logo
Transformation Fund: Fixing apartheid-era policy distortion

Transformation Fund: Fixing apartheid-era policy distortion

IOL News17 hours ago
Parks Tau, Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition (left) and Deputy President Paul Mashatile ahead of a business briefing on the Transformation Fund held at the Freedom Park Heritage Site and Museum in Pretoria on May 5, 2025.
Parks Tau
In 1994, South Africa inherited an economy that was structurally designed to exclude the vast majority of South Africans. Apartheid's distorted policies had created a dual economy: one of wealth and privilege and another of poverty and exclusion.
This calculated economic strategy, structured along racial lines, created white-owned mines, farms, and factories. At the same time, many black South Africans languished on the fringes of the economy in an underdeveloped informal sector.
Their meaningful participation in our nation's wealth was further eroded by discriminatory laws that restricted Black South Africans from owning land, accessing quality education, and entering skilled professions.
These economic distortions, which were implemented over hundreds of years, continue to plague our nation today as we grapple with one of the highest levels of economic inequality in the world, worsened by alarmingly high unemployment, especially among Black youth.
The country's Gini coefficient of 0.63 shows that our nation's income remains unevenly distributed, with the top 10 per cent of the population holding more than 85 per cent of household wealth. This persistent disparity undermines the development of an inclusive economy where all citizens participate and benefit.
The transformation we seek is about positive change and is the only logical path to long-term growth and the reduction of inequality. In deracialising ownership across our economy, we open more opportunities for black people, in particular women and the youth.
While the Constitution guides our work in creating a society with equal opportunities, we require a deliberate removal of structural obstacles to draw more people into the economy and mechanisms that advance our constitutional commitment to economic redress and transformation.
In this regard, the government plans to introduce the Transformation Fund to help level the economic playing field for emerging Black businesses, particularly those in key economic sectors such as manufacturing, agriculture and tourism who struggle to secure funding due to stringent lending requirements.
The fund will provide financial support, infrastructure and capacity-building to Black-owned businesses – in particular Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises, women and youth entrepreneurs, and people living with disabilities - who are often locked out of meaningful economic participation due to their lack of access to capital.
In fostering greater access to capital, business owners can invest in equipment, hire skilled staff, expand into new markets and ultimately quicken the pace of transformation in South Africa's economy. It is also expected to stimulate meaningful economic activities across all regions of our country.
A similar transformation initiative took place in South Korea, whose government actively worked with companies in the country to address market failures. Local businesses known as Chaebol were guaranteed loans from the banking sector, backed by the government. In the late 1980s, this led to rapid industrialisation with Chaebol businesses dominating the industrial sector in manufacturing, trading and heavy industries.
There was also great success in Malaysia's empowerment initiative, demonstrating what can be achieved through transformation. The country in 1970 found itself in a similar position we face today and began to transform its society and economy through economic empowerment. Its empowerment plan, the National Economic Policy, assisted with the redistribution of the country's wealth to the indigenous Malays known as Bumiputeras. Today, Malaysia is among the richest countries in Southeast Asia by GDP per capita.
The Transformation Fund we are proposing will operate through a transparent application process, where qualifying businesses, as well as partnerships, can apply for funding based on the project's potential for social impact, sustainability, and alignment with national development goals.
The fund will be anchored in contributions already made to the Enterprise Supplier Development and Equity Equivalent Investment Programme as part of our nation's B-BBEE policy. While no additional contributions are required over and above those made under our B-BBEE commitments, the voluntary co-funding by government and business of our transformation efforts can quicken the change we want in our economy.
In supporting the Transformation Fund, both the public and private sectors stand to benefit from the investment in future suppliers, customers, and innovators who will, in turn, build resilience and relevance in a fast-changing society.
In advancing the establishment of the fund, it is proposed that the fund will be managed by a dedicated governance structure to ensure transparency. A Special Purpose Vehicle will be established to ensure accountability to an Oversight Committee and a board that possesses the required skills and capacity.
The fund's draft concept document was released for public comment on 19 March 2025, and the comment period concluded on 28 May 2025. South Africans are encouraged to continue to actively engage on the fund, and more details can be found on the website www.dtic.gov.za.
The government plans to have the fund operational by the end of the year and capacitated with R100 billion. Once operational, it will assist in bringing real change to our economy and the lives of people. Let us turn transformation from a concept into practice as we make a real difference in others' lives and create a fairer society.
* Parks Tau is Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'A great pity': Ramaphosa slams DA's national dialogue withdrawal
'A great pity': Ramaphosa slams DA's national dialogue withdrawal

