US blasts ‘reckless' Macron as France is first G7 nation to recognise Palestine state – in ‘face slap' to Oct 7 victims
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
AMERICA has hit out at Emmanuel Macron for being "reckless" after he announced France will officially recognise a Palestinian state.
The White House described President Macron's controversial decision as a "slap in the face to the victims of October 7".
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
7
The US has hit out at Emmanuel Macron for being 'reckless' after he announced France will officially recognise a Palestinian state
Credit: AFP
7
Palestinians have been living out of tents in Khan Yunis surrounded by rubble for almost two years now
Credit: Getty
7
France will become the first G7 nation to view Palestine as its own state starting in September
Credit: AFP
France will become the first G7 nation to view Palestine as its own state starting in September, Macron said on Thursday.
Just 140 out of 193 UN members currently view the State of Palestine.
Notable exceptions include the US, UK, Italy, Germany, Canada and Japan.
Macron announced the move on X as he wrote: "True to its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognise the State of Palestine.
read more in Palestine
PUTIN'S USEFUL IDIOTS Pro-Palestine protesters damage military equipment headed to UKRAINE
"We must also guarantee the demilitarisation of Hamas, and secure and rebuild Gaza.
"Finally, we must build the State of Palestine, ensure its viability, and ensure that by accepting its demilitarisation and fully recognising Israel, it contributes to the security of all in the Middle East.
"There is no alternative."
A formal announcement will be made at a session of the UN General Assembly in New York in five weeks time.
Macron has already sent a letter to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas confirming his decision.
The US was quick to condemn Paris as Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington "strongly rejects" the announcement.
Starmer's barmy one in one out migrants plan has a fundamental flaw which means it WON'T work
Rubio issued a scathing statement on social media as he said: "This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace.
"It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th."
The US has been one of Israel's main allies since the Hamas terror attack sparked an all out war in Gaza back in 2023.
In the almost two years since, Israel has launched several military operations targeting those who helped to orchestrate the massacre.
The airstrikes, ground offensives and constant bombardments of the Gaza strip have led to serious concerns over the safety and future of Palestinian civilians.
At least 59,106 people have been killed in Gaza since, according to the Gazan health ministry.
And almost two million Palestinians have reportedly been displaced from the region.
Israel has vowed to continue on the war path until they have secured the release of all of the remaining hostages snacthed on October 7.
7
French President Emmanuel Macron meets with Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas last year
Credit: AFP
7
The US was quick to condemn Paris as Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington 'strongly rejects' the announcement
Credit: Getty
7
Hundreds of Palestinians seized trucks carrying flour as they entered in Khan younis the southern Gaza Strip on Thursday
Credit: Shutterstock Editorial
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also been adamant that Hamas must be wiped out in its entirety so they cannot attack ever again.
Netanyahu issued his own aggravated statement on France's move as he said it "rewards terror".
He also warned it "risks creating another Iranian proxy" in the Middle East where Israel has already been facing constant attacks from Hamas and the Houthis.
"A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel – not to live in peace beside it," Netanyahu said in a post on X.
"Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel."
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz described the move as "a disgrace and a surrender to terrorism".
Hamas praised Macron and said France's decision was a "positive step in the right direction" and urged all other countries to follow their lead.
Paris' decision is now set to place further pressure on those nations yet to declare a Palestinian state like the UK.
Sir Keir Starmer faces mounting calls, including from his own MPs, to join France and recognise a State of Palestine.
Starmer is yet to announce any such move but did release a statement on Thursday saying statehood is an "inalienable right of the Palestinian people".
But he believes a ceasefire in the region is a much more pressing issue to end the bloodshed.
Sir Keir said a temporary pause on the conflict would "put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution".
An "emergency call" between the UK, France and Germany is due to take place today to discuss "what we can do urgently to stop the killing".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
41 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Does anyone believe Starmer will grow a spine like Macron has?
