Tokyo-born Czech nationalist revives Czexit ahead of national election
Okamura has built a political career on hard-line nationalist positions, including proposals to ban the promotion of Islam , a strict anti-immigration agenda , and increasingly vocal criticism of Ukraine and the presence of Ukrainian refugees in Czechia.
He has dismissed the EU's Green Deal as a ' crazy neo-Marxist plan ' and his party, SPD, continues to demand referendums on Czech membership in both the EU and NATO – ideas firmly rejected by mainstream parties.
His position on a potential EU referendum is clear: "I would vote for the Czech Republic to leave the EU," he said .
A recent STEM poll for CNN Prima News places SPD at 13%, third behind the populist ANO (32%) and the centre-right Spolu (21%). The rebound follows SPD's strategic merger with three smaller nationalist groups, forming a more unified anti-EU front.
Okamura's nationalism stands in sharp contrast with his own personal biography . Born to a Czech mother and a Japanese-Korean father, he spent part of his childhood in Tokyo before moving to Prague.
Before entering politics, he ran a series of tourism-related businesses and was a partner in a now-bankrupt travel agency, which let customers send toys abroad to be photographed in popular tourist locations .
He later became vice-president and spokesperson for the Association of Czech Travel Agencies. In 2008, he was even appointed Czech ambassador for the EU's European Year of Intercultural Dialogue.
SPD is his second political project, following a bitter split from his previous party, Dawn of Direct Democracy, in 2015.
Among Okamura's fiercest critics are members of his own family. His older brother, Hayato Okamura, is an MP for the pro-EU Christian Democrats and accuses his brother of 'objectively supporting the Kremlin.'
The youngest sibling, architect Osamu Okamura, ran for the Greens in the 2024 European elections, vowing to 'strengthen active EU membership.'
Although the brothers have refrained from personal attacks in public, their ideological divisions are profound. In 2024, Hayato apologised in parliament for what he described as his brother's 'Ukrainophobia."
Okamura has also been entangled in multiple legal disputes, mainly with media outlets and NGOs over alleged defamation – most of which he has lost.
In early 2025, he was stripped of parliamentary immunity to face potential criminal charges related to an allegedly racially charged campaign in the 2024 European elections.
Okamura is unlikely to achieve his long-held goal of taking Czechia out of the EU anytime soon.
The populist party ANO, the frontrunner, shows no interest in Czexit, and the current centre-right government remains firmly pro-European.
But with several smaller factions hovering near the 5% threshold to enter parliament, the SPD could emerge as ANO's only viable coalition ally, giving Okamura leverage to pull Czech politics further toward the nationalist, anti-EU fringe.
(de, mm)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
Commission looks to expand ‘cash-for-reform' scheme on rule of law issues
The EU's justice chief stressed the need to tie EU funds to resilient and independent national judicial systems, as the European Commission presented its annual assessment of the rule of law across member states on Tuesday. With judicial independence weakening and civic space shrinking in parts of the bloc, the European Commission is exploring ways to expand existing mechanisms that condition access to EU funds on rule of law reforms, according to its newly released Rule of Law Report. Presenting this year's report, EU Justice Commissioner Michael McGrath said the EU's next long-term budget, known as the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), should be used as a tool to help protect judicial independence across the bloc. 'What's important (…) is that we have appropriate rule of law conditionality safeguards built into the MFF architecture, along with a clear link to the recommendations in the Rule of Law Report,' McGrath told Euractiv in a closed-door interview with journalists on Tuesday. The Commission is due to present its proposal for the next MFF on 16 July. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has previously indicated that the EU budget starting in 2028 would require member states to reform in order to access EU funding. In connection with the new report, a senior EU official acknowledged that 'cash-for-reform" scheme had proven 'extremely helpful' in advancing rule of law objectives. The Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), launched after the COVID-19 crisis, marked the EU's first large-scale use of conditional funding, tying disbursement of grants and loans to concrete national reforms on rule of law. Usual suspects Now in its sixth year, the Rule of Law Report provides an annual snapshot of justice systems, anti-corruption frameworks, and media landscapes. It includes tailored recommendations aimed at addressing democratic backsliding. The 2025 edition, spanning more than 800 pages and published on Tuesday, acknowledges some progress but warns that member states must do more to protect civil society, media freedom and judicial independence. The report find that EU countries have made progress, albeit slower than in the previous year. The 2024 report found that member states had made positive progress on 68% of 2023's recommendations, while only 57% of last year's recommendations had been fully or somewhat implemented this year. McGrath attributed the slowdown to the efficacy of the Rule of Law Report. 