NGOs Call For The Immediate Release Of Two Indigenous Penan From Sarawak, Malaysia
(Sarawak / Malaysia) On June 28th, two Penan from Long Tepen were arrested by forestry officals while resting with a friend on the side of the road near Batu 12. While one of three Penan escaped with minor injuries and reported the incident to the police, the other two Penan were detained for at least four days under Section 103 of the Forestry Ordinance. The Long Tepen Village Residents Action Committee emphasised in its media statement over the weekend: «It is believed that the claims of obstructing public servants and issuing threats were fabricated. This incident appears to be a case of abuse of power by the Forest Department team.»
It is pertinent to note that the Penan community from Long Tepen has filed numerous police reports in September 2024, March 2025 and June 2025 against the logging activities of the Malaysian company Shing Yang on their ancestral lands and the dismantlement of their blockades. Komeok Joe from the Penan organization Keruan concludes: «The Penan from Long Tepen have repeatedly filed police reports against the destruction of their forests by the company Shin Yang, only to see their rights ignored and their defenders criminalized. Instead of addressing the community's legitimate concerns, authorities have chosen to target those who stand up for their land and culture.»
Keruan and the Bruno Manser Fonds urge the Malaysian government to support the immediate release of the two Penan forest defenders and to take action to stop logging in indigenous territories. The rights of indigenous peoples to their land must be respected and protected.
In today's letter to the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) the NGOs request assistance in this matter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
Greenpeace International Begins Groundbreaking Anti-SLAPP Case To Protect Freedom Of Speech
In a landmark test case of the European Union's new legislation to protect freedom of expression and stop abusive lawsuits, Greenpeace International has overnight challenged the US oil pipeline company, Energy Transfer, in court in the Netherlands.[1] The multi-billion-dollar company brought two back-to-back SLAPP suits against Greenpeace International and Greenpeace in the US, after Greenpeace showed solidarity with the 2016 peaceful Indigenous-led protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. The first case was dismissed, but the Greenpeace organisations continue to defend against the second case, which is ongoing, after a North Dakota jury recently awarded over 660 million USD in damages to the pipeline from Greenpeace International and allies were present outside the courthouse in Amsterdam for the first hearing in the case with a banner reading " ENERGY TRANSFER, WELCOME TO THE EU - WHERE FREE SPEECH IS STILL A THING". Mads Christensen, Executive Director, Greenpeace International, says:"Energy Transfer's attack on our right to protest is an attack on everyone's free speech. Greenpeace has been the target of threats, arrests and even bombs over the last 50 years and persevered. We will continue to resist all forms of intimidation and explore every option to hold Energy Transfer accountable for this attempt at abusing the justice system. This groundbreaking anti-SLAPP case against Energy Transfer in the Netherlands is just the beginning of defeating this bullying tactic being wielded by billionaires and fossil fuel giants trying to silence critics all over the world. Something absolutely vital is at stake here: people's ability to hold corporate polluters to account for the devastation they're causing." Russel Norman, Executive Director, Greenpeace Aotearoa, says:"The timing of this case is particularly poignant given that we are about to mark the 40th anniversary of the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior by agents of the French Government here in Auckland. The bombing was an act of desperation by the French Government in the face of our successful, people-powered campaign to end nuclear testing in the Pacific. "Forty years ago, we showed that we could not be intimidated. Greenpeace only grew stronger, and together with the nuclear-free Pacific movement, we put a stop to nuclear testing. Now, as Greenpeace International goes to court in Amsterdam, Energy Transfer would also like us - and all climate activists - to be afraid and to shut up - but once again, we will show that we will not be silenced."The lawsuit is an important test of the European Union's Anti-SLAPP Directive, adopted in April 2024.[2] The Directive is designed to protect journalists, activists, civil society organisations, or anyone else speaking out about matters of public concern, from Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) - unfounded intimidation lawsuits brought by powerful corporations or wealthy individuals seeking to suppress public debate.[3] Since Greenpeace International is a Netherlands-based foundation and the damage caused by Energy Transfers's US SLAPP suit is occurring in the Netherlands, both Dutch and EU law apply. Amy Jacobsen, Senior Legal Counsel, Greenpeace International, says,"This case paves the way for protections from bullying lawsuits being implemented throughout Europe and beyond. The lawsuits that Energy Transfer have brought against Greenpeace International are the perfect example of the kind of abusive legal proceedings that the anti-SLAPP Directive is designed to protect against. By calling upon the EU anti-SLAPP Directive's protections, Greenpeace International refuses to allow the bullying tactics of wealthy fossil fuel corporations like Energy Transfer to compromise our fundamental free speech rights." Following a dawn ceremony on the 10 July 2025 in Auckland, the Rainbow Warrior will be open to the public for tours and talks with the crew on the weekends of 12 July and 19th July. Notes: [1] The new EU rules are aimed at addressing the growing number of abusive lawsuits against journalists, media outlets, environmental activists and human rights defenders. In February 2025, Greenpeace International initiated the first test of the European Union's anti-SLAPP Directive by filing a lawsuit in Dutch court against Energy Transfer. Greenpeace International seeks to recover all damages and costs it has suffered as a result of Energy Transfers's back-to-back, meritless lawsuits demanding hundreds of millions of dollars from Greenpeace International and the Greenpeace organisations in the US. [2] EU Member States have until 7 May 2026 at the latest to transpose the rules into their national laws, but the Dutch government has indicated that the Directive's protections can already be applied under existing Dutch legal frameworks. [3] Big Oil companies Shell, Total, and ENI have also filed SLAPPs against Greenpeace entities in recent years. Some of these cases have been successfully stopped in their tracks. This includes Greenpeace France successfully defeating TotalEnergies' SLAPP on 28 March 2024, and Greenpeace UK and Greenpeace International forcing Shell to back down from its SLAPP on 10 December 2024. Greenpeace Romania was being sued by the energy company Romgaz in 2025 - with the aim of dissolving the organisation, but their claims were withdrawn and they were forced to pay the court expenses to Greenpeace Romania. Greenpeace Italy and Greenpeace Netherlands are facing the Italian oil giant Eni in an ongoing court case in Italy.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Switzerland (Ba Sel) Court Advances Proceedings Against Syngenta
The widows of two farmers, from Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India, who died from pesticide poisoning, along with a farmer who survived severe poisoning, are suing the Swiss company Syngenta for damages. In this unique case, the Basel Civil Court has taken a significant step in deciding to initiate an assessment of the evidence regarding the victims' use of the pesticide Polo. The plaintiffs state that the poisonings back in 2017 were the result of the use of Polo – a pesticide developed, produced and sold by Syngenta. Although Polo is not permitted for sale in the EU or Switzerland, it continues to be used in India – with sometimes fatal consequences: eight years ago, dozens of farmers and agricultural workers suffered serious poisoning in connection with the use of Polo, and two died. For small and marginal farmers from the global south, confronting a multinational corporation is an immense challenge, as they often lack the legal resources, financial means, and institutional support needed to pursue accountability. As the first civil lawsuit from the Global South against an agrochemical company over pesticide poisonings, this case breaks new legal ground. It highlights the growing international criticism of double standards in the pesticide trade and the accountability of European companies for human rights violations along global supply chains. The outcome could have implications far beyond the individual plaintiffs – for others affected around the world, and for how Switzerland handles corporate accountability in the future. In June 2021, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit before the Basel Civil Court, based on Swiss product liability law. They are represented by the law firm Schadenanwälte. The case is supported by the organisations ECCHR, Public Eye, and PAN India. While the court has yet to rule on the merits of the case, it has already sent a strong signal: in June 2022, it granted the plaintiffs legal aid. This indicates that the court in principle considers that Syngenta could be held liable for harm caused by its hazardous products abroad, and paved the way for victims and their families to seek justice before the Swiss court.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
NGOs Call For The Immediate Release Of Two Indigenous Penan From Sarawak, Malaysia
The Sarawak NGO Keruan and the Swiss based NGO Bruno Manser Fonds are calling for the immediate release of two Indigenous Penan from Sarawak, Malaysia, following their arrest by police on June 28th, 2025. (Sarawak / Malaysia) On June 28th, two Penan from Long Tepen were arrested by forestry officals while resting with a friend on the side of the road near Batu 12. While one of three Penan escaped with minor injuries and reported the incident to the police, the other two Penan were detained for at least four days under Section 103 of the Forestry Ordinance. The Long Tepen Village Residents Action Committee emphasised in its media statement over the weekend: «It is believed that the claims of obstructing public servants and issuing threats were fabricated. This incident appears to be a case of abuse of power by the Forest Department team.» It is pertinent to note that the Penan community from Long Tepen has filed numerous police reports in September 2024, March 2025 and June 2025 against the logging activities of the Malaysian company Shing Yang on their ancestral lands and the dismantlement of their blockades. Komeok Joe from the Penan organization Keruan concludes: «The Penan from Long Tepen have repeatedly filed police reports against the destruction of their forests by the company Shin Yang, only to see their rights ignored and their defenders criminalized. Instead of addressing the community's legitimate concerns, authorities have chosen to target those who stand up for their land and culture.» Keruan and the Bruno Manser Fonds urge the Malaysian government to support the immediate release of the two Penan forest defenders and to take action to stop logging in indigenous territories. The rights of indigenous peoples to their land must be respected and protected. In today's letter to the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) the NGOs request assistance in this matter.