Doug Maughan, Dunblane. In the name of God, go There have been many disturbing and distressing scenes in Gaza showing the effects of the profound upheaval on the people endeavouring to eke out an existence there. One would have to have a heart of stone not to be moved by these scenes, particularly those involving women and children. A scene which particularly moved me recently was of a young mother, ill in bed in hospital, saying goodbye to her young daughter, who had already been made ready for her funeral. I am reminded of the words of Oliver Cromwell to the Rump Parliament and later used by Leo Amery to Neville Chamberlain: "In the name of God go." Today I would direct these words to all those responsible for the inhumanity and cruelty being inflicted upon the ill-used people of Gaza. Ian W Thomson, Lenzie. • Just last week, we heard about the gargantuan efforts of mostly working-class musicians, led by the incredibly tenacious Bob Geldof to help people, thousands of miles away, who were starving. All it took was a broadcast by Michael Buerk to make Bob spring into action. With the undoubted help of Midge Ure, they saved thousands of lives. We found out recently that even the normally hard-hearted Tory government contributed. Today, we know that people are being deliberately starved by a so-called democracy by the name of Israel. The governments of the world, with a few exceptions, are allowing this to happen. Shame on them. It is being left, once again, to the people to point out how very wrong this is. Be in no doubt, these are crimes against God and humanity. Jane Porteous, Kinross. The West is complicit In your recent article '[[Israel]] strikes kill at least 20 in [[Gaza]] as Lammy threatens more sanctions' (The Herald, July 23) the Foreign Secretary is quoted as saying he is 'appalled and sickened by [[Israel]]'s actions in [[Gaza]]'. I suggest that Israel's actions with regard to its treatment of the Palestinians will go down in history as an extreme example of the inhumanity of which we as a species are capable. Being halfway through the third decade of the 21st century, we apparently have made little progress in our 'moral evolution'. I wish to pass on some sentences from an article by Rabbi Noa Sattath, Executive Director of the Association for Civil Rights in Israel which I read in the liberal/left Israeli newspaper Haaretz (July 22): 'Israelis forget that human beings live in Gaza. If people aren't human beings, they can be starved, beaten and raped. We need to extricate ourselves from the moral abyss into which we have tumbled.' I suggest that the 'we' referred to in the immediately previous paragraph is not just the Israeli government but those countries in the West which have aided and abetted Benjamim Netanyahu in his genocide. One way of our making reparations to the Palestinians would be for the UK to take the lead in working towards the implementation of the two-state solution. John Milne, Uddingston. Read more letters Other dates to remember Disturbingly, much of our media continue to imply that the current conflict in Gaza had its origin on October 7, 2023. Along with "9/11" the date is a shorthand for attacks in which Americans and Israelis died. I challenge you to tell me what September 16 or April 13 or April 9 represent. Significantly, few of your readers will know but it is your duty to remind them of these dates. On April 9, 1948 the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin was attacked by the Irgun and other Zionist terrorists and 107 civilians killed. The rest were driven out in this early attempt at ethnic cleansing. On September 16, 1982 the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila in Lebanon were attacked by Lebanese fascists, assisted by Israeli forces and between 1,500 and 2,000 men, women and children were massacred. On April 13, 1996 Israeli aircraft attacked a village in South Lebanon, Mansouri, after ordering the inhabitants to evacuate. The volunteer ambulance driver packed his own family and his neighbours into the ambulance to flee. The ambulance was rocketed, with the death of all it occupants except the driver. I could go on. The list is endless. So you see that this horror did not begin on October 7, 2023 and, for the Palestinians, it continues and is likely to do so until they are eliminated. Our press could do the right thing and commemorate these anniversaries. unless it is only the lives of Americans and Israelis that matter. I beg you to do so. David Currie, Tarland. But why Troon? Feeling sympathy for the poor residents of Prestwick and Turnberry, we didn't expect that The Donald's visit to Ayrshire would bother us. We were wrong. Our usual walk through Troon this morning (July 25), past Donald Crescent incidentally, was blocked by police, who have set up camp at the local high school, necessitating a detour round its perimeter. Is nowhere immune to the disruption he causes? David Bruce, Troon. 