French foreign minister denounces spy charges against couple imprisoned in Iran
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot on Thursday said France had not been formerly notified by Iranian authorities of the charges against French citizens Cécile Kohler and Jacques Paris, which reportedly include spying for Israel.
If confirmed, France would consider the charges 'totally unjustified and unfounded,' Barrot said, calling for the couple's 'immediate, unconditional release.'
Kohler, 40, and her partner Paris, 72, were arrested in May 2022 and until last month were detained at Tehran 's Evin Prison, known for holding dual nationals and Westerners who are used by Iran as bargaining chips in diplomatic negotiations.
A French diplomat was able to meet the pair earlier this week as their families demanded proof they were alive following recent Israeli strikes on the prison.
Kohler's sister, Noemie Kohler, said in an interview broadcast Thursday on BFM TV that the couple were told they had been charged with spying for Israel, conspiracy to overthrow the Iranian regime and 'corruption on Earth.'
'Our understanding … is that they face death penalty,' she said. 'We're really extremely worried about their psychological state and the trauma of the bombings.'
The visit by the French diplomat took place at a prison south of Tehran but, like some other prisoners, Kohler and Paris were transferred from Evin following the Israeli strikes and their location is unknown, Noemie Kohler said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Sweaty French at war over air con
A political and moral row has broken out over whether France should install more air conditioning to cope with the type of blistering heatwave that has sent temperatures soaring this week. Polls suggest the French feel guilty about using energy-guzzling air con, which critics say risks accelerating climate change. However, as a 'heat dome' punishes much of Europe and temperatures in Paris hit 40C, there have been calls for France to produce an air conditioning strategy. Heatwave warnings have been issued in 84 French departments, and thousands of schools have been shut down because of the extreme heat. The top floor of the Eiffel Tower was shut to avoid visitors fainting, while the peak of Mont Blanc, Europe's highest mountain, registered a temperature above zero for the first time ever for the month of June. In Paris, River Seine bathing areas will open for the first time in a century this weekend. And Marine Le Pen, the figurehead of the Right-wing National Rally (RN) party, has called for a strategy to keep the French cool. 'It is high time that France rolled out a major air conditioning equipment plan,' she said. 'Hospitals, schools, retirement homes, public transport, etc are not equipped, even though these places are home to French people who are particularly sensitive to heat.' She claimed 'the workers' were 'suffocating in buildings without air conditioning because leaders have decided that the French people should suffer from the heat, while they themselves obviously enjoy air-conditioned vehicles and offices'. And she added: 'With the so-called French elites, austerity is always reserved for the middle and working classes.' The centre-Right government hit back, arguing that Ms Le Pen and her party were offering short-term, populist solutions that failed to tackle the root cause of climate change. 'Those who talk to you about a major air conditioning plan have apparently just discovered the moon,' said Agnès Pannier-Runacher, the ecological transition minister. 'The incompetent RN has just found out that nursing homes need air-conditioned rooms. Thank you, but it's actually been mandatory since 2004. 'The issue we have with air conditioning is global warming. We need to provide air conditioning for vulnerable people and give them some respite. However, we mustn't do it everywhere, otherwise we risk warming the planet, which is a bad solution.' A 2020 study on air conditioning use in Paris underlined that 'if AC systems release heat into the street, as is most often the case, the outside air is warmed and the heat wave worsens'. According to one study, the systematic use of air conditioning during 10 days of heatwave would increase the air temperature in the city by up to 2.4C. Globally, air con generates around one billion tons of CO2 per year out of a total of 37 billion tons emitted worldwide, according to the International Energy Agency, a figure comparable to the impact of air traffic. 'The goal must remain to have better insulated buildings,' said Gabriel Attal, a former French PM and head of Emmanuel Macron's Renaissance group. However, he conceded that 'in the meantime, we must take all measures to adapt things while we wait'. The government has not only come under fire from the Right. When the education minister criticised the Green mayor of Tours for shutting schools because of the heat, he invited her to hold a cabinet meeting in one of its classrooms, saying efforts to bring down temperatures were woefully inadequate. Despite the environmental downsides, the Left has also conceded that air con should be used in priority areas. Boris Vallaud, the leader of the Socialist MPs, said he was 'in favour of air conditioning for establishments that welcome young people'. But Marine Tondelier, the Greens leader, said 'air conditioning will not be enough' while fellow Green MP Sandrine Rousseau called for a 'shutter plan' and a 'fan plan' to reduce heat. As politicians slug it out, their debate reflects wider hand-wringing in France over the use of air con in France. 'In our country, we are touching on a kind of taboo,' Pierre Marty, a senior lecturer in energy transition at the École Centrale de Nantes, told Marianne magazine. 'Air conditioning is seen as a luxury and a new source of energy consumption. Here, we tend to think that the best energy is the energy we don't consume. 