Beijing's Cyberattack Allegation Against NSA Adds to Signs of US–China Decoupling: Analysts
As tensions escalate between China and the United States, Beijing has accused a U.S. security agency and others of conducting cyberattacks on critical infrastructure. Analysts believe this situation indicates a broader trend of economic decoupling between the two nations.
State media Xinhua reported on April 15 that Chinese authorities accused the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) of launching cyberattacks during the
Asian Winter Games
in Harbin, the capital of Heilongjiang Province, in February.
Chinese cybersecurity experts claim they traced instructions found in Heilongjiang's critical infrastructure back to the U.S. agency, according to the news report, which was republished on the website of China's Ministry of Public Security, the country's top espionage agency.
Beijing's announcement follows a report released by China's National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center on April 3 that highlights allegations of overseas cyberattacks targeting the information systems of the Asian Winter Games. The report claims that these alleged attacks, which it said occurred between Feb. 7 and Feb. 14, came mainly from the United States and its allies.
In response to a request for comment on Beijing's cyberattack accusation, the U.S. State Department said it is aware of the situation.
Related Stories
4/17/2025
3/8/2018
'The reality is that Chinese cyber actors continue to target the United States,' a State Department spokesperson said in an emailed statement to The Epoch Times on April 20.
'We have been clear that China's pervasive and irresponsible cyber activity is unacceptable.'
'Targeting U.S. critical infrastructure networks must stop.'
Chinese police are also pursuing three individuals they allege are NSA agents involved in the alleged cyberattacks, according to Xinhua. They claim that Katheryn A. Wilson, Robert J. Snelling, and Stephen W. Johnson targeted China's infrastructure and companies, including telecom giant Huawei.
The Chinese authorities encouraged the public to come forward with information, promising unspecified rewards for any tips, according to the report. No personal details, including photos or information about the accused individuals' whereabouts, have been released.
In response to an inquiry from The Epoch Times, the NSA on April 20 declined to comment on the matter.
Chinese officials claim to have evidence suggesting that the University of California and Virginia Tech were also involved in these alleged cyber incidents, according to Xinhua, but they did not provide details to support the claim.
The University of California told The Epoch Times on April 21 that it is looking into the matter, while Virginia Tech did not respond to a request for comment by publication time.
Trade War
Although it's not the first time Beijing has publicly pointed fingers at U.S. entities for alleged cyber espionage, analysts suggest that the timing of this accusation is significant, given the backdrop of an ongoing tariff war between the world's two largest economies.
China has vowed not to
Furthermore, China's Ministry of Culture and Tourism issued a notice on April 9 advising its citizens to fully consider the risks when considering traveling to the United States, citing 'deterioration of China–U.S. economic and trade relations.'
Three days later, China's National Film Administration announced
Yeh Yao-Yuan, a tenured professor at the University of St. Thomas in Houston, told The Epoch Times that Beijing's latest cyberattack accusation is a reaction to U.S. tariff hikes and an escalation in the ongoing cyber conflict.
He suggested that this exchange also reflects a broader trend of decoupling between the two nations.
'The U.S.–China relationship is heading toward a trajectory of the first Cold War, and both sides are likely to drift further apart,' Yeh said on April 18. 'Ultimately, countries around the globe will have to make choices about where they stand.'
Sheng Xue, a Chinese writer and human rights activist, believes that Beijing's latest claim of cyberattacks is part of the regime's propaganda efforts.
With U.S. tariffs exceeding 100 percent, China's ailing economy is under mounting pressure, but the leadership in Beijing aims to portray itself as a 'power capable of striking back,' Sheng told The Epoch Times on April 18.
In this context, Beijing is seeking to create 'an external enemy' to divert public attention away from domestic issues and incite anti-American sentiment among the people, Sheng said.
News coverage is shown on a large screen outside a shopping mall during coverage of U.S. tariffs, in Beijing on April 11, 2025.
Greg Baker/AFP via Getty Images
Cyberattacks by CCP
The latest development coincides with growing concerns in Washington about Chinese cyber espionage activities under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
In March, the Trump administration
In January, U.S. authorities imposed
The House Select Committee on the CCP convened a
'The CCP has targeted the grids that power our homes, the facilities that treat our water, and the hospitals that care for us as part of their cyber warfare on the American people,' Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), chairman of the House panel, said in his opening remarks.
'We must understand that this isn't just a cyber threat,' Moolenaar said. 'This is part of the CCP's larger strategy to destroy the American way of life.'
