Trump intensifies trade war with 30% tariffs on EU and Mexico
The August 1 deadline gives countries targeted by Trump's letters time to negotiate a trade deal that could lower the threatened tariff levels.
The EU had hoped to reach a comprehensive trade agreement with the U.S. for the 27-country bloc.
Three EU officials told Reuters on Saturday that Trump's threats represent a negotiating tactic.
Trump's letter to the EU included a demand that Europe drop its own tariffs, an apparent condition of any future deal.
"The European Union will allow complete, open Market Access to the United States, with no Tariff being charged to us, in an attempt to reduce the large Trade Deficit," Trump wrote.
EU President von der Leyen said the 30% tariffs 'would disrupt essential transatlantic supply chains, to the detriment of businesses, consumers and patients on both sides of the Atlantic.'
She also said while the EU will continue to work towards a trade agreement, they 'will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required.'
Canada got a higher tariff rate of 35% compared to Mexico, with both letters citing fentanyl flows, even though government data shows the amount of the drug seized at the Mexican border was significantly higher than the Canadian border.
"Mexico has been helping me secure the border, BUT, what Mexico has done, is not enough. Mexico still has not stopped the Cartels who are trying to turn all of North America into a Narco-Trafficking Playground," Trump wrote.
Mexico sends more than 80% of its total exported goods to the U.S. and free trade with its northern neighbor drove Mexico to overtake China as the U.S.'s top trading partner in 2023.
The European Union had been bracing for the letter from Trump outlining his planned duties on the United States' largest trade and investment partner after a broadening of his tariff war in recent days.
The EU initially hoped to strike a comprehensive trade agreement, including zero-for-zero tariffs on industrial goods, but months of difficult talks have led to the realization it will probably have to settle for an interim agreement and hope something better can still be negotiated.
The 27-country bloc is under conflicting pressures as powerhouse Germany urged a quick deal to safeguard its industry, while other EU members, such as France, have said EU negotiators should not cave into a one-sided deal on U.S. terms.
Trump's cascade of tariff orders since returning to the White House has begun generating tens of billions of dollars a month in new revenue for the U.S. government. U.S. customs duties revenue shot past $100 billion in the federal fiscal year through to June, according to U.S. Treasury data on Friday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
25 minutes ago
- Euronews
Yes, Italy is still part of the Paris Climate Agreement
Claims are circulating widely on social media stating that Italy has followed in the footsteps of the United States by withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, which was signed in 2015 and aims to limit the rise in global warming to below 2C. A post by an account posing as a legitimate news outlet, in which these assertions were made, has received thousands of views, likes and shares. It features a picture of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, but otherwise provides no extra information or evidence for the claim. Italy was an original signatory to the agreement, and the United Nations' official Treaty Collection website still shows the country as being a member. It says that, like most other countries, Italy formally added its signature to the agreement on 22 April 2016 and ratified it on 11 November that year. Additionally, the country is covered by the European Union, which is also a signatory to the agreement. The bloc declared upon signing that, as it contained 28 member states at the time, including Italy, it was competent to enter international agreements and implement obligations linked to preserving, protecting and improving the environment, alongside other objectives. Contrast Italy's status as a signatory country with that of the US, which the Treaty Collection notes as having withdrawn in 2020 under US President Donald Trump during his first term, and then rejoined in February 2021 under former US President Joe Biden. Since being reelected, Trump has signed an executive order to once again leave the agreement, which is due to take place in January 2026. For the time being, therefore, the US is still listed as a member. There's no evidence of Italy following suit, however: a Google search of keywords in both English and Italian shows no reputable reporting on the matter. There has also been no official announcement by the Italian government to this end. Euroverify reached out to Italy's environment ministry but did not receive a response. Regardless, Prime Minister Meloni asserted her commitment to the Paris Agreement when she first took office in 2022. She told the COP27 summit that her government remained steadfast in its pursuit of decarbonisation. "We intend to pursue a just transition to support the affected communities and leave no one behind," she said at the time. However, she has criticised other international climate initiatives, such as the EU's Green Deal, for being supposedly "ideological" in its approach. Meloni has said that green policies that are too rigid could harm European industry and has called for the continent to be more cautious, to protect its economy and people. "I have often said that in a desert there is nothing green," she said in May. "Before anything else, we must fight the desertification of European industry." She claimed that the EU's regulatory approach had harmed the automotive industry, and that its focus on electric vehicles, a market dominated by non-European countries, would expose the bloc. "I continue to believe it is counterproductive to focus solely on the electric transition, where the supply chains are not controlled by Europe, but by other actors," she said. Proponents of the green deal, however, claim that it will transform the EU into a resource-efficient, competitive economy while making Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. The EU also hopes that it will boost the economy through green technology, reducing pollution along the way and making sure "no person or place" is left behind.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Elon Musk's X hit with complaint over use of personal data for ads
Elon Musk's social media platform X has been hit with a formal complaint because of alleged breaches of the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA): the platform appears to have used sensitive personal data for targeted advertising. The complaint is filed by nine civil society organisations including European Digital Rights (EDRi), AI Forensics and Centre for Democracy and Technology Europe (CDT). It comes after evidence compiled by AI Forensics on the basis of X's Ad Repository, found that 'major brands as well as public and financial institutions engaged in targeted online advertising', based on special categories of personal data, such as political opinions, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and health conditions. Under the DSA, which entered into force for the largest online platforms – which includes X – in late 2023, platforms are prohibited from offering targeted advertising based on profiling using these special categories of data. AI Forensics uncovered evidence, for example, that 'X allowed Total Energies, the multinational energy and petroleum company, to run ads on its platform excluding users who had engaged with keywords related to ecologist political figures,' the complaint said. In addition, fast-food chain McDonalds could run ads 'excluding X users who had engaged with keywords related to McDonalds' own trade union as well as antidepressants and suicide'. The organisations call on the national Digital Services Coordinators and the European Commission to investigate the potential breach. The Commission began an investigation into X under the DSA in December 2023. In preliminary findings published last summer, the EU executive concluded that blue checkmarks used by the platforms are deceptive and that it falls short on transparency and accountability requirements. X has had the opportunity to reply in writing. The investigation is still pending.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
What's at stake in the new EU long-term budget?
