
US, China all set to resume tariff talks in effort to keep sharply higher tariffs at bay
Stockholm
Senior US and Chinese negotiators meet in Stockholm on Monday to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of the countries' trade war, aiming to extend a truce keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay.
China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached a preliminary deal in June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs.
Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from duties exceeding 100 percent.
The Stockholm talks, led by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, take place a day after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen meets Trump at his golf course in Scotland to try to clinch a deal that would likely see a 15 percent baseline tariff on most EU goods.
Trade analysts on both sides of the Pacific say the discussions in the Swedish capital are unlikely to produce any breakthroughs but could prevent further escalation and help create conditions for Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to meet later this year.
Previous US-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing US and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States.
So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include US complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that US national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth.
'Stockholm will be the first meaningful round of US-China trade talks,' said Bo Zhengyuan, Shanghai-based partner at China consultancy firm Plenum.
Trump has been successful in pressuring some other trading partners, including Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines, into deals accepting higher US tariffs of 15 percent to 20 percent.
He said there was a 50-50 chance that the US and the 27-member European Union could also reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to 'make a deal very badly'.
Two of Trump's top trade officials, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, will attend the Scotland talks and then travel to Stockholm.
Analysts say the US-China negotiations are far more complex and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on US industries.
In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October.
Trump has said he will decide soon whether to visit China in a landmark trip to address trade and security tensions. A new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail any plans for a meeting with Xi.
'The Stockholm meeting is an opportunity to start laying the groundwork for a Trump visit to China,' said Wendy Cutler, vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute.
Bessent has already said he wants to work out an extension of the August 12 deadline to prevent tariffs snapping back to 145 percent on the US side and 125 percent on the Chinese side.
Still, China will likely request a reduction of multi-layered US tariffs totaling 55 percent on most goods and further easing of US high-tech export controls, analysts said. Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the US trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024.
China is currently facing a 20 percent tariff related to US fentanyl crisis, a 10 percent reciprocal tariff, and 25 percent duties on most industrial goods imposed during Trump's first term.
Bessent has also said he would discuss with He the need for China to rebalance its economy away from exports toward domestic consumer demand. The shift would require China to put an end to a protracted property crisis and boost social safety nets to encourage household spending.
Michael Froman, a former US trade representative during Barack Obama's administration, said such a shift has been a goal of US policymakers for two decades.
'Can we effectively use tariffs to get China to fundamentally change their economic strategy? That remains to be seen,' said Froman, now president of the Council on Foreign Relations think-tank.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US sanctions Brazil's Supreme Court judge overseeing case against Bolsonaro
The US Department of the Treasury has said it was imposing sanctions on Brazil's Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes over alleged suppression of freedom of expression and the ongoing trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro. Bolsonaro is accused of masterminding a plot to stay in power despite his 2022 election defeat to current President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. US President Donald Trump has tied new tariffs on Brazil to what he called a 'witch hunt' against his right-wing ally. The announcement on Wednesday of sanctions against Moraes, who oversees Bolsonaro's case, follows Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement in June saying Washington was considering sanctioning the judge. Moraes was sanctioned under the Global Magnitsky Act, which allows the US to impose economic penalties against foreigners it considers to have a record of corruption or human rights abuses. 'Alexandre de Moraes has taken it upon himself to be judge and jury in an unlawful witch hunt against US and Brazilian citizens and companies,' US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement. 'De Moraes is responsible for an oppressive campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions that violate human rights, and politicized prosecutions – including against former President Jair Bolsonaro.' The decision orders the freezing of any assets or property Moraes may have in the US. Brazil's Supreme Court and the Presidential Palace did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Moraes recently ordered Bolsonaro to wear an ankle bracelet and stop using social media over allegations that he courted the interference from Trump. Earlier this month, Washington escalated tensions with the government of Latin America's largest economy, imposing US visa restrictions on Moraes, his family and other unnamed court officials. Brazilian President Lula denounced that move as 'arbitrary' and 'baseless,' and said foreign interference in the judiciary was 'unacceptable'. The left-wing leader said in a statement that the US action violated fundamental principles of respect and sovereignty between nations. The visa bans were a response to the Supreme Court's decision to issue search warrants and restraining orders targeting Bolsonaro, who is accused of plotting a coup to overturn the results of a 2022 election he lost. In a letter in mid-July, when Trump announced a 50-percent tariff on Brazilian goods starting August 1, he opened the message with criticism of Bolsonaro's prosecution. Bolsonaro has denied that he led an attempt to overthrow the government but has acknowledged taking part in meetings aimed at reversing the election's outcome.


Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US Federal Reserve leaves rates unchanged despite pressure from White House
Despite pressure from the White House, the United States Federal Reserve will hold interest rates steady at 4.25-4.50 percent, on par with economists' expectations as tariff-driven uncertainty weighs on the US economy. The Fed, the US central bank, announced its decision on Wednesday as it wrapped up its two-day policy meeting. 'The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. Uncertainty about the economic outlook remains elevated,' the Fed said in a statement. Rates have held steady at this rate since December. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has long argued that keeping rates consistent puts the central bank in a strong position to respond to inflationary pressures driven by US President Donald Trump's tariffs. 'Recent indicators suggest that growth of economic activity moderated in the first half of the year. The unemployment rate remains low, and labor market conditions remain solid. Inflation remains somewhat elevated,' the Fed added. Inflation ticked up to 2.7 percent, according to the consumer price index report released earlier this month. But the decision also drew dissent from two of the central bank's governors, both Trump appointees who agree with him that monetary policy is too tight. This week's meeting marks the first time in more than 30 years that two members of the Fed's seven-person Washington-based Board of Governors voted against a rate decision at the consensus-driven central bank, and it will likely stoke debate about how Trump's public pressure to cut rates is playing out at an institution designed to set monetary policy independent of demands from elected officials. Both Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller, who has been mentioned as a possible nominee to replace Powell when his term expires in May 2026, 'preferred to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by one quarter of a percentage point at this meeting', the Fed's policy statement said. Pressures on Powell Last week, the US president claimed that he thought the central bank was ready to reduce interest rates after a visit to Fed headquarters. On Wednesday, prior to the rate decision's announcement and on the heels of mixed GDP data, the White House said in a statement that 'There are no more excuses — now is the time for 'too late' Powell to cut the rates!' The claims are the latest in a slew of attempts by the White House to pressure the central bank to lower rates, including threats of replacing Powell and ongoing personal attacks on the Fed chair. Last week, Trump called Powell a 'numbskull'. But Powell has long maintained that the central bank's decisions on monetary policy remain independent of political pressures.


Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Democrats use obscure law to pressure Trump on Epstein case
Democrats in the United States have moved to force President Donald Trump to release files from the investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, invoking an obscure law to keep up the pressure on an issue that has roiled Trump's administration and base. The White House has been facing increasingly intense demands to be more transparent about the disgraced financier, who died in federal prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. The president raised further questions about his past relationship with Epstein on Tuesday when he told reporters he fell out with his former friend after Epstein 'stole' employees from the spa at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. The Department of Justice angered Trump supporters earlier this month when it said Epstein had died by suicide and had no 'client list' – rebuffing conspiracy theories about the supposed complicity of high-profile Democrats that leading figures in Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement had been pushing for years. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Democrats on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee wrote to the Justice Department asking for the materials under a section of federal law known as the 'rule of five'. The measure, introduced a century ago but rarely used, requires government departments to provide relevant information if any five members of the Senate's chief watchdog panel request it. It is not clear if it could be enforced in court, but even if the effort fails, it keeps the spotlight on an issue that has upended Trump's summer, dividing his Republican Party and leading to the early closure of the House of Representatives. Trump's administration, seeking to ease the uproar, urged two judges to release testimony to a grand jury that indicted Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell on sex trafficking charges. In late-night court filings on Tuesday, federal prosecutors said unsealing the materials would be appropriate given the 'abundant public interest' in the case of Epstein and Maxwell, a now-imprisoned British socialite. Trump supporters angered Trump had promised to make public Epstein-related files if re-elected and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But Trump's Justice Department has now said the previously touted Epstein client list did not in fact exist, angering Trump's supporters. The department first sought court permission on July 18 to make public transcripts of the confidential grand jury testimony given by witnesses years ago in the two cases, but Manhattan-based US District Judges Richard Berman and Paul Engelmayer asked the government to flesh out the legal bases for the requests. Even if one or both of the judges allow the transcripts to be made public, it is not clear whether the public would learn anything new or noteworthy about Epstein or his longtime girlfriend Maxwell, who was convicted of sex trafficking in 2021. Lawmakers have also been seeking testimony from Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in a Florida prison for her role in his crimes. Maxwell's lawyer has said she would speak to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee if granted immunity for her testimony. 'The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony,' a spokesman for the panel said. Democrats have also sought to attach votes on the Epstein files to unrelated bills multiple times, prompting House Speaker Mike Johnson to send lawmakers home for the summer a day early last week rather than risk them succeeding. 'Donald Trump promised he would release the Epstein files while he was on the campaign trail. He made that promise, and he has yet to do it,' Schumer said in a speech on Tuesday on the Senate floor. In the filings, prosecutors said the only witness at Epstein's grand jury was an FBI agent. That same agent and a New York City Police Department detective were the only witnesses to testify before Maxwell's grand jury, prosecutors said. Maxwell's four-week trial in 2021 included public testimony from sex trafficking victims, associates of Epstein and Maxwell, and law enforcement officers. She is asking the Supreme Court to overturn her conviction. She had pleaded not guilty.