logo
‘Otago is being overlooked'

‘Otago is being overlooked'

A new medical school will be established at the University of Waikato. File photo
The government's backing of a third medical school at Waikato is yet more evidence it cares little about Dunedin, opponents say.
Health Minister Simeon Brown said yesterday Cabinet had approved $82.85 million in government funding towards the project, with the university chipping in more than $150m.
The numbers differ from National's policy heading into the 2023 election.
Then, it pledged $280m for a third medical school at Waikato University, with the university to raise a further $100m.
The school would also open in 2028, a year later than National had promised, but still with an initial roll of 120 students.
The University of Otago and University of Auckland — which run the country's two existing medical schools — had submitted to the government they could train more medical students for significantly less than the cost of establishing a new medical school.
Megan Pōtiki. PHOTO: ODT FILES
Otago Polytechnic executive director Dr Megan Potiki said she was surprised by the decision, "which even Treasury had described as unaffordable".
"Otago Polytechnic has concerns about the potential impact on clinical placements for our nursing ākonga [students], and on the long-term security of our industry-leading nursing programme."
Dr Potiki's comments come after the government's decision to place Otago Polytechnic in a federation model rather than being fully stand-alone.
"It appears Otago is being overlooked by this government with their recent decisions, and Otago's proud tertiary track record is being undermined."
Otago University, which had been strongly opposed to the idea, yesterday had a mixed response. .
Megan Gibbons. PHOTO: SUPPLIED
Pro-vice-chancellor for health sciences Prof Megan Gibbons said the university was disappointed the government did not follow the alternative and more cost-effective option of further increasing the intakes into the country's existing medical schools.
"However, any investment that supports growing and sustaining the health workforce is a step towards strengthening care for our communities — particularly in rural and under-served regions."
Otago was committed to working alongside others in the sector to ensure the best outcomes for the health of all New Zealanders, she said.
Auckland University dean of medical health services Prof Warwick Bagg would not comment on that university's previous opposition to the plans.
Instead, Prof Bagg looked towards the positive.
"Today is a historic day for medical education in New Zealand. The government has made its decision, and the good news is the extra 120 students."
Others were not so sanguine.
Bryce Edwards. PHOTO: ODT FILES
Director of The Integrity Institute Dr Bryce Edwards issued a scathing assessment of the decision that said it had been political rather than one made in the best interests of the health system or the education system.
"It's a stark contrast to have the new Dunedin hospital really restrained in its build and essentially funds cut back, producing a less than optimal new hospital at the same time that $83m is going to be spent elsewhere in the health system that, frankly, very few experts believe is a good spend of money.
"The people of Dunedin and Otago should feel aggrieved."
Taieri MP Ingrid Leary, of Labour, said nothing about the decision had been transparent.
"There's nothing rational about it either.
"Given the cuts to the new Dunedin hospital, the vindictive and appallingly communicated decision last week by Penny Simmonds regarding Otago Polytechnic, and now this decision that effectively kneecaps our medical school, it is clear that Christopher Luxon and his three-headed government don't care one iota about the deep South."
In August last year, Treasury shared the concerns of the existing medical schools saying the plan was unaffordable and that there were other ways to achieve the government's goal of increasing the number of rural GPs.
Green MP Francisco Hernandez said the government had committed to yet another irresponsible, white elephant project.
"The quarter of a billion dollars on just capital costs for a third medical school would have been more responsibly spent on boosting the number of doctors that Aotearoa needs from tried-and-true training facilities at Otago and Auckland."
University of Waikato vice-chancellor Prof Neil Quigley said it was "a landmark moment for New Zealand".
"We will be offering a programme that selects and trains doctors in a fundamentally different way and will complement New Zealand's two existing medical schools."
matthew.littlewood@odt.co.nz
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government warned of even longer election counts without reforms, but Māori and young people likely to be hit hard by change
Government warned of even longer election counts without reforms, but Māori and young people likely to be hit hard by change

NZ Herald

timean hour ago

  • NZ Herald

Government warned of even longer election counts without reforms, but Māori and young people likely to be hit hard by change

