Care home nurse suspended over attempt to cover up errors
However the regulator ruled that her "dishonesty was not at the lower end of the scale and was extremely serious."The three person panel added that her decisions "brought the profession into serious disrepute by your departure from the fundamental tenets" of the profession.
Resident 'in pain and discomfort'
While working the nightshift on 15 May 2021, Mrs Amoabeng was found to have locked a resident in their bedroom for up to 30 minutes, as well as locking other residents in their rooms.This created a "significant risk of potential harm" to the first resident in particular, who was left in an agitated state.She accepted these charges, as well as one that stated she later moved another resident without using a hoist after they fell and suffered a potential fracture - a decision the panel ruled was "not wholly unexpected".Mrs Amoabeng disputed charges that she advised the resident should be left and regular checks should be conducted, and that any decision on whether to call an ambulance be left to the day shift when they arrived for work.However, these charges were proved by the regulator, which found the resident was agitated "because of the pain and discomfort they were experiencing" after the fall, and that an ambulance should have been called immediately. It was only when a care assistant challenged Mrs Amoabeng's decision that an ambulance was called.
'Very serious issues of dishonesty'
Following the fall, she was found to have asked two colleagues on multiple occasions to say the resident had been able to walk to bed.This was found to have "left a profound impact" on two witnesses, who were shocked. Mrs Amoabeng denied this charge but the panel ruled she had committed dishonest actions to create a "misleading impression" of the incident. It stated these were "very serious issues of dishonesty" and her actions "did fall seriously short of the conduct and standards expected of a nurse." The panel ruled: "While there is no evidence of actual harm being caused there was a significant risk of unwarranted harm to residents. "Your misconduct had breached the fundamental tenets of the nursing profession and therefore brought its reputation into disrepute."However the regulator ruled the "clinical failings" - meaning the locked room and patient assessment charges - were unlikely to be repeated and that Mrs Amoabeng's most recent manager believed she was "kind, safe, and effective." It found there was a risk of repetition regarding dishonesty, and that her fitness to practice was impaired as a result. The panel decided to impose a suspension order for six months with a review, with a interim suspension order of 18 months in place to cover any appeal period.If no appeal is made the interim suspension order will be replaced by the substantive suspension order 28 days after Mrs Amoabeng receives the hearing decision in writing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Parents of man who died in Colorado jail say nurses, deputies ignored his pleas for 15 hours
The parents of a man who died alone in a Colorado jail cell after an ulcer burned a hole in his digestive tract and left him in what they said was excruciating pain for about 15 hours filed a federal lawsuit Monday, accusing the jail's nurses and sheriff's deputes of ignoring his cries for help. The lawsuit blames them, local government officials and Southern Health Partners for failing to stop the death of Daniel Foard in 2023 by taking him to the hospital. Foard, 32, was a cook at a brewpub and user of fentanyl who was arrested for failing to appear in court. After being segregated and monitored for withdrawal from the synthetic opioid, he began vomiting and complained of stomach pain after being put in a regular jail cell, it said. The lawsuit alleges Southern Health Partners — the Tennessee-based company they contracted with to provide health care at the La Plata County jail — has tried to maximize its profits at the jail by only having one nurse on duty at a time, leaving it to medically untrained deputies to monitor sick inmates. The company holds hundred of contracts at jails around the country and the lawsuit alleges that is has been involved in lawsuits related to the deaths of at least five other jail inmates nationally. The company's lawyer, Shira Crittendon, said she had not seen the lawsuit and declined to comment on it. The sheriff's office referred questions about the the lawsuit to a county spokesperson. In a statement, the county said it had not analyzed the allegations in the lawsuit and does not comment publicly on active litigation. Autopsy found Foard died because of an ulcer Foard was found dead in the jail on Aug. 17, 2023, six days after he was arrested. An autopsy found Foard died as a result of a hole created by an ulcer in his small intestine, which caused inflammation of the tissue lining his abdomen. Such ulcers can let food and digestive juices leak out of the body's digestive tract. Fentanyl was found in Foard's blood but the autopsy report did not name that as a cause of his death. Dr. Michael Arnall ruled Foard's death was due to natural causes. On Aug. 15, 2023, even though Foard had collapsed several times and had trouble standing, he was moved out of an area where he could be more easily observed for problems with his withdrawal and put into a regular jail cell, staggering as we went, the lawsuit said. The day nurse ignored a deputy's concern that he was very unstable, according to the lawsuit brought by lawyers Dan Weiss, Anna Holland Edwards, John Holland and Erica Grossman. After a deputy delivering breakfast on Aug. 16, 2023 saw that Foard repeatedly fell while trying to get his tray, the jail's day nurse came to check on him, it