Think of any EU policy you care about or benefit from, as a citizen, politician, or stakeholder. Whether it's funding Ukraine's reconstruction, boosting the continent's competitiveness, or maintaining farm subsidies, all of it ties back to one foundational element: the EU's long-term budget. That process begins in earnest this Wednesday, when the European Commission presents its first proposal for what is known in Brussels jargon as the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), covering the period from 2028 to 2034. Behind almost every major fight in Brussels, there's a battle over money. And this is the mother of them all. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has promised a comprehensive overhaul of the EU budget to make it simpler, more effective, and better aligned with strategic priorities. Translating that ambition into actual numbers—especially when it comes to funding areas like defence, which the treaties currently prohibit—will be the start of many difficult negotiations with EU leaders and MEPs. Meanwhile, traditional programmes that may no longer be viewed as top priorities could face deep cuts, sparking fierce resistance. A masterclass in secrecy The lead-up to this MFF proposal has been marked by an extraordinary level of secrecy. Few details have leaked, most of them deliberately and only at a very final stage in the process. This cloak of confidentiality is one of the most successful examples of von der Leyen's consolidation of power and a testament to the control wielded by her powerful chief of staff, Bjoern Seibert. Commission insiders describe a system of 'compartmentalisation' akin to methods used in intelligence operations, where individuals only have access to the information strictly necessary for their tasks. Within the Commission, this has meant that discussions about the budget have taken place in isolated groups, particularly in high-level 'chef' meetings involving Commissioners' cabinets and directorate-generals. A senior EU source told Euronews that most of these discussions occurred in silos, with each group unaware of what others were working on, and especially in the dark about the figures for each fund. 'The truth is: numbers will go directly to the College of Commissioners [tomorrow]. Only like three people know about them,' the source revealed. While Commission staff have been working on structure and governance issues of the funds, which couldn't prevent these from being leaked, details on actual funding levels remain tightly guarded. Two key elements The current MFF for 2021–2027 stands at €1.2 trillion, equivalent to about 1% of the EU's GDP (not including post-pandemic recovery funds). Few expect this figure to change dramatically. Instead, the focus will be on spending smarter and prioritising better. Initially, the Commission considered structuring the next MFF around three major pillars: one for national envelopes covering agriculture and cohesion funds; another for competitiveness, innovation, and strategic investment; and a third consolidating all external instruments. While insiders suggest that some adjustments have been made since then, the drive for radical simplification remains intact. 'Still, expect surprises,' one Commission source said. The current 7-year budget has already reduced the number of funding programmes from 58 to 37 in the name of streamlining. Yet the Commission still sees room for further consolidation, and one major question is how drastic this simplification will be. The other is how far the Commission can go in increasing its flexibility to reallocate funds. Today, the vast majority of the EU budget is pre-allocated to specific programmes, leaving little room for rapid response or discretionary spending. The EU does have mechanisms to address emergencies and unforeseen events, but their size is limited: around €21 billion, just a small fraction of the total MFF. The Commission cannot unilaterally shift large sums from one policy area to another without formal revisions, which require the approval of both the European Parliament and the Council. That rigidity is something the new budget proposal will try to address, as enhancing the EU's ability to course-correct in real time has become a top priority (as shown by the mid-term review of the current MFF). Funds to watch Among the most hotly debated issues will be how to fund Ukraine, how to address defence spending despite legal constraints, and whether to introduce new common debt instruments (considering the EU still has to repay its pandemic borrowing). Nordic countries, for example, have pointed out that if von der Leyen avoids debt-based solutions, some member states may push to introduce it anyway. But what will really draw attention this week are the proposed funds themselves. Leaks suggest that a new European Competitiveness Fund will consolidate into a single instrument up to 12 existing programmes, including: Horizon Europe, the EU's flagship research fund; the recently created EU4Health programme; and the LIFE programme for environmental and climate action. Another innovation appears to be something called 'National and Regional Partnerships,' a working title that has surfaced in multiple drafts, and that will be supported by a single "European Economic, Territorial, Social, Rural and Maritime Sustainable Prosperity and Security Fund." This would group together the funds under shared management, namely the agricultural subsidies and the policy to tackle the socio-economic gap between the EU's poorest and richest regions, known as cohesion. With these two funds accounting for the bulk of the EU budget, the expected merging of their structures could have profound implications—not only for governance and oversight, but also for how money is distributed across member states. A tangle of joint programmes will be replaced with 27 national plans specific to agriculture and cohesion, each reflecting EU-wide priorities while tailoring implementation locally. But this raises thorny questions about who controls the funds and how priorities are set. One thing that's likely to remain intact is the European Social Fund, which supports anti-poverty efforts and vulnerable groups. Socialists in the European Parliament claimed this as a key win in exchange for backing von der Leyen's bid for a second term—though in truth, the fund is enshrined in EU treaties and was never really in danger of being scrapped. This week's proposal is only the beginning of what promises to be a long, complex, and politically fraught negotiation process. Member states, the European Parliament (which appears sidelined in the delivery of the EU budget from some leaked drafts), and the Commission will all bring different priorities and red lines to the table. The Danish presidency of the EU Council aims to present the 'nego-box', the first compromise on the Commission's proposal, before the EU summit in December.