Goldsmith, along with the rest of the coalition, expressed frustration at the length of the count at the last election, and asked officials to look at changes. 'If we leave things as they are, it could well take even longer in future elections. The 20-day timeframe for a final result will likely already be challenging to achieve at the next election without changes,' Goldsmith said. Labour and the Greens criticised the changes, with Labour's justice spokesman Duncan Webb saying they were an 'appalling change that will make it harder for a lot of people to exercise their democratic right'. A Regulatory Impact Statement from the Ministry of Justice said there had been an explosion in special votes as more and more people enrolled or updated their details on the day they voted. There were about 300,000 to 350,000 of these votes at the last election. In the 2023 election, 602,000 votes cast were special votes, or about 20.9% of all votes. If nothing were to change, the Electoral Commission forecasts this to rise to 739,000 special votes in the 2026 election, or 24% of the total. By the 2032 election, the Electoral Commission forecasts 999,000 special votes, or 30% of the total. Officials noted a general trend towards people getting their enrolment sorted far later in the cycle, with 66% of enrolment 'transactions' in the 2023 election occurring after writ day, the Governor-General's official instruction to hold an election. This compared to 52% in 2017 and 42% in 2020. The change may go deeper than mere laziness. Officials said that New Zealanders move around a lot more than in the past. At the last census, about a fifth of people had lived in their house for a year or less and 53% of people had lived in their house for less than five years. Moving house more means updating your enrolment details more. If people do this on the day, it means more special votes and a longer count. Officials shared Goldsmith's concern about ballooning numbers of special votes leading to a longer counting period. If a third of votes were special votes, the count could take longer than it does now — although they did not estimate a time. They warned that a longer vote count and more special votes could delay the start of coalition negotiations prolonging uncertainty and affecting everything from the functioning of charities to investment in the economy. 'Special votes often affect the final number of seats allocated to parties. For that reason, government formation negotiations may be constrained until special votes have been counted,' officials said. 'The level of uncertainty about election outcomes will always depend on how close the results are for each election. 'Likewise, the degree to which parties may be able to progress government formation negotiations while awaiting the official results will depend on the closeness of the results as well as other political considerations,' officials said. '[E]lections are by nature a time of uncertainty in democracies, and there is value in a timely and smooth transfer of power following an election. A change of government and associated changes in policies can have broad impacts — for example, on the general public, Māori, businesses, the voluntary sector, public services and more. 'Some international studies have indicated that political uncertainty around national elections can have an impact on economic factors, such as reduced investment and spending,' officials said. These challenges are particularly acute for New Zealand, which because of the coalition negotiations period that is almost guaranteed by an MMP election, will always have a period of post-election uncertainty. New Zealand also has relatively short three-year terms, meaning elections come around frequently. Campaigns take about six weeks from the last day of Parliament to election day. If the vote count takes three weeks and coalition negotiations take another five, then New Zealand will spend about one month in every 20 either in the midst of an election campaign or waiting for a government to be formed — the period of uncertainty is even longer considering how little governments tend to do between delivering their final budget and getting out on the hustings. Officials also warned the pressures of these enormous special vote counts could lead to errors, undermining confidence in the electoral system. A move to different counting methods might be desirable. The current model is 'largely manual', officials said. 'This model may be nearing the end of its capacity to cope with increasing volume and processing requirements,' they said. Officials warned the changes could have serious consequences on turnout. The Electoral Commission advised that special votes are more likely to come from areas with high Māori, Asian, and Pacific communities. Younger people are also far more likely to cast special votes — particularly first-time voters. In 2023, 33% of 18- to 19-year-old voters enrolled or updated their details during the voting period, including 48% of Māori voters aged 18 to 19. In 2023, 17.3% of Māori voters updated their details or enrolled during the voting period. The same figure for the general population is 18.9%. Officials raised some concerns about whether the changes might raise Treaty of Waitangi problems, as the Treaty 'provides for equal citizenship rights for Māori'. 'These rights include the right to political representation. Setting an earlier enrolment deadline will increase the administrative requirements to exercise this right,' they said. Officials were also concerned that based on 'previous trends' there may be an 'increased likelihood' that votes cast by Māori would be disallowed at a higher rate than those cast by non-Māori, depending on how people responded to the new deadline for updating their details. As part of Goldsmith's changes, the Government will introduce automatic enrolment updates, making it more likely for people to have their enrolments kept current automatically. Officials recommended this option on its own as their preferred method to reduce vote counting timeframes. Instead, it was paired with decisions to close enrolment 13 days before election day. Officials also considered closing enrolment on writ day and requiring people to vote in their electorate, rather than casting a vote from somewhere else.

