
UK High Court rejects bid to halt Palestine Action terror list ban
Lawyers representing Huda Ammori, co-founder of the pro-Palestinian direct action group, appeared before the court on Friday to challenge the decision by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to proscribe the group under terrorism laws.
But after the hearing. judge Mr Justice Chamberlain said: "I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order of force.
'In reaching this decision I have borne in mind my assessment of the merits of the claim at this early stage.'
The ban is scheduled to take effect this weekend. A further hearing is scheduled for 21 July when thr group is expected to apply for a judicial review to overturn the ban.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Palestine Action, known for targeting companies involved in the Israeli arms trade, has denied any links to terrorism and described the government's move as politically motivated.
During the hearing, lawyers for Ammori criticised the government's assessment, highlighting that plans to proscribe the group had been in place as early as March, well before last month's incident claimed by the group at RAF Brize Norton where two military planes were sprayed with red paint.
"Why move to proscribe before then? They put their bodies on the line between the genocide and violations of international law and the munitions and airplanes," said Blinne Nessa Aine Ni Ghralaigh, one of Ammori's legal representatives.
"The context for why the Home Secretary has proscribed Palestine Action is materially relevant - and that is the situation in Gaza. It is an annihilation, it is a genocide, according to rights groups, leading academics, scholars, and many states including Ireland."
Aine Ni Ghralaigh added that the proscription could cause 'irreparable harm' to individuals and civil society groups, warning that vague and ambiguous language in the order could lead to widespread self-censorship and a broader chilling effect on protest and free expression.
Friday's hearing aimed both to pause the implementation of the ban and to determine whether Palestine Action can mount a full legal challenge against the proscription order.
Israel's war on Gaza: Who are Palestine Action? Read More »
The government's order to proscribe the group followed a vote in Parliament on Wednesday, during which MPs approved the order.
Alongside Palestine Action, the proscription order also included the Maniacs Murder Cult, a neo-Nazi group, and the Russian Imperial Movement, a white supremacist organisation.
The move came after Palestine Action activists broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire last month using electric scooters and sprayed two RAF planes with red paint. Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned the act as 'disgraceful,' while the Ministry of Defence claimed the activists caused £7 million in damages.
Following the parliamentary vote, Palestine Action criticised the Home Secretary for "bundling our domestic civil disobedience protest group in with two violent neo-Nazi militias".
"Many MPs told us that, as a consequence, they felt they did not have the option to vote against the measure," the group said in a statement.
Ten Labour MPs, including Liverpool MP Richard Burgon, voted against the government. Burgon warned that the ban risked 'criminalising thousands of volunteers and supporters.'
Outside the High Court on Friday, hundreds gathered to protest the government's designation of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation.
The court proceedings came a day after four activists linked to the RAF Brize Norton protest were denied bail at Westminster Magistrates' Court.
The defendants - Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29; Jony Cink, 24; Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 35; and Lewie Chiaramello, 22 - were charged with conspiracy to commit criminal damage and conspiracy to enter a prohibited place for purposes prejudicial to national safety.
District Judge Daniel Steinberg denied bail over concerns that the four might commit further offences if released. They are due to appear at the Central Criminal Court on 18 July for a plea hearing.
During Thursday's bail hearing, several supporters were ejected from the courtroom after chanting 'Free, free Palestine' as proceedings concluded.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Hamas ready to start ceasefire talks 'immediately'
Hamas said on Friday it was ready to start talks "immediately" on a proposal for a ceasefire with Israel in Gaza, after holding consultations with other Palestinian factions, reported AFP. "The movement is ready to engage immediately and seriously in a cycle of negotiations on the mechanism to put in place" the terms of a draft truce proposal received from mediators, the group said in a statement.


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Two Palestinians arrested in Israeli raid in occupied West Bank
Israeli forces arrested two Palestinians as they stormed the village of Rummana, located west of Jenin in the occupied West Bank, according to the Wafa news agency. Separately, Israeli settlers have attacked a Palestinian Red Crescent Society ambulance. Wafa reported that Israeli soldiers and settlers opened fire and used tear gas in clashes with local Palestinians, but no injuries were reported.


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump says Gaza ceasefire deal could be next week
US President Donald Trump said Saturday that it was a 'good thing' that Hamas has responded in 'positive spirit' on a US-brokered ceasefire proposal. Speaking to journalists on board Air Force, he said that there could be a deal on a Gaza ceasefire by next week, but added that he has no information regarding the current state of negotiations. Meanwhile, Israeli media reported that Israel has received Hamas's response on the ceasefire proposal and is currently looking into details. In the late hours of Friday, Hamas has said it has given its response to the ceasefire proposal to the mediators after consultations with Palestinian forces and factions. 'The movement has submitted a positive response to the mediators, and the movement is fully prepared to immediately enter into a round of negotiations regarding the mechanism for implementing this framework,' the group said in a statement posted on Telegram. In response, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad movement announced its support to Hamas's plans to start negotiations with Israel on a ceasefire in Gaza, but demanded additional 'guarantees' to ensure the truce would be permanent. 'We presented [Hamas] a number of detailed points on the mechanism for putting in place the mediators' proposal, and we want additional guarantees to assure us [that Israel] will not resume its aggression after [the captives] are freed,' Islamic Jihad said in a statement.