Tengku Maimun says goodbye, with no regrets
She presided over the case of the murder of former public prosecutor Kevin Morais and also made a ruling on the Peaceful Assembly Act, after which she said she had no regrets in her six-year tenure as the top judge in the country.
While there has been buzz among lawyers and other judges over why she was not given a six-month extension in her post, Tengku Maimun shrugged it off, saying she had no resentment that she had not received such an offer.
The outgoing Chief Justice, who is retiring, told press members that there was 'no issue' that a six-month extension was not on the cards.
'All I can say is that I have served for six years in good health and I think that in itself is a blessing.
'And no regrets, because I have completed my term as the Chief Justice, so the fact that I have not been extended for another six months, that's no issue at all.
'Six months is not significant compared to the six years,' she told the media at the Palace of Justice here.
At 5pm yesterday, Tengku Maimun ended her service as the nation's 16th Chief Justice. She had made history as the first woman Chief Justice when she was appointed to the post in May 2019.
Tengku Maimun celebrates her 66th birthday tomorrow, therefore reaching the mandatory retirement age.
Her retirement has caused a stir and has become a subject of discussion as there has been no formal announcement of a successor, thus far.
Asked about her thoughts on the judiciary, Tengku Maimun hoped her legacy would be continued by whoever succeeds her.
'I want to take this opportunity to say thank you to the Malaysian Bar and, of course, generally all the lawyers, including those from Sabah and Sarawak, for giving me strong support.
'I think they understand that the strength of the judiciary depends very much on the strength of the Bar. I am truly appreciative,' she added.
The second most senior judge in the country, Court of Appeal president Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, will retire today unless a last-minute extension is announced.
Justice Abang Iskandar is the first judge from Sabah and Sarawak to hold the position.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Outgoing appeals court president to judges: Continue to uphold legacy of justice
KUALA LUMPUR: Outgoing Court of Appeal president Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim marked his final day in office with a heartfelt farewell, urging the next generation of judges to preserve and strengthen the legacy of the country's judiciary. "I pray that the legacy of the Malaysian judiciary in upholding justice will be continued by the next generation of judges," he said in a note today. He said he trusts the judges will uphold justice with transparency, integrity, and courage. Abang Iskandar's judicial career spanned 18 years, beginning in 2007 and culminating in his appointment as Court of Appeal president, the second-highest judicial office in the country. "It has been a journey filled with challenges that shaped meaningful memories," he said, reflecting on nearly two decades of service. He expressed deep gratitude for the opportunities he had received and acknowledged the support of colleagues throughout the judiciary, legal profession, and academia. "During this time, I met many kind, dedicated and noble-hearted individuals… who have always extended their cooperation in the pursuit of justice," he said. Abang Iskandar said their contributions made his duties more manageable, both as Court of Appeal president and as a Federal Court judge. He admitted he would miss the daily camaraderie and wished his colleagues continued success. Describing his emotions as a mixture of joy and sadness, he said retirement would allow him more time with family, charitable work and personal pursuits. "I leave this role with immense gratitude, reflection, and a peaceful heart. This is the start of a new phase in life," he said.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Suaram seeks repeal of restrictive assembly law
PETALING JAYA: Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) has emphasised the need for amendments to the Peaceful Assembly Act (PAA) 2012, highlighting the importance of recognising gatherings as a constitutional right, not just a privilege. Suaram executive director Azura Nasron said while amendments to Section 11 of the PAA are crucial, it was equally important to repeal Section 9(5) of the same law. 'Sections 9(5) and 11 have long operated in tandem to entrench an authorisation-centric culture, where peaceful assemblies are treated as privileges subject to approval rather than inalienable constitutional rights. 'Amending one without repealing the other leaves the underlying legal framework fundamentally flawed and impairs the development of a culture grounded in the presumption that peaceful assemblies are lawful,' said Azura in a statement on Thursday (July 2). She said that under international norms, restrictions on peaceful gatherings must be the exception. 'The continued existence of Section 9(5) undermines this principle and obstructs the full realisation of the right to assemble under Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution,' she added. Article 10(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution guarantees every Malaysian citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression. Azura also criticised a recent remark by Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution who said that close to 99% of assemblies in 2023 and 2024 proceeded without restrictions. 