logo
IAEA board resolution declaring Iran in breach of non-proliferation duties

IAEA board resolution declaring Iran in breach of non-proliferation duties

Reuters12-06-2025
VIENNA, June 11 (Reuters) - Below are key passages from a four-page resolution on Iran that diplomats said the International Atomic Energy Agency's 35-nation Board of Governors passed on Thursday. The text is still confidential and was seen by Reuters.
The Board of Governors,...
(d) Recalling the Board of Governors' resolutions of 19 June 2020... , of 8 June 2022 ... , of 17 November 2022 ..., of 5 June 2024 ..., and of 21 November 2024 ..., which called upon Iran to fully cooperate with the Agency and decided that it is essential and urgent, in order to ensure verification of the non-diversion of nuclear material, that Iran act to fulfil its legal obligations and, with a view to clarifying all outstanding issues, take all specified actions without delay,
(e) Regretting that despite the above resolutions by the Board and numerous opportunities provided by the Director General since 2019, Iran has failed to provide the co-operation required under its Safeguards Agreement, impeding Agency verification activities, sanitizing locations, and repeatedly failing to provide the Agency with technically credible explanations for the presence of uranium particles of anthropogenic origin at several undeclared locations in Iran or information on the current location(s) of nuclear material and/or of contaminated equipment, instead stating, inconsistent with the Agency's findings, that it has declared all nuclear material and activities required under its Safeguards Agreement,
(f) Noting the Director General's conclusion ... that Iran did not declare nuclear material and nuclear-related activities at three undeclared locations in Iran, specifically, Lavisan-Shian, Varamin, and Turquzabad, and that, because of the lack of technically credible answers by Iran, the Agency is not in a position to determine whether the nuclear material at these undeclared locations in Iran has been consumed, mixed with other declared material, or is still outside of Safeguards,
(g) Noting with concern the Agency's conclusion that these undeclared locations were part of an undeclared, structured programme carried out by Iran until the early 2000s, and that some of these activities used undeclared nuclear material,
(h) Noting with concern the Agency's conclusion that Iran retained unknown nuclear material and/or heavily contaminated equipment, and other assets, arising from the former undeclared structured nuclear programme, at Turquzabad in the period 2009 until 2018, after which items were removed from the location, the whereabouts of which remain unknown,
...
(k) Noting that Iran's failure on numerous occasions to co-operate to facilitate the implementation of Safeguards, while pursuing activities consistent with concealment efforts, including extensive sanitization and the provision of inaccurate explanations, represents a significant impediment to the Agency's ability to clarify and verify Iran's declarations and the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme,
(n) Regretting Iran's failure to provide the Agency with technically credible explanations regarding undeclared nuclear material,
...
(o) Reiterating its concern that Iran has still not provided necessary, full and unambiguous cooperation with the Agency and has not taken the essential and urgent actions as decided by the Board in its June and November 2024 resolutions ... , and
(p) Concerned that the Agency is at an impasse with regards to resolving these issues,
1. Deeply regrets that, despite repeated calls from the Board and many opportunities offered, Iran has failed to co-operate fully with the Agency, as required by its Safeguards Agreement;
...
3. Finds that Iran's many failures to uphold its obligations since 2019 to provide the Agency with full and timely cooperation regarding undeclared nuclear material and activities at multiple undeclared locations in Iran ... constitutes non-compliance with its obligations under its Safeguards Agreement with the Agency ...;
4. Finds also consistent with Article 19 of Iran's Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement ... that the Agency is not able to verify that there has been no diversion of nuclear material required to be safeguarded under the Agreement to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices;
5. Finds also that the Director General's inability ... to provide assurance that Iran's nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful gives rise to questions that are within the competence of the United Nations Security Council, as the organ bearing the main responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security, consistent with Article III.B.4 of the Agency's Statute, and expresses its grave concern in this regard;
6. ... The Board will address the timing and content of the report required under Article XII.C of the Agency's Statute and also provided for in Article 19 of Iran's Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement, and the notification required under Article III.B.4 of the Agency's Statute;
7. Reaffirms its decision that it is essential and urgent in order to ensure verification of the nondiversion of nuclear material that Iran act to fulfil its legal obligations and, with a view to clarifying all outstanding Safeguards issues, take the following actions without delay:
i. Provide technically credible explanations for the presence of uranium particles of anthropogenic origin in two undeclared locations in Iran,
ii. Inform the Agency of the current location(s) of the nuclear material and/or of the contaminated equipment,
iii. Provide all information, documentation and answers the Agency requires for that purpose, and
iv. Provide access to locations and material the Agency requires for that purpose, as well as for the taking of samples as deemed appropriate by the Agency;
...
10. Calls upon Iran to urgently remedy its non-compliance with its Safeguards Agreement by taking all steps deemed necessary by the Agency and the Board, so that the Director General can provide the necessary assurances regarding the correctness and completeness of Iran's declarations pursuant to its Safeguards Agreement;
11. Stresses its support for a diplomatic solution to the problems posed by the Iranian nuclear programme, including the talks between the United States and Iran, leading to an agreement that addresses all international concerns related to Iran's nuclear activities, encouraging all parties to constructively engage in diplomacy; ...
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Footage shows aftermath of Israeli strike on Gaza school turned shelter
Footage shows aftermath of Israeli strike on Gaza school turned shelter