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

'A great pity': Ramaphosa slams DA's national dialogue withdrawal

President Cyril Ramaphosa said the national dialogue will continue without the input of the Democratic Alliance (DA). He was speaking at a joint media briefing with the President of Austria, Alexander van der Bellen, on Friday, 4 July. Ramaphosa described the DA's decision to withdraw from the national dialogue as 'hypocrisy'. He said it demonstrated a lack of principle. He said South Africans had called for a national conversation about the state of the country after 30 years of democracy. The head of the nation stressed that the dialogue is not a political platform but a collective discussion. Ramaphosa criticised the DA's withdrawal, saying it made no sense and was contradictory. He added that many South Africans were appalled by the party's behaviour. He expressed regret that the DA would deprive the people it represents of the opportunity to contribute to shaping the country's future. The president said the national dialogue will look at the country's governance and economic growth. As well as other aspects such as cultural, sports, and science-related matters. 'And I can name them all so that I can wet their [The DA] appetite. So that their tongues hang out and see that they are going to miss the biggest show in South Africa by defining themselves outside of the national dialogue. What a great pity,' Ramaphosa said. Ramaphosa added that he had anticipated the DA's withdrawal from the Government of National Unity (GNU) before the party pulled out of the national dialogue. This followed its member, Andrew Whitfield's axing from his position as deputy minister of trade and industry. At a media briefing on Friday, 27 June, DA leader John Steenhuisen also accused the African National Congress (ANC) of abusing its power. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news

Integrating AI in your business can be a double-edged sword
Integrating AI in your business can be a double-edged sword

Daily Maverick

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Integrating AI in your business can be a double-edged sword

