logo
Why Kim Caldwell's Lady Vols will make Final Four before Rick Barnes, Tennessee

Why Kim Caldwell's Lady Vols will make Final Four before Rick Barnes, Tennessee

Yahoo08-04-2025
Basketball national championships were decided Sunday and Monday, and Tennessee wasn't involved. That's not a shocking development.
The Tennessee men have never have made the Final Four, and the Lady Vols haven't made the Final Four since they won a national title in 2008.
Advertisement
Just because you aren't cutting down nets hardly constitutes failure, though.
The Vols won 30 games and reached the Elite Eight in back-to-back seasons for the first time in school history. The Lady Vols reached the Sweet 16 of the NCAA tournament in coach Kim Caldwell's first season.
Both accomplishments are noteworthy. But the Lady Vols are more likely to make another Final Four before the Vols make their first Final Four − for multiple reasons.
First, there's history to consider. The Lady Vols have never failed to make the NCAA tournament. And even though they are far removed from their glory days, their glory days under coach Pat Summitt included eight national championships, more than any other program except UConn's.
Advertisement
The history of the men's program is altogether different. You can't ignore the obvious: It's 0-for-forever in Final Fours.
Rick Barnes is a masterful program builder. He has proved that wherever he has coached. Thanks to him, UT basketball has never enjoyed so much sustained success. He has led them to seven consecutive NCAA tournaments and an average of 27 victories per season the past four years.
But as good as his teams have been, they haven't been Final Four good. They just haven't fared as well as in the postseason. You can't dismiss that track record when considering future postseasons.
I tried dismissing it this March, and Houston proved me wrong by dominating the Vols for most of their Elite Eight matchup.
Advertisement
That track record isn't the only reason to believe the Lady Vols will reach the Final Four first. We have seen the Vols' and Barnes' upside. We haven't seen Caldwell's.
Maybe, the Sweet 16 is it. But I don't believe that.
You could argue that her team advanced only one rung higher on the NCAA tournament ladder than her predecessor did. And Kellie Harper was fired after the 2023-24 season.
But look below the tournament surface. Caldwell had to execute a complete overhaul to implement an unusual system that relies on a deep bench, 3-point shooting and a frantic pace.
She made that extreme transition by combining players who were recruited for a different system with well chosen transfers. She also signed the nation's second-ranked recruiting class in her first year. How many coaches could have pulled that off?
Advertisement
Another question: If she could do that much in one season – and have a baby in the middle of it – how much more can she do in two years?
Something else to consider: It's much easier to make the women's Final Four than the men's.
ADAMS: Lady Vols basketball comes up short, but long-range view is promising under Kim Caldwell
Never mind that the women's game has developed more parity than when UConn and Tennessee so often decided championships between themselves. You still have far more Final Four candidates in the men's game.
I'm not ruling out the possibility that both Tennessee programs eventually could advance to the Final Four. Barnes has proved he can work the transfer portal effectively, and UT has shown it can close NIL deals. That's significant.
Advertisement
But history favors the Lady Vols making the Final Four first. So does Caldwell's first season.
John Adams is a senior columnist. He may be reached at 865-342-6284 or john.adams@knoxnews.com. Follow him at: twitter.com/johnadamskns.
This article originally appeared on Knoxville News Sentinel: Why Kim Caldwell's Lady Vols will make Final Four before Rick Barnes
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump's New Order Hits College Football 'Salaries'
Donald Trump's New Order Hits College Football 'Salaries'