said. She recorded that Foard reported he had sharp, shooting pain that was a '10' on a scale of one to 10, but she did not call for a doctor or send him to the hospital, it said. The nurse moved Foard to an empty cell where he could be monitored but didn't tell deputies what he was being monitored for and didn't order any follow up care or check on him, it said. He vomited all day and was moved to another cell and then a third because they had all become so messy with vomit, it said. Surveillance video showed him crawling to the final cell, where it said he continuously called out for help and yelled that he needed to go to a hospital, saying he was vomiting blood. The lawsuit claims that no one responded to his pleas but one deputy could be heard on surveillance video telling him to 'try to hit that drain' with his vomit to keep the cell from becoming dirty. Another nurse, working the evening shift, only walked by his cell and glanced inside, but did not assess him or provide care as he was pleading for help, the lawsuit said. When she did enter his cell around 10 p.m., Foard was dead, it said. She told state investigators that vomiting was normal for people withdrawing from fentanyl. State authorities investigated Foard's death The day shift nurse later told a state investigator that it was not unusual that Foard would not have had his vital signs checked for 12 hours because of the number of inmates the jail's nurses need to provide care, according to a report from an investigation by the Colorado Bureau of Investigations. She also said she didn't think there was anything different she could have done based on Foard's symptoms. The bureau's findings were forwarded to the 6th District Attorney's Office, which would decide whether any criminal charges were warranted in connection with Foard's death. It's not known whether the office decided to pursue any charges. A telephone message and email sent to District Attorney Sean Murray were not immediately returned. In a statement, Jim Foard and Susan Gizinski said they want everyone to know about their son's ordeal both to hold those they say are responsible for his death accountable and to change how inmates are treated at the jail. 'Just basic training in having compassion for others would be a great start. But adding more staff is critical too,' they said.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
There was no risk… Peggie would not have treated trans patients differently, boss tells tribunal
A hospital manager said she had no concerns for the safety of patients being treated by Sandie Peggie and details of the row which led to her being suspended was just 'she said/she said' hearsay. Sandie Peggie, 51, is suing NHS Fife and Dr Beth Upton after being made to change next to the born-male medic at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy. She was suspended after confronting the 30-year-old resident doctor in the female-only changing room. Yesterday service manager Lottie Myles told the landmark employment tribunal brought by the veteran nurse that the dispute was a 'she said/she said' situation where there was 'nobody who could provide evidence'. And the witness, who started work at NHS Fife just six months before the changing room incident, said there were no patient safety concerns and that Ms Peggie would not have treated trans patients differently to any others. The tribunal in Dundee entered its second week of the latest string of hearings yesterday. Just days after the changing room incident Mrs Peggie was suspended. Ms Myles reviewed the suspension later in 2024. The tribunal heard claims that Mrs Peggie was 'homophobic and there were elements of racism in her beliefs' but Ms Myles dismissed them as 'hearsay' and claims which 'haven't been documented or there's little evidence of'. The Accident and Emergency nurse had told the manager she would not treat a transgender patient any differently to anybody else, the tribunal heard. Ms Myles said: '[Mrs Peggie] has been a nurse for 30 years, I'm sure in that time she has dealt with transgender patients. 'I felt confident and reassured there were no patient safety concerns.' When patient safety concerns were raised, the tribunal heard, 'nobody could confirm' them and Ms Myles branded them 'hearsay'. Ms Myles, who made the decision to lift the suspension on March 7, told the tribunal two senior consultants and two senior nurses 'weren't happy' at the decision. But those expressing their concern were not able to give an 'accurate response' regarding the alleged patient safety concerns. The tribunal was told that Dr Kate Searle had 'expressed unhappiness' at bringing Mrs Peggie back to work. It was told: '[Dr Searle] made a comment saying there had been patient safety issues, there had been other behaviours towards a doctor. 'I asked if this had been investigated and reported appropriately, and she said no. 'I said that if these events had happened and they had not been reported, you were culpable.' Ms Myles had been asked to help oversee Mrs Peggie's return to work and had proposed she work in a different hospital. But this was rejected by the nurse. It was eventually agreed to put the pair on opposite shifts in what was described as a 'compromise'. On Friday NHS Fife published a statement online which critics have said was an attempt to 'smear' the veteran nurse and the charity supporting her. Yesterday Mrs Peggie's legal team said they have now asked the embattled health board to confirm the names of those who signed off on the statement. MSP Tess White, of the Scottish Conservatives, said: 'Senior officials should come clean over who authorised the outrageous statement issued last Friday, so that those responsible are made to carry the can.' The tribunal continues.
