
Zara shopper says store employee barged into fitting room and shoved his hand down his pants: lawsuit
In what the suit describes as an 'act of forcible compulsion,' the retail worker – who is not named as a defendant in the case – allegedly barged in on the shopper, 'pushed his hand inside [the man's] underwear, and seized, held, and pulled [his] genitals.'
It says the 'appalling and invasive assault was committed with complete disregard for [the shopper's] autonomy and was captured on video,' providing 'irrefutable evidence of [the employee's] brazen and predatory conduct.'
The alleged incident took place at one of the fast-fashion chain's Midtown Manhattan locations, according to accuser 'John Doe,' who brought the suit anonymously. A few months later, the same employee was accused of similar behavior towards another customer, but was let off with a mere verbal warning, the lawsuit maintains.
Doe's attorney, Thomas Andrykovitz, told The Independent that the situation represents 'an appalling violation of customer safety and trust.'
'Our client was sexually assaulted by a Zara employee inside a fitting room, which is an area that should offer privacy, not peril,' Andrykovitz said. 'No customer should have to fear being preyed upon while shopping for clothes. We filed this case to hold Zara accountable and to help ensure no other customer is victimized or put at risk in one of its stores.'
A Zara spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment on Monday, a U.S. holiday.
Zara, a massively popular apparel and home decor retailer owned by Inditex, a Spanish conglomerate, operates more than 2,200 stores worldwide, 99 of them in the United States. In March, as Inditex reported slowing growth during the first part of 2025, it also announced Zara had posted 2024 sales of more than $30 billion, a 6.6 percent increase year-over-year, making it the top performer in its parent company's portfolio of brands.
On January 18, 2024, Doe was shopping for shorts and shirts at a Zara store on Fifth Avenue and 42 Street, and selected several items to try on, according to his complaint. Doe brought them up to a fitting room on the second floor, where the employee in question was working by himself, the complaint says.
'Rather than instructing [Doe] to use any available changing stall, as is standard practice in most retail clothing stores, [the Zara employee] insisted that [Doe] use a specific changing stall,' the complaint states. 'This deviation from common procedure was unusual and suspicious, particularly given that other stalls were unoccupied and accessible at the time.'
Nevertheless, Doe did as he was told and began to undress 'in the privacy of the closed changing stall,' the complaint continues. However, while Doe was taking off his clothes, the store employee 'repeatedly and abruptly pulled back the curtain without permission, brazenly staring at [Doe] during various stages of undress,' the complaint alleges.
It says the Zara employee 'attempted to mask this gross invasion of privacy by pretending to inquire about the fit of the garments [Doe] had selected – as if such a question could possibly justify his unwelcome and outrageous intrusions into a space specifically designed for personal privacy.'
Each time the employee opened the curtain, Doe would immediately close it again 'in an effort to reestablish his privacy,' according to the complaint. But, it contends, the employee kept coming back for more, each time 'with increasing boldness.'
Soon, the employee physically entered the fitting room and 'plac[ed] his bare hands on [Doe's] body, all under the false pretense of assisting with garment fit,' the complaint states, calling his behavior 'a flagrant violation of [Doe's] bodily autonomy and the sanctity of the private space Zara purported to provide for its customers.'
Doe 'expressly resisted' the alleged advances by the Zara employee, and demanded he stop touching him, again shutting the curtain to try and 'reclaim his privacy,' the complaint alleges. Regardless, it says, the employee ignored Doe's 'clear and repeated objections, [and] continued to return to the private changing stall.'
Then, in what the complaint calls a 'shocking escalation,' it says the Zara employee 'inserted his fingers into the waistband of [Doe's] pants and underwear, snaking his hand toward [Doe's] penis.'
In a state of shock, Doe took out his phone and began recording what was happening, '[i]n a desperate attempt to protect himself and document the ongoing sexual abuse,' according to the complaint. Yet, at this point, the employee – 'motivated solely by his own sexual gratification' – shoved his hand down Doe's underpants and gripped his genitalia, the complaint says.
Doe became 'overwhelmed with disbelief as the assault unfolded,' and could barely comprehend what was happening, the complaint asserts.
'Fearing for his safety and unable to rely on Zara's safeguards,' the complaint says Doe 'remained in the stall until he could safely escape the fitting room – still reeling from the shock of the forced sexual contact and the betrayal of trust by a store employee in a space meant to offer privacy and protection.'
The 'grotesque act' constituted 'a profound violation' of Doe's personal dignity, according to the complaint.
Five months later, another Zara customer reported that Doe's alleged attacker had also opened the curtain to their fitting room without permission, the complaint states.
But, the complaint alleges, Zara responded 'with nothing more than a verbal warning, failing to take meaningful corrective action or protect future customers from further harm.'
Zara fitting rooms have been at the center of controversy before. Earlier this year, an Irish woman sued and won some $20,000 after a security guard at a Zara store in Dublin pulled back the curtain to her changing room and peeked in while the shopper was 'half-dressed.'
In 2022, Zara apologized to a trans woman in the Philippines after a store employee allegedly refused to allow her into the women's dressing room.
And in early 2020, a brawl between a customer and a Zara employee over the number of items allowed into a fitting room at one time landed both of them, as well as a 61-year-old bystander who tried to intervene, in the hospital.
