Prince William like ‘just another guy': inventor
Orepuki eco-farming inventor Grant Lightfoot has taken his edible bale netting to the world — including British royalty.
Mr Lightfoot introduced his award-winning eco invention to Prince William during the prince's surprise visit to the United Kingdom's regenerative agriculture festival; Groundswell, last week.
A festival official had organised for Prince William to stop at Mr Lightfoot's stall because he was the stall holder that had travelled the furthest.
After a quick chat with one of the prince's team, who had already heard about the edible bale netting, Mr Lightfoot stood at his stall ready for the prince's arrival.
"I had my card in my hand and my brochure ready . . . "
However, after speaking on stage, the prince headed off in another direction.
"He had six security guards, and the crowd. There was just thousands of people around. And me being me, I just bee-lined for him and stopped him. And before the security guys could get a word in, I started talking about my edible bail net.
The prince, as the eldest son of the reigning British monarch, inherited the Duke of Cornwall title and estates, becoming custodian of 52,172ha of land across 19 counties.
Mr Lightfoot invited the prince to see the eco-friendly bale net.
"It was so funny. Everyone just [did] a complete U-turn and came straight over to see me and my bail."
Orepuki farmer and Kiwi Econet inventor Grant Lightfoot with his product. PHOTO: APL FILES
During a brief chat with the prince, he explained the benefits of the wrap and how it could be eaten by stock animals and saved the environment.
"I spoke to him like he was just another guy, and he spoke to me the same way. He took my business card, my brochure and said, 'we'll be in contact'."
A video taken of the meeting and shared on social media platforms had gone viral, Mr Lightfoot said.
Two days before Groundswell, the Southland farmer decided on an unscheduled early morning stopover at Jeremy Clarkson's Diddley Squat farm.
But he initially took a wrong turn into Mr Clarkson's neighbour's property.
"So I went up there and got talking to the film guy — they were just about to start filming.
"He said, 'you know you're trespassing, blah blah blah'.
"I said, 'no, I didn't know that. I thought I'd just drive up and say g'day."
"Once I told him who I was, the attitude changed."
The show's producer expressed an interest in featuring Kiwi Econet on Mr Clarkson's show sometime in the future.
By Toni McDonald
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
Trump tariffs: What's the latest on the trade war?
It came a day after he announced a plan to impose a 50% tariff on all imports from Brazil. He suggested that the new levies were partly a response to a 'witch hunt' against Brazil's former president Jair Bolsonaro. A political ally of Trump, Bolsonaro is facing trial for attempting a coup. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil said in a statement yesterday that his country would retaliate, and that Brazil 'will not accept being abused by anyone'. Trump also announced plans to impose a 50% tariff on imported copper on August 1 after his advisers submitted a report arguing that protecting copper was important for national security. The metal is also heavily used by the manufacturing and construction industries, which are likely to pay higher prices for imported copper. The threats came as part of a wave of announcements this week of potential new import tax rates on goods from more than 20 nations, which Trump said would also take effect August 1. In many instances, the rates Trump announced were the same as or close to the high levels he threatened to impose in April, when he rolled out punishing levies on nearly 60 US trading partners. He then abruptly reversed course for 90 days — for every country except China — to give governments time to make deals. Since then, US officials have been juggling negotiations with trading partners, working to draft agreements before the 90-day deadline. Two such arrangements have been reached: one with Britain that lowers tariffs on British cars, steel and aluminium, and aerospace equipment; and one with Vietnam. The agreement with Vietnam imposes a 20% tariff on all imports from the country and a 40% tariff on any 'transshipping'. Vietnam was scheduled to face a 46% tariff. Representatives from Japan, the European Union, Malaysia, South Korea, Indonesia and other governments have also been cycling through Washington in recent weeks to try to find an arrangement that would avert higher tariffs. Who or what else is facing tariffs? China: Trump's trade war has been no more apparent than in America's relations with China. The world's two largest economies began to ratchet up import taxes on each other earlier this year, then reached a handshake agreement in June to remove some of the harmful economic measures they had used to target each other. While details of the truce were not released, the deal called for China to relax restrictions on rare earth metals, critical minerals that are needed for manufacturing cars, robots, wind turbines, jet fighters and other technologies. In return, the US agreed to pull back