Atomic Brussels? Support for nuclear power gains ground in EU
By Adrien DE CALAN
Long a taboo, Brussels opened the door to EU funding for nuclear power this month in a sign of the growing support atomic energy is enjoying within the bloc.
The European Commission listed "nuclear fission energy" among the sectors eligible to receive EU money in its 2028-2034 budget proposal unveiled last week -- reversing a previous ban.
The commission declined to say if that meant Brussels was prepared to fund the building of new nuclear reactors, with a spokeswoman stressing that the proposal was "still to be discussed" with member states.
Nuclear's eligibility remained only potential, she said, and fission was listed alongside other related fields such as decommissioning nuclear facilities, management of radioactive waste and nuclear research.
But the change in tack -- given atomic energy was explicitly excluded from funding under the current European Union budget -- marked a victory for the pro-nuclear camp, which has been steadily gathering steam.
Europe has long been divided on nuclear.
While France has championed it, Germany has led the opposition since former chancellor Angela Merkel accelerated a phase-out in 2011, after the meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan.
The two economic powerhouses even captain rival informal clubs of countries that vie for influence in Brussels.
Paris leads the "European Nuclear Alliance" while Berlin is top dog in the "Friends of Renewables" group.
Informal breakfast talks of the two groups are normally held ahead of meetings of EU energy ministers, with representatives of some countries shuttling between the two gatherings.
'Unavoidable' topic
France's club has been gaining members, with Belgium and Italy announcing this year they would join, and Greece also expressing interest.
This came after Rome opened the door to a return to atomic power, and Belgium officially abandoned a two-decades-old pledge to phase it out.
Other members of the club include Bulgaria, Croatia, Finland, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden.
Germany's grouping includes Austria, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Denmark, and the Baltic states, among others.
"The enlargement of the alliance makes the subject somewhat unavoidable," Neil Makaroff, a climate transition expert at Strategic Perspectives, a think tank, said of the pro-atomic faction.
After years of EU ostracism, these countries want to "make nuclear power politically neutral", he added.
Opposition is weaker than a couple of years ago, with more and more governments emphasising the need for a complementary energy mix to speed-up the electrification of the continent.
France is even hoping for a more lenient approach from Germany under new leader Friedrich Merz.
In May, the chancellor co-signed an opinion piece with French President Emmanuel Macron backing "technological neutrality" and the "non-discriminatory treatment of all low-carbon energies within the European Union".
French Energy Minister Marc Ferracci later said the Germans were ready to end "the religious war over nuclear power".
Yet, opinions on the matter within Germany's ruling coalition differ and whether Berlin -- a net contributor to the bloc's budget -- would go so far as to greenlight EU funding for nuclear remains to be seen, said Makaroff.
Tensions might bubble up again in the coming months, as countries discuss European rules on renewable energy -- a package France would rather be called "decarbonised" energy and include nuclear power.
Paris claimed a first victory this month when the commission included the concept of "technological neutrality" dear to the French in its 2040 climate target proposal.
Still, even in the most nuclear-heavy scenarios, wind and solar power are projected to dominate the European energy mix in the coming decades.
In 2024 renewables accounted for 47 percent of electricity production in Europe, compared with 23 percent for nuclear energy, according to EU data agency Eurostat.