1,000 years? So what? I agree that "we must focus on nuclear" (Letters, July 24) because the closer we look, the more obvious it is to see what a dangerous pig in a poke it is. Your correspondent Peter Wright claims that discarded turbine blades cannot be sent to landfill – and in the next line, tells us that in the USA they are buried. He states that we are a clever species who will be able to reduce the half-life of toxic nuclear waste but he believes that we are incapable of ever recycling turbine blades. He, rightly, points out that concrete bases for turbines produce a lot of CO2 but omits to highlight the megatons of concrete required to build a nuclear power station and even more for waste storage. He tells us that Hitachi is experimenting with a reactor that might be able to reduce the half-life of nuclear waste from 30,000 years to a mere 1,000. I wonder if he can name an institute, government, empire or supervisory body that has ever survived that long, or more importantly, one in the future that could monitor the safe storage for that length of time and even less likely, one to provide that service for the waste we have already produced, with a 30,000 year half-life. David Hay, Minard. A truly sad loss I was truly saddened to hear of the passing of Sir Jamie McGrigor ("Tributes to 'kind and dedicated' former Tory MSP McGrigor who has died at 75", The Herald, July 23). Jamie devoted so much of his life to public service – first as an MSP and later as a councillor for Argyll and Bute. But more than his titles or years of service, it was the way he carried himself that left a lasting impression on so many of us. Thoughtful, kind, and principled, Jamie was someone who brought both wisdom and compassion to everything he did. I had the real honour of working alongside him on Argyll and Bute Council. He was never interested in attention or praise – he simply got on with the job and always kept the people he served at the heart of every decision. In a world where politics can often feel cynical or performative, Jamie was the real thing: steady, sincere, and deeply committed to making life better for others. He will be missed – not just as a public figure, but as a colleague and a good man. My thoughts and prayers are with his family, his friends, and all those across our community who had the privilege of knowing him. Rest in peace, Sir Jamie. Thank you for your service. Councillor Alastair Redman, Kintyre and the Islands ward, Islay. It's economics, not misogyny The lack of common sense, relativity and any basic understanding of how sponsors choose to invest their cash creates a spurious argument about gender injustice ("Fresh funding boost to resolve gender 'injustice' in Scottish golf", The Herald, July 24). All sports sponsorship is based on the value of brand exposure via the media and TV in particular. The whole assessment is based on viewing figures. Gender has nothing to with it. Indeed, the separation of male and female sports is, in itself, based on the belief that female sportswoman would struggle very badly to survive in any male version of a sport. Women's golf has made huge strides forward in the past 20 years, as has women's football. However, I headed along to Irvine this morning (July 24) to play at my course and passed by Dundonald Golf Club at around 9.30am. The Women's Scottish Open is being held there today. No traffic jams, no police directing traffic. Consider that compared to the men's event at the Renaissance Club recently. This is why TV put so much more cash into men's golf. It's economics, not misogyny. It's like trying to say the SPFL teams should be getting the same as English Premier League teams. It's just not possible. In order for women's golf or football to continue to grow it's essential that more women start to actually attend the tournaments and matches. If there were 20k people a day at the Women's Scottish Open then it wouldn't take long for TV to pump more cash in. The big objective for the leaders of women's sports is to increase attendances steadily over the next five years. That's common sense. John Gilligan, Ayr. Charlotte Laffar of England at the Women's Scottish Open at Dundonald Links (Image: PA) Pronoun problems This obsession amongst the vocal minority about which incorrect pronoun they must be referred to, in order to keep their thin skins intact, is becoming ridiculous. As previous contributors have noted, all grammatical sense sometimes goes out of the window. Remember Sam Smith and his aspiration to be a "fisherthem"? That suggests that those he would class as binary would be a "fisherhim" or "fisherher". (I shan't apologise for using the words "his" and "he" in the preceding sentences. To my mind, I'm not misgendering him. He's misgendering himself. In fact, the word "misgender" exists in neither my Chambers nor Oxford dictionaries). Brian Johnston, Torrance. Delayed reaction With the plight of the victims of the infected blood and Post Office scandals being recently highlighted once again, I have to, in my 79th year, agree that you are never past learning. MoD: it actually stands for Masters of Delay. The wretched Establishment at its best. Andrew Liddell, Banknock.
