
Apple is doing in China what it has never done since its first store opening in 2008
Apple
will close one of its retail stores in China after establishing its presence in the country in 2008. The Apple Store in question is the one situated in
Dalian City Parkland Mall
and it is set to cease operations on August 9. This move signals Apple's response to a reportedly challenging retail environment, as locals have described the Parkland Mall as struggling, noting that other major brands like Michael Kors and Armani have also recently closed their outlets there.
'Given the departure of several retailers at the Parkland Mall, we have made the decision to close our store,' The New York Times quoted Apple spokesman Brian Bumbery as saying. He said that the company remains committed to the Dalian community and that 'all of our valued team members will have the opportunity to continue their roles with Apple.'
Apple plans new store in China amid tough competition
The report also said that Apple plans to open a new store in the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen this month. With this new opening, the company expects to maintain its total number of stores in China at 58 by the end of 2025, the same figure it held at the beginning of the year.
The news comes at a time when China is facing broader economic challenges, particularly with consumer spending. Despite significant government programmes designed to stimulate purchases of goods like smartphones and electric vehicles, economists caution that any boost to consumption may be short-lived, the report said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice
Grammarly
Install Now
Undo
Meanwhile, Apple's has ongoing business struggles in China, which stands as its second-largest market. The tech giant has reported declining sales in the country for six consecutive quarters. Chinese rivals such as Huawei, Xiaomi, and Vivo have been steadily eroding Apple's market share in the world's largest smartphone market.
India is gaining on becoming a smartphone manufacturing hub as Apple continues to shift its focus to India. According to a report by Canalys, India has surpassed China in exporting smartphones to the US. Driven by Apple's shift and Trump's tariffs, India now accounts for 44% of US smartphone imports.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Right to choose trading partners': Russia calls Trump's trade ‘threats' to India ‘not legal'
The Kremlin on Tuesday hit out at US President Donald Trump's recent remarks targeting India over its continued trade ties with Russia, calling such pressure tactics 'not legal'. Responding to Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said, 'We hear many statements that are in fact threats, attempts to force countries to cut trade relations with Russia. We do not consider such statements to be legal.' In a sharp rebuke of Trump's stance, Peskov added, 'We believe that sovereign countries should have and do have the right to choose their own trading partners, partners for trade and economic cooperation, and to choose for themselves the forms of trade and economic cooperation that are in the interests of a particular country.' The comments came days after Trump, in a July 31 post on Truth Social, vowed to impose steep tariffs on India for what he described as 'obnoxious' trade barriers. His threat included an unspecified 'penalty' for buying Russian crude. New Delhi has called Trump's threats 'unjustified' and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening a trade rift between the two major economies.

Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
US Tech Jobs Under Fire? Marjorie Greene Demand Ban On Indian Work Visas Amid Tariff Tensions
Far-right US congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has called on Donald Trump to halt the H1B visa programme for Indian nationals, claiming they are replacing American workers. Her remarks followed Trump's social media post threatening steep tariffs on Indian goods due to India's oil trade with Russia. Greene doubled down, urging an end to US funding for Ukraine and blaming former Democratic presidents for the ongoing war. The H1B visa debate has resurfaced, with powerful voices in Trump's circle offering conflicting views.#MarjorieTaylorGreene #TrumpIndiaTensions #H1BVisaBan #IndiaUSTrade #UkraineWarFunding #FarRightPolitics #TechJobsCrisis #USImmigrationDebate #ElonMuskH1B #TrumpVsIndia Read More

Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
SIP or stop? What smart investors should do in 2025's market volatility