Newsweek

time42 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's New Order Hits College Football 'Salaries'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Trump on Thursday signed an Executive Order that seeks to ban so-called "pay-for-play" payments to college athletes, which critics argue are de facto salaries, arguing college sports in the U.S. is "under unprecedented threat." Why It Matters In 2021 the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) can't impose limits on the education-related benefits available to college athletes who play in Division I basketball and football. Shortly afterward the NCAA introduced a new interim policy allowing college athletes to benefit financially from their name, image or likeness (NIL) such as through merchandising and brand endorsements. Direct salaries remain banned and the exact rules vary between states. Critics argued the new system has resulted in some players receiving de facto salaries via NIL payments, to the benefit of the wealthiest university teams, while supporters argue the move was needed to avoid exploitation. What To Know Trump's executive order instructs the Secretary of Education, together with the Attorney General, Health and Human Services Secretary, and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) chair, to formulate a plan within 30 days to achieve a number of objectives including the elimination of "pay-for-play inducements" in college sports. The president specified that Attorney General Pam Bondi and FTC chair Lina Khan should use "litigation, guidelines, policies, or other actions, as appropriate" to achieve this objective. Within 60 days of the Executive Order being issued the Attorney General and FTC chair are also instructed to "review, and as necessary revise" their proposals including regarding federal legal action. Jeremiah Smith #4 of the Ohio State Buckeyes celebrates after scoring a touchdown against the Notre Dame Fighting Irish during the second quarter in the 2025 CFP National Championship at the Mercedes-Benz Stadium on January... Jeremiah Smith #4 of the Ohio State Buckeyes celebrates after scoring a touchdown against the Notre Dame Fighting Irish during the second quarter in the 2025 CFP National Championship at the Mercedes-Benz Stadium on January 20, 2025 in Atlanta, Georgia. More Todd Kirkland/GETTY Trump's order also states it is "the policy of the executive branch that opportunities for scholarships and collegiate athletic competition in women's and nonrevenue sports must be preserved and, where possible, expanded" from the 2025-6 athletic season onward. Collegiate athletic departments which had revenue greater than $125,000,000 during the 2024-5 season are instructed to "provide more scholarship opportunities in nonrevenue sports" next season. Those with a revenue of at least $50,000,000 must "provide at least as many scholarship opportunities in nonrevenue sports as provided during the 2024-2025 athletic season." In February 2025 Trump signed an executive order banning transgender athletes from competing in female college sports, and stripping federal funding from any universities that failed to comply. What People Are Saying In his Executive Order Trump said: "The future of college sports is under unprecedented threat. Waves of recent litigation against collegiate athletics governing rules have eliminated limits on athlete compensation, pay-for-play recruiting inducements, and transfers between universities, unleashing a sea change that threatens the viability of college sports. "While changes providing some increased benefits and flexibility to student-athletes were overdue and should be maintained, the inability to maintain reasonable rules and guardrails is a mortal threat to most college sports." Trump's move was welcomed by NCAA President Charlie Baker who said: "The NCAA is making positive changes for student-athletes and confronting many challenges facing college sports by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships, but there are some threats to college sports that federal legislation can effectively address and the Association is advocating with student-athletes and their schools for a bipartisan solution with Congress and the Administration. "The Association appreciates the Trump Administration's focus on the life-changing opportunities college sports provides millions of young people and we look forward to working with student-athletes, a bipartisan coalition in Congress and the Trump Administration to enhance college sports for years to come." What Happens Next It remains to be seen exactly what measures the various federal agencies will suggest to achieve Trump's policy objectives in college sports over the next 30 days. Payment for college athletes is likely to remain controversial considering the enormous viewing and attendance figures enjoyed by college football and basketball in particular.

Tyran Stokes or Jordan Smith Jr.? College hoops coaches on their favorite players in 2026
Tyran Stokes or Jordan Smith Jr.? College hoops coaches on their favorite players in 2026

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Tyran Stokes or Jordan Smith Jr.? College hoops coaches on their favorite players in 2026

