BBC licence fee cost may now be determined by value of house in new proposal
TV license fees may start increasing based on the value of your home, as proposed by a BBC boss. Charmain Samir Shah has urged that the £174.50 fee be scrapped to make way for a progressive payment structure that is based on assets.
Speaking in an interview earlier this year, Mr Shah explained the fee would be tied to property bands and collected at the same time as council tax, which would come as his first major shake-up since taking over from Richard Sharp. He also shut down speculation that the TV licence would be scrapped for a Netflix subscription-style service, stating that it would "not meet the BBC's key role to offer something for everyone in the country.'
Viewers living in higher council tax bands would pay more for BBC service while those in lower bands may end up paying less than the current rate. Those who opt out of paying a TV licence would no longer be able to do so. The chairman believes this policy would reduce the need to prosecute people for not paying.
He told The Sunday Times: "It gets rid of the enforcement issue, which is a problem. The idea that not paying the licence fee is a criminal offence seems too harsh."
In Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, where there is no Council Tax, an alternative would have to be implemented.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy may also be open to it, having described the current model as "harder for poorer households to pay".
In the interview, he answered questions about changing the model of the BBC and rejected the proposal of a hybrid structure, which would see the broadcaster offering its basic services such as news for free and charging for content like drama or comedy series.
He continued to say that the advertising on the BBC would "kill off ITV", and dismissed the idea that the broadcaster should be funded solely by general taxation because it would "leave the BBC open to influence from the government of the day".
Samir Shah, 73, took over as BBC chairman in February 2024 after he replaced Richard Sharp, who resigned in April 2023.
At the moment, although there are concessions or free licences for certain groups, such as those over 75 who receive Pension Credit, the licence fee does not take personal assets into consideration.
The standard fee is charged at £174.50 per annum with a reduced rate of £58.50 for black and white subscriptions.
For viewers who are blind or severely sight-impaired, a 50% discount is available, bringing the cost down to £87.25.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
ASOS rolls out new loyalty scheme after banning UK shoppers for too many returns
It comes after ASOS faced backlash after shoppers said their accounts were closed down for making too many returns ASOS has rolled out its new loyalty scheme to UK shoppers. gives shoppers early access to new items and sales, as well as priority back-in-stock alerts and invites to events. There are different levels you can sign up for. The first tier is called Stylist and this is free to join. You'll be upgraded to the Curator when you spend £100 a year, Icon when you spend £350 and A-Lister when you spend £700. The rollout comes following a successful trial of in March this year. ASOS Head of loyalty Macy Hong said: 'Our customers want to engage with ASOS in a way that goes beyond just shopping. ' creates opportunities for them to connect with the brand, discover new fashion and gain access to exclusive experiences. 'It's a programme designed to reward loyalty while staying true to what makes Asos exciting and relevant – a dynamic fashion mix of our own brands and curated selection of partner brands.' It comes after ASOS faced backlash after shoppers said their accounts were closed down for making too many returns. ASOS has sent emails to some users, telling them their account will be shut in 30 days. The email reads: "After reviewing your recent return activity, we've noticed that it no longer aligns with our current policy." One shopper called Lucy told the BBC: "I probably spend at least £100 a month with ASOS - my latest holiday shop [over several orders] was £500. "Most of the time I have to order two sizes and then I'll return the one that doesn't fit - and ASOS sizing, especially its own brands, is very unpredictable." In a statement, Asos told the BBC: "We recently closed the accounts of a small group of customers whose shopping activity has consistently fallen outside our fair use policy. "This helps us maintain our commitment to offering free returns to all customers across all core markets." It comes after ASOS started charging £3.95 for returns last year. Consumer rights expert Martyn James recently explained whether ASOS is actually allowed to ban shoppers for making too many returns, in his latest Mirror column. He said: "Retailers can reserve the right to ditch you if they feel that you are misusing their services. This might include returning items that you've ordered, photographed yourself in on Instagram or TikTok then sent back. "There are a few isolated incidents where people have tried it on and had a night out in a nice frock with the tags on then shipped the clothes back! Retailers will know you've done this. But this is pretty rare. Looking at returns policies for the main online retailers, a cardinal sin is returning too many items."
