Trump to prosecute Kamala Harris, Beyoncé, Oprah Winfrey? US President reiterates explosive warning
Oprah Winfrey
and
Beyoncé
of taking millions of dollars from Democrats during the 2024 election in return for their endorsements. He has also declared that former Vice President
Kamala Harris
be prosecuted along with Beyoncé, Oprah Winfrey and Al Sharpton, according to US media reports.
Trump said that he was "looking at the large amount of money owed by the Democrats," claiming that the two A-listers had received $14 million from the party between them.
Trump to prosecute Oprah Winfrey, Beyonce?
The accusation follows a week of Trump's renewed interest in the Democrats' spending during the 2024 campaign. On Monday, Trump claimed that Beyoncé had been paid $11 million "to walk onto a stage, quickly ENDORSE KAMALA, and walk off" without doing any kind of musical performance.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Moose Approaches Girl At Bus Stop In Laguna - Watch What Happens
Happy in Shape
Undo
'I'm looking at the large amount of money owed by the Democrats, after the Presidential Election,' Trump began on Truth Social Saturday. 'These ridiculous fees were incorrectly stated in the books and records. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PAY FOR AN ENDORSEMENT. IT IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO DO SO.'
ALSO READ:
Happy Gilmore 2 declared a must watch by Taylor Swift with 13/10 review. The reason is totally expected
'Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying for people to endorse them. All hell would break out.'
Live Events
Kamala Harris campaign drew massive criticism over $165,000 payments to Beyonce's production company, Parkwood Entertainment, for an Oct. 26 Houston rally. The payment was made on November 19, weeks after Beyoncé endorsed Harris at a rally in Houston.
Winfrey's production company, Harpo Productions, was paid $1 million for a live stream event she helped organize in Michigan. Harris' team also sent $500,000 to Sharpton's National Action Network, according to New York Post.
Records from the Federal Election Commission do not show an $11 million payment from the Harris campaign to Beyoncé. Trump did not cite specific news reports in his post, and it is unclear where the $11 million figure came from.
ALSO READ:
Trump's Scotland tour to promote golf resorts has a shocking price tag for Americans, sparks backlash
What Beyonce said at Kamal Harris rally
Beyoncé said at a campaign rally for then-Vice President Kamala Harris in October: "I'm not here as a celebrity. I'm not here as a politician. I'm here as a mother—a mother who cares deeply about the world my children and all of our children live in, a world where we have the freedom to control our bodies, a world where we're not divided."
'Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT (she never sang, not one note, and left the stage to a booing and angry audience!), Three Million Dollars for 'expenses,' to Oprah, Six Hundred Thousand Dollars to very low rated TV 'anchor,' Al Sharpton (a total lightweight!), and others.'
Trump has peddled similar claims in the past. Last December, he alleged the Harris campaign paid the three for an endorsement, but cited slightly different figures. That time, he claimed Democrats sent '$11,000,000, $2,000,000, and $500,000 to get the ENDORSEMENT of Beyoncé, Oprah, and Reverend Al.'
ALSO READ:
'Made me a meme': Ex-Astronomer CEO Andy Byron to sue Coldplay over viral kiss cam controversy. Chris Martin reacts
'Beyoncé didn't sing, Oprah didn't do much of anything (she called it 'expenses'), and Al is just a third rate Con Man,' he groused at the time.
In May, Trump revisited the accusations as well, publicly asking how much the Harris campaign paid Bruce Springsteen, Bono, Winfrey and Beyonce.
The Harris campaign previously addressed questions about the payments made to Beyonce's production company and denied paying for an endorsement.
Beyonce's mother has also publicly denied reports that her daughter was paid up to $11 million to speak at the Harris rally.