Luo Ya contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China summons Nvidia over 'backdoor safety risks' in H20 chips
WASHINGTON (AP) — China's cyberspace regulators on Thursday summoned Nvidia over security concerns that its H20 chips can be tracked and turned off remotely, the Cyberspace Administration of China said on its website. In the meeting, Chinese regulators demanded that the U.S. chip company provide explanations on 'backdoor safety risks' of its H20 chips to be sold in China and submit relevant materials, the office said. 'Cybersecurity is critically important to us. NVIDIA does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them,' an Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement to AP. It came just about two weeks after the Trump administration lifted the block on the computing chips and allowed Nvidia to resume sales of H20 chips to the Chinese market. Jensen Huang, chief executive of Nvidia, made the announcement with fanfare when he was in Beijing earlier this month. The latest episode appears to be another turbulence in the tech rivalry between the United States and China, which have left businesses in both countries tussling with governments over market access and national security concerns. Any safety concern by Beijing could jeopardize the sale of H20 chips in China. Citing unnamed U.S. AI experts, the Chinese regulators said Nvidia has developed mature technology to track, locate and remotely disable its computing chips. The regulators summoned Nvidia to 'safeguard the cybersecurity and data security of Chinese users,' in accordance with Chinese laws, the statement said. The statement also referred to a call by U.S. lawmakers to require tracking and locating capabilities on U.S. advanced chips sold overseas. In May, Rep. Bill Huizenga, R.-Michigan, and Rep. Bill Foster, D.-Illinois, introduced the Chip Security Act that would require high-end chips to be equipped with 'security mechanisms' to detect 'smuggling or exploitation.' The bill has not moved through Congress since its introduction. Foster, a trained physicist, then said, 'I know that we have the technical tools to prevent powerful AI technology from getting into the wrong hands.' The U.S. still bans the sale to China of the most advanced chips, which are necessary for developing artificial intelligence. Both countries aim to lead in the artificial intelligence race. The Trump administration in April blocked the sales of H20 chips, which Nvidia developed to specifically comply with U.S. restrictions for exports of AI chips to China. After the ban was lifted, Nvidia expected to sell hundreds of thousands more H20 chips in the Chinese market. But the easing of the ban has raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill. On Monday, a group of top Democratic senators, including Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer, wrote to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to express their 'grave concerns". While chips like the H20 have differing capabilities than the most advanced chips such as Nvidia's H100, 'they give (China) capabilities that its domestically-developed chipsets cannot,' the senators wrote. Shortly after the ban was lifted, Rep. John Moolenaar, R.-Michigan, who chairs the House Select Committee on China, objected. 'The Commerce Department made the right call in banning the H20. Now it must hold the line,' Moolenaar wrote in a letter to Lutnick. 'We can't let the CCP use American chips to train AI models that will power its military, censor its people, and undercut American innovation," Moolenaar wrote, referring to the Chinese Communist Party by its acronym. Didi Tang, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio
American Military News
40 minutes ago
- American Military News
Innovative Chinese dissident uses cryptocurrency to fund his activism
This article was originally published by Radio Free Asia and is reprinted with permission. To skeptics, a meme coin is a fast way to make a cheap buck. For exiled activist Li Ying, it's been a way to bankroll a pro-democracy community that's challenging Chinese censorship and authoritarian rule. Li, 32, is better known by his handle on the social media platform X: 'Teacher Li is not your teacher.' He's built a following of more than 2 million by posting news that Chinese authorities don't want people to see. Last December, he branched out to launch $Li, a form of cryptocurrency modeled after his own social media avatar — a hand-drawn tabby cat. The goal was to provide financial support for his initiatives to crowd-source data from inside China on social issues like overwork by students and laborers with an aim to promote change. But his move split the Chinese diaspora. While some supporters rallied behind Li, many activists and former supporters of Li condemned the launch as a fraud and an act of self-dealing. On its debut, $Li reached a market capitalization in the tens of millions of U.S. dollars. But the price quickly plunged. As of the time of reporting, $Li's market cap had dropped more than 80%, to less than $2 million. Li concedes that his personal reputation took a beating, but he says that the coin's launch has stimulated a debate about how cryptocurrency might be used to fund the activities of dissident groups beyond the reach of governments — not least the long arm of the Chinese Communist Party. As an exiled influencer challenging Beijing's censorship machine, Li said he has been facing threats and pressure from Chinese authorities. Li said he lost his job in Italy, had his bank accounts in China frozen, and struggled to make a living through individual donations. In 2023, he publicly disclosed that his ad revenue from X averaged just €568 per month (about US$650) — well below the average monthly income in Italy. 'I had no choice but to launch a cryptocurrency,' Li told RFA. According to a statement issued by Li on X, $Li had a total supply of 1 billion coins, with pricing left to market forces. A foundation was to be established to oversee the coin, with 19.5% of tokens held by the foundation and 2% held by Li himself. Li said he froze the majority of his own holdings because he has no plans to sell. The remainder has been used for payments to staff involved in initiatives promoting democracy in China. One of the managers of the foundation, Canada-based influencer 'Toronto Squareface,' stated in a post on his X account that the use of funds would be determined through a democratic process. All transactions would be publicly recorded and transparent under the blockchain technology. In a statement on X, Li said he plans to use the foundation to build community supporting initiatives that promote freedom of speech and press freedom in China.