logo
Martin Lewis warns against crucial pension mistake as he shares top tips for savers

Martin Lewis warns against crucial pension mistake as he shares top tips for savers

Independent30-01-2025
Money expert Martin Lewis has issued a 'tax warning' to pension savers, giving advice that could help hold on to tens of thousands of pounds.
Most personal pensions will set an age when you can start withdrawing money, which is usually not earlier than 55. But how and when you take the money is important, and could cost savers dearly if they 'get it wrong,' says Mr Lewis.
Up to 25 per cent of personal pension money can usually be withdrawn as a tax-free lump sump, with the rest subject to tax based on your income tax band. However, there could be major tax savings to be made if you plan to drop a tax band in later life.
Mr Lewis explains that you can take your 25 per cent tax-free lump sum and put the rest in income drawdown, an investment product that you can take money out of when you need to. Or you could opt for an annuity, which pays you a set income each year for the rest of your life.
With either option, it would mean that the remainder of your pension pot (which isn't tax-free) would be taxed at the point you access the money, which may be after you have moved down a tax band.
Speaking on a special pension-themed episode ITV's The Martin Lewis Money Show, the personal finance expert said: "So why is this important? Imagine that right now you're a higher 40 per cent rate taxpayer, and at a later date, once you retire, you're not going to have as much income. You'd be a 20 per cent rate taxpayer.
"So you take £10,000 out right now, £7,500 of it is taxed at 40 per cent - but if you could wait for it, it'd be taxed at 20 per cent, so less tax would be paid. This could be £1,000s or £10,000s difference that you're unnecessarily paying. So please get guidance on that."
The money expert advises that anyone considering the move gets free one-on-one advice from Money Helper (if under 50) or Pension Wise (if over 50). Both are government-backed services.
Here are more top pension tips backed by the money saving expert:
Money you put into a personal pension will effectively maintain 100 per cent of its value, advises Mr Lewis, meaning it is not taxed in the way other savings and investments can be.
This is because of tax relief, where the government automatically gives back tax you would have paid as an additional deposit into your pension pot.
So for someone on the basic income tax rate of 20 per cent, an £80 deposit will be boosted to £100. Those on higher rates can also claim additional relief to reclaim the right amount of tax back.
2. You could have hidden money in lost pensions
If you've lost touch with a pension provider, it's possible they won't know how to pay you when you retire. This could mean tens of thousands of pounds which have been hard-saved going to waste.
There are a number of steps that can be taken to ensure no pension pot is lost, with the government launching a tool in 2016 to help find old pensions.
Mr Lewis said: 'Nearly three million pensions are thought to be 'lost', often these are worth £10,000 - this is not trivial money. So, try contacting your ex-employer if you know who they are and digging out your paperwork if you can.
'If not there are a number of pension tracing services, an easy one is the Pension Tracing Service tool on gov.uk, it can list over 200,000 pension schemes.'
3. A rule of thumb for putting money away
It can be difficult to decide how much money to put into a pension. Mr Lewis gives his rule of thumb: 'Take the age you start a pension and halve it. Then aim to put this per cent of your pre-tax salary into your pension each year until you retire.'
He acknowledges that this might be tricky for some, but writes that 'the real takeaway is start as early as possible with whatever you can, as you've longer for the gains to compound.'
4. How to get a 'hidden pay rise'
By law, all employers must auto-enrol their employees into their pension scheme and contribute on their behalf. Since 2019, the minimum contribution rate has been eight per cent, with employers required to pay in at least 3 per cent.
This means it often falls to the employee to pay the other 5 per cent. This can seem like a sizeable chunk of your income, but Mr Lewis advises against opting out. If you are not enrolled in your workplace's pension scheme, you will also miss out on the their contributions to your pot.
5. Don't accidentally leave your pension to your ex
Pension savings can't be left in your will. Instead, you need to fill out an 'expression of wish' form to tell your pension provider who should receive your savings if you die.
Mr Lewis advises that you should always fill one in, but don't forget about it once you do. After a divorce or break up, it's wise to change your expression of wish to ensure you're not leaving your pension to an ex-partner.
When investing, your capital is at risk and you may get back less than invested. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nationwide will pay £760 into accounts of customers who do one thing
Nationwide will pay £760 into accounts of customers who do one thing

