logo
Manipur High Court asks NIA to submit progress report on Jiribam abduction, killing of women and children

Manipur High Court asks NIA to submit progress report on Jiribam abduction, killing of women and children

The Hindua day ago
The Manipur High Court has asked the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to file a detailed progress report on the investigation into the abduction and killing of six women and children from the Meitei community amidst the flare-up in the ethnic conflict seen in Manipur's Jiribam district last November.
Also read: Why is Manipur's Jiribam district on edge? | Explained
This came up when a Bench of Chief Justice K. Somashekar and Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the office-bearers of the civil society organisation Uripok Apunba Lup, a conglomerate of dozens of local clubs in the Uripok area.
The petitioners had called for detailed records of the case, and prayed for directions to arrest those involved in the crime, and a speedy and time-bound probe into the case. In a July 7 order of the Bench, the High Court said it had almost been seven months since the incident and 'no progress report is submitted by the NIA'.
The court said the NIA's advocate had sought additional time to come back to it with a detailed progress report 'in terms of the chargesheet'. The court went on to direct the NIA to submit the 'detailed progress report in terms of chargesheet before the concerned court of Law'.
'If chargesheet is not filed, this matter should be viewed seriously,' the court added. The High Court has listed the matter for the next hearing on July 24.
After the November flare-up in the ethnic conflict in Manipur's Jiribam district, the NIA had taken up two other cases for investigation, apart from the abduction and killing of the six women and children from the Meitei community.
One was for the alleged rape and burning alive of a Kuki-Zo woman, Zosangkim (31), in Jiribam on November 7; and the alleged attack on a Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) post in Jiribam's Borobekra on November 11, in which 10 armed militants were gunned down.
Earlier, in the hearing of this PIL, the Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) had filed an affidavit before the court, arguing that since the Jiribam cases were a matter of 'law and order, they fall under the State government'. This statement had come even after the NIA, a central agency, had taken over the cases.
Since this affidavit of the MHA, however, Chief Minister N. Biren Singh resigned, and Manipur was placed under President's Rule.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kerala HC cancels KEAM rank list, orders fresh evaluation
Kerala HC cancels KEAM rank list, orders fresh evaluation

India Gazette

time2 hours ago

  • India Gazette

Kerala HC cancels KEAM rank list, orders fresh evaluation

ANI 10 Jul 2025, 00:38 GMT+10 Kochi (Kerala) [India], July 9 (ANI): The Kerala government has filed an appeal against the High Court single bench order quashing the KEAM rank list. The appeal will be considered by the Division Bench on Thursday. The High Court quashed the Kerala Engineering, Architecture, and Medical (KEAM) exam results announced by the government after consolidating marks in the new formula. The single bench of the High Court also ordered that the KEAM rank list be revised. The state government announced the KEAM results last week based on the new formula, considering the long-standing complaint of Kerala syllabus students that marks were being reduced due to mark consolidation. Hana Fathima, a student who passed Plus Two in the CBSE syllabus, filed the petition, questioning the consolidation of marks in the rank list. The state government announced the results last week based on the new formula, considering the long-standing complaint of Kerala syllabus students that marks were reduced due to the consolidation of marks. The Plus Two student approached the High Court challenging this. The High Court's action accepted the student's argument that the prospectus was changed at the final stage of the admission process. The High Court's verdict also took into account the argument that CBSE students had lost the weightage they had earlier due to the new equation for consolidation of marks. The government had announced yesterday that the rank list was prepared by considering the marks obtained in the entrance exam and Plus Two together. There were complaints that when the previous equation was prepared, Kerala syllabus students scored 15 to 20 marks less than CBSE students. Justice D K Singh delivered the ruling, observing that the revised method of calculating engineering entrance ranks adversely affected students from the CBSE syllabus. (ANI)

"Movie against terrorist mindset...not against any community or religion": Kanhaiya Lal's son on Udaipur Files
"Movie against terrorist mindset...not against any community or religion": Kanhaiya Lal's son on Udaipur Files

India Gazette

time2 hours ago

  • India Gazette

"Movie against terrorist mindset...not against any community or religion": Kanhaiya Lal's son on Udaipur Files

New Delhi [India], July 9 (ANI): Amid a controversy over the Udaipur Files movie, based on the 2022 murder of tailor Kanhaiya Lal in Rajasthan's Udaipur, Lal's son on Wednesday emphasised that the movie is made to oppose the 'terrorist mindset', and does not target any particular religion or community. The movie has faced sharp criticism for allegedly stoking communal tensions. Speaking to ANI, Kanhaiya Lal's son, Yash Sahu, said, 'The movie is releasing on 11th July. There were controversies earlier too, it had to be and Director did everything possible and showed what happened to my father; how he was killed under a terrorist mindset, under a sleeper cell are terrorists.' Sahu further claimed that he demanded a fast-track investigation into the case, and also an NIA special court's enquiry, but nobody listened to him. 'This movie is against a terrorist mindset, not against a community or has been 3 years now, and the case has gone cold. I demanded fast track, but it wasn't done. I demanded an NIA Special Court, but it wasn't done. Statements of only 14-15 people have been recorded in 3 years. So, when will the statements of 150 people be taken?... How long will it take for us to get justice?' he said. Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court on Tuesday directed a special screening of the film before ruling on petitions seeking to halt its release, scheduled for July 11. The directive came during Tuesday's hearing, where Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, representing the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), informed the court that 40-50 objectionable elements had already been removed from both the trailer and the film. The CBFC had proposed these cuts before certification, and they were duly implemented. A bench comprising Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Anish Dayal ordered the screening of the censored version for all counsels, including Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, who appeared for petitioners Maulana Arshad Madani (President of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind) and Prashant Tondon. (ANI)

26/11 Mumbai terror case: NIA files fresh charges against Tahawwur Rana
26/11 Mumbai terror case: NIA files fresh charges against Tahawwur Rana

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

26/11 Mumbai terror case: NIA files fresh charges against Tahawwur Rana

New Delhi: National Investigation Agency ( NIA ) on Wednesday filed a supplementary charge sheet at the Patiala House Court in Delhi against Tahawwur Rana in the 26/11 Mumbai terror case . The agency is probing a larger conspiracy case involving David Coleman Headley and Pakistan's ISI behind the attack. The 26/11 attacks, orchestrated by Lashkar-e-Taiba , claimed over 170 lives and left hundreds injured. Special NIA judge Chanderjit Singh has put the supplementary charge sheet for consideration on August 13. Meanwhile, the court has extended Rana's judicial custody till August 13. The court is to hear Rana's application for regular telephonic conversation with his family on July 15. Rana was produced before the special judge through video conferencing after the expiry of his judicial custody. He was extradited from the US in April this year. Rana's counsel Piyush Sachdev said that the supplementary charge sheet contains procedural documents like an arrest memo, seizure memo and other documents. NIA filed the main charge sheet in December 2011. On June 9, the court granted Tahawwur Rana permission to make a single phone call to his family for the time being. The call was strictly conducted in accordance with the jail regulations and under the supervision of a senior official from the Tihar Jail. Due to security concerns, he was presented virtually on the last date of hearing. Recently, NIA collected voice and handwriting samples from Rana. NIA had previously informed the court that Rana was confronted with substantial evidence related to the attacks. It argued for further custody, citing his evasive behaviour during questioning and lack of cooperation. Senior advocate Dayan Krishnan and special public prosecutor Narender Mann represented NIA while advocate Piyush Sachdeva defended Rana. Live Events

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store