Meet 65-year-old ‘Gangster Granny': UK's drug cartel mastermind Deborah Mason, jailed for 20 years over £80m Cocaine trade
A 65-year-old grandmother masterminded one of UK's most sophisticated drug trafficking operations, has been sentenced to 20 years in prison. Deborah Mason, infamously nicknamed the 'Queen Bee' and 'Gangster Granny,' ran a sprawling family-led drugs cartel that trafficked more than a ton of cocaine worth up to £80 million across the country.
Mason and seven of her relatives, including her sister and children, operated the high-level narcotics ring over a seven-month period from April to November 2023, reported
The Guardian
. On Friday, she was sentenced in a London courtroom alongside other key members of the syndicate.
The court heard that Mason's gang used a network of couriers to transport massive quantities of imported cocaine. The drugs were distributed from London to several major cities including Bradford, Leicester, Birmingham, Bristol, and Cardiff.
The cartel's value of cocaine ranged between £23 million and £35 million, while its street value was estimated at a whopping £80 million. Despite the scale of the operation, prosecutors noted that Mason's relatives were not coerced into joining the syndicate, but were instead "motivated by financial benefit."
Mason's 29-year-old daughter, Roseanne Mason, played a crucial role in the cartel's logistics. She was responsible for managing collections of the drug shipments.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
In a show of how deeply involved the family was, Roseanne even babysat the children of other couriers so they could continue working uninterrupted. She was sentenced to 11 years in prison for her part in the operation.
Other members of the gang received lengthy prison terms as well, with sentences ranging from 13 to 15 years based on their individual roles in the criminal enterprise.
The Metropolitan Police launched a thorough investigation into the drug ring, employing a range of surveillance tactics, including analysis of extensive call data and physical tracking of suspects. Acting on critical intelligence, most of the gang members were apprehended in May 2024.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
The World's safest and unsafest countries in 2025: Why the US and UK landed on the wrong side of the list
In 2025, the global conversation around safety continues to be a crucial topic for travelers, expatriates, and policymakers alike. Recent data from the Numbeo Safety Index 2025 reveals which countries around the world are considered the safest and the most dangerous. Interestingly, the United States and the United Kingdom, traditionally viewed as stable and secure nations, have landed on the wrong side of the safety ranking, highlighting growing concerns about crime rates and public safety in these countries. The World's safest countries in 2025 Topping the 2025 safety ranking are several countries known for their low crime rates and robust security infrastructure. The world's safest countries based on the Numbeo Safety Index include: Andorra: with a safety score of 84.7 United Arab Emirates (UAE): 84.5 Qatar: 84.2 Taiwan: 82.9 Oman: 81.7 These countries excel in maintaining public safety and personal security, making them attractive destinations for tourists and expatriates. Their success can be attributed to effective law enforcement, stable political environments, and comprehensive safety policies. Source: The New York Post The least safe countries according to 2025 data Conversely, the index highlights several countries grappling with serious safety challenges. The unsafest countries in 2025 include: Venezuela: safety score of 19.3 Papua New Guinea: 19.7 Haiti: 21.1 Afghanistan: 24.9 South Africa: 25.3 These nations face a complex mix of issues such as high crime rates, political instability, economic hardship, and social unrest, which negatively impact public safety and security perceptions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Global MBA for executives. Study online. IIMK UWA Undo The rank of the United States and the United Kingdom in safety Perhaps most striking in the 2025 report is the relative positioning of the United States and the United Kingdom. Despite their developed economies and strong institutions, both countries rank lower than many expect: The United States is ranked 89th with a safety score of 50.8. The United Kingdom ranks slightly higher at 87th with a score of 51.7. The factors that contribute to lower safety scores in the US and UK Several factors contribute to the relatively low safety scores for the US and UK in the 2025 safety ranking: Rising violent crime rates in certain urban areas Concerns about public security, especially in densely populated cities Increased reports of theft, robbery, and property crime Challenges in community policing and social cohesion These issues have influenced how citizens and travellers perceive safety, impacting the overall safety index score. Why does safety ranking matter Understanding the world's safest and most dangerous countries is essential for multiple reasons: Travel planning: Tourists rely on safety rankings to make informed decisions about where to visit. Business decisions: International companies consider safety when investing or expanding operations. Public policy: Governments use safety data to improve law enforcement and social programs. Expatriate choices: People moving abroad seek safe environments for themselves and their families. Understanding the Numbeo Safety Index 2025 The Numbeo Safety Index is a widely referenced measure of safety and security worldwide. It compiles user-contributed data on various factors including crime rates, perceptions of public safety, and personal security concerns. The 2025 index evaluates 146 countries, providing a comprehensive overview of global safety trends. According to the latest report, safety scores reflect how safe residents and visitors feel in their daily lives, factoring in the likelihood of violent crime, theft, and other safety risks. This index is particularly useful for travelers and international business professionals seeking to understand where they can feel most secure.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who was Rosie Roche? Prince William and Harry's 20-year-old cousin found dead; police says ‘no foul play'