Scotsman
43 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Dear Donald Trump, Gaza needs Berlin Airlift-style rescue mission and you can make it happen
After Israel agrees to allow aid into Gaza from other countries, the world must respond decisively Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Earlier this week, Henry McLeish, a former First Minister, wrote what was essentially an open letter to Donald Trump, urging him to intervene to save lives in the Gaza Strip. 'Mr President, the United States must act now or forever be associated with this catastrophe, ethnic cleansing and genocide,' he said. Another former First Minister, Humza Yousaf, and his wife Nadia El-Nakla, a Dundee councillor, posted a video online in which they said the latter's relatives, including her cousin Sally, were being starved in Gaza. 'Sally is one of millions in Gaza. Her husband goes out all day searching for food, often to come home with nothing. And when I say home, I mean a tent and almost 40 degree heat,' Yousaf said, adding children were being 'starved, displaced, bombed, all while the world watches'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And the current First Minister, John Swinney has said it is his responsibility to raise 'the unimaginable suffering we are witnessing in Gaza' with Trump, ahead of their meeting during the President's visit to Scotland. Naeema, pictured on Wednesday, holds her malnourished two-year-old son Yazan in their damaged home in the Al-Shati refugee camp, west of Gaza City (Picture: Omar Al-Qattaa) | AFP via Getty Images Gesture politics This country may be far away from Gaza, but there are bonds of family, friendship and simple, shared humanity that make the suffering of innocent Palestinians an urgent issue for many Scots. Trump is in a unique position to help Gaza's population of more than two million. According to some, the US and other countries should do so by recognising the state of Palestine, an idea he has dismissed. This may be necessary at some point, but it seems like gesture politics when what Gazans really need is a ceasefire, food and medical help. Israeli army radio has reported Benjamin Netanyahu's government has now given permission for foreign countries to resume parachuting aid into Gaza. The international community should respond by launching a Berlin Airlift-style rescue mission. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Trump has the power to make an operation on that scale happen by utilising America's military and economic might to rush in food and medical supplies. He is said to want the Nobel Peace Prize. Saving the people of Gaza from starvation and war would certainly warrant one. A man holds a sign saying 'a hungry journalist writes a report about the hungry' during a protest by journalists in Gaza City (Picture: Omar Al-Qattaa) | AFP via Getty Images 'Gaza to be wiped out' If the world continues to fail to address the situation, Palestinians in the Strip face a horrifying fate. A joint statement issued by more than 100 humanitarian organisations on Wednesday said: 'Every day without a sustained flow [of aid] means more people dying of preventable illnesses. Children starve while waiting for promises that never arrive.' When is this going to stop? How many more people are going to starve to death? Israel's ultimate intentions are unclear but far-right politicians, including some in government, have made some truly terrifying statements. In November 2023, Israel's heritage minister Amichay Eliyahu suggested dropping a nuclear bomb on Gaza was an option, claimed there was 'no such thing as uninvolved civilians in Gaza', and said 'we wouldn't hand the Nazis humanitarian aid'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He has remained in government and claimed earlier this month that 'the government is racing ahead for Gaza to be wiped out... Thank God, we are wiping out this evil'. Hours later, after midnight, Netanyahu released a statement on social media – in English – saying Eliyahu 'does not speak for the government I lead'.