AI promises to transform businesses with smarter systems and personalised customer experiences. But AI, like any tool, requires skill to wield. Without proper scrutiny, these tools can do more harm than good. The AI sales pitch is irresistible: automated customer service, hyper-personalised engagement, razor-sharp inventory forecasting. But AI, like any tool, requires skill to wield. 'AI isn't magic; it's math and data,' said Matthew Elliot, chief delivery officer at tech consultancy CloudSmiths. 'The more visibility you have into how it works and what it's doing, the safer your outcomes will be.' 'Safe' is the key word here. While AI can give any business an edge, it can just as easily entrench inequality, expose private data, or simply, much like humans, make bad calls. Riskier than you think According to Wendy Tembedza, partner at Webber Wentzel, the issue isn't whether or not to use AI – because most businesses already do. The problems creep in when the risks of its usage are not rigorously assessed. 'Businesses must carefully consider the intended use case of any AI tool and conduct a risk assessment prior to implementation,' she advised. 'This helps manage the risks that may arise from incorrect or inappropriate use.' Those risks include exposure to legal liability if systems fail to meet ethical or compliance standards. If an AI tool inadvertently discriminates, say by offering preferential pricing or marketing to customers living in urban areas that shop online, it poses the risk of enforcing bias. 'In a society where South Africans have unequal access to the internet, AI tools that learn only from online behaviour run the risk of generating biased results,' Tembedza warned. 'The resulting insights may fail to reflect the actual behaviours and preferences of the wider customer base.' Bad inputs, bad outcomes Much of the risk begins with the data. AI tools need clean, well-structured, and representative data to train on. 'Bad inputs make bad decisions,' Elliot said. 'If you don't know where your data came from or how your model behaves, you're flying blind.' TymeBank chief technology officer, Bruce Paveley agrees on that point. 'Bank data is carefully selected and scrubbed to ensure we don't put dirty data into our AI tools,' he said. 'We also allow our AI tools to use learning from other reliable sources to avoid bias toward our own ideas.' What is 'dirty' data? This refers to information that is inaccurate, incomplete, or outdated, hindering the performance and reliability of AI models Elliot reckons that bias is a human problem as much as it is a technical issue, and if your model isn't trained on diverse, representative data, it will leave people behind. To mitigate this, CloudSmiths has developed workflows that stress-tests models against real-world scenarios, using tools such as 'Objective Lens' to detect underrepresentation and misclassification. 'If your AI doesn't work for everyone, it doesn't really work,' Elliot said. Inventory gains, infrastructure pains Inventory management is one of AI's most lucrative use cases. Predictive tools can anticipate buying trends and automate restocking, which reduces waste. But again, the model is only as smart as the data it learns from. 'In practice, many retailers do not have centralised or well-organised data sets,' Tembedza said. 'If data used to train AI models are outdated, inconsistent or inaccurate, no level of technical sophistication can compensate.' Even when the data is right, legacy IT systems often aren't. 'Many retailers continue to operate on legacy information technology systems that may not support the integration of the AI tools they intend to implement,' Tembedza added. In Africa, up to 60% of businesses cited IT infrastructure as a major barrier to AI implementation, a survey by cybersecurity company Fortinet found. Modern, cloud-first businesses like TymeBank are less encumbered, but even their barriers are not always technical. 'The challenge was more adoption by our team members rather than a technical limitation,' said Paveley. 'Education and exposure were key enablers to get our team to embrace AI as a productivity tool rather than one that threatens their jobs.' Leak risks of generative AI When it comes to businesses that adopt and use AI, the most insidious risk does not necessarily come from a chatbot gone rogue but rather from employees pasting confidential information into ChatGPT. 'Never assume off-the-shelf AI is private by default,' Elliot said. He sees companies frequently underestimating the risk of intellectual property exposure and data leaks from generative AI tools. His advice: Use air-gapped or private models for anything involving intellectual property. Train staff on what's safe to input. Review AI governance legislation, like the EU's AI Act. Establish monitoring and evaluation frameworks from day one. 'There needs to be a policy to govern, rather than restrict, usage of AI in our business,' Paveley said. 'Our staff need to complete AI training to ensure they understand the power of productivity improvements but also for awareness of the associated risks.' Boost engagement, don't alienate Done right, the shiny promise of personalisation through AI can boost engagement. If not, it reinforces stereotypes and alienates customers and clients. 'The most ethical AI is also the most useful,' Elliot said. 'If users trust the experience, they are more likely to engage with it – and that's good for everyone.' 'Personalisation shouldn't enforce stereotypes; it should surprise you, teach you something new, or reflect who you're becoming, not just who you've been.' Helpful or harmful? For all its potential, AI certainly doesn't solve problems on its own and certainly not by default. 'The questions are similar from what we hear every day from our South African and UK clients,' Elliot said. 'Typically it's concerns around safety, fairness, cost or return on investment. It seems most businesses are desperately trying to minimise AI risk while staying competitive.'

National dialogue: Ramaphosa slams DA ‘hypocrisy', says party will miss out on ‘biggest show in SA'
National dialogue: Ramaphosa slams DA ‘hypocrisy', says party will miss out on ‘biggest show in SA'

The Citizen

time4 hours ago

  • The Citizen

National dialogue: Ramaphosa slams DA ‘hypocrisy', says party will miss out on ‘biggest show in SA'

