logo
Medicare and Medicaid turn 60 – and face historic cuts decades in the making

Medicare and Medicaid turn 60 – and face historic cuts decades in the making

The Guardian4 days ago
The US's largest public health insurance programs, Medicare and Medicaid, turn 60 years old on Wednesday – a birthday that will be celebrated only weeks after Republicans enacted the largest cuts to healthcare in the nation's history.
Passed in the civil rights era, the sister health insurance programs served as tools for the Democratic president Lyndon Johnson to desegregate American healthcare and fight poverty.
'This is an infamous day for the US, which already has the most abysmal healthcare system among our peer nations,' said Lawrence Gostin, a professor of global health law at Georgetown Law. 'Now, in order to give tax relief and spend more on defense, we're kicking off our most needy citizens from life-saving care.'
In a health system defined by a patchwork of public and private coverage, Medicare and Medicaid have stood for 60 years as the civil rights era's health legacy – their history more often marked by expansion than contraction, even amid decades of attacks from conservatives.
That history took a sharp right turn on the Fourth of July, when Donald Trump signed a Republican budget law that will cut $1tn from Medicaid beginning in 2026.
'It's really unconscionable these cuts,' said David Lipschutz, co-director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, speaking about both programs. 'The magnitude, the scope, the targeting of certain lawfully present immigrants, the added requirements and burdens for people with Medicaid – specifically designed to purge the roles of people who would otherwise be eligible.'
Today, Medicare insures more than 68 million seniors, and Medicaid insures 71 million low-income, elderly and disabled adults. Cuts signed by Trump are expected to result in nearly 12 million people losing Medicaid coverage and another 5 million people losing health insurance because of a reduction in government subsidies to private insurance, through so-called 'Obamacare' plans.
The cuts are the largest in the program's history, and enact decades of conservative rhetoric – tracing all the way back to then-actor Ronald Reagan's 1961 criticism of public health insurance as 'socialized medicine'.
Medicare and Medicaid were enacted together on 30 July 1965 – born with Johnson's signature on the Social Security Amendments of 1965, or HR 6675.
The programs represented both an enormous victory and, in a way, a concession. A group of campaigners for universal health coverage tried and failed to pass a 'national health insurance' after the second world war – in large part because of the antagonism of American doctors – around the same time that the United Kingdom's National Health Service was getting off the ground.
Unable to achieve universal coverage, proponents settled for an 'add-on' to social security, the retirement benefit for older Americans, according to Pulitzer prize-winning author Paul Starr, whose book, The Social Transformation of American Medicine, is the authoritative history.
'Medicaid was a footnote,' said Starr. 'The whole focus was on passing Medicare.'
Medicare also sought to correct a searing injustice in American healthcare – Jim Crow segregation that extended to America's doctor's office and hospitals. In 1946, congressional lawmakers modernized the nation's healthcare facilities with the Hill-Burton Act, but did so with a 'separate but equal' philosophy. For nearly two decades, Hill-Burton helped construct or modernize 6,800 facilities in 4,000 communities, often excluding Black patients and physicians.
'Typical practice in the south would be to see all the white patients first, and see the Black patients last,' said Starr. 'Hospitals were segregated and Black people did not have access to mainstream hospital care in many places.'
A 1963 supreme court case against a North Carolina hospital found that the 'separate but equal' doctrine was unconstitutional. In a few short years, hospitals and clinics across the country desegregated to participate in Medicare.
Less recognized at the time was the power of Medicaid, and how its structure – jointly operated by the states and federal government – would make it more vulnerable to political attacks.
'Medicaid gradually grew to being the system of health insurance for low-income people, for people with disabilities. It became the method of financing nursing homes in the US,' said Starr.
Medicare and Medicaid led, 'not only to desegregating, but elevating life expectancy across the states and reducing disparities among racial and ethnic minorities, women, children and older adults and people with disabilities,' said Daniel Dawes, an expert on global health policy at Meharry Medical College.
Beginning in the Reagan era in the 1980s, conservatives proposed transforming Medicaid from an 'entitlement', which does not cap costs, to a limited 'block grant' to states – necessarily capping how many people and what services would be covered.
The former House speaker Newt Gingrich, George W Bush's administration and the former House speaker Paul Ryan, all Republicans, made proposals to block-grant Medicaid.
Decades of rhetoric pushing to cut Medicaid carried into talking points about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Trump's signature spending bill. Trump officials rolled out vintage Republican arguments to describe Medicaid beneficiaries as caught in 'a lifelong trap of dependency'.
A wide array of evidence shows most Medicaid beneficiaries who can work already do, and new requirements instead function as red tape to limit enrollment. Polls show that Medicaid is widely popular, even among Republicans.
The Obama administration led a historic expansion of Medicaid in 2010, through the Affordable Care Act (ACA), better known as Obamacare. For the first time, Medicaid would cover working-age single adults – not just pregnant women or families, as the program had traditionally done.
In 2025, a major economic study again showed its benefits: expanding Medicaid to millions more Americans probably saved more than 27,000 lives.
The improvement in Americans' health was perhaps only matched by the ferocity of attacks from the political right. For nearly a decade, the repeal of Obamacare became a cornerstone of Republican politics.
Trump himself has only sporadically engaged in the healthcare debate. In 2017, he would tell the press: 'Nobody knew that healthcare could be so complicated.' Before he was elected again in 2024, he said he had 'concepts of a plan' to replace Obamacare, and promised not to touch Medicaid, Medicare or social security.
Trump first attempted to repeal Obamacare in 2017, a change that would have left an estimated 15 million people without insurance. The bill was memorably tanked with a thumbs-down from the Republican senator John McCain.
However, ideas about how to cut Medicaid did not sink with the bill. In 2018, the Trump administration approved the first Medicaid work requirements as pilots in Arkansas and Georgia. Courts struck down those pilots, but they now form a critical part of how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is expected to push people off the program.
Starr described the cuts to Medicaid as out of step with reality.
'A lot of people do work at the minimum wage, millions of people, and they're still poor,' he said. 'And by the way those minimum-wage jobs won't provide them any healthcare – so you're just going to let them die when they get sick? What are you going to do?'
The enormous cuts to Medicaid have set off new wrangling within the Republican party, including efforts by the Missouri Republican senator Josh Hawley to repeal the cuts for which he just voted.
Republicans could face further backlash when cuts to Medicaid start to hit rural hospitals around 2026. A June analysis by the University of North Carolina's Sheps Center for Health Services Research found that 338 rural hospitals, including dozens in states such as Louisiana, Kentucky and Oklahoma, could close as a result of the spending bill. There are nearly 1,800 rural hospitals nationally, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), a healthcare research non-profit.
'While we've tried to chip away at Medicaid for many, many decades this is the first time Congress has really gutted the program,' said Gostin. 'People will die, a lot of people will die. A lot of people will get very, very sick, have preventable illnesses, and so to me this is just simply historic and unconscionable.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House boasts about Trump's golf score – days after he was accused of cheating on his own course
White House boasts about Trump's golf score – days after he was accused of cheating on his own course