New Statesman
43 minutes ago
- New Statesman
The revenge of the left
Photo byTwo-front wars seldom have happy endings for the combatant in the middle. But Keir Starmer's beleaguered government is now fighting one, following the announcement of the impending arrival of the Corbyn-Sultana party on the left. The emerging, and as yet unnamed new force, secured more than 245,000 sign-ups within twenty-four hours of the announcement by the two former Labour MPs, one of them Starmer's immediate predecessor as Labour leader. As this is being written supporters are registering at 200 a minute, with forty donations a minute too. All polls which have given it as an option register the party making an impact, and one put it level-pegging with Labour. Early days, only polls etc. But it should be clear that Reform UK is now not the only insurgent force that Downing Street chief strategist Morgan McSweeney needs to worry about. Indeed, it is likely that the Corbyn-Sultana party (CSP here on in) will prove more attractive to more Labour voters than the Farageists, very few of whom will ever switch to Starmer according to polling evidence. 'The electorate has twice given its verdict on a Jeremy Corbyn led party' was the only response from a Labour source to the news. OK, let's go there. The Corbyn-led Labour party polled three million more votes in 2017 than Starmer's party managed last year. Indeed, Starmer's Labour even undershot, in vote numbers, the more miserable haul Corbyn Labour secured in 2019. So the electorate may not exactly be where Downing Street imagines it is. One thing is certain – Starmer's five years as Labour leader, and year in government, have opened up enormous space to the party's left. The birth of CSP has been a long time coming. The meandering road to this week's announcement can be traced back to the hundreds of thousands of people who joined Corbyn's Labour, often engaging in politics for the first time, and have since quit. Long marginalised, socialism was back within the Overton Window of the politically-conceivable. The fuse was then lit by Starmer's suspension of Corbyn from Labour in October 2020, and his subsequent exclusion as a Labour candidate. Corbyn himself was long sceptical about the merits of a left-of-Labour electoral challenge, and could point to the wreckage of previous such initiatives – Socialist Labour, Respect, Left Unity and on and on – in his support. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The game-changer was Gaza and the enormous movement of solidarity with the Palestinian people which developed after October 2023. That movement turned much of its anger against Labour, then in opposition, because of Starmer's blundering endorsement of Israeli war crimes in an LBC radio interview, a position it took him nine days to walk back. British Muslim opinion in particular proved to be irreconcilable, and Labour parted company with one of its staunchest voting blocs. Four independents were elected as MPs alongside Corbyn last year, above all on the Palestine issue. That is more than the aggregate of MPs elected to the left of Labour in all general elections since the second world war. The general election outcome also showed that Labour, beneath its puffed-up first-past-the-post Commons majority, is far more vulnerable to challenge than at any other time since its emergence as a governing force in the aftermath of World War One. The Party won over forty per cent of the vote, whether winning or losing, in all eight elections up to and including 1970. It has reached that benchmark just three times in fourteen elections since – twice under Blair (charisma) and once under Corbyn (authenticity). Its electorate is fragmenting in all directions. We can be sure it will not see forty per cent, or likely even thirty, again under Starmer. After a year in office, its polling is underwater, with resistance to the economic and social strategy of Rachel Reeves joining Gaza as a recruiting sergeant for the left. Now the CSP could be Britain's second biggest party in terms of membership by the end of the weekend. Its main asset at this stage is not just the sense that its two leaders say what they mean and mean what they say – it is enthusiasm. Reform may be cornering the market in anger, channelling the hyper-ventilating tabloid/GB News agenda, itself fuelled by decades of complacent establishment support for capitalist globalisation. But anger isn't the only emotion available. Hope and excitement get a look-in too. Where was the political enthusiasm in the generally enervating election campaign last year? Such as I came across was in a church hall in Chingford where Faiza Shaheen launched her independent campaign having been shamefully axed as Labour candidate on McSweeney's orders after the election had been called; on the streets of neighbouring Ilford North as charismatic British-Palestinian woman Leanne Mohamad came within a few hundred votes of ending Wes Streeting's political career, and in a garden in Bristol where Green canvassers massed to send their co-Leader Carla Denyer to Westminster. In Islington North too, of course, where a national mobilisation of the left helped return Corbyn for an eleventh term as their