"In the short term, most of the work on electrification will be done through renewables," said Makaroff.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
Trump, EU's von der Leyen to meet on Sunday to clinch trade deal
GLASGOW, Scotland (Reuters) -- European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is set to meet with U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday to clinch a trade deal for Europe that would likely see a 15% baseline tariff on most European Union goods but end months of uncertainty for EU companies. U.S. and EU negotiators huddled in final talks on tariffs facing crucial sectors like cars, steel, aluminum and pharmaceuticals before the meeting, which is expected at 15:30 GMT on Trump's golf course in Turnberry, western Scotland. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick flew to Scotland on Saturday, and EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic arrived on Sunday morning. Lutnick told "Fox News Sunday" that the EU needed to open its markets for more U.S. exports to convince Trump to reduce a threatened 30% tariff rate that is due to kick in on Aug. 1. "The question is, do they offer President Trump a good enough deal that is worth it for him to step off of the 30% tariffs that he set?" Lutnick said, adding that the EU clearly wanted -- and needed -- to reach an agreement. A separate U.S. administration official was upbeat that a deal was possible. "We're cautiously optimistic that there will be a deal reached," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "But it's not over till it's over." The EU deal would be a huge prize, given that the U.S. and EU are each other's largest trading partners by far and account for a third of global trade. Ambassadors of EU governments, on a weekend trip to Greenland organized by the Danish presidency of the EU, held a teleconference with European Commission officials on Sunday to agree on the amount of leeway von der Leyen would have. In case there is no deal and the U.S. imposes 30% tariffs from Aug. 1, the EU has prepared countertariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of U.S. goods. EU diplomats have said a deal would likely include a broad 15% tariff on EU goods imported into the U.S., mirroring the U.S.-Japan trade deal, along with a 50% tariff on European steel and aluminum for which there could be export quotas. EU officials are hopeful that a 15% baseline tariff would also apply to cars, replacing the current 27.5% auto tariff. Some expect the 27-nation bloc may be able to secure exemptions from the 15% baseline tariff for its aerospace industry and for spirits, though probably not for wine. The EU could also pledge to buy more liquefied natural gas from the U.S., a long-standing offer, and boost investment in the United States. Trump told reporters there was "not a lot" of wiggle room on the 50% tariffs that the U.S. has on steel and aluminum imports, adding, "because if I do it for one, I have to do it for all." The U.S. president, in Scotland for a few days of golfing and bilateral meetings, told reporters upon his arrival on Friday evening that von der Leyen was a highly respected leader and he was looking forward to meeting with her. He said there was a 50-50 chance that the two sides could reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to "make a deal very badly." The EU now faces U.S. tariffs on more than 70% of its exports, with 50% on steel and aluminum, an extra 25% on cars and car parts on top of the existing 2.5% and a 10% levy on most other EU goods. EU officials have said a "no-deal" tariff rate of 30% would wipe out whole chunks of transatlantic commerce. A 15% tariff on most EU goods would remove uncertainty but would be seen by many in Europe as a poor outcome compared to the initial European ambition of a zero-for-zero tariff deal on all industrial goods. Seeking to learn from Japan, which secured a 15% baseline tariff with the U.S. in a deal earlier this week, EU negotiators spoke to their Japanese counterparts in preparation for Sunday's meeting. For Trump, aiming to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old U.S. trade deficits, a deal with the EU would be the biggest trade agreement, surpassing the $550 billion deal with Japan. So far, he has reeled in agreements with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has failed to deliver on a promise of "90 deals in 90 days."
Japan Times
5 hours ago
- Japan Times
Russian Navy parade canceled for 'security reasons'
Russia said on Sunday a major annual navy parade had been canceled for "security reasons", without specifying the threat or concern. "It has to do with the general situation. Security reasons are of utmost importance," said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, quoted by Russian news agencies. The parade was meant to be the highlight of Russia's Navy Day, which falls on the last Sunday of July each year and honors the country's sailors. But local authorities in the coastal city of St. Petersburg, where the warships and submarines were scheduled to pass, said on Friday the parade had been canceled without giving a reason. Russian President Vladimir Putin — who re-established Navy Day in 2017, nearly four decades after it was canceled in Soviet times — appeared in a video message hailing the "bravery" and "heroism" of Russia's sailors participating in the offensive in Ukraine. "We are celebrating the holiday in a working atmosphere," Putin said later on Sunday, in a video address to Russian forces involved in large-scale naval maneuvers called "July Storm". The drills, launched earlier this week in the Baltic and Caspian seas as well as in the Arctic and Pacific oceans, involved more than 150 ships and over 15,000 troops, Putin said. "Our main task is to ensure Russia's security and firmly protect the sovereignty and national interests," Putin said in St. Petersburg, where he was traveling on Sunday, according to the Kremlin. Russia, which launched its military operation on Ukraine in February 2022 with daily bombardments of its neighbor, has faced retaliatory Ukrainian drone strikes on its territory in recent months. The Russian defense ministry said on Sunday that 100 Ukrainian drones were downed overnight. At least 10 of them were intercepted not far from St. Petersburg and a woman was wounded, the governor for the northwestern Leningrad region, Aleksandr Drozdenko, said on Telegram. That drone assault also disrupted operations at St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Airport, delaying dozens of flights, the facility's authorities said.