Nearly half of Kiwis applying for Australian citizenship born elsewhere
Nearly half of Kiwis applying for Australian citizenship born elsewhere

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Nearly half of Kiwis applying for Australian citizenship born elsewhere

Max Siqueira (second from right), during his New Zealand citizenship ceremony - he has now moved to Australia. Photo: Neil Macbeth / SUPPLIED Nearly half of the New Zealanders applying for Australian citizenship weren't born here, according to data from the Australian government. Between July 2023 and June 2025, more than 92,000 New Zealand citizens applied for Australian citizenship, its Department of Home Affairs said. The figures raised questions about whether New Zealand had become a launch pad for migrants aiming to settle in Australia . When Max Siqueira moved from Brazil to New Zealand in 2016, he had no firm plans. He arrived on a visitor visa, but after landing a job, he stayed long enough to gain permanent residency and eventually became a New Zealand citizen last year. Soon after, his family went on holiday to Australia - they liked it so much they decided to move there and now live on the Gold Coast. Australia's Gold Coast. (File photo) Photo: 123rf "It's really easy once you get the New Zealand passport," Siqueira said. "I just bought a plane ticket. At the airport, I gave them my passport and said I was moving to Australia. They said 'Welcome, good luck' - that's it. The next day, I applied for a tax number and started working. It was that easy." His case was not unique. In 2024 alone, nearly 30,000 New Zealanders moved to Australia - the highest number in more than a decade . Since July 2023, New Zealand citizens on a Special Category Visa (SCV) had been able to apply directly for Australian citizenship after four years of residence, without first needing to become permanent residents. Australia did not cap the number of SCVs issued, and nearly every New Zealand citizen was eligible for one upon arrival. While Siqueira believed most migrants came to New Zealand intending to settle, he agreed some planned to move on. "It happens, but not as much as people might think. I know a few who had that plan from day one, go to New Zealand, then move to Australia once they get the passport. "But most didn't plan that. They were happy in New Zealand and only thought about moving once they visited Australia or realised how easy it would be with the passport. "I can't speak for all nationalities, but among Brazilians I know, the main reason people move to Australia is the weather. It reminds us of home," Siqueira said. Stats NZ said since the early 2000s, migrants born outside of New Zealand have made up a growing share of New Zealand citizens moving across the Tasman. Of New Zealand citizens who migrated to Australia in 2024, 35 percent were foreign-born. Data form the Department of Home Affairs showed, from 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2025, more than 92,000 New Zealand nationals who hold a Special Category Visa (SVC) applied for Australian citizenship. Of these, 48 percent were born outside of New Zealand. Emeritus Professor Richard Bedford, a population geographer, said while New Zealand had a net loss of citizens to Australia, it had also a considerable net gain of citizens from other countries during the same period. "There's sometimes an assumption all the people going to Australia are highly skilled, and those coming here are not, but that's incorrect", he said. "We bring in many highly skilled migrants, and it does help balance the overall flow." But retaining that talent was a real challenge, he said. "We need to take very seriously the factors that attract skilled migrants. It's not always about money, but money is a big one. "We must ensure that highly skilled migrants we bring in get good jobs and are well paid. But we're a small country with a smaller economy, and we can't compete on everything. "What we can offer is a good lifestyle, a welcoming environment, and a strong sense of community, things that also matter to many migrants." Immigration rules were an important factor, he said. "Many barriers to skilled employment in New Zealand come from our own professional associations, like medical or engineering boards. "If we're not letting these skilled people work, we shouldn't be inviting them in the first place. "And once someone has residency, they have the same rights as anyone else. If they don't want to stay in the job they came for, or if they want to move to Australia, they have every right to do so. Bedford, who had been working on migration issues since the 1960s, said it's too difficult to tell if more immigrants are using this country as a stepping stone across the Tasman. He said the real challenge was making New Zealand a place people want to stay. "Not just with good pay, but with access to housing, a welcoming culture, and opportunities. If we want migrants to commit to staying, we have to make it worth their while beyond just the job offer." Emeritus Professor Jacques Poot, a population economist at the University of Waikato, said New Zealand and Australia had long functioned as two closely linked labour markets, and New Zealand had typically come out on the losing side. "Australia's economy is about five times bigger, and wages tend to be higher due to slightly greater productivity." Poot said it was unfair to assume migrants who left had always intended to do so. "People migrate for all kinds of reasons. Some move on, some return home, and others stay. There's a lot of churn in modern labour markets. Migration today is often temporary." Still, he said New Zealand should improve its ability to retain people who wanted to settle. "We should revisit our pathways to residency. We need to make sure people who want to settle here have every opportunity to do so." He also pointed to New Zealand's wage gap as a long-standing push factor. "Australia offers higher wages, and that's tied to their larger economy and more populous cities. Cities like Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane generate what we call 'agglomeration advantages', with more productivity, more opportunities, better pay." Even so, he said the narrative of a mass exodus from New Zealand was overstated. "If you look at the numbers in proportion to our total population, the real exodus happened in the late 1970s, when we only had 3 million people. Now we have over 5 million. So while the numbers may look big, they're not records in relative terms. "One of the things that struck me in 1979 was the big headline in two papers in Wellington: 'Last one to turn off the light.' Because they were really amazed about the out migration from New Zealand. "Well, since then, we're still having the lights on in New Zealand, so I wouldn't worry too much about it." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Former Black Fern Cheryl Waaka left to fundraise for survival after shock cancer diagnosis
Former Black Fern Cheryl Waaka left to fundraise for survival after shock cancer diagnosis