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Nationwide will pay £760 into accounts of customers who do one thing

Nationwide is offering to boost your bank balance by hundreds of pounds - but there's one key factor members should note - you have to be a customer of the building society Nationwide customers are being given the opportunity to significantly increase their savings. The building society offers a variety of savings accounts, one of which could considerably boost your bank balance. The Two Year Fixed Rate Cash ISA boasts an annual interest rate of 3.80 percent By signing up to their newsletter, you can receive their top money-saving tips and tricks. ‌ This account provides savers with the chance to grow their funds. However, patience and commitment is required as it is a two-year account. One advantage from opening is that a lump sum pay-out will be received when the account matures. ‌ So customers must commit an amount for the two-year term and naturally, the larger the amount, the more they will earn in interest. For instance, those depositing £10,000 into the account will gain an additional £760 at the end of the two years. Savers must be willing to leave their money untouched for the two-year period, otherwise, they will face charges for early withdrawal, reports Birmingham Live ‌ Nationwide described the account as follows: "Deposit a lump sum for a fixed term. Lock it away for 2 years and earn tax-free interest" - warning that "If you withdraw money, we will close the ISA and you will pay an early access charge". As of June 26, according to tembomoney, the current Nationwide ISA rates stand at: ‌ Year Fixed Rate ISA: 3.80% AER/tax-free (fixed). Requires a minimum opening deposit of £1 Year Fixed Rate ISA: 3.80% AER/tax-free (fixed). Requires a minimum opening deposit of £1 Year Fixed Rate ISA: 3.80% AER/tax-free (fixed). Requires a minimum opening deposit of £1 TV money expert Martin Lewis said: "So the Nationwide Flex is Nationwide's current account linked to regular savings account that off the top of my head pays I think 6 per cent interest on up to £200 a month for a year fixed. A number of bank accounts have these regular savings accounts," adding that "They tend to pay very high interest". He also spoke on the "marketing" of bonus initiatives such as Two Year ISA, saying: "In the same way as many banks pay you, like First Direct and Natwest will pay you free cash for switching of £175, that's one incentive. "Another incentive is a linked limited regular saver for a small amount of money with a high headline rate of interest which attracts some people. That's why - it's marketing. It's not really a product, it's a marketing bonus."

Car finance: What does the Supreme Court ruling mean and can I claim compensation?
Car finance: What does the Supreme Court ruling mean and can I claim compensation?

ITV News

time9 hours ago

  • ITV News

Car finance: What does the Supreme Court ruling mean and can I claim compensation?

Millions of car owners are set to miss out on compensation in a long-running row with lenders over car finance commission. In a high-stakes legal battle that could have opened the floodgates for payouts, the UK's highest court ruled in favour of lenders on Friday, overturning a previous judgment that had deemed so-called 'secret' commission arrangements unlawful. But while the court sided with finance companies, the ruling does not shut the door entirely on redress for consumers. Here, ITV News explains what the Supreme Court case entailed and what to do if you think you are owed compensation. What is the background of the case? The case involved three drivers who bought cars on credit before 2021. Unknown to them, car dealers earned commission from the finance companies, a common practice at the time. The Court of Appeal ruled last year that these 'secret commissions' were unlawful unless fully disclosed. But on Friday, the Supreme Court overturned that decision, siding with lenders FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers. While the claimants said they were misled, the judges said car dealers were acting in their own commercial interests and did not owe buyers a duty of undivided loyalty. One claimant, Marcus Johnson, did still receive compensation under a different law for an 'unfair relationship,' so that route may remain open to others. What did the Supreme Court say? Secret commissions are not automatically illegal. Car dealers do not have a fiduciary (loyalty) duty to act solely in the customer's interest when arranging finance. The court did not rule out compensation entirely - some cases may still qualify under the Consumer Credit Act or if further regulations apply. What does the Supreme Court ruling mean for consumers? The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the UK's financial watchdog, is now expected to announce whether it will launch a formal redress scheme, potentially offering relief to drivers who unknowingly paid more for their car loans because of commission-based incentives given to dealers. That decision is due by 8 am on Monday, and it could affect millions of people who bought vehicles on finance before 2021. If the FCA decides to proceed with a redress scheme, it is likely to clarify what type of motor finance arrangements it applies to and potentially include all deals where people were not told clearly enough, or at all, that the car dealer was receiving commission. A scheme is intended to be simpler for consumers than making a direct complaint to providers. What is the advice to customers now? Consumer finance expert Martin Lewis has strongly urged any customers who think they have been affected to wait for the FCA announcement and not sign up to claims firms. Adverts from claims management companies have sprung up significantly in the lead up to the court decision, but some regulators have been warning against using them as people may be charged for a service they ultimately do not need. Following the Supreme Court ruling, Mr Lewis posted on social media platform X: "CAR FINANCE DO NOT DO ANYTHING NOW. DO NOT SIGN UP TO A CLAIMS FIRM. PLEASE SHARE."My suspicion is the FCA will within weeks announce consultation on a redress scheme for discretionary commission cases. "You may not even have to claim it, could be automatic. And with excessive commissions, I suspect more guidance will come on that at a similar time."If you sign up to a claims firm now, you may have to give it a cut even if it does nothing. So just sit on your hands for now."