The Independent

time22 minutes ago

  • The Independent

White House boasts about Trump's golf score – days after he was accused of cheating on his own course

The White House on Saturday posted President Donald Trump 's winning golf score from a tournament at his New Jersey golf club, boasting about his win just days after he was accused of cheating on another course. 'Winning on and off the course,' the official White House Instagram page wrote, showing the final score card from the 2025 Men's Senior Club Championship tournament at Trump National in Bedminster. At the top of the card was Trump's gross score of 69 – representing the number of golf strokes the president took on each hole in the tournament. Adjusted with his handicap, the numerical measure of how well a person golfs by either adding or deducting strokes from the gross score, Trump's net score was 67. The score means the president has a handicap of around 2, which is considered very impressive for a non-professional golfer. But a number of commenters on the Instagram post did not appear excited about the president's score, many joking that just last week, reports accused Trump of cheating on his golf course in Scotland. 'Yo we saw the video from Scotland last week, he just throws the ball where he wants it and makes up a score,' one commenter wrote. 'I mean yeah, I'd win too if my caddy was dropping balls on the course for me,' another Instagram user wrote on the post. While on a trip to Scotland in July, a widely-circulated video of the president golfing at his course in Turnberry appeared to insinuate that Trump cheats at his beloved game. The president's caddy appeared to drop Trump's ball closer to the fairway – which some interpreted as a violation of the rules of golf, which generally says to play the ball where it lies. Allegations that Trump cheats at golf date back to before his first term. Some have accused him of using his caddies or Secret Service detail to move his ball. Others claim the president himself has kicked his ball to make it easier to hit. Trump has always denied the allegations. The cheating allegations have been so rampant that one sports writer, Rick Reilly, even wrote an entire book on it, titled Commander in Cheat. In response to the president's recent win, Reilly wrote on X, 'The 4 guys in Trump's group finished 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th. Trump has a magic pencil. #CommanderInCheat' However, some professionals who have played alongside the president say he is actually quite a good golfer. Jack Nicklaus, a hall-of-fame golfer, said in 2020 that Trump plays 'pretty well.' Tom Watson, a former professional golfer, said in 2017 that the president was a good hitter and 'can really get the ball out there.' Trump is passionate about golf; he famously played often during his first term in office and continues to play often now. According to a website that tracks the number of golf trips the president takes, he's golfed approximately 49 out of the 196 days he's been in office. Earlier this year, Trump said he won the golf club championship at his golf club in Palm Beach, Florida, as well.