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
What Rachel Reeves' tears at PMQs say about the government and Labour
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video At Prime Minister's Questions yesterday afternoon, Keir Starmer may have been the main event – but many people couldn't take their eyes off Rachel Reeves. The Chancellor was visibly distressed, wiping tears from her cheeks as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch tore into the government's climbdown over welfare the previous evening. According to Reeves' spokesperson, the reason she was upset was a 'personal matter, which – as you would expect – we are not going to get into'. That gap has left room for speculation, one of the favourite pastimes of politicians and journalists in Westminster. While some have linked her emotional state to her role or relationship with colleagues, the PM has dismissed those suggestions. But it's not possible to deny that those images had an impact. Messages of concern were posted by figures across the political spectrum, and the markets reacted badly to questions of whether Reeves was on the way out. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Bond yields – a key measure of economic trust in the UK government – jumped up considerably during PMQs, when Starmer ignored Badenoch's questions about whether the Chancellor was going to be sacked. They have since fallen back to where they were on Wednesday morning, after the Prime Minister told the BBC she would remain in her role 'for a very long time to come'. This morning, Reeves joined Starmer and Health Secretary Wes Streeting at the launch of the NHS 10-Year Plan. In a sense, it doesn't matter why Reeves was crying at PMQs – showing a bit of emotion doesn't affect people's ability to do their job. It's not hard to understand that politicians, particularly those at the top of government, are often under an immense amount of pressure. That can be exacerbated if – as seems to be the case here – something has happened in their personal life that they would rather keep private. The Chancellor appears to have had a bit of a disagreement with Speaker Lindsay Hoyle yesterday over her response to being told to keep her answers short in an earlier Parliamentary session. Other reports of rows with Deputy PM Angela Rayner or Starmer himself have, however, been denied. And in his interview with the BBC, the Prime Minister said: 'It's got nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what's happened this week. 'It was a personal matter for her. I'm not going to intrude on her privacy by talking to you about that, it's a personal matter.' Perhaps Reeves will feel comfortable telling the full story about why she felt the way she did at PMQs one day – perhaps she won't. Either way is fine. The country doesn't necessarily need to know every detail. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video What's true, though, is that those pictures seemed to reflect a broader sense of how the government might be feeling after almost exactly a year in power. More Trending Even if it's not the reason she was in tears yesterday, the Chancellor is likely to be deeply frustrated by the tight fiscal spot she finds herself in – a situation that wasn't helped by the chaotic welfare bill vote the day before. Speculation is rife that she may need to resort to raising taxes in her budget later this year after the last-minute scrapping of reforms to the Pip disability benefit left her without billions in expected savings. But if there's one reason for Reeves to be cheerful, it's those bond yields mentioned earlier. The fact they spiked amid concerns she was leaving and fell back when it was confirmed she was staying suggests the markets – an important source of support for any Chancellor – would rather she stays in No 11. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Almost 20,000 asylum seekers in 6 months proves a crucial point MORE: Full list of 38 New Look stores closing down in 2025 MORE: The stress caused by welfare reform flip-flopping left me feeling sick
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Starmer vows to reflect on welfare bill fiasco after ‘tough last few days'
Update: Date: 2025-07-03T07:58:55.000Z Title: Keir Starmer Content: Good morning. Tomorrow it will be a year since the general election, and on Saturday it will be one from the day when started forming a government. It has not been a good week to celebrate the anniversary. In a long interview with the BBC's Nick Robinson last night, only some of which has now been broadcast (the rest is coming later), Starmer defended Rachel Reeves, his chancellor, saying that she would be in office 'for a very long time to come' and that an undisclosed personal matter, not politics, was the reason why she was in tears at PMQs yesterday. As Graeme Wearden reports on his business live blog, UK government borrowing costs are down a bit this morning. Yesterday they rose after PMQs as bond traders responded to speculation that Reeves might be sacked, and replaced by a chancellor less committed to fiscal discipline. But that does not mean the political crisis for the government is over. In his BBC interview, Starmer said he needed to 'reflect' on what went wrong this week, when the government had to abandon the main thrust of its welfare bill about 90 minutes before MPs were due to vote on it. He said: I'm not going to pretend the last few days have been easy, they've been tough. I'm the sort of person that then wants to reflect on that, to ask myself what do we need to ensure we don't get into a situation like that again, and we will go through that process. But I also know what we will do and that's we will come through it stronger. Labour MPs would love to see the government 'come through it stronger' but with some tough decisions just postponed, and autumn tax rises all but inevitable, that won't be easy. This morning Starmer wants to focus on something else – his 10-year health plan. Here is Denis Campbell's preview story. Starmer will be speaking about this at a press conference this morning. Here is the agenda for the day: 9.30am: Angela Rayner, the deputy PM and housing secretary, gives a speech at a Local Government Association conference. 10.30am: and Wes Streeting, the health secretary, announce the 10-year NHS plan at an event in London. After 11.30am: Streeting is expected to make a statement to MPs about the 10-year NHS plan. 3.45pm: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing. (The usual morning one is not happening because of the PM's event.) Afternoon: Peers vote on the order banning Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