With global uncertainty rising and market volatility back in focus, many investors are asking, "Should I continue my SIPs or pause them?" In this exclusive conversation, ET Markets speaks to Chirag Muni, Executive Director at Anand Rathi Wealth, to decode the current scenario and outline the right mutual fund strategy for today's market. ADVERTISEMENT Excerpts: Q. Let's begin with Trump's move. The U.S. has imposed a 25% tariff on Indian imports. Do you see this as an alarm or an opportunity for SIP investors? Chirag Muni: While the 25% tariff sounds severe, markets haven't reacted sharply, partly because there's still a lack of clarity. The market did open lower but recovered quickly, possibly also due to the monthly expiry. In the long term, India's macroeconomic fundamentals remain strong. Our export dependency on the U.S. isn't significant enough to cause a massive dent. Preliminary estimates suggest that the GDP impact may be around 0.2%–0.3% if the full tariffs are there are talks of penalties related to India's continued imports of Russian oil, but these are still unconfirmed. Overall, from a 3–5 year perspective, India's outlook remains positive. So, market dips should be seen as an opportunity rather than a reason to panic. It's a good time to accumulate on dips.Q. Some investors are panicking and considering redeeming mutual fund investments. Should they hold or exit? And what about continuing their SIPs? ADVERTISEMENT Chirag Muni: If you're already invested, stay put. Rebalance only if your equity exposure is above 75–80%. If you're between 60–70%, there's little reason to worry. As for SIPs — absolutely continue. SIPs work because of rupee cost averaging. When markets fall, you get more units; when markets rise, fewer. This naturally reduces your average cost per unit. ADVERTISEMENT For example, let's say you started an SIP in January investing ₹10,000 monthly. If the NAV fluctuated between ₹9 and ₹13, your average cost would still be favorable compared to investing a lump sum at a peak.Q. Should new investors start an SIP now or wait for a dip? ADVERTISEMENT Chirag Muni: Timing the market is tough. We did a study over the past 25 years, even if someone invested at the peak of each month, they earned ~11.19% returns. Those who invested at monthly lows got ~12.65%, and a disciplined mid-month investor earned ~11.84%.So, the difference isn't significant. If you have investable surplus, start now. Waiting rarely helps in the long run. ADVERTISEMENT Q. What's your view on step-up SIPs in the current environment? Chirag Muni: Step-up SIPs are incredibly effective and often underutilized. Let's say a 25-year-old starts a ₹5,000 SIP and continues for 35 years — they might build a corpus of ₹3.5 crore. But if they increase the SIP by 10% annually, the corpus could grow to ₹9.4 crore! Even a ₹25,000 SIP can become ₹17.5 crore over 35 years, but with a 10% annual step-up, that corpus can grow to ₹47 crore. So yes, step-up SIPs are a powerful way to grow wealth over time.Q. Investors often wonder... which date of the month is best for SIPs? Chirag Muni: We looked at 25 years of data and tested SIPs started on every date of the month. The return difference between the best and worst-performing dates was just 0.15%. So, the date doesn't matter. What matters is consistency. Pick a date you're comfortable with and stick to it. Q. Do SIPs outperform lump sum investments? Chirag Muni: Yes, especially in volatile markets. In 20 out of 24 calendar years, SIPs offered a better average entry cost than lump sum investing. Over the last 10 years, SIPs outperformed lump sum in 90% of cases. Rupee cost averaging helps navigate volatility effectively — making SIPs the better choice for most retail investors.Q. What's an ideal investment horizon for SIPs? Chirag Muni: A minimum of 3–4 years is essential. Over three years, 90% of SIPs deliver positive returns. If you hold for five years, the probability of 10%+ returns goes up to 85%. For 15 years, it becomes 95%. Also, even if the first year shows negative returns, holding on for three more years often delivers 11–12% CAGR. So patience and discipline are key.Q. Given current domestic and global uncertainty, should investors review or rebalance their SIPs? Chirag Muni: Absolutely. While SIPs are automated, reviewing your portfolio annually is important. Evaluate scheme performance, asset allocation, and market cap exposure. If a scheme underperforms for a long time or your allocation becomes skewed, consider rebalancing. Regular monitoring is essential for long-term success. Q. Where should SIP investors focus: large, mid, or smallcap funds? Chirag Muni: Largecaps are less volatile, but mid and smallcaps offer higher return potential over longer horizons. From 2014 to 2024: Largecap (Nifty 100): Avg return ~12.6% Avg return ~12.6% Midcap: Avg return ~16.8% Avg return ~16.8% Smallcap: Avg return ~14% If you have a 5+ year horizon, a higher allocation to mid and smallcaps can make sense. Diversify across market caps for balanced growth.Q. What's a good market cap allocation mix for current conditions? Chirag Muni: Right now, a balanced allocation could be: Largecap: 55% 55% Midcap: 22–23% 22–23% Smallcap: ~20% This mix offers relative stability with growth potential. Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts/brokerages do not represent the views of Economic Times.