the limits it had placed on exported products and technology, including ethane and airplane parts, as well as proposed visa restrictions. While Trump hailed the agreement as progress, it appeared to return the countries to a status quo from several months earlier, before he began singling out China. Foreign steel and aluminium: In June, tariffs on foreign steel and aluminium doubled to 50%, in a move that Trump said in an executive order would 'counter foreign countries' as they 'undercut the competitiveness' of American industries. But the higher tariff rate is likely to raise costs for American businesses that rely on the metals — such as automakers, plane manufacturers homebuilders and oil drillers — and could make some consumer goods, like canned food, more expensive. Cars and car parts: All cars assembled outside the US and all imported auto parts are subject to a 25% duty. Trump has said the policy will spur investments and jobs in the US, but analysts say it could raise new car prices by thousands of dollars and add to the cost of auto repairs. De minimis: In May, Trump ordered the closure of the de minimis rule, a shipping loophole that allowed retailers to send clothes and other goods from China directly to American shoppers without paying tariffs. The rule allowed products up to US$800 to avoid levies and other red tape as long as they were shipped directly to US consumers or small businesses. It resulted in the rapid growth of e-commerce platforms like Shein and Temu, but made it difficult for US manufacturers to compete with the surge of low-cost Chinese products. Other tariff threats: The President has issued a broad range of other tariff threats in recent months, including new duties on semiconductors and pharmaceutical products. Trump has also targeted the film industry, saying he would put a 100% tariff on movies made outside the US, and warned Apple that it could face a 25% duty on iPhones made in other countries. Trump has taken aim at so-called BRIC nations, which include Brazil, Russia, India, and China. He recently threatened on social media to impose an additional 10% tariff on 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS.' He has also singled out the EU, which he has said was formed to 'screw' the US. The bloc faces a tariff of 50% if it cannot reach an agreement with the Trump Administration. Why is Trump using tariffs? Trump's point of view appears to be that any trade deficit — when the value of goods the US imports from a country is more than what it exports to that country — is bad. He has long described bilateral trade deficits as examples of America's being 'ripped off' or 'subsidising' other countries. The President and his advisers say their goal is to make the tariffs so painful that they force companies to make their products in the US. They argue that this will create more American jobs and push up wages. But Trump has also described tariffs as an all-purpose tool to extract concessions from other countries. The President also maintains that tariffs will rake in huge sums of revenue that the government can use to pay for domestic tax cuts. Economists say tariffs cannot simultaneously achieve all of the goals that Trump has set. In fact, many of his aims contradict one another. The same tariffs that are supposed to increase US manufacturing are also making life painful for US manufacturers, by disrupting their supply chains and raising the cost of their raw materials. 'All of these tariffs are internally inconsistent with each other,' said Chad Bown, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington think-tank. 'So what is the real priority? Because you can't have all those things happen at once.' Who pays for tariffs, and where does the money go? A tariff is essentially a government surcharge on products imported from other countries. Tariffs are paid by the companies that import the goods. The revenue from US tariffs is paid by US importers to the US Treasury Department. For example, if Walmart imports a US$100 shoe from Myanmar — which now faces a 40% tariff — Walmart will owe US$40 in tariffs to the US government. What happens next? 1 Walmart could try to force the cost onto the Myanmar-based shoe manufacturer, by telling it that Walmart will pay less for the product. 2 Walmart could cut into its own profit margins and absorb the cost of the tariff. 3 Walmart could raise the price of the shoes at its stores. 