Sheriff Breaches Bitcoin ATM to Reclaim $25K From Scam
Jasper County authorities in Texas executed a search warrant to physically open a Bitcoin ATM on June 16, retrieving approximately $32,000 in cash—$25,000 of which a local family had deposited after falling prey to a scammer posing as a government official. Sheriff Chuck Havard authorised the operation after tracing funds to an ATM operated by Bitcoin Depot.
Law enforcement agents secured the warrant following a police report that fraudulent calls threatened the family with fines unless they paid via the kiosk. Deputies pulled cash from the machine using a power‑cutting tool, recovering a surplus in addition to the family's deposit.
The sheriff defended his actions: 'When thieves, low‑lifes and scammers attempt to take advantage of the citizens of Jasper County, we will work swiftly and utilise every resource at our disposal to protect our citizens and their property at all costs'. He also warned that cryptocurrency‑based fraud cases are notoriously complex and that the perpetrator remains unidentified.
ADVERTISEMENT
The incident has sparked debate across digital‑currency communities. Some critics argue that damaging ATM infrastructure and seizing funds from an operator may undermine property rights, asserting that the ATM itself—provided by a third party—was collateral damage in the scam. One Redditor remarked:
'Sounds like maybe government employees destroyed an innocent third party's property and stole his money.'
This episode highlights a concerning rise in crypto‑ATM scams. The FBI logged nearly 11,000 complaints totaling over $246 million in losses tied to such ATMs in 2024—a 31 percent increase from the previous year—with many victims aged over 60. Citing the surge in fraud, Spokane, Washington, enacted a ban on crypto‑ATMs on June 18, and Australia imposed tighter transaction caps earlier this month.
Bitcoin Depot, the ATM's operator, confirmed it works closely with law‑enforcement agencies under AML and KYC protocols, but typically does not supervise cash retrieval directly from kiosks. The nature of cryptocurrency—its decentralisation and pseudonymity—adds obstacles to tracking illicit transfers and returning funds to victims.
Although the seized amount exceeds the family's loss, victims must navigate legal processes to claim reimbursement, and success often depends on tracing crypto to identifiable exchanges. Past efforts, such as the U.S. Department of Justice recovering $2.3 million from the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack, show that fund recovery is complex and rare.
Industry observers say the operation may set a legal precedent for law enforcement intervention in crypto‑ATM fraud. However, critics caution against the public destruction of third‑party property without clear evidence of complicity, warning it could erode trust in digital‑currency infrastructure.
Amid growing consumer vulnerabilities, experts call for enhanced public education, robust regulation, and strengthened compliance from ATM operators. Proposed measures include mandatory transaction limits, stricter licensing, real‑time fraud monitoring, and clearer cooperation channels with enforcement agencies.
Federal and state authorities are also considering new legislation targeting crypto‑ATM fraud. The Crypto ATM Fraud Prevention Act, if passed, would require improved operator oversight and clearer protocols for law‑enforcement response. Meanwhile, states like North Dakota and Nebraska have already introduced licensing and transaction‑cap laws.