Winfrey has also previously insisted she 'was not paid a dime' to participate in the event with Harris, but instead had production fees covered by the campaign. The White House has not yet confirmed if it will be pursuing any legal action against the Democrats or the Harris campaign.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US tariff imposition is terrible, but India has done well to resist: Trade expert
The US imposition of 25% tariff is `terrible' and India has done to stand up to Donald Trump's bullying and calling the US bluff, says a leading US trade expert. US President Donald Trump on Wednesday, July 30, announced the imposition of a 25 per cent tariff on all goods coming from India starting August 1(PTI/File) ``India could have fared a lot worse if it had given in to US pressure to open its agriculture and dairy industries, which is America's principal interest. To that extent, the 25% tariff is along expected lines, Biswajit Dhar, told this reporter, adding that 'India sensibly shielded its agricultural and dairy markets from American access. Had we caved, the harm would have been much worse.' He said that India must keep its small and marginal farmers in mind and their interests could scarcely be ignored. ``No trade deal can be so one-sided,'' the trade expert said. Dhar also said that the threat to impose tariffs on India's import of Russian oil ratcheting up the pressure on New Delhi, is unacceptable. ``The US has no business telling India how it should manage its relations with other countries. It is a direct impingement on India's sovereignty," Dhar said. "What is most objectionable is the manner in which the US President cites what kind of trade relations will have with other countries," he said. "First, you said you played a part in ending the India-Pakistan conflict. Now he is going even further. India cannot be led by Trump," Dhar added. President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that the United States would impose a 25% on goods imported from India, alongside an additional "penalty" import tax, citing India's significant trade barriers and continued purchasing of Russian oil and military equipment. In a social media post, Trump stated that while India "is our friend", its existing tariffs on US goods were "far too high, among the highest in the World". He also criticised India's "most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country". The US president added that India's procurement of military equipment and oil from Russia had enabled the war in Ukraine. As a result, he intended to charge an additional "penalty" on Indian imports starting this Friday, as part of his administration's revised tariffs on multiple countries. ``What Trump's decision has done is to scuttle, in effect, Indo-US bilateral trade talks, which were proceeding alongside," Dhar said. The US president's comments on social media called into question the prospects of a deal with a key US trading partner just days before his tariff deadline. This move follows Washington running a US$45.8 billion trade imbalance in goods with New Delhi last year, according to the US Census Bureau. India said on Wednesday that it was committed to a fair and balanced trade agreement with Washington after Trump's tariff announcement. Top trade officials have been transiting back and forth between Washington and New Delhi for months in pursuit of a final agreement. "India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective," the Indian government said in a statement. Asked what New Delhi could do now, including imposing counter tariffs as China had done, Dhar said that India needs to wait and watch. ``The kind of tariffs he has imposed on India and other countries, will come back and bite the US,'' he predicted. Asked what the short-term impact of this tariff imposition would be, Dhar said while they will be 'painful' and will have a clear bearing on exports from India, US companies which trade in India would also suffer. ``For instance, the US pharmaceutical industry leverages the Indian pharmaceutical sector for cost-effective production, particularly of generic drugs, which significantly benefits the US healthcare system through lower drug prices and increased access. Indian companies, in turn, find a large and lucrative market in the U.S., especially for generic medications. This balance could be disturbed," he said. US tariffs will also impact its smartphone industry, Dhar predicted. For the first time India has overtaken China as the No. 1 exporter of smartphones to the US, following Apple's tariff-driven manufacturing pivot to New Delhi. India-made devices accounted for 44% of smartphone imports in the US during the second quarter, up sharply from 13% during the same period last year, according to a new report published Monday by research firm Canalys. The total volume of smartphones made in India jumped 240% year-over-year, Canalys wrote.
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
25% US tariffs, 'dead economy': How Donald Trump doubled down on India in 24 hours
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday slapped 25% tariffs on Indian goods, along with an unspecified penalty tied to energy and defence purchases from Russia. The US President's move that, if enforced, could erode India's export competitiveness and weigh on investor sentiment. US President Donald Trump shakes hands with Prime Minister Narendra Modi during a joint press conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, (AFP file) India said it has 'taken note" of Donald Trump's statement on bilateral trade and the government is studying its implications. 'India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective,' the statement said. Also Read | Donald Trump again slams India, via Russia: 'They can take their dead economies down together' Donald Trump has set the August 1 date for his tariffs to go into effect. Trump, however, later told reporters talks on India's tolls were ongoing and "we will see what happens", but did not elaborate. Hours later on Thursday, Donald Trump once again mounted a sharp attack on India and Russia for their close ties and said the two countries can take their "dead economies down together". 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,' Trump said. Also Read | Rahul Gandhi backs 'dead economy' remark on India: 'Glad Donald Trump stated a fact' 'We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World,' he added. Trump on Wednesday announced the imposition of a 25 per cent tariff on all goods coming from India starting August 1, plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian crude oil and military equipment. The surprise announcement came a day after Indian officials said that a US trade team would visit from August 25 to negotiate a trade deal. Also Read | PM Shehbaz Sharif reacts to Pakistan-US trade agreement, thanks Donald Trump: 'Landmark deal' The announcement is being seen as a pressure tactic to get India to agree to demands made by the US, which has, in recent days, got favourable trade deals with major partners such as Japan, the UK and the European Union. Trump termed India's trade policies as 'most strenuous and obnoxious'. 