4 Or some combination of the above. In May, Walmart's chief executive cautioned that tariffs would push the company to start raising prices soon, and it refrained from projecting profits for its current quarter. Trump, in turn, scolded the retailer on social media, telling it to 'EAT THE TARIFFS' and keep prices down. How have companies responded? One way to understand how companies are reacting to the tariffs is to think about Christmas. The production of toys, Christmas trees and decorations is usually in full swing by now. It takes four to five months to manufacture, package and ship products to the US. And factories in China produce nearly 80% of all toys and 90% of Christmas goods sold in America. Toy makers, children's shops, and specialty retailers have begun pausing orders for the winter holidays as the import taxes have cascaded through supply chains. Mattel, the US toy company and maker of Barbies, said it would raise prices on US toys because of Trump's tariffs on imports from China. How could tariffs affect consumer prices? Tariffs are widely considered by economists to be a catalyst for price increases. A company may be unable to absorb the cost of tariffs or force it onto overseas manufacturers or suppliers and may lay that cost at the feet of its customers. But price increases have yet to show up in a significant way in broad measures of inflation like the consumer price index. How could that be? For one, rising inflation is a matter of when, not if, economists say, and we may start to see prices increase later this northern summer. And if products haven't got more expensive yet, it's partly because businesses stocked up on goods before levies were imposed, allowing them to hold off on raising prices until those stockpiles run out. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Scoop
6 days ago
- Scoop
Public Debt, Japan, And Wilful Blindness
I just heard on Radio New Zealand a claim by a British commentator, Hugo Gye (Political Editor of The i Paper), that the United Kingdom (among other countries) has a major public debt crisis, and that if nothing is done about it (such as what Rachel Reeves – Chancellor of the Exchequer – is wanting to do), then in 2070 the public debt to GDP ratio would reach an 'extreme' level of 270% of GDP (gross domestic product). He added for good measure that no country in the world has public debt at a level anything like that. (Refer UK: Macron meets the King, RNZ, 10 July 2025.) So I checked the International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2025, and found the following about Japan, the world's fourth-largest national economy, looking at years from 2010 to 2024, with respect to government gross debt and general government financial deficit: minimum debt 206% (in 2010) maximum debt 258% (in 2020) average debt 234% current debt 237% (in 2024) projected debt 232% (in 2030) minimum deficit 2.3% (in 2023) maximum deficit 9.1% (in 2010) average deficit 5.3% current deficit 2.5% (in 2024) projected deficit 5.3% (in 2030) Advertisement - scroll to continue reading Japan does not have a 'cost of living crisis'. Below is a list of Japan's interest (source: and inflation rates (again the reference period is 2010 to 2024): Japan is a prosperous country, with high life expectancy (85, the highest in the world for large economy nations), a very high ratio of retired people to working-age people, low inflation, and low interest rates. It was able to host the Olympic Games in 2021 without any financial fuss, and is about to host World Expo 2025. It has some of the world's most sophisticated infrastructure. Despite its high government debt – actually, to a large extent because of its high government debt – Japan's is a creditor economy. Japan is not in debt to the rest of the world. Japan's national debt is non-existent. Japan's government debt is widely acknowledged, however, to be the world's highest. Too many commentators – using wilful laziness – conflate national debt with government debt. Japan's is the world's most successful twenty-first century large economy. It operates by Japanese savers lending much of their savings to their government at very low interest rates; those savers prefer to lend to their government rather than to pay high taxes to their government. Prosperous Japanese people are not greedy in the way that many rich westerners are. Their mantra is 'private wealth, public wealth'; not 'private wealth, public poverty'. Japan's is not a zero-sum economy; in a zero-sum economy the prosperity of some comes at the expense of the impoverishment of others. Hugo Jye was negligently dishonest – a case of wilful blindness or ignorance – in claiming that no countries had anything like 270% of GDP government debt. Western economists and financial commentators are likewise wilfully negligent in failing to alert their countries' governments that there is an alternative – in plain sight – to our woeful policies of financial suffocation. Note about three other economies Within the European Union, it is rare for professional commentators to sing the praises of Spain and Italy. Spain, with 101% public debt, is enjoying a low inflation economic boom. It has a life expectancy of 83, higher than all European Union countries other than Malta and Luxembourg. Spain has had only government budget deficits since the surpluses of the years leading up to the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (a crisis which hit Spain particularly badly). Despite – no, because of – these accumulated deficits, Spain's public debt (as a percent of GDP) has been falling since 2020; the deficits stimulated GDP. Spain had one year of high inflation (8.3% in 2022; the next highest since 2020 were 3.05% in 2011 and 3.0% in 2021); it recovered very quickly from that one year. Spain's current interest rate is 2.15%. Italy had 135% government debt to GDP in 2024. Its people's life expectancy is high, marginally lower than Spain's