'There has also been a growing awareness of global warming and, for some, adapting to it – by installing air conditioning, for example – is seen as a sacrifice. This proves that we have failed in our mission.' According to a 2021 OpinionWay survey for France Energie, 75 per cent of French people said they did not plan to buy an air conditioner. Nearly six out of 10 said they would rather 'suffer from the heat than install an air conditioner to protect the environment'. Only 47 per cent believe that all public places should be air-conditioned, and 48 per cent believe air conditioners should be banned altogether because of their environmental impact. Air con's use of electricity is of less concern in France, where around 95 per cent of electricity output is low-carbon. But not only do units raise temperatures outside, they also contain coolants that are thousands of times more detrimental to global warming than carbon emissions if leaked. Overheating 'hits productivity' Battle lines have even been drawn in the office, according to financial daily Les Echos, which said employees were split between 'team air conditioning' versus 'team open window'. Arguing in favour of air con, Nicolas Bouzou, a French economist, said overheated offices and schools took a terrible toll on productivity. 'We lose almost half a day's work every week the office temperature exceeds 30C,' he wrote in Le Figaro. 'Making our fellow citizens sweat limits learning, reduces working hours and clogs up hospitals. 'Some 5,000 French people died from the heatwave in the summer of 2023 (15,000 in 2003). The climate gains nothing from this – on the contrary.' All the same, French attitudes are changing. The number of homes with air con in France rose from 14 per cent in 2016 to 25 per cent in 2020, though installations are mainly in the south. That compares with 90 per cent in the US and around five per cent in the UK. Meanwhile, French air con companies are being inundated with calls. 'We're getting between 100 and 150 a day, compared to around 30 normally,' said Samuel Azoulay, the manager of EMDF climatisation. 'We can't answer everyone, but we're doing our best.'
Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
I felt a lot safer in Israel under Iranian attack than I do back home in Britain
Visiting Israel during the recent Iranian attacks, several times I saw Israeli interceptors hurtling single-mindedly through the night sky over Tel Aviv towards an unseen Iranian ballistic missile. I'd been in active warzones before, but even so, in my experience it is a uniquely reassuring sight. The IDF Air Defence Command shot down around 86 per cent of some 500 missiles Iran fired during the twelve day war, and stopped 99 per cent of over 1,000 drones. If drones are the future of warfare, they were a busted flush in this conflict, when faced with the most sophisticated air defence system in the world. That system is made up of a wide range of expensive and precisely directed and coordinated interceptors including Arrow, David's Sling, Barak and Iron Dome, supplemented by US Thaad launchers and SM interceptors fired by US warships near Israel. Ever since Saddam Hussein fired 42 Scud missiles at Israel during the 1991 Gulf War, Jerusalem has been working assiduously to defend its people against all forms of air attack. Thirty four years of research and development and tactical and technical innovation accompanied by heavy financial investment has more than paid off in the face of missile and drone attacks from Iran, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iraq. Israel's strategy is not just to meet threats from the air but to overmatch them, and the IDF continues to work flat out to maintain its qualitative edge as its enemies learn from their own failures. Now I'm back home in Britain, and to be honest I don't feel nearly as safe as I did in Israel under active attack. The UK has made almost no effort in this sphere and today we are undefended against all but the most limited forms of attack. What defences we do have are too few to cover much of our territory. Our only protection against ballistic missiles is the Royal Navy's six Type 45 destroyers, armed with Sea Viper anti-air missiles – just two of these ships are typically available for duty. Even their capabilities are limited compared to the Israeli equivalent: HMS Diamond did shoot down an Iranian ballistic missile fired by the Houthis last year, but Sea Viper is not meant to be capable of ballistic intercept and the enemy weapon was probably quite basic: of the type often dubbed 'quasi ballistic'. If one of our aircraft carriers sails across the world, as is the case today, she takes a destroyer with her and we are down to one to protect the UK. Aside from our one available destroyer, a few RAF quick response fighters can be launched to intercept enemy planes, cruise missiles and drones. The Army has a few batteries of short-range air defence missiles. We do not have any up and running airborne radar systems, meaning that we have very limited ability to detect low-flying incoming threats. Our combined defences don't come anywhere close to meeting the threat we face today. The UK homeland can easily be struck by a range of Russian missiles – ballistic, cruise, hypersonics and drones – fired from Russia itself or from its aircraft, ships or submarines. There is a man in the Kremlin who has proved his willingness to use the weapons against military targets as well as population centres, and has already ordered lethal attacks of a different type against civilians in our country. I wonder if Keir Starmer realised that, and our inability to effectively defend against such strikes, when he led with his chin on heading a 'coalition of the willing' against Russia. Perhaps he has realised now and maybe that explains why he's gone so quiet. But it only gets worse. Within 15 years ballistic missiles fired from anywhere in the world will likely be able to hit targets anywhere else in the world: such systems have already been