Inside the mushroom trial: Death stares and cell issues
She had requested the trial be held in the small Victorian town of Morwell, where she was held underneath the local police station.
Had the trial been conducted in Melbourne, she may have been afforded more comforts from inside Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, a maximum security women's prison, where she was driven back to every weekend over 11 weeks.
On the first day of trial, Patterson's lawyers complained that she wasn't given a duvet, nor access to a computer and writing materials in her cell.
Erin Patterson passes her phone to police during a search of her home in August 2023. (Source: Supreme Court of Victoria)
ADVERTISEMENT
"At some stage, she was given a blanket, but she spent the night cold — and awake because she was cold — and she can't operate like that," defence barrister Colin Mandy SC said on April 29.
There had been "some suggestion to her that she wasn't going to get special treatment by custody officers", he said.
"Someone who is in police cells for five weeks, facing a murder trial... with a massive brief of evidence, should be afforded some accommodation," he said.
"Because in some ways... she requires special treatment so that we can do our job properly, so that she can provide us with proper instructions, so that she's not uncomfortable."
This was among many parts of the trial that the jury was not privy to, as these conversations occurred while they were out of the room.
But it can all now be revealed after Patterson was found guilty of murdering her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail, and his aunt Heather Wilkinson, along with the attempted murder of his uncle Ian Wilkinson.
Erin's Patterson's friend with the 'death stares'
ADVERTISEMENT
Patterson, who only had one supporter in court — her friend Ali Rose Prior. She was known among media to give death stares if you locked eyes with her.
Media were limited to six seats in the regional courtroom due to the immense interest, and because members of the public couldn't watch it remotely and had to attend in person.
Those seats were directly in front of Patterson in the court dock and, to catch a glimpse of her reaction during the trial, reporters had to swivel around and face her.
The Victorian woman was found guilty this week of murdering three of her former in-laws and attempting to kill a fourth with a poisonous lunch. (Source: 1News)
She would often turn her head on an angle and stare directly into the eyes of reporters — leaving a menacing impression.
Photographers and camera operators outside the court were banned from photographing Patterson during the trial, with a prohibition on "any images of the accused which suggest, expressly or impliedly, that she is in custody".
Estranged husband seeks court transcripts 'to grieve'
ADVERTISEMENT
One of the most bizarre moments the jury didn't see was in the early weeks of trial, when the estranged husband Simon Patterson was giving evidence.
During a break on May 1, he made a "small request" of Justice Christopher Beale.
"The legal process has been very difficult," he said. "I have a lot to grieve and am grieving a lot about all this stuff here, as I'm sure you can imagine.
"One thing that is really difficult is not being able to follow what happens."
He asked the judge if he could make available to him all of the transcripts from the trial and the pre-trial to help him "grieve the legal process".
Simon had attended court when he gave evidence with a PR adviser, Jessica O'Donnell, which led to a warning from Justice Beale after the judge was told he wanted to issue a statement to media mid-trial.
"Whatever his media adviser might be telling him, it seems to me the most prudent course for him is to defer any statement to the media until after the conclusion of the trial," the judge said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Media on notice to watch what was said
With the world's attention on the trial, the Supreme Court's media team, the judge and his associates were monitoring coverage including daily podcasts, live news blogs, radio programmes, blogs and television news crosses.
Justice Beale issued several warnings and referred two outlets to prosecutors for potential contempt including The Kyle and Jackie O Show on June 16.
He said the radio show "shock jocks" had commented on the case while on air and used it as an example to warn others on speaking about the trial.
1News Australia correspondent Aziz Al Sa'afin speaks to Breakfast in the wake of yesterday's verdict. (Source: Breakfast)
"I encourage all commentators to engage their brains before they open their mouths, as they may otherwise land themselves and their organisations in hot water," Justice Beale said.
A second referral to prosecutors was made by the judge about a visiting psychologist experienced in serial killers, who spoke about the case at an event in Melbourne on May 31.
