, the country's Joint Staff told outlet Stars and Stripes. The C-130's pilot then explained the situation to U.S. and Japanese forces via radio before making an emergency landing, Seoul said. After refueling, the aircraft was cleared to continue on to Guam, a U.S. territory. "We conveyed to South Korea that this scramble was regrettable and requested measures to prevent further incidents," a Japanese official said. "But as they are our important partner, we will continue to work closely together to address the issue." The incident came just two days after a joint drill in South Korea involving U.S. and South Korean fighter jets and a U.S. B-52 Stratofortress. It marked the first deployment this year of the nuclear-capable bomber to the Korean Peninsula. What's Next It's unclear whether South Korea's military will take disciplinary measures against the C-130 pilot. Japan is expected to continue to respond to anomalous activity within its EEZ, particularly in light of repeated encroachments by Chinese drones.
3 days ago
US Osprey makes emergency landing in Japan, officials say
TOKYO - -A U.S. CV-22 Osprey made what Japanese officials called an emergency landing Thursday at Hanamaki Airport in northeastern Japan, about 300 miles north of Tokyo. Airport officials say the tilt-rotor aircraft touched down safely after reporting a mechanical issue mid-flight. The U.S. Air Force said the craft made a "precautionary landing" during a flight from Misawa Air Base to its home base, Yokota Air Base. No injuries were reported. Operations for commercial flights continued as normal. Video from Japanese broadcaster NHK shows the aircraft taxiing to the apron where uniformed personnel could be seen on top of the aircraft, near the center, inspecting the aircraft. Japan's Defense Ministry says it has dispatched staff to the site and is in contact with U.S. forces. The landing came six days after another U.S. Osprey set down in Akita Prefecture for a safety inspection, according to Japanese officials. That aircraft remained on the ground for over seven hours. A U.S. military public affairs officer described the Thursday incident as a "precautionary landing." The V-22 Osprey has been involved in several incidents in recent years, including a crash off Yakushima, in southern Japan, in 2023 that killed eight and grounded the fleet for months. Cullen Drenkhahn, a 1st lieutenant serving as a public affairs advisor for the 353d Special Operations Wing Kadena AB, told ABC News, "I can confirm a U.S. CV-22 Osprey conducted a precautionary landing today at Iwate Hanamaki Airport at 9:45 a.m." "The landing was executed safely and in accordance with policies. An assessment is ongoing to gather additional information. No injuries or damages occurred. There were no interruptions to airport operations," Drenkhahn said. "The aircraft is assigned to the 353rd Special Operations Wing and was flying from Misawa Air Base to its home base, Yokota Air Base. He added, "No further information at this time. the safety of our pilots and aircrew, as well as the men and women of Japan is our foremost priority."