Doe's complaint says Zara should have been aware of the store employee's "dangerous propensities," but failed to take "adequate precautions" to prevent his alleged misconduct. It further calls Zara out for allowing its fitting rooms to be "exploited by sexual predators as a hunting ground."
Doe, who claims to have suffered severe emotional trauma, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress, accuses Zara of negligence, assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent hiring, and violations of the New York City Human Rights Law.
He is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorneys' fees and court costs, to be determined by a jury.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Off-duty Border Patrol agent shot in a Manhattan park in apparent botched robbery, police say
An off-duty U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer was shot in a Manhattan park on Saturday following an apparent robbery gone wrong, New York City police and federal officials said. The 42-year-old officer was in stable condition Sunday and expected to survive. There was no indication that he was targeted because of his employment, New York City Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said. The officer, who was not in uniform, had been sitting with a woman in a park beneath the George Washington Bridge when two men approached on a moped just before midnight. The passenger got off and approached the officer, who realized he was being robbed and drew his service weapon, Tisch said. The two exchanged gunfire and the off-duty officer was shot in the face and arm. The perpetrator was injured before he and the moped driver rode off, police said. A person of interest, identified as Miguel Mora, a 21-year-old undocumented immigrant with an extensive criminal past, was taken into custody after arriving at a Bronx hospital with gunshot wounds to the groin and leg, Tisch said. It was unknown if Mora had an attorney. The police commissioner said Mora's injuries were consistent with what was seen on surveillance video of the shooting shared by the Department of Homeland Security. The search for his alleged accomplice continued Sunday. Mora entered the country illegally through Arizona in 2023 and had two prior arrests for domestic violence in New York. He was wanted in New York to face accusations of robbery and felony assault, and in Massachusetts over a stolen weapons case, Tisch said. In a social media post Sunday afternoon, President Donald Trump seized on the shooting as evidence of Democrats' failures to secure the border. 'The CBP Officer bravely fought off his attacker, despite his wounds, demonstrating enormous Skill and Courage,' Trump added. The shooting comes as federal officials warn of a surge of attacks on agents carrying out Trump's mass deportation agenda. As enforcement efforts have ramped up in recent months, many officers have chosen to cover their faces with the goal of avoiding harassment in public and online. On Sunday, the acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Todd Lyons, said he would allow agents to continue covering their faces as a safety measure. 'If that's a tool that the men and women of ICE that keeps themselves and their families safe, then I will allow it,' Lyons said.


Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump calls for Obama's arrest with jaw-dropping Truth Social post after Tulsi Gabbard claimed ex-president was behind 'years-long coup'
President Trump has called for Barack Obama to be arrested after spy chief Tulsi Gabbard claimed the former leader was behind a 'years-long coup' against him. Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, declassified hundreds of documents on Friday related to the investigation in to alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election. She claimed the emails reveal a conspiracy by Obama to try and subvert Trump's win by using 'manufactured and politicized intelligence' to make it seem like bad actors may have influenced the result. 'Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people,' Gabbard said. Her claims were reiterated by Trump who republished her interviews with Fox and several others about the issue on Truth Social. And on Sunday, he escalated things further by reposting an AI-generated TikTok which showed Obama being apprehended and placed in handcuffs along with the message, 'No one is above the law'. Gabbard released an 114-page document she says shows the Obama administration was aware that there was no threat of Russia 'directly' manipulating the vote in 2016. She called for an investigatio n into and potential criminal prosecution of anyone who took part – which may include the ex-President and James Comey, the former FBI director. The documents revealed insider discussions among top Obama officials about Russia's much-debated role in the 2016 US elections. Although many of the documents are highly redacted or completely blacked out, they show conversations among favorite Trump targets including former intel chief James Clapper, as officials debated how to describe Russian election activity. The documents found that there was 'no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count through cyber means'. But Gabbard says the documents show that Democrats chose to ignore that - or even promote the opposite narrative - to try and take down Trump. 'Their egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic,' Gabbard in a blistering statement accompanying the document release. 'No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again.' Several of the documents put out by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) show officials found that Russia either wouldn't try or wouldn't be able to shift the outcome of a US vote. 'Russia probably is not trying to going to be able to? [influence] the election by using cyber means to manipulate computer-enabled election infrastructure,' reads one draft line by the then-deputy director of ODNI. Documents show officials crafting a document saying there wasn't an indication Russia could manipulate the vote count The administration unsealed the documents amid the fury over the Jeffrey Epstein files By December 9, following Trump's stunning win over Democrat Hillary Clinton, a document to top intelligence officials tasked them with creating an assessment 'per the President's request' about 'tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election' 'We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election,' according to a January 2017 report titled 'Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections.' The report then mentioned Russian cyber operations against both political parties. Of the material Gabbard released, one new August 31, 2016 document by an official with their name blacked out states that the 'thrust of the analysis is that there is no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count through cyber means.' Democrats have responded by claiming that Gabbard's declassification is designed to deflect from the Department of Justice's decision to close its investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. In response Trump has instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to disclose grand jury testimony files, pending court approval.

Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Macro Matters: Trump-controlled Fed would 'hurt the economy'
President Trump's attacks on the Fed's independence are escalating, and are spurred by his desire to dramatically lower benchmark interest rates. Gregory Daco from EY Parthenon told Reuters if monetary policy were to ease significantly it would risk 'inflation de-anchoring to the upside' and be a big hit to consumers and businesses.