ADVERTISEMENT
Network Ten was warned by the judge about saying it had been "another day of damning evidence" in a news story put to air, and the women-focused website Mamamia was told to take down a problematic podcast episode and Facebook post.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
2 hours ago
- 1News
Full scope of mushroom trial media circus revealed
The full scope of the circus surrounding the mushroom murder trial has been revealed as the biggest media matter the Supreme Court has managed in recent history. As the Victorian trial entered week 11 on Monday, almost double its expected six weeks, a jury returned with four guilty verdicts and convicted Erin Patterson of three murders and one attempted murder. Her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, all died after Patterson served them beef Wellington laced with death cap mushrooms in July 2023. A total of 252 media outlets had been interested in the case, the Supreme Court of Victoria confirmed this afternoon. This included 15 international media from the United Kingdom, the United States and New Zealand, which grew to 22 after the verdicts were handed down, a court spokeswoman said. ADVERTISEMENT There were nine authors, including acclaimed writer Helen Garner, seven podcasts, seven documentary film crews, including one from streamer Stan, and one drama series – ABC's Toxic. "These figures make the trial the biggest matter media-wise the court has managed in recent history," the court's media and public affairs manager Anthea Cannon said. The court actively monitored the extensive trial coverage and issued 16 directions to media to remove content, including four for social media commentary, she said. The working-class town of Morwell has been the backdrop of one of the world's most talked-about trials. (Source: 1News) Most were related to breaches of sub judice, a form of contempt related to publishing information that might improperly influence a jury, and a small number of inaccuracies were corrected. Cannon said the court was pleased with the quality and diligence of reporting, but was concerned some outlets and commentators with no direct contact with the trial were purporting to cover the case. "At least one such outlet has been referred to the Office of Public Prosecutions for contempt as a result," she said. ADVERTISEMENT "The way this trial captured the public's attention and was discussed and dissected in popular culture was particularly challenging and should serve as a reminder why the principle of sub judice exists – to ensure every person who appears in court is afforded a fair trial." Justice Christopher Beale told the trial, while the jury was out on June 16, that the Kyle and Jackie O Show would be referred to prosecutors for potential breach of sub judice for commenting about it live on air. 1News Australia correspondent Aziz Al Sa'afin speaks to Breakfast in the wake of yesterday's verdict. (Source: Breakfast) Meanwhile, the court has confirmed sequestered jurors were placed in the same hotel as the police informant Stephen Eppingstall and prosecutors while they deliberated. Justice Beale's associate emailed both defence and prosecution about the incident but said there had been no interaction between prosecutors, police and the jury. "The jury have had a separate floor to themselves and have eaten their meals in a conference room separate from other guests of the hotel. But all guests use the same entrance at the hotel," the email said. Most hotels had been booked out as national tennis table championships were being held in the Latrobe Valley at the same time as the jury entered its final days deliberating. ADVERTISEMENT On Monday morning, the prosecution emailed the associate to say they were no longer staying at the same hotel. The email said the informant had been staying in a different wing of the hotel and was using a different entrance to the jurors. "And he took steps to avoid common areas from the point that he became aware that they were there," the email said. The prosecution's legal team had to move from its accommodation on Friday and tried to move again when it became aware the jury was at its new accommodation. However, due to a lack of available accommodation, they could only move senior counsel and prosecution solicitors stayed at the same accommodation. "We confirm that the prosecution solicitors did not interact with the jury at any stage and also took steps to avoid any incidental contact in common areas," the prosecution email said. ADVERTISEMENT Patterson will next face court later in 2025 for a pre-sentence hearing.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Death By Fungi: Cashing In On Erin Patterson