As this case advances, Jasper County officials and Bitcoin Depot are expected to coordinate further to identify the scammer and determine rightful ownership of the recovered assets. The outcome of this operation may shape future legal and regulatory standards governing crypto‑ATM responses to fraud.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tahawul Tech
6 hours ago
- Tahawul Tech
Cybercriminals set their sights on U.S. airlines
Notorious cybercriminal group 'Scattered Spider' has set its sights on the aviation industry, successfully breaching the computer networks of multiple airlines in the U.S. and Canada, according to the FBI and private experts responding to the hacks. The hacking hasn't affected airline safety, but it has top cyber executives at major airlines across the United States on alert because of the hacking suspects: A network of young cybercriminals called 'Scattered Spider' who are known for their aggressive efforts to extort or embarrass their victims. It's a fresh headache for the travel industry as the busy summer travel season kicks into high gear. This is now the third major US business sector, after insurance and retail, to face a flurry of cyberattacks tied to the criminal group. The hackers target big companies and their IT contractors, 'which means anyone in the airline ecosystem, including trusted vendors and contractors, could be at risk', the FBI said in a statement that named Scattered Spider as the perpetrator of the airline hacks. 'Once inside (a victim's network), Scattered Spider actors steal sensitive data for extortion and often deploy ransomware', the FBI said. The FBI, the statement continued, 'is actively working with aviation and industry partners to address this activity and assist victims.' Hawaiian Airlines and Canada's WestJet confirmed that they were still assessing the fallout from recent cyberattacks, though the airlines did not name the perpetrators. More victims in the aviation industry could come forward, sources briefed on the investigation said. WestJet's issues began when the airline said it was responding to a 'cybersecurity incident' that was affecting access 'to some services and software systems', including its app for customers. Both WestJet and Hawaiian Airlines said their operations were unaffected by the hacks. The lack of impact on operations at the airlines is 'likely a sign of good internal network separations or good business continuity and resiliency planning', said Aakin Patel, the former chief information security officer of Las Vegas' main airport. It is not just the airlines themselves, but other 'segments of the aviation ecosystem' that are seeing increased cyberattacks, according to Jeffey Troy, the president of the Aviation ISAC, an industry group for sharing cyber threats. 'Our members are keenly alert to attacks from financially motivated attackers and collateral impacts emanating out of geo-political tensions around the world', Troy said. The fine margins for error in the airline industry were on display recently, when a separate IT outage, apparently unrelated to malicious cyber activity, caused delays for some American Airlines passengers. The Scattered Spider hacks have mobilised people across the industry to respond. In-house cybersecurity experts at major airlines have been closely monitoring the situation while cybersecurity firms such as Google-owned Mandiant are helping with the recovery and urging airlines to secure their customer service call centres. One of Scattered Spiders' preferred methods of infiltrating corporations is calling up help desks and pretending to be employees or customers. The technique has been highly effective for hackers to gain access to the networks of big companies. 'Airlines rely heavily on call centres for a lot of their support needs,' said Patel, making them 'a likely target for groups like this'. Scattered Spider gained attention in September 2023 when they were linked to a pair of multimillion-dollar hacks on Las Vegas casinos and hotels MGM Resorts and Caesars Entertainment. The hackers tend to pick one sector to target for weeks on end. Recently they were the suspect in a hack of insurance giant Aflac that potentially stole Social Security numbers, insurance claims and health information. Before that, it was the retail sector: The hackers, according to an internal memo, targeted Ahold Delhaize USA, which has the same parent company as the Giant and Food Lion grocery chains. 'The actor's core tactics, techniques, and procedures have remained consistent,' Mandiant chief technology officer Charles Carmakal said in a statement, and that it 'is aware of multiple incidents in the airline and transportation sector' that resemble the operations of Scattered Spider. Source: CNN Image Credit: Stock Image
The National
5 days ago
- The National
UAE Central Bank suspends bank's Islamic window from onboarding new customers for six months
The UAE Central Bank has suspended the Islamic window of a bank operating in the country from onboarding new customers for six months and also fined it more than Dh3.5 million ($953,632) for non-compliance with Sharia governance rules. The sanctions were imposed following the banking regulator's Sharia supervision examination, which found breaches by the bank, the Central Bank said on Wednesday. The name of the lender was not disclosed. 'The Central Bank, through its supervisory and regulatory mandates, endeavours to ensure that all banks and their staff, abide by the UAE laws, regulations and standards … to maintain transparency and integrity of the banking sector and safeguard the UAE financial system,' it said. The banking regulator has been cracking down heavily on regulatory non-compliance in recent weeks. On Tuesday, it imposed a Dh2 million fine on an exchange house for failing to comply with the country's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CFT) policies and procedures. Last month, it also imposed a Dh100 million fine on an exchange house for 'significant failures' in its AML/CFT framework and related regulations. It also fined an exchange house Dh200 million for the same offence in May. A Dh500,000 fine was also imposed on a branch manager, who was banned from working in any licensed financial institutions in the UAE. Earlier this month, the European Commission, the EU's main executive body, removed the UAE from its list of countries that pose a high risk for money laundering, amid growing efforts by the Emirates to boost its regulatory framework. The commission said the list was updated after taking into account the work of the Financial Action Task Force. The updated list will come into force after it receives 'no‑objection' from the European Parliament and the council within one month, which can be extended for another month. The FATF, the global body that combats money laundering and terrorism financing, removed the UAE from its 'grey list' in February last year after significant progress on reforms. The Emirates was placed on the grey list in 2022.