Supreme Court car finance ruling: Martin Lewis explains action you need to take
Supreme Court car finance ruling: Martin Lewis explains action you need to take

The Independent

time12 hours ago

  • The Independent

Supreme Court car finance ruling: Martin Lewis explains action you need to take

Martin Lewis has issued advice to motorists as the Supreme Court rules on whether millions could be owed compensation over hidden car finance commission payments. The Supreme Court will rule on Friday (1 August) whether millions of motorists could be entitled to compensation on their hire-purchase agreements signed before 2021. The Court of Appeal ruled that 'secret' commission payments to car dealers as part of finance arrangements made before 2021 without the motorist 's fully informed consent were unlawful, back in October last year. The court found that three motorists, who had all purchased their cars before 2021, had not been informed either clearly enough or at all that the car dealers, acting as credit brokers, would receive a commission from lenders for introducing business to them, and were therefore entitled to compensation. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, have challenged that ruling, calling it an 'egregious error'. Writing on X, Mr Lewis urged drivers not to act yet: 'People asking me 'what to do'. The very strong answer right now is nothing. This will all play out tonight then likely over the next six weeks or so and then we'll have a good idea. Do not sign up to a claims firms. Don't do anything now.' The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has warned the court that the earlier ruling 'goes too far', but said it could still launch a redress scheme covering motorists affected by so-called discretionary commission arrangements, which were banned in 2021. The outcome of the ruling could have major consequences for the industry, with the FCA telling the Supreme Court last year that almost 99% of the roughly 32 million car finance agreements entered into since 2007 involved a commission payment to a broker. The three drivers, Marcus Johnson, Andrew Wrench and Amy Hopcraft, all used car dealers as brokers for finance arrangements for second-hand cars, all worth less than £10,000. Only one finance option was presented to the motorists in each case, with the car dealers making a profit from the sale of the car and receiving commission from the lender. The commission paid to dealers was affected by the interest rate on the loan. The schemes were banned by the FCA in 2021, with the three drivers taking legal action individually between 2022 and 2023. After the claims reached the Court of Appeal, three senior judges ruled that the lenders were liable to repay the motorists the commission, as there was 'no disclosure' of the commission payments in Ms Hopcraft's case, and 'insufficient disclosure' in the case of Mr Wrench. In Mr Johnson's case, the judges found that he had received 'insufficient disclosure' about the commission to give 'fully informed consent' to the payment. Lady Justice Andrews, Lord Justice Birss and Lord Justice Edis said that while each case was different, 'burying such a statement in the small print which the lender knows the borrower is highly unlikely to read will not suffice' as enough to inform a motorist about the commission properly. If justices dismiss the challenge, it is unclear how many people could be entitled to compensation. If they side with the lenders, then it is likely to significantly limit the scope of potential payouts to motorists. The FCA has said it will confirm within six weeks of the judgment whether it is planning to launch a redress scheme.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store