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Nurse at centre of trans doctor row accused of racism after suspension lifted
A nurse who complained about a transgender doctor using a hospital's female changing room was accused of racism by senior NHS staff, an employment tribunal has heard. Charlotte Myles, a service manager at NHS Fife, said she had reviewed a decision to suspend Sandie Peggie over the row with Dr Beth Upton, who was born male but identifies as female. Ms Myles told a tribunal in Dundee that senior figures at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy 'expressed unhappiness' at her decision to allow Ms Peggie to return to work. She said they claimed that the nurse was homophobic, had been 'racist towards a doctor' and that she supported Donald Trump's views on gender. She said Dr Kate Searle, who was Dr Upton's line manager, alleged there were 'patient safety issues' with allowing Ms Peggie to resume her nursing job. It was claimed that Ms Peggie had walked away from patients when Dr Upton arrived to treat them, including one who required resuscitation. But none of the allegations were reported at the time they were said to have occurred or were supported by documentation, she said. Ms Myles said they instead came from 'second, third-hand information' and the doctor who was the alleged subject of the racist comment did not recall it having been made. She said Ms Peggie 'wasn't happy' with the homophobia claims as 'I believe she has a daughter who is gay'. Nicole Peggie tweeted on Monday that her mother was 'my best friend'. Ms Myles said that the lack of evidence meant she did not consider the allegations when reaching her decision to end the nurse's suspension. She said claims that the nurse shared Mr Trump's views on gender were 'tittle tattle' and Ms Peggie was entitled to her private opinions if they did not harm patients. The Scottish Tories said: 'The scale of the witch hunt conducted against Sandie Peggie by her employers becomes ever more apparent and indefensible.' The row centres on an encounter between Ms Peggie and Dr Upton on Dec 24, 2023. The nurse experienced a sudden and heavy period and feared that it had bled through to her scrubs. Ms Peggie entered the female hospital changing room to find Dr Upton and challenged their presence. Within hours, a bullying complaint was lodged by Dr Upton and the nurse was suspended. In May 2024 Ms Peggie submitted a formal claim to an employment tribunal against NHS Fife and Dr Upton for sexual harassment, belief discrimination and victimisation. The nurse complained of being required to share a single-sex space with someone she believed to be male and being victimised for holding a gender-critical belief that biological sex is immutable. It emerged last week that Ms Peggie had been cleared of gross misconduct by an NHS Fife disciplinary hearing. However, the tribunal is scheduled to continue for another seven days, with Dr Searle giving evidence on Tuesday. After being asked to review the nurse's suspension on Feb 27 2024, Ms Myles said she concluded there was no risk to patients in Ms Peggie returning to work. But she said senior staff at the hospital 'weren't particularly happy with my decision' when she informed them. She name-checked Dr Searle and Dr Margaret Currer, who are both consultants in emergency medicine, and Esther Davidson and Louise Curran, two nurses who are Ms Peggie's line managers. After Dr Searle made the patient safety and racism allegations, Ms Myles said she challenged her whether they had been 'escalated and reported appropriately when these events happened'. Dr Searle said they had not and Ms Myles warned her that 'if these events had happened and there's been a failure to report' them, the doctor would be 'culpable' for any future incidents. Supporter of Donald Trump Ms Myles said Ms Davidson and Ms Curran had made similar allegations and she again asked them for the dates when the incidents occurred and whether they had been escalated. But she said they 'couldn't give me an accurate response' and it was 'all hearsay', leading her to take no action. Ms Peggie had received no previous complaints from patients or staff. Asked about Ms Curran's allegations, she said: 'Again, it was just very similar and, like you said, tittle tattle of being a supporter of Donald Trump and sharing his views on gender. 'But again, that's somebody's personal view. As long as it doesn't impact on patients and it doesn't impact on the workforce and actually doesn't cause harm to anybody within the board, then people are entitled to have their private views.' Ms Myles said Ms Peggie was alleged to have called a consultant a 'p---' but it 'took a while' for Ms Davidson to recall the identity of the alleged victim, who 'doesn't recall the comment'. The tribunal also heard that the nurse rejected a proposal to work at the Queen Margaret Hospital in Dunfermline so she and Dr Upton could avoid each other. Nicole Peggie, the nurse's daughter, responded to the homophobia allegations on X, saying: 'Jeez, do I need to go back under oath to clear this up? 'My mum is my best friend, has and always will be. Her only concern is if I'm happy.' Tess White, the Scottish Tories' shadow equalities minister, said: 'It's plain wrong that she was urged to work at a different hospital after pointing out that her right to access a single-sex space was being denied, while the lack of evidence for the racism allegation thrown at her suggests it was a crude smear.'