Prince William (left) and Harry (AP) Rosie Roche, a 20-year-old distant cousin of Princes William and Harry and the granddaughter of Princess Diana's uncle, was found dead at her family home in Norton, Wiltshire, England on July 14. According to an inquiry, a firearm was discovered near her body, reported The Sun. She was discovered by her mother and sister after she had been packing for a trip with friends. An inquest into her death was opened at Wiltshire and Swindon coroner's court and has been adjourned until October 25. Area coroner Grant Davies stated that police 'have deemed the death as non-suspicious and there was no third-party involvement,' with no indication of foul play. An official investigation is underway to determine the complete circumstances of death. Rosie was a student of English literature at Durham University. A spokeswoman said she 'will be sorely missed.' An obituary published in The Yorkshire Post on July 19 announced that Rosie, a distant cousin of Princes William and Harry, will have a private funeral attended by family, with a memorial service planned for a later date. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Rosie's passing follows the death of Thomas Kingston, husband of Lady Gabriella Windsor and one-time boyfriend of Pippa Middleton, who died from a gunshot wound in February 2024 at the age of 45. His death was subsequently deemed 'not suspicious.' Who was Rosie Roche? Rosie Jeanne Burke Roche, 20, was a student at Durham University with close ties to British aristocracy. She was the granddaughter of the late Edmund Roche, 5th Baron Fermoy, Princess Diana's uncle, making her a first cousin once removed to Princes William and Harry. Born on June 21, 2005, Rosie was the daughter of Hugh Burke Roche and Pippa Long. Her heritage traces back to the Spencer-Roche branch on Diana's maternal side, a prominent family with longstanding connections to the royal household.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
The New American Scarlet Letter: Andy Byron becomes Hester Prynne in the court of public opinion
Hester Prynne and Andy Byron being publically shamed In the heart of 17th-century Puritan Boston, Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter immortalized Hester Prynne's public shaming for her personal life. Nearly 400 years later, in the digital glare of 21st-century New York, Andy Byron , CEO of a tech firm, was thrust into notoriety after a viral moment at a Coldplay concert exposed his private indiscretions. Both stories, though centuries apart, reveal a consistent American tradition: the ruthless spectacle of public shaming and how society polices morality, regardless of era. Hester Prynne: Bearing the mark of sin The society forced Hester Prynne to wear a scarlet 'A' for adultery. It was a punishment designed both to shame her and to warn the community against individuals like 'her'. Over time, Hester's dignity and resilience transformed the meaning of that letter from 'adulteress' to 'able,' but what was the compensation for the untold agony she suffered due to this moral policing? Hester's punishment was a blend of legal and moral judgment, intended to isolate her and reinforce the community's moral code. The ritual of her shaming was not private. She endured the collective scorn and voyeurism of her neighbors. Andy Byron: A victim of public verdict A few days ago, a New York CEO's brief, intimate moment with his company's HR head at a Coldplay concert went viral. With the world watching, Andy Byron was removed from his position, not by a judge, but by social media verdict. The video led to instant public scrutiny, speculation about his marriage, and ultimately his resignation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Purpose of Shame: Byron's actions infringed upon organizational standards, but the swift escalation from workplace investigation to public vilification mirrors the same zeal for moral enforcement. Instead of the town square, the internet became the trial box, amplifying every frame and encouraging worldwide judgment Did Andy Byron deserve to resign? In a trust-driven industry, CEOs are often held to higher standards, even in private matters, because personal choices can affect a company's image, investor confidence, and workplace morale. Was the punishment fair? Arguments vary: Byron's actions risked undermining Astronomer's ethical code and could raise questions about favoritism or workplace boundaries. However, critics argue that one's private life shouldn't destroy a career unless it directly affects job performance. The rapid responsiveness felt less like justice and more like an attempt to preempt public outrage. Was Andy Byron a victim? (Image via X @PopBase & @MAGAgeddon) Byron was 'outed' before he had an opportunity to explain or defend himself; the instantaneous nature of viral media allows no shelter, similar to Hester's public display of penance. Much like the Puritans' need for spectacle, today's public continually demands confessions and consequences—often before all facts surface, and regardless of the line separating personal from professional. Was someone out to get him? There's no evidence that Byron was intentionally 'set up' by Coldplay or others—rather, circumstance, technology, and an eager public did the work. In both cases, individual transgressions were magnified into community drama. Hashtag is the new Scarlet Letter Centuries after Hester Prynne's ordeal, the machinery of public shaming in America shows few signs of evolution. The symbols change-from embroidered letters to trending hashtags, but the collective appetite to watch, judge, and punish remains. Whether in colonial Boston or digital New York, the boundaries of personal responsibility and public condemnation remain perilously blurred. What Andy Byron or Hester Prynne did-whether right or wrong, is far from black and white. Their actions live in a vast, complicated gray area where human flaws, desires, and mistakes often cross paths. Hester's so-called 'sin' was a deeply personal act of love and survival in a rigid, unforgiving society. Andy's moment, caught on a kiss cam, was a private lapse amplified by modern technology and public fascination. Neither act alone should define the entirety of their lives. But what society did to them? That's where the story sharpens into something darker, clearer, and infinitely more troubling. Society didn't just judge Andy or Hester, it weaponized their personal moments as public spectacle. It turned human vulnerability into a form of entertainment, a collective verdict uttered without mercy or context.