Japan Times
6 hours ago
- Japan Times
Climate disclosure is advancing — but who's being left behind?
The global push for climate action is becoming increasingly fragmented. While some countries move forward, others are falling behind — widening a gap that could undermine our collective ability to confront the climate crisis. Under the Trump administration, the United States has seen a clear rollback of climate policy, with many disclosure and regulatory measures reversed or abandoned. The European Union, while sticking to its climate goals, has taken steps to ease compliance burdens for smaller businesses by effectively exempting them. Despite these shifts, global momentum for standardized climate-related disclosure remains strong, reflecting a desire to balance regulatory ambition with economic competitiveness, rather than an abandonment of progress on climate. The International Sustainability Standards Board continues to play a central role. Many countries are considering adopting ISSB's climate disclosure standards mainly for listed companies, which aim to bring consistency and comparability to corporate climate data. In the banking sector, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has also recently taken steps. In June, it finalized a voluntary climate risk disclosure framework for large banks. But progress depends on one critical factor: the quality of data that banks receive from the companies that they finance. As momentum builds to tackle climate change, a quieter but no less urgent problem is emerging: While many advanced economies and large corporations press forward with ambitious climate action and disclosure frameworks, others face serious capacity constraints. The divide is no longer just about emissions — it's about awareness, resources and fairness in the transition itself. A key driver of this imbalance is 'transition risk' — the financial exposure that companies face as economies move toward decarbonization. These risks stem directly from climate mitigation efforts such as carbon pricing, emissions targets and the transition to renewable energy. While essential, these policies carry economic consequences, especially for companies in carbon-intensive sectors. As investors and regulators increasingly demand transparency, transition risk has become central to financial reporting. The good news is that these risks are becoming easier to quantify. Widely adopted standards like the Greenhouse Gas Protocol allow companies to track their emissions. Climate scenario models from the International Energy Agency, along with carbon price estimates aligned with the 1.5 degrees Celsius target, offer tools to assess financial exposure. These same tools help banks evaluate climate risk within their lending and investment portfolios. The landscape of climate disclosure is expanding rapidly, with various sector-based frameworks, taxonomies, environmental and social governance scoring systems and certification schemes emerging worldwide. But growing sophistication comes with its own challenge. While these tools aim to enhance transparency and combat greenwashing, they risk overwhelming smaller firms and developing countries that lack the institutional or technical capacity to comply. Many companies are being left behind — for lack of means. This is where a global minimum standard becomes essential. Instead of continually raising the bar, we need to develop a baseline that any company or country can realistically meet. Such a standard wouldn't replace more advanced frameworks — it would complement them, creating a more inclusive and equitable foundation for climate accountability. After all, progress that only includes the well-resourced isn't real progress. More importantly, climate risk isn't just about mitigation and transition risk. The other half of the equation — physical risk — is becoming more urgent by the day. Around the world, extreme weather events such as floods, droughts, wildfires and heatwaves are growing more frequent and more severe. These risks are already inflicting major economic and social losses. Yet efforts to adapt — by building resilience to climate impacts — remain underdeveloped, even in advanced economies. Most companies and financial institutions have yet to meaningfully integrate physical risk into their strategies or disclosures. Unlike transition risk, which is concentrated in carbon-intensive sectors, physical risk affects all countries, industries and communities — often in highly localized and variable ways. This makes it harder to define, quantify and standardize adaptation activities. In many vulnerable regions, disaster insurance coverage is shrinking or becoming unaffordable. Insurance markets alone cannot bear the burden. Governments and businesses must work together to build policy and financing frameworks that proactively address physical risk. In the end, climate risk is not just about emissions. It's about exposure, resilience and the ability to act. If we fail to close the capacity gap — on both mitigation and adaptation — we risk building a climate transition that is exclusive, fragmented and ultimately ineffective. Sayuri Shirai is a professor at Keio University and an adviser on sustainable policies at the Asian Development Bank Institute. She was a former policy board member at the Bank of Japan.