'The low-hanging fruit has been picked at this stage,' he said. The report delivered particularly critical assessments for Hungary, Poland, Italy, and candidate country Albania. In Hungary, the Commission noted that aside from modest pay increases for judicial staff, 'no progress' had been made in all other areas. Italy drew criticism for relaxed rules on political campaign financing. Similarly, last year's report gave low marks to Hungary, Slovakia, and Italy. On Tuesday, McGrath declined to speculate on whether more countries could face frozen funds due to rule of law violations in the future. 'Our goal is not to increase the number of member states that are subject to conditionality,' he said. The aim is to achieve 'the highest standards possible throughout the European Union in relation to the rule of law'. (de)
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
EPP holds trump card after far right seizes control of EU climate bill
Greens, socialists and liberal lawmakers are trying to outmanoeuvre nationalist Patriots for Europe group after it secured the right to steer a crucial climate bill through the European Parliament – but they can't do it without the European People's Party. Last week, the European Commission proposed that by 2040 the bloc's net greenhouse gas emissions should be 90% lower than in 1990. The European Parliament and the Council of the EU – which represents national governments – can amend the proposal before adopting it. Time is of the essence as a deal on the 2040 target is politically linked to the decision on the contribution to the global climate effort that Europe has to pledge before the United Nations' COP30 climate change conference opens in November. But with the file in the hands of the climate-sceptic Patriots group, lawmakers who support the ambitious reduction in emissions fear it will be impossible to meet this deadline using the normal legislative procedure. Patriots chair Jordan Bardella, who presides over Marine Le Pen's right-wing National Rally in France, said today that his group was 'resolutely opposed' to the plan to cut emissions by 90%. His group would not abandon industry and ordinary citizens to the "harmful influence of the left and the ecologists', Bardella said. His group later declared that Europe's Green Deal policy needed "a complete reset" rather than "cosmetic adjustments". The Patriots dismissed calls to rush through the legislation as a 'direct attempt to bypass parliamentary scrutiny, avoid a transparent committee process, and block any meaningful revision of the Green Transition'. The group, which is also home to Spain's Vox and Hungarian premier Viktor Orbán's Fidesz, called on the centre-right European People's Party (EPP) to join them. Conservatives hold the key As the largest group in the European Parliament, the EPP will be decisive in any vote on whether to use the urgency procedure to accelerate the passage of the climate bill. Green and centrist lawmakers say the EPP allowed the far-right group the to seize control of the bill by failing to outbid the Patriots in an auction-like process used to assign legislative files in the parliament. The Greens withdrew a unilateral call for an urgent procedure so they could submit a joint request with centrist groups in the hope of securing the EPP's support, the Austrian Green Lena Schilling said. Scenarios If the bill is fast-tracked, the role of the rapporteur nominated by the nationalist group would be 'very limited', said the liberal Renew group lawmaker Pascal Canfin, a former environment committee chair. 'The Patriots can be outmanoeuvred and we will do everything we can to outmanoeuvre them because … they will just sabotage everything in order to not have climate protection,' said the green lawmaker Michael Bloss According to him, the Environment Committee in the European Parliament could discuss the amendments to the European Commission proposal already next week. The pro-Green alliance could then agree compromises on the Commission proposal and vote at committee level by early October. Canfin envisaged the possibility of the Parliament's Environment Committee voting for the same position agreed by EU governments in the Council. This would clearly indicate the will of the two institutions even if final negotiations were still pending. However, sources close to the EPP have told Euractiv that the group would vote against initiating a fast-track procedure on Wednesday – possibly reconsidering after the summer, depending on whether the Patriots do any real work on the file. Such a delay would, at the very least. make it more difficult to secure agreement on the EU law in time for COP30. UN pledge Denmark, which chairs ministerial talks in the Council of the EU until December, recently said that it wants to agree on the 2040 climate goal well ahead of COP30, so the required 2035 pledge can be based on it. The EU could still present its 2035 emission reduction promise to the UN without agreeing on the 2040 target. But it would likely be less ambitious if based on the existing EU climate law, which commits the bloc to net-zero emissions by mid-century but does not set out the pathway to reach that goal. *Eddy Wax contributed reporting (rh, aw)