'Assemblies critical of government-linked corruption or human rights violations remain more vulnerable to surveillance, investigation, and administrative obstruction. 'These figures do not reflect the chilling effect of selective enforcement, nor do they counteract the entrenched perception - enabled by laws like Section 9(5) - that peaceful assembly is conditional on state approval,' said Azura. Section 9(5) of the PAA provides a criminal penalty on organisers of public gatherings who failed to give police at least five days' notice before holding an assembly. Section 11 in the PAA provides that an organiser of an assembly, other than a religious assembly or funeral procession, must obtain the consent of the owner of the place of the assembly. On Tuesday (July 1), the Federal Court's five-member bench ruled that a provision under Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, which penalised an organiser who failed to provide the police with a five-day prior notice before holding an assembly, is unconstitutional. Saifuddin said the Home Ministry will table amendments to Section 11 of the PAA in the upcoming parliamentary sitting that begins this month. He also said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim implemented a moratorium on legal proceedings under Section 9(5) of the PAA as part of the government's broader agenda to reform the law. Commenting further, Azura asked Putrajaya to clarify the status of the moratorium, as it remains unclear whether this is a new policy shift. 'A moratorium on Section 9(5) must be explicitly announced and enforced—covering all ongoing investigations and prosecutions—until formal legislative repeal is completed,' she said. Azura also urged the government to consult civil society before the next parliamentary sitting on the proposed PAA amendments to ensure they reflect current realities and international human rights standards. 'Review and amend other provisions of the PAA that are incompatible with international standards - including Section 4(d), which unjustifiably prohibits individuals below 21 years old from organising assemblies,' she added. The next Parliamentary sitting will sit from July 21 till Aug 28.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Federal court rules in favour of LHDN over RM1.8bil tax appeal against TNB
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court on Wednesday (July 2) allowed the Inland Revenue Board's (LHDN) appeal to reinstate an additional tax assessment of RM1.8bil against Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) for the 2018 assessment year. A five-member panel chaired by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim unanimously overturned the earlier decisions of both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, which had ruled in favour of TNB and quashed the LHDN's tax assessment. The other members of the panel were Federal Court judges Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan, Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang, and Datuk Abu Bakar Jais. No order as to costs was made, with the court noting that the matter involved issues of public interest. Delivering the court's judgment, Justice Rhodzariah held that TNB's claim for reinvestment allowance (RA) under Schedule 7A of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA) was misconceived and not in accordance with the provisions of the Act. She added that TNB ought to have applied for an investment allowance under Schedule 7B of the ITA, rather than seeking RA under Schedule 7A. She explained that the legislative intent behind Schedule 7A was to incentivise manufacturing companies to reinvest in their existing operations in Malaysia. In contrast, Schedule 7B provides for investment allowance incentives specifically tailored to companies in the services sector, as approved by the Minister of Finance. Justice Rhodzariah further noted that TNB is authorised to impose a service charge under the Service Tax Act 2018, which reinforces its status as a service provider. As such, the court found that TNB falls within the ambit of the services sector and is therefore subject to Schedule 7B, not Schedule 7A. The LHDN argued that TNB, as a utility provider, does not qualify as a manufacturer and is thus not entitled to the RA granted to entities engaged in manufacturing activities. On July 21, 2020, TNB filed a judicial review application seeking, among others, to quash the LHDN's decision dated July 13, 2020, which had disallowed its RA claim amounting to RM1,812,506,384.64. The company also sought a declaration that it was entitled to claim the RA under Schedule 7A of the ITA. TNB had included its RA claim for the year of assessment 2018 in its tax return. However, the LHDN informed the company that the claim had been disallowed in a letter dated July 3, 2020. Subsequently, on July 13, 2020, the LHDN issued a notice of additional assessment against TNB for RM1,812,506,384.64 in tax. TNB then initiated judicial review proceedings to challenge the assessment. In February 2022, the High Court allowed the application and set aside the LHDN's additional assessment for the year 2018. The Court of Appeal, in a decision delivered in May 2023, affirmed the High Court's ruling. Despite the dispute, TNB has already paid the assessed sum. At Wednesday's hearing, the LHDN was represented by Datuk Dr Cyrus Das and senior revenue counsel Ashrina Ramzan Ali, while counsels Datuk D. P. Naban and S. Saravana Kumar appeared for TNB. - Bernama