She has become a notorious figure of international interest, shamelessly exploited for news cycles, commercial worth and career advancement. After a trial lasting nine weeks, conducted at the Latrobe Valley Law Courts in Morwell, Victoria, Erin Patterson, a stocky, thick set mother of two was found guilty for three murders and an attempted murder. Date: July 29, 2023 in the town of Leongatha. Her weapon in executing her plot of Sophoclean extravagance: death cap mushrooms (Amanita phalloides) served in a beef Wellington. Her targets: in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, and Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson. Of the four, only Ian survived the culinary killings - barely. Prudently, estranged husband Simon chose not to attend. News outlets thought it useful to produce graphics about this Australian's terminating exploits. CNN produced one with voyeuristic relish, making it appear much like a Midsomer Murders episode. Details aplenty are provided, including the gruesome end for the victims. 'Gail and Heather died on August 4 [2023] from multiorgan failure, followed by Don on August 5 after he failed to respond to a liver transplant.' Fortunately, Ian Wilkinson survived, but the rumour mongering hack journalist can barely take it, almost regretful of that fact: 'after almost two months of intensive treatment', he was discharged. Having an opinion on this case has become standard fare, amassing on a turd heap of supposition, second guessing and wonder. The range is positively Chaucerian in its village variety. The former court official interviewed about the killer's guilty mind and poisoning stratagems, stating the obvious and dulling. The criminologist, keen on career advancement and pseudo-psychology, attempted to get into Patterson's mind, commenting on her patent ordinariness. One example of the latter is to be found in The Conversation, where we are told by Xanthe Mallett with platitudinous and forced certainty how Patterson, speaking days after the incident, 'presented as your typical, average woman of 50.' If attempting to kill four people using fungi is a symptom of average, female ordinariness of a certain age, we all best start making our own meals. But Mallett thinks it is precisely that sense of the ordinary that led to a public obsession, a mania with crime and motivation. 'The juxtaposition between the normality of a family lunch (and the sheer vanilla-ness of the accused) and the seriousness of the situation sent the media into overdrive.' This is certainly not the view of Dr. Chris Webster, who answered the Leongatha Hospital doorbell when Patterson first presented. Realising her link to the other four victims suffering symptoms of fungi poisoning, Webster explained that death cap mushrooms were suspected. Asking Patterson where she got them, she replied with one word: 'Woolworths.' This was enough for the doctor to presume guilt, an attitude which certainly gave one of Australia's most ruthless supermarket chains a graceful pardon. 'She was evil and very smart to have planned it all and carried out but didn't quite dot every 'i' and cross every 't'.' The marketer, thrilled with branding and promotion, suggests how Patterson Inc. can become an ongoing concern of merchandise, plays and scripts. (Think of a shirt sporting the following: 'I ate beef Wellington and survived'.) The ABC did not waste much time commissioning Toxic, a show created by Elise McCredie and Tony Ayres, aided by ABC podcaster Rachel Brown. Ayres hams it up by saying that, 'True stories ask storytellers to probe the complexities of human behaviour. What really lies beneath the headlines? It's both a challenge and a responsibility to go beyond the surface – to reveal, not just to sensationalise.' Given that this project is a child of frothy publicity born from sensationalism and hysteria, the comment is almost touching. The media prompts and updates, mischaracterising Patterson as 'The Mushroom Murderer', leave the impression that she really did like killing fungi. But an absolute monster must be found, and the press hounds duly found it. Papers like the Herald Sun preferred the old Rupert Murdoch tactic: till the soil to surface level to find requisite dirt. According to a grimy bit of reporting from that most distinguished of Melbourne rags, 'the callous murderer, whose maiden name was Scutter before marrying Simon Patterson in 2007, was secretly dubbed 'Scutter the Nutter' among her training group.' The Australian was in a didactic mood, unhappy that the judge did not make it even more obvious that a crime, committed by a woman involving poison and 'not a gun or a knife', was equally grave. To complete matters was an aggrieved home cook, Nagi Maehashi, who also rode the wave of publicity by expressing sadness that her recipe had become a weapon for lethal effect. (Presumably, Maehashi did not have lethal mushrooms in her original recipe, but precision slides in publicity.) Overcome with false modesty in this glare of publicity, Maehashi did not wish to take interviews, but felt her misused work deserved a statement. 