local MP, despite both Peter Mandelson and Paul Mason putting in appearances to try to get Labour over the line. Enthusiasm is not really the Prime Minister's thing, and to be fair he has never pretended otherwise. But he did promise 'Corbynism with competence' – the nod to his predecessor's policy agenda has long been discarded, and the last year has shredded whatever reputation he had for the latter. Nevertheless, the Corbyn years at Labour's helm have shown the limitations of enthusiasm alone. Can the CSP defy history and make a lasting impact? One pre-requisite for doing so must be reaching some form of electoral agreement with the Green Party, themselves presently choosing a new leader, with Zack Polanski's campaign drawing significant 'Corbynista' support. It is clear that in competition the two parties will simply eat each others' votes to a significant extent. United, it is easy to see seats tumbling to a red-green alliance all over the country. The Greens could sweep Bristol, the CSP half of Birmingham. Together, they could defeat Labour almost everywhere in east London. Bye bye, Health Secretary. Moreover, such an alliance would mark the birth of a five-party politics across England, and six-party in Scotland and Wales. Given the prevailing rules, that could see MPs being elected on thirty per cent of their constituency vote in many seats. At that point, predicting the outcome in a particular constituency becomes a lottery. In every seat there could be three or more possible winners. So the non-Labour left could be a significant force in the next House of Commons. But that is very far from certain. Several things could go wrong. One, entirely in the new party's own hands, is that the perennial habit of left-wing Pythonesque factionalism and splits could manifest. It is an open secret that Corbyn was surprised by the decision of the committee then organising the new party to vote for a co-leadership arrangement between him and Sultana, and even more by her subsequent public announcement of it. Nor is it news that Corbyn's own leadership style has its detractors. Unity has been restored – Corbyn and Sultana get on well together and are almost perfectly complementary in every personal characteristic and quality. But there are certainly different perspectives on how the new party should be organised, as well as its political strategy. Its promised founding conference will bear a heavy load. Then there is the possibility that Labour could shoot the CSP fox by actually addressing left-wing concerns. For a moment, after the U-turn on the welfare benefit cuts under backbench pressure, it had seemed that might be possible. The suspension of four MPs from the parliamentary whip punctured that bubble tout suite. The authoritarianism of the Starmer leadership, directed exclusively against the left, looks like remaining its hallmark. Number Ten is determined to foreclose any possibility of a revival of the left within Labour. Previous regimes within the party, of the left or far more often the right, always allowed the other wing of the party to hope for a turn of the wheel in the future. That is not the McSweeney way, and it is certainly one factor powering recruits to the CSP. Securing the support of more Labour MPs and official trade union backing for the CSP will be challenging in the short-term. But if the new party looks popular and properly-run a couple of years down the line, and the government continues on its dismal way, that could very well change. The government is imprisoned both by its commitments – to the electorate, to the City, to Trump – and its prejudices. It hopes that the possibility of Lee Anderson as Home Secretary will drive voters back into its arms in 2029. It also recycles the arguments I and others used in 2019 when pressing against a commitment to hold a second referendum on EU membership – Labour can lose votes to the Liberal Democrats and Greens in many areas without endangering seats. The margin for error in the 'red wall' is next to non-existent. So it proved. But does the argument hold true today? Labour's strategists claim that in 2024 they consciously allowed for a fall in support in safe big city seats in order to make gains where they were needed, in the red wall inter alia. This plan only half-worked at the time. The metropolitan support indeed dropped – in Starmer's Camden constituency he lost half his personal vote, something little remarked on since – but there was no return to voting Labour in seats which had been its traditional strongholds. It elected MPs entirely because of a split in the right. Today, those urban strongholds are not so strong. The day after Sultana's initial announcement that she was quitting Labour I spoke at a Palestine demonstration in Kentish Town, the heart of Starmer's own seat. Every mention of her and the 2024 independent challenger against the Labour leader, Andrew Feinstein, was cheered to the echo. Downing Street will have to listen. Andrew Murray is political correspondent of the Morning Star, a former advisor to Jeremy Corbyn and the author of The Fall and Rise of the British Left and Is Socialism Possible in Britain – Reflections on the Corbyn Years (both Verso). Related
