Trump fired him over white supremacist links. Now he's leading the US Institute of Peace
Beattie, who will continue serving as U.S. Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy while leading the institute as acting president, has a history of inflammatory views.
The former academic has lauded eugenics-style population control and mass sterilization, praised the Chinese Communist party and dismissed its repressive campaign against the Uyghurs, claimed the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol was a conspiracy by federal agents, and wrote on social media last year that 'competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work.'
'We look forward to seeing him advance President Trump's America First agenda in this new role,' the State Department said in a statement on Friday.
The Trump administration has tried to exert control over the peace-keeping organization as part of the president's radical restructuring of federal agencies and diplomacy.
In February, the president signed an executive order slashing most of the group's staff, part of a wider effort to drastically change U.S. tools of foreign influence and diplomacy that also saw the administration gut the U.S. Agency for International Development.
The following month, Elon Musk's so-called DOGE initiative seized the peace institute's headquarters with the help of police and the FBI, ejecting staff from the building.
Staff members then sued over the takeover and mass firings, and a federal judge in May temporarily blocked the Trump administration from dismantling the institute.
The administration then appealed, and a federal appeals court in Washington last month returned control of the building to the administration as the legal process plays out.
In March, Democratic members of Congress wrote to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who sits on the board of the U.S. Institute for Peace, expressing alarm over Beattie's appointment in February to his diplomatic post.
'Darren Beattie's white nationalist loyalties and public glorification of our adversaries' authoritarian systems make him unqualified to serve as the top diplomat representing American values and culture to foreign audiences,' the members wrote.
The Independent has requested comment from the State Department and U.S. Institute for Peace for comment.
After his dismissal from the Trump administration in 2018, Beattie returned to the government two years later, with the White House appointing him to the Commission for the Preservation of American Heritage Abroad, a body that preserves historical sites, including those related to the Holocaust.
The Biden administration forced Beattie's resignation from the commission in 2022.
Beattie isn't the only Trump staffer welcomed back into the government after controversy over their views.
Marko Elez, a DOGE staffer who previously praised eugenics, declared himself 'racist before it was cool,' and said he wanted to 'normalize Indian hate,' according to reporting from The Wall Street Journal, resigned from the administration in February, but soon found a new position in the Social Security Administration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Hampshire Secretary of State details answers to Trump voter registration inquiry
New Hampshire Secretary of State David Scanlan on Friday released an eight-page letter with detailed responses to the Trump administration's 15 questions about the state's voter registration process, including why the state rejected the request to disclose the statewide voter list. 'New Hampshire law authorizes the Secretary of State to release the statewide voter registration list in limited circumstances not applicable here,' Scanlan wrote. The Trump administration is seeking millions of names from targeted states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Scanlan explained that state law permits his office to, 'upon request, provide a political party, political committee, or candidate for county, state, or federal office, 'a list of the name, domicile address, mailing address, town or city, voter history, and party affiliation, if any, of every registered voter in the state.'' Scanlan told Trump administration officials they were free to go community by community to get voter lists from each clerk or supervisors of the checklist, and he shared a website link to city and town clerk contacts. Before answering the Trump administration's questions, Scanlan provided three paragraphs of 'prefatory remarks' as a primer on what information he could or couldn't share. 'Regardless of the fact that election systems and assets are critical infrastructure, divulging any cybersecurity information could harm the integrity of the systems. Therefore, our responses to questions regarding database infrastructure may be limited depending on the nature of the question,' Scanlan wrote. Scanlan's letter also included a sample voter registration form and Memorandum of Understanding for Help America Vote Act implementation and enhanced data exchange for database accuracy. Trump's inquiry Questions from the Trump administration ranged from basic information for how voter registration works in New Hampshire to specific ways in which the information is confirmed, shared and managed. Here are some examples of the questions: * Describe how the statewide voter registration list is coordinated with the databases of other state agencies. And provide the name of each state database used for coordination and describe the procedures used for the coordination as well as how often the databases are coordinated with the statewide voter registration list. * Describe the process by which registrants who are ineligible to vote due to non-citizenship are identified and removed from the statewide voter registration list. * Describe the state's requirement for an individual to vote if the individual registered to vote by mail and has not previously voted in an election for federal office in the state. * Describe the verification process that election officials perform to verify the required information supplied by the registrant. And describe what happens to the registration application if the information cannot be verified. * Describe the process by which deceased registrants are identified and removed from the statewide voter registration list. Other questions asked for how the state handles voters convicted of a felony, duplicate voter registrations, security measures and how the state removes registered voters who have moved to another state. Scanlan's answers The Secretary of State's Office outlined the step-by-step processes that are used in each aspect of voter registration, providing detail at the state level all the way down to how communities manage their checklists. In terms of New Hampshire's citizen requirement, he described the new law that went into effect this year. 'The statute lays out several types of acceptable documents to prove citizenship: 'the applicant's birth certificate, passport, naturalization papers if the applicant is a naturalized citizen, or any other reasonable documentation which indicates the applicant is a United States citizen,'' Scanlan wrote. For voters who have died, Scanlan described how the communities across the state remove voters from the rolls if they died here or elsewhere. The process involves comparing official death records and how municipal clerks receive official notice of a voter's death and then remove the names locally. Most of Scanlan's answers read like a textbook or quoted New Hampshire law directly. He provided each specific statute number, leaving it up to federal officials to read further on their own. He also provided contact information for the Division of Motor Vehicles and website links for further information. To read Scanlan's letter, visit dpierce@
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
CISA Cannot Drift: Will Sean Plankey Be The Captain To Lock The Wheel?