'It is of course upsetting to learn that one of my recipes – possibly the one I've spent more hours perfecting than any other – something I created to bring joy and happiness, is entangled in a tragic situation,' she moaned on Instagram. Those familiar with Maehashi will note her tendency to megalomania in the kitchen, especially given recipes that have been created long before she turned to knife and spatula. The ones forgotten will be those victims who died excruciatingly before their loved ones in a richly sadistic exercise. At the end of it all, the entire ensemble of babblers, hucksters and chancers so utterly obsessed with what took place in Leongatha should thank Patterson. Her murders have excited, enthralled and given people purpose. She will start conversations, fill pockets, extend careers and, if we are to believe some recent reporting, make meals for her fellow inmates in prison. Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He currently lectures at RMIT University. Email: bkampmark@
1News
14 hours ago
- 1News
Khandallah murder-accused disposed of bin bag in passing rubbish truck
CCTV footage shows murder-accused Julia DeLuney changed her clothes on the night of her mother's death, before fetching someone to help. She is accused of murdering her mother, 79-year-old Helen Gregory, in the woman's home in Khandallah, Wellington, on January 24, 2024 — to which DeLuney has pleaded not guilty. The high court jury was shown a number of video clips of DeLuney coming and going from her mother's Baroda Street house. CCTV footage from BP Johnsonville shows her arriving at 5.47pm — on the way to her mother's — wearing blue jeans and a vivid green shirt. She is seen putting petrol in her car, a black Citroen. She arrived at her mother's at 6.10pm, according to a neighbour's CCTV camera. ADVERTISEMENT The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Australian doctor speaks about first meeting with Erin Patterson, why Donald Trump's swearing about Vladimir Putin, and how science could bring the moa back. (Source: 1News) Between then and 9.40pm, when that same camera captured her leaving the house — pictured as only a tiny figure holding a light at the top left of the screen — the Crown says she violently attacked her mother, leaving her dead or dying in one of the bedrooms, before staging the scene to look like she had fallen from the attic. Her clothing is not discernable in the nighttime CCTV footage. But the defence says Helen Gregory did fall from the attic and DeLuney went to get help, in which time someone else caused those fatal injuries. Later that night, footage from a different petrol station, Mobil Johnsonville, shows DeLuney arriving in the forecourt at 9.50pm — only minutes after she left her mother's — wearing a pink top, black pants and black shoes, and with wet hair. Constable Timothy Stott, who was on the stand to walk the jury through the footage, told the court there appeared to be a black plastic bag on the passenger seat — although he stressed he could not say for certain. The cameras captured DeLuney walking to the after-hours window, where she bought a lighter. ADVERTISEMENT The footage shows she is wearing bright red or orange nails, but one is missing from her thumb, which is visible as she presents her debit card. The bin bag and the early morning rubbish truck The jury also heard DeLuney disposed of a black bin bag in a passing rubbish truck the morning after the death. Footage was captured by cameras attached to the back and sides of a truck doing its rounds in Paraparaumu Beach on 25 January. The truck's driver, Gavin Twist, told the court a woman approached him outside Moby Dickens Bookshop just before 7am. The defence does not dispute that this woman was DeLuney. Video footage from the truck's cameras shows her carrying a large black bin bag, cradled in her arms, as she walked down the footpath. ADVERTISEMENT The truck had just emptied a red wheelie bin, which Twist said contained waste from the bookshop, when DeLuney approached. Twist said: "So she had asked, very nicely, if she could [...] put the bag in the bin. And I — because it's early morning, big day for me — I just went, 'Yeah'." The footage shows DeLuney leaning over the red wheelie bin to put the bundle inside it, and then the truck's automatic arm picks up the bin again, and tips the black bag into the truck. Another camera, with a view of the truck's contents, shows it being pushed aside with a sweeper arm and compacted into the other rubbish. The trial is in its third week and is expected to take up to five in total, with the defence yet to call its witnesses.