The Guardian

time27 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Footage shows aftermath of Israeli strike on Gaza school turned shelter

At least 17 people were killed in an Israeli strike on the Mustafa Hafez school, which shelters displaced Palestinians in Gaza City, and 20 others were wounded, according to health officials at al-Shifa hospital. Witnesses said women and children were among those killed who had been sheltering at the site. It came as Hamas said it was studying what Donald Trump called a 'final' ceasefire proposal for Gaza

This Gaza film is impossible to review because I don't know who to believe anymore
This Gaza film is impossible to review because I don't know who to believe anymore

Telegraph

time31 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

This Gaza film is impossible to review because I don't know who to believe anymore

Gaza: Doctors Under Attack (Channel 4) is the documentary commissioned but then dropped by the BBC – a rare example of the corporation smelling potential disaster. It aired last night on Channel 4 instead. Hardly anyone cares about Channel 4, so its impact will now be minimal. But the impact of the BBC's handling of this, and of their Gaza documentary that went before it – Gaza: How To Survive A War Zone, in which the child narrator was later revealed to be the son of a Hamas minister – will endure. It makes this film almost impossible to review, because you now wonder if you should trust what you are being told. Undeniably, the film is harrowing and shocking. It contains unbearably distressing scenes of children's suffering: a boy sobbing over the body of his father, a little girl on an operating table after the skin had been flayed from her torso. Gaza is hell on earth, and the documentary showed us this in graphic terms. You can see these images on television news reports, but they are brief. An hour of them is hard to endure. It is the central claims of the film that the BBC found too difficult to handle. They are a) that Israel is detaining, torturing and, in some cases, deliberately killing Israeli doctors and hospital workers, targeting them at work and at home; and b) that Israel is systematically crippling Gaza's hospitals as part of an overall plan to destroy Gaza. There is a playbook, the film says: attack the hospital and its surroundings with air strikes, besiege the building with ground troops and block medical supplies, detain medical staff, then withdraw troops and leave behind a non-functioning shell of a building. Move on to the next hospital and repeat. The documentary builds a pretty convincing picture of this. Doctors spoke of torture and imprisonment, while mobile phone footage captured chilling scenes, including Israeli soldiers allegedly raping a prisoner inside the notorious Sde Teiman prison (nine soldiers were arrested last year). An Amnesty International worker told of Israeli 'black sites' where men are detained without judicial oversight, alongside disturbing images of prisoners; she also declared that Israel was acting 'with genocidal intent' against the Palestinian healthcare system. Israel, according to the film's many disclaimers, denies all of the allegations made. The programme was hampered, as is all coverage of Gaza, by Israel's refusal to let foreign journalists in. It claims to be a 'forensic investigation,' but in the circumstances, that just isn't possible. An Israeli whistleblower, his face hidden, claimed to have worked as a doctor at a field hospital and to have witnessed a detainee being treated without anaesthetic as 'retribution' for October 7. This is grim. You think: was this a one-off or widespread? The Israeli government maintains that Hamas uses hospitals as part of its military strategy, and that some medical staff have treated Israeli hostages. Reporter Ramita Navai tells us that two of the doctors whose stories were featured here had expressed support for the October 7 attacks, although she omits to share the words. She asks one doctor if he ever treated hostages, and he insists that he didn't but equivocates on the wider point, saying 'even if doctors in other hospitals… dealt with the hostages and treated them, does that mean for saving the life of a hostage or treating one you should be killed or interrogated?' But some things are not in doubt. Doctors in Gaza are working under horrendous conditions, often without electricity, water and basic supplies, trying to save lives. Children in Gaza are living in unimaginable misery. On that, at least, the evidence is clear.

French foreign minister denounces spy charges against couple imprisoned in Iran
French foreign minister denounces spy charges against couple imprisoned in Iran

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

French foreign minister denounces spy charges against couple imprisoned in Iran

France's foreign minister denounced spy charges reportedly being used to hold two French nationals in Iran for more than three years, saying the allegations are 'unjustified and unfounded." French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot on Thursday said France had not been formerly notified by Iranian authorities of the charges against French citizens Cécile Kohler and Jacques Paris, which reportedly include spying for Israel. If confirmed, France would consider the charges 'totally unjustified and unfounded,' Barrot said, calling for the couple's 'immediate, unconditional release.' Kohler, 40, and her partner Paris, 72, were arrested in May 2022 and until last month were detained at Tehran 's Evin Prison, known for holding dual nationals and Westerners who are used by Iran as bargaining chips in diplomatic negotiations. A French diplomat was able to meet the pair earlier this week as their families demanded proof they were alive following recent Israeli strikes on the prison. Kohler's sister, Noemie Kohler, said in an interview broadcast Thursday on BFM TV that the couple were told they had been charged with spying for Israel, conspiracy to overthrow the Iranian regime and 'corruption on Earth.' 'Our understanding … is that they face death penalty,' she said. 'We're really extremely worried about their psychological state and the trauma of the bombings.' The visit by the French diplomat took place at a prison south of Tehran but, like some other prisoners, Kohler and Paris were transferred from Evin following the Israeli strikes and their location is unknown, Noemie Kohler said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store