Rattling the past: How ancient toys shake up our understanding of childhood
Mette Marie Hald, co-author of the study detailing the discovery published in the scientific journal "Childhood in the Past", laid out her findings to AFP.
"We argue that the rattles served as toys to amuse and calm infants, rather than as musical instruments, based on the low noise level of the rattles and the relatively small size of their handles," says the summary of the paper.
Hald even suggested museum curators should take a second look at their collections in case objects originally classified as religious artefacts were actually carefully crafted toys.
"If you wanted to entertain your child, you could just give them a wooden spoon or a stone," she said.
But even then, parents had the option to spoil their young ones with fancier alternatives.
"4 500 years ago, parents would go to the market and buy toys made by professionals," she explained.
Researchers discovered pieces of 19 clay rattles made in Hama, Syria, dating back to the Bronze Age, in the collections of the National Museum of Denmark.
According to Hald, the quality of the rattles means they couldn't have been made by the parents themselves.
She hopes the discovery will encourage professionals to look at clay fragments more carefully because other objects, light figurines, might turn out to be toys.
"They are often considered religious figurines placed in a temple ... but we wonder if these can be toys made for children, as there is a lot of variety and they look very funny," the researcher noted.
Mostly, such finds are unearthed as shattered fragments so the toys are difficult to recognise.
As such, researchers have developed an identification guide specifically designed to identify rattles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
a day ago
- eNCA
Physicists still divided about quantum world, 100 years on
The theory of quantum mechanics has transformed daily life since being proposed a century ago, yet how it works remains a mystery -- and physicists are deeply divided about what is actually going on, a survey in the journal Nature said Wednesday. "Shut up and calculate!" is a famous quote in quantum physics that illustrates the frustration of scientists struggling to unravel one of the world's great paradoxes. For the last century, equations based on quantum mechanics have consistently and accurately described the behaviour of extremely small objects. However, no one knows what is happening in the physical reality behind the mathematics. The problem started at the turn of the 20th century, when scientists realised that the classical principles of physics did not apply to things on the level on atoms. Bafflingly, photons and electrons appear to behave like both particles and waves. They can also be in different positions simultaneously -- and have different speeds or levels of energy. In 1925, Austrian physicist Erwin Schroedinger and Germany's Werner Heisenberg developed a set of complex mathematical tools that describe quantum mechanics using probabilities. This "wave function" made it possible to predict the results of measurements of a particle. These equations led to the development of a huge amount of modern technology, including lasers, LED lights, MRI scanners and the transistors used in computers and phones. But the question remained: what exactly is happening in the world beyond the maths? - A confusing cat - To mark the 100th year of quantum mechanics, many of the world's leading physicists gathered last month on the German island of Heligoland, where Heisenberg wrote his famous equation. More than 1,100 of them responded to a survey conducted by the leading scientific journal Nature. The results showed there is a "striking lack of consensus among physicists about what quantum theory says about reality", Nature said in a statement. More than a third -- 36 percent -- of the respondents favoured the mostly widely accepted theory, known as the Copenhagen interpretation. In the classical world, everything has defined properties -- such as position or speed -- whether we observe them or not. But this is not the case in the quantum realm, according to the Copenhagen interpretation developed by Heisenberg and Danish physicist Niels Bohr in the 1920s. It is only when an observer measures a quantum object that it settles on a specific state from the possible options, goes the theory. This is described as its wave function "collapsing" into a single possibility. The most famous depiction of this idea is Schroedinger's cat, which remains simultaneously alive and dead in a box -- until someone peeks inside. The Copenhagen interpretation "is the simplest we have", Brazilian physics philosopher Decio Krause told Nature after responding to the survey. Despite the theory's problems -- such as not explaining why measurement has this effect -- the alternatives "present other problems which, to me, are worse," he said. - Enter the multiverse - But the majority of the physicists supported other ideas. Fifteen percent of the respondents opted for the "many worlds" interpretation, one of several theories in physics that propose we live in a multiverse. It asserts that the wave function does not collapse, but instead branches off into as many universes as there are possible outcomes. So when an observer measures a particle, they get the position for their world -- but it is in all other possible positions across many parallel universes. "It requires a dramatic readjustment of our intuitions about the world, but to me that's just what we should expect from a fundamental theory of reality," US theoretical physicist Sean Carroll said in the survey. The quantum experts were split on other big questions facing the field. Is there some kind of boundary between the quantum and classical worlds, where the laws of physics suddenly change? Forty-five percent of the physicists responded yes to this question -- and the exact same percentage responded no. Just 24 percent said they were confident the quantum interpretation they chose was correct. And three quarters believed that it will be replaced by a more comprehensive theory one day. By Bénédicte Rey
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Dutch twins help recreate the face of Belgium's ancient hunter-gatherer