The president also questioned the DA's decision to remain in the GNU. President Cyril Ramaphosa has strongly criticised the Democratic Alliance (DA), accusing the party of hypocrisy after it pulled out of the much-anticipated national dialogue. The DA's decision followed Ramaphosa's removal of Andrew Whitfield as Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition. The party has opted to remain within the government of national unity (GNU) despite harsh criticism of the president's actions and threats to table a motion of no confidence. Ramaphosa on DA's withdrawal from national dialogue Addressing the matter at a press conference held at the Union Buildings in Pretoria alongside Austrian President Alexander Van der Bellen, Ramaphosa described the DA's withdrawal from the dialogue as both 'unfortunate' and a 'real shock to me'. He reminded the DA that all participating parties had agreed to the dialogue process when signing the GNU statement of intent. 'Every party signed to that, and it is rather surprising to hear a leader of the Democratic Alliance saying they never agreed to that in the first place.' 'That is the worst form of hypocrisy that I've ever heard,' the president said, in the presence of DA leader John Steenhuisen. ALSO READ: DA threats 'irresponsible': Ramaphosa 'amazed' at Steenhuisen's reaction over Whitfield dismissal Ramaphosa reiterated that the national dialogue was not a 'party political platform', but rather a collective initiative. He confirmed that the dialogue would proceed regardless of the DA's involvement. 'What is wrong with the dialogue? Nothing is wrong with the dialogue. It's about people getting together. 'So what I can say is that the national dialogue will continue without the participation of the Democratic Alliance, and we will probably have a very, very successful dialogue without diversionary inputs or interference from a party that does not have the interests of South Africans at heart.' 'The National Dialogue is a platform for all South Africans to craft a shared vision of the kind of a society we seek to build and agree on the actions we need to take to realise that vision. The dialogue will proceed as planned.' ~President @CyrilRamaphosa #AustriaInSA — The Presidency 🇿🇦 (@PresidencyZA) July 4, 2025 The president added that by refusing to participate, the DA was going to 'miss the biggest show in South Africa' that would discuss various issues. 'What a great pity,' Ramaphosa remarked. Ramaphosa insists national dialogue will proceed Former president Thabo Mbeki has also criticised the DA's stance in an open letter. Mbeki described the party's actions as both misguided and disrespectful to the South African public, dismissing the DA's claim that the dialogue was merely an ANC election campaign platform. Ramaphosa reacted to Mbeki's sentiments. 'He's also appalled, as many South Africans are appalled at the behaviour of the Democratic Alliance.' READ MORE: 'Bring all to dialogue': Experts insist national dialogue must be people-driven He further questioned the logic behind the DA's continued presence in the GNU while opposing the national dialogue. 'It's the strangest behaviour I've ever seen. And when they met, we thought that they were going to withdraw from the government of national unity. What did they come with? 'They come with saying no, no, no, no; we want to stay in the government of national unity, but we're boycotting the people of South Africa. 'What a contradiction. It makes no sense. So national dialogue will go on,' Ramaphosa concluded. Steenhuisen pushes back Meanwhile, Steenhuisen questioned the timing and setting of Ramaphosa's remarks. 'I don't think that intemperate attacks on a public platform when you have a visiting head of state next to you is the appropriate forum to do that,' he told the media. The DA leader said he intended to discuss with the president his appointment to the inter-ministerial committee (IMC) overseeing the national dialogue. 'I never asked to be on the IMC.' Responding to Mbeki's letter, Steenhuisen claimed the dialogue was 'an inside closed shop deal with the ANC.' 'Clearly, there's been a free flow of information, meetings, discussions around budgets and etc. that have not even taken place with members of the government of national unity. 'The first I found out that there was a R700 million price tag on this thing was when I read it in the media.' Steenhuisen maintained the dialogue was an ANC strategy to rebuild political support ahead of the 2026 local elections. He further contended that the matters set for discussion in the dialogue would not be effectively implemented by ministers linked to corruption scandals. 'A dialogue isn't going to feed anybody. It's not going to build a single house. 'It's not going to create a single other job and nothing we do or say is going to do that unless we get out there and vigorously implement the medium-term development plan, which is the adopted program of government,' Steenhuisen added. NOW READ: 'Hijacked' by the ANC? Maimane issues National Dialogue warning

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store