Euractiv
3 hours ago
- Euractiv
The Brief – The real story behind Europe's high energy bills
Critics who say expensive natural gas is the driving force behind Europe's high power bills have got it right – but miss the forest for the trees. Gas-fired power plants have a tight grip on Europe. Despite providing just 14% of electricity last year, they set the power price 40% of the time – making gas the decisive factor in calculating monthly energy bills. Lest we forget, our energy bills are around three times more expensive than in the US or China. However, don't let the very necessary fight against King Gas consume all the oxygen in the room. A power bill is usually split into three components: fuel (gas), grid costs and levies. Whilst the price of the fuel itself depends on international markets, there are still plenty of means by which Europe could bring consumer costs down. This is highlighted by the discrepancies in electricity bills across Europe. Take Austria, where the EU's 2000s market liberalisation simply failed and there is still 'no functioning national competitive market,' as the head of competition authority BWB has admitted. Instead, all the energy firms simply own shares in each other and local governments happily partake in the bonanza. Other issues affect all of Europe, like Paris blocking Spain from constructing cross-border cables to connect the sun-rich Iberian Peninsula to the European mainland – fearful of undermining the business case for nuclear (an industry French politicians back to the hilt). Even worse is Germany's infamous unitary electricity price zone – by which German politicians insist that electricity should cost the same in its wind-rich north and gas-reliant south, even though the cables to connect the two halves of the country do not exist. This has major ramifications for prices elsewhere in the bloc, the biggest loser being Denmark, where power prices are much higher because of competition from Bavaria. Similarly, the for-profit firms that manage electricity grids are usually the same companies that own the cables – allowing them a stranglehold on bill-payers. Whenever there is a bottleneck in the grid, companies usually just lay down more (expensive) copper cables, instead of opting for cheaper 'non-wire solutions', because at the end of the day, it's consumers who foot the bill. Meanwhile, a lack of regulatory oversight allows low-voltage grid operators (the ones who deliver power to households) to make a killing. A recent investigation in Germany found local monopolies earning up to 50% return on their investment in 2023 (ten times more than would be appropriate). A full account of the many factors inflating Europe's energy bills could fill a book. But the villain of the story wouldn't be gas itself, rather the pretence that gas is singularly responsible for our crippling energy bills. Much as they would have us believe otherwise, governments played a major role in getting Europe hooked on gas. Not only did they mismanage energy transitions (look no further than Germany's hopeless attempt to ditch coal and nuclear at the same time ), but they profit from our pain with high rates of VAT. Europe can't fix its gas woes overnight, but there are other levers it should pull. The Roundup De-risking, not de-coupling – Ursula von der Leyen said on Tuesday that the EU must accelerate efforts to 'de-risk' from China, warning that Beijing's control over critical supply chains like rare earth minerals, alongside support for Russia, pose a growing threat to Europe's economy and security. € in Bulgaria – EU finance ministers gave the final green light on Tuesday for Bulgaria to adopt the euro on the first day of January 2026, nearly 19 years after the country joined the European Union. Parliamentary probe – The European Public Prosecutor's Office has launched a formal investigation into allegations of misusing over €4.3 million of EU funds by Identity and Democracy, a defunct far-right group in the European Parliament that included France's Rassemblement National, a spokesperson for EPPO said on Tuesday. Across Europe Embargoing nowhere – Spain's promise for an arms embargo on Israel faces continued hurdles, as the country continues to import weapons and utilise Israeli military technology in domestic production, and political divisions over the matter deepen. Anonymous immunisation – Public vaccination registration in the Netherlands is being impacted by a rise in anonymous data reporting and a decline in vaccination rates in specific demographics, according to the Dutch Public Health Institute, making it difficult for the organisation to provide exact vaccination rates. A migration loss for Merz – A German court ruled Tuesday that the government must issue visas to an Afghan family previously accepted under a programme for those at risk after the Taliban seized power in 2021, which was frozen by Merz's new government.