and slightly higher than New Zealand's; significantly higher than Germany, Netherlands and the United States. Italy's economy has been growing faster than the European Union average. Its public debt (compared to GDP) has been falling despite government deficits. Spain and Italy are doing relatively well despite having among the highest older-person to younger-person age ratios in Europe. Spain is pro-actively utilising immigrant labour, whereas Northern Europe is scapegoating immigrants. And Spain, unlike most of Europe, is not looking to its 'Defence' budget to boost future growth. Türkiye's public debt has fallen from a high (since 2006) of 40% in 2021 to under 30% in 2023. This is despite double-digit inflation since 2016 and an average budget deficit since 2011 of 5.3%. While high inflation has benefitted Türkiye by bringing about negative real interest rates (meaning interest payments effectively flow from richer to poorer, generally benefitting indebted Turkish businesses and households), current interest rate settings look like suffocating for Türkiye for the remainder of the 2020s. (This monetary policy of suffocation is also true for Australia in 2025, with its particularly hawkish Reserve Bank at present.) Despite challenging geopolitical and climatic circumstances, Türkiye has, at least until 2024, managed to achieve rising living standards for a substantial majority of its people. Unlike the United Kingdom and some northern European countries, Türkiye has not been a crisis economy despite (or because of) a reputation for unsound public finance. ------------- Keith Rankin (keith at rankin dot nz), trained as an economic historian, is a retired lecturer in Economics and Statistics. He lives in Auckland, New Zealand. Keith Rankin Political Economist, Scoop Columnist Keith Rankin taught economics at Unitec in Mt Albert since 1999. An economic historian by training, his research has included an analysis of labour supply in the Great Depression of the 1930s, and has included estimates of New Zealand's GNP going back to the 1850s. Keith believes that many of the economic issues that beguile us cannot be understood by relying on the orthodox interpretations of our social science disciplines. Keith favours a critical approach that emphasises new perspectives rather than simply opposing those practices and policies that we don't like. Keith retired in 2020 and lives with his family in Glen Eden, Auckland.
Otago Daily Times
6 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Prince William like ‘just another guy': inventor
Orepuki farmer and Kiwi Econet inventor Grant Lightfoot met Prince William during the prince's surprise visit to the UK's regenerative agriculture festival, Groundswell. PHOTO: SUPPLIED Orepuki eco-farming inventor Grant Lightfoot has taken his edible bale netting to the world — including British royalty. Mr Lightfoot introduced his award-winning eco invention to Prince William during the prince's surprise visit to the United Kingdom's regenerative agriculture festival; Groundswell, last week. A festival official had organised for Prince William to stop at Mr Lightfoot's stall because he was the stall holder that had travelled the furthest. After a quick chat with one of the prince's team, who had already heard about the edible bale netting, Mr Lightfoot stood at his stall ready for the prince's arrival. "I had my card in my hand and my brochure ready . . . " However, after speaking on stage, the prince headed off in another direction. "He had six security guards, and the crowd. There was just thousands of people around. And me being me, I just bee-lined for him and stopped him. And before the security guys could get a word in, I started talking about my edible bail net. The prince, as the eldest son of the reigning British monarch, inherited the Duke of Cornwall title and estates, becoming custodian of 52,172ha of land across 19 counties. Mr Lightfoot invited the prince to see the eco-friendly bale net. "It was so funny. Everyone just [did] a complete U-turn and came straight over to see me and my bail." Orepuki farmer and Kiwi Econet inventor Grant Lightfoot with his product. PHOTO: APL FILES During a brief chat with the prince, he explained the benefits of the wrap and how it could be eaten by stock animals and saved the environment. "I spoke to him like he was just another guy, and he spoke to me the same way. He took my business card, my brochure and said, 'we'll be in contact'." A video taken of the meeting and shared on social media platforms had gone viral, Mr Lightfoot said. Two days before Groundswell, the Southland farmer decided on an unscheduled early morning stopover at Jeremy Clarkson's Diddley Squat farm. But he initially took a wrong turn into Mr Clarkson's neighbour's property. "So I went up there and got talking to the film guy — they were just about to start filming. "He said, 'you know you're trespassing, blah blah blah'. "I said, 'no, I didn't know that. I thought I'd just drive up and say g'day." "Once I told him who I was, the attitude changed." The show's producer expressed an interest in featuring Kiwi Econet on Mr Clarkson's show sometime in the future. By Toni McDonald