tested. Unless our capabilities improve dramatically, we will be comprehensively deterred from any unilateral action, no matter how vital it may be. The Israelis also understand something else we seem to have forgotten: attack is the best form of defence. During the twelve day war they didn't just rely on their interceptors but, using combat planes, ships and drones, they relentlessly struck at Iran's launchers, knocking out at least half of them – as well as missile and drone stocks and production facilities. Meanwhile our Attorney General, Lord Hermer, reportedly advised Starmer that Britain's participation in these operations would be illegal. Churchill received no such advice when he launched a 600 bomber raid against the German V-weapon missile development site at Peenemunde in 1943 and then, Israel-style, proceeded to pummel warehouses, storage facilities, rail tracks and launch sites connected with the V-weapons. As well as re-discovering the political spine necessary to defend ourselves, we need to rapidly build up our missile defences. That's not going to be achieved by decades of the glacial procurement processes for which the Ministry of Defence is infamous. It would be a good idea to follow the German example of buying Arrow off the shelf from Israel. But wait, the Government has an arms embargo against the Israelis. Perhaps, however, we should not be listening to the pro-Hamas hordes on our streets (just four per cent of Brits supported Hamas in a YouGov poll in March, while over half said they had at least some sympathy for Israel). We might rather consider our own national security interests instead of performatively attacking an ally in need – an ally that can also help us. It's past time for joined up strategic thinking plus some Churchillian 'action this day'.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Young Europeans losing faith in democracy, poll finds
Only half of young people in France and Spain believe that democracy is the best form of government, with support even lower among their Polish counterparts, a study has found. A majority from Europe's generation Z – 57% – prefer democracy to any other form of government. Rates of support varied significantly, however, reaching just 48% in Poland and only about 51-52% in Spain and France, with Germany highest at 71%. More than one in five – 21% – would favour authoritarian rule under certain, unspecified circumstances. This was highest in Italy at 24% and lowest in Germany with 15%. In France, Spain and Poland the figure was 23%. Nearly one in 10 across the nations said they did not care whether their government was democratic or not, while another 14% did not know or did not answer. Thorsten Faas, a political scientist at Berlin's Free University, who worked on the study, said: 'Among people who see themselves as politically to the right of centre and feel economically disadvantaged, their support of democracy sinks to just one in three. 'Democracy is under pressure, from within and without.' The study was carried out in April and May. More than 6,700 people between the ages of 16 and 26 in Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Greece and Poland responded to the ninth annual survey by the YouGov institute for the Tui Foundation, which funds projects dedicated to youth in Europe. Forty-eight per cent worry that the democratic system in their own country is endangered, including 61% in Germany, where the economy – Europe's biggest – is ailing and the far right has made significant inroads, fuelled in part by increased backing from young voters. The return of Donald Trump to the White House, the rise of China, and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine have shifted power away from Europe in the respondents' perception, with just 42% counting the EU among the top three global players. Despite – or perhaps because of – Brexit, the figure was highest among Britons at 50%. Of those surveyed in the UK, 73% wanted a return to the EU, while nearly half of young Europeans (47%) sought stronger ties between the EU and Britain. The US was seen by 83% as part of the power trio, followed by China with 75% and Russia on 57%. Rising polarisation is also driving young Europeans to the ideological fringes along with their elders, but a notable gender divide has emerged in the process. Nearly one in five – 19% – described themselves as politically right of centre, up from 14% in 2021, while 33% called themselves centrists, 32% as leftist and 16% without any designation. Women in Germany, France and Italy identified as progressive in higher numbers than four years ago, while young men in Poland and Greece have grown more conservative in the same period. Support for tougher restrictions on migration has grown across the board since 2021, to 38% from 26%. Most young Europeans expressed hope in the EU's potential, and two in three overwhelmingly supported their country remaining in the bloc if it still was. But 39% described the EU as not particularly democratic and just 6% said their own national governments worked well, with little need for significant changes. More than half – 53% – felt the EU was too focused on details and trivial matters. They would like the bloc to tackle the high cost of living, bolster defence against external threats and create better conditions for companies to improve the economy. Elke Hlawatschek, the head of the Tui Foundation, said: 'The European project, which has brought us peace, freedom of movement and economic progress for decades, is seen as unwieldy.' Greek people see the strongest need for fundamental overhaul of their political system and are most sceptical about the EU, which Faas described as rooted in enduring trauma of the eurozone debt crisis that drove their country's economy to the brink. Despite stronger support for climate protection among young Europeans, just one in three said it should take priority over economic growth. The figure has slipped from 44% in 2021.