Arabian Post
5 days ago
- Arabian Post
Sheriff Breaches Bitcoin ATM to Reclaim $25K From Scam
Jasper County authorities in Texas executed a search warrant to physically open a Bitcoin ATM on June 16, retrieving approximately $32,000 in cash—$25,000 of which a local family had deposited after falling prey to a scammer posing as a government official. Sheriff Chuck Havard authorised the operation after tracing funds to an ATM operated by Bitcoin Depot. Law enforcement agents secured the warrant following a police report that fraudulent calls threatened the family with fines unless they paid via the kiosk. Deputies pulled cash from the machine using a power‑cutting tool, recovering a surplus in addition to the family's deposit. The sheriff defended his actions: 'When thieves, low‑lifes and scammers attempt to take advantage of the citizens of Jasper County, we will work swiftly and utilise every resource at our disposal to protect our citizens and their property at all costs'. He also warned that cryptocurrency‑based fraud cases are notoriously complex and that the perpetrator remains unidentified. ADVERTISEMENT The incident has sparked debate across digital‑currency communities. Some critics argue that damaging ATM infrastructure and seizing funds from an operator may undermine property rights, asserting that the ATM itself—provided by a third party—was collateral damage in the scam. One Redditor remarked: 'Sounds like maybe government employees destroyed an innocent third party's property and stole his money.' This episode highlights a concerning rise in crypto‑ATM scams. The FBI logged nearly 11,000 complaints totaling over $246 million in losses tied to such ATMs in 2024—a 31 percent increase from the previous year—with many victims aged over 60. Citing the surge in fraud, Spokane, Washington, enacted a ban on crypto‑ATMs on June 18, and Australia imposed tighter transaction caps earlier this month. Bitcoin Depot, the ATM's operator, confirmed it works closely with law‑enforcement agencies under AML and KYC protocols, but typically does not supervise cash retrieval directly from kiosks. The nature of cryptocurrency—its decentralisation and pseudonymity—adds obstacles to tracking illicit transfers and returning funds to victims. Although the seized amount exceeds the family's loss, victims must navigate legal processes to claim reimbursement, and success often depends on tracing crypto to identifiable exchanges. Past efforts, such as the U.S. Department of Justice recovering $2.3 million from the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack, show that fund recovery is complex and rare. Industry observers say the operation may set a legal precedent for law enforcement intervention in crypto‑ATM fraud. However, critics caution against the public destruction of third‑party property without clear evidence of complicity, warning it could erode trust in digital‑currency infrastructure. Amid growing consumer vulnerabilities, experts call for enhanced public education, robust regulation, and strengthened compliance from ATM operators. Proposed measures include mandatory transaction limits, stricter licensing, real‑time fraud monitoring, and clearer cooperation channels with enforcement agencies. Federal and state authorities are also considering new legislation targeting crypto‑ATM fraud. The Crypto ATM Fraud Prevention Act, if passed, would require improved operator oversight and clearer protocols for law‑enforcement response. Meanwhile, states like North Dakota and Nebraska have already introduced licensing and transaction‑cap laws. As this case advances, Jasper County officials and Bitcoin Depot are expected to coordinate further to identify the scammer and determine rightful ownership of the recovered assets. The outcome of this operation may shape future legal and regulatory standards governing crypto‑ATM responses to fraud.