$Li will not hold any presale, meaning that there will be no early access sales to any investors, and the team has no authority to mint additional tokens. According to the latest data from a trading platform GMGN, there are 6,283 holders of $Li. Shortly after its launch, some platforms flagged $Li as a scam or high-risk token and banned its trading. Li explained to RFA that this was primarily because those platforms have Chinese ownership, such as the on-chain wallet OKX. He added that $Li was labeled a scam as part of a political attack by the Chinese authorities. Despite the reassurances offered by Li about the management of $Li, many of his supporters turned against him after its launch, accusing him of betrayal and opportunism. 'He (Li) has changed under immense pressure and the temptation of money,' wrote Huang Yicheng, an organizer and exile who participated in China's anti-Covid protests. He announced on X that he was cutting ties with Li. Huang accused Li of leveraging public trust to enrich himself, which Li denies. Others claim that under the guise of promoting democracy in China, Li's real goal was to exploit investors. Some critics even drew comparisons to Guo Wengui, the self-styled Chinese dissident and vocal supporter of Donald Trump. Guo was convicted on multiple counts of fraud and money laundering for allegedly using his online influence to scam followers out of more than $1 billion, including through a fraudulent cryptocurrency scheme. Li's supporters, however, view the meme coin's launch as an innovation in the civic movement. 'Li burst onto the scene like a disruptor no one expected,' said Jiangbu, who prefers to be identified by a pseudonym for security reasons. He's a Paris-based non-governmental organization activist focusing on social issues in China. Jiangbu, who once led overseas protests against China's zero-covid policy, said he's familiar with the slow grind of traditional non-profit work — securing grants, drafting reports, executing programs. 'What Li did was create money out of thin air,' said Jiangbu, who has served as a coordinator for one of the initiatives funded by $Li. 'The project is efficient, and everyone gets a little reward and has a real sense of participation. It's incredibly innovative.' According to Aaron Zhang, a member of Li's team who is also being identified by a pseudonym due to security concerns, staff chose $Li as a payment mechanism because of cryptocurrency's anonymity. This has made it difficult for the Chinese government to trace transactions back to individual investors, thereby protecting their safety. Despite the criticism Li has faced, he said he succeeded in building a cryptocurrency-based community capable of launching initiatives with real impact on China. 'Every time you come back from the brink,' Li said, 'you come back stronger.'
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
North Korea Openly Defies Sanctions With Help From China
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. North Korean oil tankers blacklisted by the United Nations have been transmitting their locations while operating in Chinese waters, openly flouting sanctions against the illicit transfer of energy to Kim Jong Un's regime and despite U.N. resolutions requiring Beijing to seize and inspect the ships. In an investigative report released on Thursday, the specialist outlet NK Pro said data from ship-tracking service MarineTraffic found at least five North Korean tankers had entered Chinese waters in July. Four were under U.N sanctions. A Newsweek map captured their partial tracks utilizing self-reported signal data captured by MarineTraffic and Global Fishing Watch. The Chinese Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment after hours. Why It Matters North Korea is not banned from importing oil but faces a U.N.-imposed 500,000-barrel cap per year. Countries must report any shipments of fuel to the international body. Russia faces restrictions on its oil exports including a G7-imposed cap, which Moscow has circumvented this with a sanctions-busting shadow fleet. The data indicates North Korean vessels were getting oil from Russia's Far East, too, and will continue to get the commodity under the protection of its closest allies, Beijing and Moscow, thus undermining the sanctions regime. What To Know NK Pro said the five North Korean tankers likely sailed to Chinese waters to pick up fuel. They included the U.N.-sanctioned ships Song Won 2, An San 1, Kum Jin Gang 3 and Sin Phyong 9. The latter three had also frequented an oil pier at Russia's Vostochny Port, in the far-eastern Primorsky region, which is the main hub for North Korean fuel runs, the outlet said. This image from 2008 shows Port Vostochny in Russia's far eastern city of Nakhodka where North Korean vessels have reportedly loaded Russian oil. This image from 2008 shows Port Vostochny in Russia's far eastern city of Nakhodka where North Korean vessels have reportedly loaded Russian fifth vessel, the Chong Ryong San, is not sanctioned but is suspected of transporting petroleum products to North Korea's main port of Nampho and conducting illicit ship-to-ship transfers, according to a U.N. report. All four blacklisted vessels had broadcast their locations this month off eastern or southeastern China, near the reports of Zhoushan, Taizhou and Fujian. It was a sign that China was following Russia in rejecting sanctions against North Korea, said Neil Watts, a sanctions specialist and former member of the U.N. Panel of Experts on Pyongyang. Between March and November 2024, Russia supplied North Korea with over a million barrels of oil, or twice the U.N.-imposed limit, likely in payment for military support, according to the BBC, citing satellite data from the U.K.-based Open Source Center. What People Are Saying Neil Watts, former member of the U.N. Panel of Experts: "The freer movements of North Korean vessels over the last two years, since the start of the war in Ukraine, suggest that China is following Russia in dismissing sanctions against North Korea." What Happens Next The North Korean tanker movements show Beijing's reluctance to enforce U.N. resolutions barring them from entering foreign ports, according to Watts, who added that such "brazen movements" are likely to continue as they see themselves untouchable under Russian and Chinese protection.