Dutch artist Alfons Kennis works on a model representing a prehistoric human skull in his workshop in Arnhem, on July 3, 2025. Alfons and his twin brother Adrie are known for their paleo-anthropological work. With her clear blue eyes and slightly nervous gaze, the reconstructed bust of Mos'anne - a woman who lived around 10 500 years ago - is uncannily lifelike. Reborn via a close partnership between science and art, Mos'anne's bust was created at Belgium's Ghent University as part of a project to explore how the region's last hunter-gatherers lived during the Mesolithic era. "Part of the project is also understanding the genetics of these people, figuring out their kinship and so on, and to be able to really translate the science that we do to a wider audience," the project's lead researcher, Isabelle de Groote, told AFP. Scientists chose the skull of Mos'anne - named by public vote in reference to Belgium's Meuse Valley - for reconstruction, as it was exceptionally well preserved. The bones held a large amount of preserved DNA, making it possible to reconstruct the woman - aged between 35 and 60 at her death - with remarkable realism. "We also know that in the Mesolithic times, she is genetically part of the Western hunter-gatherer group," said de Groote. Using genetic testing, researchers were able to determine the Mesolithic woman's skin and eye colour. "This group is known for having very dark skin and blue eyes, a bit like Cheddar Man in Britain," she said, referring to the man who lived in Britain around 10 000 years ago, whose skeleton was discovered in 1903. 'Mixed emotions' Mos'anne's DNA revealed valuable clues about her appearance but it was the unique skills of Dutch "paleo-artists" Alfons and Adrie Kennis that brought her back to life. After receiving guidance from the researchers - including instructions to use ochre pigment on Mos'anne's headband - the twins began their work, from moulding the skull to the final decorative feather, meticulously sculpting each facial muscle in clay. "The biggest part of the reconstruction is forming a character," Alfons Kennis said from their Darwin-esque studio in Arnhem. "You can make a forensic reconstruction... use the data, apply the muscles, apply the skin, but you get no character," Kennis said of their artistic process. The Kennis brothers - whose surname means "knowledge" in Dutch - take about six months to complete a reconstruction. They gained global recognition in the 2000s, their work exhibited in museums worldwide and featured in specialist publications. The twins, fascinated by evolution and visual art since childhood, draw inspiration from archived anthropological images of early encounters between isolated populations and researchers. "At the first meeting, there's nervousness, shyness. People are laughing, maybe out of nerves," said Kennis. "When a prehistoric ancestor meets you for the first time, you see these mixed emotions... It's these emotions that we want to show." Much about Mos'anne remains unknown. In Ghent, researchers are still analysing her to find out what she would eat. With her headband dotted with duck feathers, golden skin, and pierced animal teeth adorning her ears and necklace, the prehistoric woman seems closer to us than ever. "It was always my wish to be able to make it more tangible in a way," De Groote said.
eNCA
3 days ago
- eNCA
Study reveals potato's secret tomato heritage
You say potato, I say tomato? Turns out one helped create the other: Natural interbreeding between wild tomatoes and potato-like plants in South America gave rise to the modern day spud around nine million years ago, according to a new study published Thursday in the journal Cell. Co-author Loren Rieseberg, a professor at the University of British Columbia, told AFP the findings point to a "profound shift" in evolutionary biology, as scientists increasingly recognize the role of ancient hybridization events in shaping the Tree of Life. While it was once thought that random mutations were by far the biggest driver of new species, "we now agree that the creative role of hybridization has been underestimated," he said. Simple, affordable and versatile, the humble potato is now one of the world's most important crops. But its origins have long puzzled scientists. Modern potato plants closely resemble three species from Chile known as Etuberosum. However, these plants do not produce tubers -- the large underground structures, like those found in potatoes and yams, that store nutrients and are the parts we eat. On the other hand, genetic analysis has revealed a surprising closeness to tomatoes. "This is known as discordance, and indicates something interesting is going on!" co-author Sandra Knapp, a research botanist at Britain's Natural History Museum, told AFP. To solve the mystery, an international team of researchers analyzed 450 genomes from cultivated potatoes and 56 wild potato species. Lead author Zhiyang Zhang, of the Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, said in a statement: "Wild potatoes are very difficult to sample, so this dataset represents the most comprehensive collection of wild potato genomic data ever analysed." - 'Wow' moment - The analysis revealed that modern potatoes carry a balanced genetic legacy from two ancestral species -- roughly 60 percent from Etuberosum and 40 percent from tomatoes. "My wow moment was when the Chinese team showed that ALL potatoes, wild species as well as land races, had basically the same proportion of tomato genes and Etuberosum genes," said Knapp. "That really points to an ancient hybridization event rather than various events of gene exchange later on," she added. "It is so clear cut! Beautiful." One gene called SP6A, a signal for tuberization, came from the tomato lineage. But it only enabled tuber formation when paired with the IT1 gene from Etuberosum, which controls underground stem growth. The divergence between Etuberosum and tomatoes is thought to have begun 14 million years ago -- possibly due to off-target pollination by insects -- and completed nine million years ago. This evolutionary event coincided with the rapid uplift of the Andes mountain range, providing ideal conditions for the emergence of tuber-bearing plants that could store nutrients underground. Another key feature of tubers is their ability to reproduce asexually, sprouting new buds without the need for seeds or pollination -- a trait that helped them spread across South America, and through later human exchange, around the globe. Co-author Sanwen Huang, a professor at the Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, told AFP that his lab is now working on a new hybrid potato that can be reproduced by seeds to accelerate breeding. This study suggests that using the tomato "as a chassis of synthetic biology" is a promising route for creating this new potato, he said.