'All things not good! India will therefore be paying a tariff of 25 per cent, plus a penalty for the above, starting on August first,' Trump said in a social media post. What would be the impact on India? India, the world's most populous country, is not an export powerhouse, but the United States is its largest trading partner, with New Delhi shipping goods worth $87.4 billion in 2024. India's protectionist trade policies, however, saw it run up a surplus of nearly $46 billion the same year. According to analysts, the tariffs alone could result in a 20-50 basis point hit to India's gross domestic product. Bloomberg Economics have also projected that a 26 per cent reciprocal levy could cut US-bound shipments by 30 per cent. The overall impact of Trump's policies could be more severe depending on the Russian "penalty" that is eventually levied on Indian exports. More broadly, experts say, the president's latest move poses a challenge to India's manufacturing dreams. "The 25 percent tariff... would undermine India's attractiveness as an alternative manufacturing hub to China," Shilan Shah of Capital Economics said in a note. Since the Indian tariff is higher than those on other Asian economies, 'it would somewhat diminish India's appeal,' Shah said, but added that the country still retained other advantages such as low labour costs. What sectors will be most affected? India's top exports include smartphones, drugs, gems, textiles and industrial machinery, with some of the most labour-intensive goods – including jewellery and seafood – under threat. India's jewellery sector, which exported goods worth more than $10 billion last year, has warned of job losses potentially hitting "thousands". Smartphones and pharmaceuticals are currently exempt from Trump's "reciprocal" duties. From Russia with love? Trump's anger with Indian purchases of Russian military equipment and oil overlooks the fact that New Delhi and Moscow have had historically close ties since the Cold War, say analysts. Data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute shows Russia supplied 76 per cent of India's military imports between 2009 and 2013. And while this percentage has dropped significantly in recent years, India still depends on Russia for spare parts. Moscow is also an important supplier of advanced weaponry, including submarine technology and cruise missiles. India has become a major buyer of Russian oil, providing Moscow with a much-needed export market after the Ukraine war cut it off from traditional European buyers. That has drastically reshaped energy ties, with India saving itself billions of dollars while bolstering Moscow's coffers. (With inputs from PTI, AFP)
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Senate Declines to Block Weapons for Israel as Gaza Hunger Worries Grow
WASHINGTON—Senators rejected an effort to block U.S. arms sales to Israel, sticking with the increasingly isolated government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu even as lawmakers of both parties expressed growing concerns about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The votes took on new prominence following an international outcry over images of malnourished babies and children. Global food-insecurity experts have said famine is unfolding in the enclave, where at least 16 children under age 5 have died of hunger-related causes since mid-July, according to a U.N.-backed report. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) led the effort late Wednesday on two resolutions to block the sale of weapons to the Israeli military over its conduct in the war against Hamas. In debate on the Senate floor before the vote, he held up a stack of papers that he said contained the names of children in Gaza who have died during the war and asked to put their names into the congressional record. 'The time is long overdue for Congress to use the leverage we have—tens of billions in arms and military aid—to demand that Israel end these atrocities,' he said. Sen. Jim Risch (R., Idaho), who leads the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, spoke against the resolutions. 'The solution to all of this isn't to deprive Israel of the weapons it needs. The solution is in the hands of Hamas,' he said. Sanders's proposals would prohibit the $676 million sale of two types of 1,000-pound bombs and guidance kits that direct them, along with tens of thousands of assault rifles. The resolution to block assault rifles failed with 27 in favor and 70 opposed. The resolution to block bombs failed 24-73. No Republican in the GOP-controlled chamber supported either measure. Democratic support has grown since April, when Sanders forced similar votes. Notable Democrats who voted to block weapons sales after rejecting earlier measures to do so included Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R., Ga.) this week became the first Republican lawmaker to say that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. President Trump said Tuesday the U.S. would partner with Israel on new food centers in Gaza but stopped short of providing further details or clarifying how any new efforts would differ from existing distribution sites. Earlier this week, Trump also appeared to reject Netanyahu's claim that there was no starvation in Gaza by citing images of children on television who 'look very hungry.' U.S. allies are stepping up pressure on Israel. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the U.K. would join France in recognizing a Palestinian state, unless Israel takes 'substantive steps' to end the war in Gaza, among other moves. Canada said it intends to recognize a Palestinian state, if conditions including a new election are met. Only 32% of Americans currently approve of Israel's military action in Gaza, a 10 percentage point drop since September, according to a Gallup poll released Tuesday. Democrats have long grappled over how to navigate the divide between pro-Israel members and progressives who criticize the country's treatment of Palestinians. But cracks were also showing among Republicans, who have largely stood firmly behind Israel's actions following the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R., Ga.), long a skeptic of aid to Israel, this week became the first Republican lawmaker to say that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. She also sparred online with one of Israel's top supporters in the House, newcomer Florida Rep. Randy Fine. In a social-media post earlier this month, Fine said: 'Release the hostages. Until then, starve away,' casting reports of hunger as Hamas propaganda. Greene shot back in a tweet that questioned how Fine's constituents feel about his 'calls for starving innocent people and children.' Pro-Palestinian activists said the Senate votes were a litmus test for whether lawmakers are willing to pair sharper rhetoric with meaningful action. 'We are at the tipping point of the famine,' said Beth Miller, the political director of Jewish Voice for Peace Action, the political arm of a group that has been protesting U.S. support for Israel since the beginning of the war. 'Senators who keep voting to send weapons to Israel are acting against the will of the American people,' she said. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.), the highest-ranking Jewish U.S. elected official, condemned 'the devastating levels of hunger, starvation, suffering and death' being documented in Gaza, calling them 'wholly unacceptable.' He has been an outspoken critic of Netanyahu. Still, he voted against the Sanders resolutions on Wednesday. Schumer signed a letter led by Sen. Adam Schiff (D., Calif.) to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, saying the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is 'unsustainable and worsens by the day.' The letter urged the Trump administration to use diplomatic efforts to end the fighting. Write to Katy Stech Ferek at and Sabrina Siddiqui at
