Almost half of people do not think 10-year plan will boost GP access
More than four in 10 also believe the 10-year plan will make no difference or will not improve waiting times in A&E.
However, there is huge support for some of the ideas included in the blueprint, with the overwhelming majority backing the creation of neighbourhood health centres, the expansion of the NHS app and more mental health support in schools and colleges.
The 10-year health plan was unveiled by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer earlier this month, and set out a series of shifts to bring care much closer to people's homes, reducing the reliance on hospitals and A&E.
Key reforms include an enhanced NHS app, giving patients more control over their care, new neighbourhood health centres open six days a week and at least 12 hours a day, and new laws on food and alcohol to prevent ill health.
A survey of 1,023 adults in Britain, conducted by Ipsos for the PA news agency, asked people how they think the plan will impact access to healthcare, such as getting a GP appointment, A&E waiting times and waiting times for routine hospital treatment.
Some 35% said the plan will have no impact on getting a GP appointment, while 14% believe it will make things harder.
This compares with the 29% of people who said they think it will make getting an appointment easier.
More than a third (37%) said it will make no difference to waiting times in emergency departments, while almost one in 10 (9%), said they believe it could worsen waiting times, compared with 30% who said it will improve them.
Meanwhile, 31% said the plan will have no impact on waiting times for hospital treatment, 11% believe the plan will worsen waiting times and 34% said they think the measures will help.
However, a number of proposals outlined in the plan were strongly backed by the public.
Some 84% said they supported the creation of a single patient record, while 78% backed the creation of neighbourhood health centres, 73% support the expansion of the NHS app and 72% are in favour of more mental health support in schools and colleges.
However, more than a quarter (27%) of people do not support making hospitals fully AI enabled, compared with 44% who would back the move.
Almost one in five (18%) said they would not support so-called 'patient power payments', which would allow patients to hold back some of the payment for their care if they are not satisfied, while 42% would support the measure.
Some proposals aimed at helping people to lead healthier lives were also strongly supported.
A ban on the sale of high-caffeine energy drinks was backed by 78% of people, while 69% back plans to restrict junk food advertising.
However, almost one in five (18%) tended to disagree with measures that could see alcoholic drinks labelled with nutritional information, although 57% backed the move.
One in four people think the measures included in the plan will make no difference to patients, the poll found.
Almost one in 10 (9%) said they think the changes will make things worse, while 35% believe it will improve the health service.
A similar proportion, 23%, said the 10-year health plan will make no difference to NHS staff, while 13% said it could make things worse and 33% believe it will have a positive effect.
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'We're getting on with the job of delivering for patients, with NHS waiting lists falling by 260,000 since July 2024, delivering more than 4.6 million additional appointments since the general election and recruiting over 1,900 extra GPs to fix the front door of the NHS.
'Backed by an additional £29 billion, our 10-year health plan will seize the opportunities provided by new technology, medicines and innovation to deliver better care for all patients, no matter where they live or how much they earn, and better value for taxpayers.
'It is no surprise the plan is popular with patients, it was the result of the biggest conversation with staff, patients and the public since the formation of the NHS, with more than a quarter of a million contributions.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
10 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Officials urge those who left school without lifesaving vaccine to get protected
It comes amid warnings that more than 418,000 children have left school with no protection against human papillomavirus (HPV) in the last three years. The HPV vaccine is offered to boys and girls when they are in Year 8 and is key to wiping out cervical cancer in the UK. Around 13 high-risk types of HPV are known to cause 99.7% of cervical cancers. The jab also protects against genital warts and head and neck cancers, such as those in the mouth or throat. Now, GP practices in England will invite 16 to 25-year-olds to have the vaccine if records show they did not have it in school. According to NHS England, more than 418,000 children left school without having the jab in the last three years, with concerns there are many more people aged 16 to 25 who are not protected. Dr Amanda Doyle, national director of primary care and community services, said: 'This vaccine is hugely important in our fight to eradicate cervical cancer but it isn't just for girls and women – it's also vital for boys and men to get vaccinated to protect themselves against cancers of the mouth, throat or genitals, while preventing spreading the HPV infection to sexual partners who could then develop cervical cancer. 'Too many lives are lost to cervical cancer so the hard work of NHS staff across the country in vaccinating and screening as many people as possible will help us to meet our ambition of wiping out this disease. 'Encouraging progress has been made recently in increasing uptake but we know there is much more to do. 'So if you're eligible for a HPV vaccination or are the parent of a child who is eligible, but didn't get the vaccine at school when they had the chance, I would urge you to come forward when your GP contacts you. 'Only a single dose is required and it could save you or your child's life.' Data shows that in the 2023/24 academic year, some 76.7% of girls and 71.2% of boys aged 14 to 15 were vaccinated against HPV by Year 10. Uptake in Year 8 increased to 72.9% among girls and 67.7% among boys, from 71.3% and 65.2% respectively a year earlier. The health service will aim to boost uptake among girls to 90% as part of plans to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040. It will also aim to increase the number of women attending cervical cancer screening appointments. Public health minister Ashley Dalton said the vaccine 'is our most powerful tool in our fight to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040' but said there is a 'long way to go'. 'Thousands of young people are still unvaccinated and vulnerable to this disease – which is so easily prevented,' she added. Last month, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) warned young women in some parts of England are at greater risk of cervical cancer because not enough children are getting the jab. Analysis by the agency showed inequalities in vaccine uptake in some regions – by Year 10, HPV coverage in girls was lowest in London (64.9%) and highest in the South East (82.7%). Among boys, it was also lowest in London (58.9%) and highest in the South East (77.3%). Meanwhile, at local authority level, Year 10 vaccination levels in girls ranged from 38.7% (Lambeth in London) to 97.6% (Northumberland). Among boys, it ranged from 28.2% (Lambeth in London) to 92.2% (West Berkshire). Dr Sharif Ismail, consultant epidemiologist at UKHSA, said: 'We know that uptake of the HPV vaccination in young people has fallen significantly since the pandemic, leaving many, many thousands across the country at greater risk of HPV-related cancers. 'This is a real concern as each HPV vaccine, now just a single dose offered in schools, gives a young person good protection against the devastating impact of these cancers, which includes cervical, genital, mouth and throat cancers. 'This new catch-up campaign is a really important opportunity for us to make sure that no teenage girl or boy, young woman or man is denied that protection.'