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Former Black Fern Cheryl Waaka left to fundraise for survival after shock cancer diagnosis

Photo: Mata with Mihingarangi Forbes Cheryl Waaka, a former Black Fern and a māmā of two teenagers, is now facing her toughest opponent yet, stage 4 bowel cancer. She was a fit and strong wāhine Māori hailing from Ngāpuhi and Ngāti Kahungunu, she's won two world cups in the Black Jersey and is still dedicated to the game, but her diagnosis in June has left her stricken with sadness. "I was healthy, running around, doing my everyday job. It was King's birthday weekend. There was a Johnny Isaacs Māori tournament in Kaikohe. I was running the line, AR-ing, and three days later, I'm on the floor in excruciating pain." She remembers the day her life was changed forever. "I got my brother to get me to the GP in Kaikohe. Ambulance to Kawakawa. Ambulance to Whangārei and then that night broke the news that I have a tumour in my bowel and I need to have emergency surgery. "I suppose I'm very lucky to my surgeon. He got the tumour, but unfortunately, it spread to my liver." In March, Health Minister Simeon Brown announced the National Bowel Screening Age would be lowered for all New Zealanders from 60 to 58, a step he said will save hundreds of lives. The "redirected" funding was previously set aside for a pilot programme that allowed Māori and Pacific people to access bowel cancer screening starting at age 50. While Health Minister Simeon Brown said the age of eligibility for free bowel screening is projected to prevent an additional 771 bowel cancers and an additional 566 bowel cancer deaths over the next 25 years, advocates are calling the move 'institutionalised racism' as half of bowel cancers in Māori occur before the age of 60. Waaka, who is up to date on all her health checks, said if the screening age was lowered to 50, her diagnosis would not have been stage 4. "If it didn't happen now, would [the tumor] have been still sitting there, and by the time I got to 58, if I got to 58, it might have been too late. "You look at me, strong, fit, healthy. It can happen to anyone. And I don't want it to happen to anyone." And the effect ripples to her whānau, she recalled the moment she had to break the news to her two children. "I wouldn't like to wish that on anybody. Just myself to be told, and then to actually tell the kids. "I was trying to hold myself to be strong, as we do as wāhine. So that was one of the hardest moments of my life. I wouldn't wish that." The rates of early onset colorectal cancer have risen by 26 percent per decade on average over the past 20 years, according to University of Otago researcher Dr Oliver Waddell. Researchers and Māori health practitioners have called for the age to be lowered to 45 as it was in many other countries. "If we had [earlier] screening, I most probably wouldn't be costing the country money. "That's how I'm looking at it. If I was able to get screened at a younger age, you just imagine how much money this government will be saving in health costs," Waaka said. Bowel cancer treatment costs depended on when it was found - stage 1 being the cheapest and stage 4 is the most expensive. For Waaka, her bowel cancer has got into her liver and aside from rounds of chemotherapy, the non-funded drug she needs comes at a cost of $30,000. To start her first round of treatment on 11 August, she is having to fundraise to survive. But Waaka said it's a big ask to turn to the community for funds. "Life is hard, people are struggling and for me, I feel like I'm taken from the whānau. "And everyone said, you know, you've given so much, it's our time, but deep inside you know everyone's struggling to survive out there, and I'm just so grateful that people are willing to help me to survive and for me to fight this fight... which I'm going to do." She wants her off-the-field legacy to be remembered as much as her on-the-field career. "I'm never one to ask for help, but I'm always giving. So for me, my legacy will be that I've given everything that I can, and hope I've just left something that will remind people of me."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store