UNITED STATES - JULY 24: Sean Plankey, nominee to be director of the Cybersecurity and ... More Infrastructure Security Agency, testifies during his Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee confirmation hearing in Dirksen building on Thursday, July 24, 2025. America's top cyber defense agency is flying without a captain and time is running out. On July 24 President Trump's nominee to lead the agency, Sean Plankey, appeared before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in a well-received confirmation hearing. After months of delays, paperwork issues and a procedural hold by Sen. Ron Wyden the panel appears ready to advance his nomination to the full Senate. Plankey has in recent months been working as Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's senior adviser overseeing the Coast Guard, where he also served for years including as a cyber leader. Plankey brought a steady hand and deep operational experience to the confirmation hearing. He cited the significant Coast Guard funding increase in the latest Congressional budget as proof of Noem's willingness to go to bat for cyber and infrastructure security. The Clock Is Ticking On CISA Leadership The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency is the nation's digital sentry. It guards civilian federal networks, supports the defense industrial base and shares threat intelligence with private companies that operate essential systems. Yet the agency has been operating with significantly reduced senior leadership and dealing with budget pressures. Since the departure of former CISA Director Jen Easterly earlier this year the agency has lacked steady leadership. Easterly, nominated by President Biden, advanced his administration's agenda by adding misinformation and election security to the CISA mandate. Every week without a confirmed director represents opportunity for adversaries like China and Russia as well as criminal syndicates that constantly probe for vulnerabilities. House Homeland Security Chairman Mark Garbarino warned that every minute without CISA's top leadership benefits nation state actors like Salt Typhoon. In today's threat environment leadership vacuums translate directly into risk. Plankey Brings A Mission First Reset Sean Plankey has been serving as senior adviser for the U.S. Coast Guard to Homeland Security ... More Secretary Kristi Noem. A cyber veteran who served on the National Security Council and as the Department of Energy's most senior cybersecurity official in the first Trump administration, Plankey brings a rare combination of federal experience and operational credibility. Plankey told senators that he would refocus CISA on its congressional mandate which means defending federal systems critical infrastructure and supporting states. He drew a clear line on one of the most politically charged questions facing the agency: content moderation. 'CISA will not do any of that work,' Plankey said when asked about speech policing. His position reflects an effort to keep CISA grounded in its core mission rather than drifting into broader debates over online content. When pressed on election disputes Plankey stayed neutral. He stated simply that elections are run by the states and CISA's role is to provide support not to referee politics. He also signaled strong support for reauthorization of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, a foundational law that enables threat intelligence sharing between private companies and government. Why Narrowing The Mandate Matters Over the years CISA's mission has grown into areas like disinformation and pandemic messaging. That expansion diluted focus and triggered political backlash. Plankey and his supporters in Congress are signaling that it is time to strip away distractions and return to core tasks. This approach does not weaken cyber defense. It strengthens it. When agencies chase every new issue, specially politicized ones, they risk losing sight of the fundamentals. With CISA's responsibilities increasingly tied to civilian infrastructure from pipelines to hospitals clear priorities are essential. Plankey also highlighted two critical programs that expire on September 30. Plankey signaled he is prepared to fight for both programs and stated that he knows how to go to Secretary Noem to request more funding if needed. Congress will need to deliver as well. Civilian Infrastructure Is Now Mission Critical Much of the responsibility for cyber defense is shifting to the networks, utilities and companies that power daily life. The private sector now sits on the front lines and its actions will determine how resilient the nation is in the face of escalating cyber threats. Standards like the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework and modern supply chain security protocols are no longer optional checklists. They are becoming the foundation of national defense. Critical infrastructure operators and the defense industrial base must go beyond compliance and embed these standards into everyday operations. That means segmenting networks, conducting regular threat hunting, hardening endpoints and practicing incident response as rigorously as fire drills. If state and local systems are not hardened, if telecom carriers are not meeting baseline expectations, if airlines, airports, railways, shipping ports, financial institutions and hospitals are not securing critical systems then the entire security structure is at risk. Every weak link becomes an opening for adversaries. Every delay in upgrading defenses becomes a window for attackers. The nation's ability to defend itself now depends as much on the vigilance of power companies, water authorities, transportation hubs, manufacturers, defense suppliers, banks and healthcare networks as it does on any federal agency. This means investing in modern security architectures, implementing continuous monitoring and ensuring that every sector has clear response plans that are tested and updated. Without that collective effort, the country's cyber defense will always be one breach away from failure. CISA Cannot Remain Leaderless. The mission is too important. Sean Plankey brings the right pedigree, a Coast Guard foundation in operational security, a focused mission plan and the credibility to guide the agency forward. He has received broad bipartisan and cybersecurity endorsements. Now is the time to set aside political posturing and focus on the shared goal of securing the nation's digital front lines. The damage from delaying his confirmation is greater than the debate surrounding it. Other agencies can address the issues where consensus does not exist. The hope is that the Senate would move swiftly to confirm him. Every day without leadership at CISA is a day when adversaries gain ground, vulnerabilities deepen and the nation's critical systems face greater risk. The threats are real and accelerating. The country cannot afford hesitation when decisive action is required.
Fox News
15 minutes ago
- Fox News
Are Democrats' predictions about Trump's tariffs coming true?
The 'Big Weekend Show' hosts discuss how tariffs are positively impacting the economy and how Democrats are reacting to the developments.