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Two London boroughs record among highest measles cases in UK
Two areas of London are among the highest in the country for measles rates, as the government renews calls for parents to stay up to date with their children's vaccinations. Between January and June, 46 cases of the virus were laboratory confirmed in the borough of Hackney, making it the local authority with the second highest rate in England. According to the latest government data, Newham is also placed in sixth place with 24 cases recorded in the first six months of 2025. Bristol had the highest number of measles cases, with 47 confirmed cases, with Leeds, Salford and Essex also appearing in the top eight locations. This places the east London borough just two cases behind Birmingham, which has a population of 1.1m and has been at the centre of previous measles outbreaks. Overall, 44 per cent of all cases have been confirmed in London, followed by the North West and the East of England with 12.10 per cent each. Last year, there were more than 2,000 confirmed measles cases in England - the highest number recorded annually since 2012. Data shows that the highest percentage of cases affects the one to four years old age group, accounting for 31.80 per cent of cases. Earlier this month, a child in Liverpool died of the virus with health secretary Wes Streeting calling for the nation to 'redouble its efforts' to vaccinate more children. Measles is highly infectious and can lead to serious complications. People with this infection have a number of cold and flu-like symptoms and a rash appears a few days after symptoms start. On rare occasions, measles can also lead to meningitis and brain swelling, which can cause long-term disabilities or even death. Since 1 January 2025, there have been 529 laboratory-confirmed measles cases reported in England, according to UKHSA data which was released on July 3. NHS England figures covering 2023/24 show that not a single vaccine met the target needed to ensure diseases cannot spread among youngsters. The World Health Organisation (WHO) says to achieve herd immunity – which stops illnesses transmitting across the population – at least 95 per cent of children should receive their set of vaccine doses for each illness. Figures show 91.9 per cent of five-year-olds had received one dose of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine, the lowest level since 2010/11, while just 83.9 per cent had received both doses, the lowest since 2009/10. Uptake of the first MMR dose at 24 months stood at 88.9 per cent in 2023/24 – again, the lowest since 2009/10.
BBC News
11 minutes ago
- BBC News
Care home nurse suspended over attempt to cover up errors
A nurse has been suspended after attempting to cover up several failings at a Glasgow care Amoabeng was found to have committed a number of errors in May 2021 while working at Oakbridge Care Home in the city's Knightswood mistakes included locking a resident in their room for up to half an hour, not correctly assessing another resident following a fall, and trying to get two colleagues to give a "misleading impression" about events. The Nursing and Midwifery Council heard Mrs Amoabeng was suffering difficult personal circumstances at the time, and has no other incidents on her record during a near 30-year career. However the regulator ruled that her "dishonesty was not at the lower end of the scale and was extremely serious."The three person panel added that her decisions "brought the profession into serious disrepute by your departure from the fundamental tenets" of the profession. Resident 'in pain and discomfort' While working the nightshift on 15 May 2021, Mrs Amoabeng was found to have locked a resident in their bedroom for up to 30 minutes, as well as locking other residents in their created a "significant risk of potential harm" to the first resident in particular, who was left in an agitated accepted these charges, as well as one that stated she later moved another resident without using a hoist after they fell and suffered a potential fracture - a decision the panel ruled was "not wholly unexpected".Mrs Amoabeng disputed charges that she advised the resident should be left and regular checks should be conducted, and that any decision on whether to call an ambulance be left to the day shift when they arrived for these charges were proved by the regulator, which found the resident was agitated "because of the pain and discomfort they were experiencing" after the fall, and that an ambulance should have been called immediately. It was only when a care assistant challenged Mrs Amoabeng's decision that an ambulance was called. 'Very serious issues of dishonesty' Following the fall, she was found to have asked two colleagues on multiple occasions to say the resident had been able to walk to was found to have "left a profound impact" on two witnesses, who were shocked. Mrs Amoabeng denied this charge but the panel ruled she had committed dishonest actions to create a "misleading impression" of the incident. It stated these were "very serious issues of dishonesty" and her actions "did fall seriously short of the conduct and standards expected of a nurse." The panel ruled: "While there is no evidence of actual harm being caused there was a significant risk of unwarranted harm to residents. "Your misconduct had breached the fundamental tenets of the nursing profession and therefore brought its reputation into disrepute."However the regulator ruled the "clinical failings" - meaning the locked room and patient assessment charges - were unlikely to be repeated and that Mrs Amoabeng's most recent manager believed she was "kind, safe, and effective." It found there was a risk of repetition regarding dishonesty, and that her fitness to practice was impaired as a result. The panel decided to impose a suspension order for six months with a review, with a interim suspension order of 18 months in place to cover any appeal no appeal is made the interim suspension order will be replaced by the substantive suspension order 28 days after Mrs Amoabeng receives the hearing decision in writing.