Harvard study casts new light on why some couples conceive all girls or boys
Harvard study casts new light on why some couples conceive all girls or boys

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Harvard study casts new light on why some couples conceive all girls or boys

Harvard study casts new light on why some couples conceive all girls or boys A Harvard study has revealed a link between a woman's age and the likelihood of giving birth to multiple children of the same sex. Siwen Wang, a PhD student in nutritional epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, began researching the topic after noticing a trend in her own family. Her mother was one of three sisters and a younger brother, while her father had two brothers and no sisters. 'I was wondering whether it's just pure chance or if there was some special biology underlying this phenomenon,' she told the Boston Globe. Her questions led to a study published July 18 in Science Advances by her and seven others. The researchers analyzed 146,064 pregnancies from 58,000 US nurses across nearly six decades and discovered that in some families the odds are not so random. The NIH-funded Nurses' Health Study studied the subjects between 1956 and 2015 and found that some families were more likely to have children of the same sex. Researchers found that maternal age played a key role in the sex of the baby. A Harvard study has revealed a link between a woman's age and the likelihood of giving birth to children of the same sex Siwen Wang (pictured), a PhD student at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, began researching the topic after noticing a trend in her own family. Her mother was one of three sisters and a younger brother, while her father had two brothers and no sisters The research found that women who had their first child at age 29 or older were significantly more likely to have multiple children of the same sex. 'It's like moving the needle from 50 to 60 percent,' Dr. Bernard Rosner, a co-author of the study told the outlet. 'I don't think you could use any of this information to definitively predict whether a specific person will have a male or female offspring, but ... it's not necessarily random probability.' The findings also showed that women who already had three children of the same sex were more likely to have a fourth of the same gender. The study showed a 61 percent likelihood for boys and 58 percent for girls. 'If you've had two girls or three girls and you're trying for a boy, you should know your odds are not 50-50,' Jorge Chavarro, professor of nutrition and epidemiology and author of the study, told the Washington Post. The research found that women who had their first child at age 29 or older were significantly more likely to have multiple children of the same sex 'You're more likely than not to have another girl.' 'We don't know why these genes would be associated with sex at birth, but they are, and that opens up new questions,' Chavarro added. Paternal influences on the child's sex were not entirely explored in the study. Researchers did not include detailed data on fathers so they couldn't analyze how paternal factors might influence the sex of children. Despite, the lack of research on the paternal side, Wang did mention that older maternal age is most highly correlated with older paternal age.

MTG hints that she might be finished with the GOP: ‘I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me'
MTG hints that she might be finished with the GOP: ‘I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me'

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

MTG hints that she might be finished with the GOP: ‘I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me'

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a well-known far-right Republican and loyal ally to President Donald Trump, has expressed deep frustrations and a growing rift with her political party. Over the last few weeks, Greene has notably broken with her party and the president on several matters she cares deeply about. She condemned Israel's war in Gaza and called it a 'genocide,' opposed Trump's recent artificial intelligence executive order, and advocated for the administration to release the Epstein Files. The pattern, Greene said in an interview with The Daily Mail this week, represents her frustrations with the Republican Party, which she believes is abandoning policies geared toward regular Americans. 'I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me, or if I'm kind of not relating to the Republican Party as much anymore,' Greene said. 'I don't know which one it is.' The Georgia congresswoman said she felt as if the party had given up on issues that she resonates with, such as stopping foreign aid, using the Department of Government Efficiency to make cuts across the federal government, and driving down inflation. Greene had long advocated for the U.S. to stop sending military aid to Ukraine amid the Russia–Ukraine conflict – something that has not ceased. She has also criticized the administration for involving itself in the Iran–Israel conflict. Since Elon Musk, the de facto head of DOGE, left the White House, the administration appears to be less focused on using DOGE to make cuts. While DOGE staffers are still present throughout the government, reports indicate they have less authority. 'Like what happened to all those issues? You know that I don't know what the hell happened with the Republican Party. I really don't,' Greene said. 'But I'll tell you one thing, the course that it's on, I don't want to have anything to do with it, and I just don't care anymore,' she added. Greene has said online that she believes Republicans are pushing away younger voters by continuing to push the same unpopular policies. But she told The Daily Mail that the GOP may also be unpopular with conservative women based on how it treats them. 'I think there's other women in our party that are really sick and tired of the way men treat Republican women,' Greene said. The Georgia congresswoman specifically referenced Elise Stefanik, the Republican Rep. from New York. Trump initially nominated Stefanik to serve as U.S. ambassador to the U.N., but then reportedly pulled her nomination to maintain a safe majority in the House of Representatives. Instead, he nominated former national security adviser Mike Waltz. Greene said Stefanik got 'screwed' by Speaker Mike Johnson and people in the White House – Greene specifically said she did not blame the president. While Greene expressed frustrations with the current state of the Republican Party she did not say she would definitely rescind her affiliation with it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store