NORTH AUGUSTA, S.C. — When it comes to the 2026 recruiting class, two players have separated from the pack: Tyran Stokes and Jordan Smith Jr. Stokes, a 6-foot-7, 245-pound forward, has been the consensus No. 1 player in the 2026 class according to talent evaluators for years now, but he might not be the overwhelming top player any longer. Based on conversations with college coaches last weekend at Peach Jam, Nike's annual championship tournament for its circuit, Stokes is the most polarizing player in this class, and Smith, a 6-2 guard with a 6-9 wingspan, is a player coaches believe can immediately impact winning. The duo dominated our poll when we asked 35 coaches which player they would most like to have from the 2026 class. Advertisement And in somewhat of a surprise, Smith barely outpaced Stokes. This is the conclusion of our Peach Jam coaches' poll, which also included what coaches think about NCAA Tournament expansion and the future of revenue sharing/budgets. Coaches were granted anonymity in exchange for their candor. Below, we also asked coaches whether they believe eligibility rules should be changed to allow for a fifth year of eligibility. Here are the results. (Note: Two coaches picked two players.) Big Ten assistant: 'Motor, impacts winning at the highest level of anyone. College body. Can come in and help a team right away.' ACC assistant: 'Toughest player I've ever seen play the game. Winner, best defensive player, every 50-50 is his. And if you want to have a chance to win a national championship, you get those players.' SEC head coach: 'NBA body ready. He just guards the ball. He just dominates the ball, and he's just fierce.' Big Ten assistant: 'He will change your program.' Mountain West assistant: 'I'm watching Tyran Stokes — I think the kid's an absolute stud, he's awesome — but I'm not saying you're going to take him No. 1 in the draft. (If) that's the No. 1 player in the country? There's nobody. 'He's just so physically gifted. LeBron (James) looks like a fish out of water in terms of strength and physicality in the NBA, and that's what Stokes is going to look like in college. He's a Zion-ish (type) where you just can't stay in front of him.' SEC assistant: 'Have you seen him?' Diane, a 7-1 center from Norwalk, Iowa, and the No. 15 player in the class (per 247Sports), was the only other player to pick up multiple votes. Big 12 assistant: 'I just think what he does translates the most to the college game. You look at the four Final Four teams, they had the best, deepest front lines in college basketball. Front courts don't win in the NBA, but they win in college.' Advertisement Atlantic 10 head coach: 'Rebounds, runs the floor, has super high motor. He can handle it and dribble. He can operate as a hub, and then he's just a monster in the post, monster rim runner, runs so hard, puts so much stress on the defense. Just plays so hard. He's so physical. He's fantastic.' Big Ten assistant: 'I would always start with a point guard. I'd go with Deron Rippey. He's just a dynamic playmaker as a point guard. I think he's going to be a great four-year college player who wins 120 games and goes to two Final Fours.' Big 12 head coach: 'Ethan Taylor. Seven-footer who catches the ball and can score and doesn't have an ego and plays hard. He comes off the bench on his team, and he might be the best player on the team.' Big Ten assistant: 'I want tough kids, culture kids, kids who want to be coached hard. That's harder and harder to find. But Jasiah Jervis (NY Rens) and Julius Avent (PSA Cardinals) are two of those kind of kids.' This past season was the final year of the extra year of eligibility for athletes who competed in the 2020-21 season — known as the COVID-19 year. There are still a handful of players using a fifth season because they competed that year and then might have also had a medical redshirt season, but we're closer to the old standard: You have five years to play four. Several players have tried to sue for an extra year of eligibility, and chatter around college athletics is that eventually the NCAA might allow for a fifth year of eligibility. The NCAA Division II Management Council recommended this week that its executive board sponsor a proposal for the 2026 NCAA Convention that would allow athletes to compete in five seasons of competition during their first 10 semesters or 15 quarters of enrollment. We asked coaches whether they were for or against such a proposal. Big 12 assistant: 'I think it should be normalized. So many of these kids, their first year is their most frustrating year, and a fifth year just needs to be normalized in college to where these kids and their people and their circles don't hold programs hostage for first-year success. We've got to get back to where, your first year, it's okay to develop. And if fifth-year eligibility helps the groupthink with that, then I'm all about it.' Advertisement ACC head coach: 'With all the transferring now, most kids need five years now to graduate — if we're still going to even pretend like we're trying to graduate kids academically. I think five years makes a lot of sense. Most college kids — normal college students — take five years now to graduate. So it would make sense, stand to reason, that a student-athlete get five years, too.' Big East assistant: 'In football, 30 percent of a football season, a guy gets to start four games at quarterback and transfer and get the year back. For us, we've had young players that we knew weren't going to play that much, and if we put them in the game for a minute in the opener, they're done for the season. So it's hard to get these guys a true understanding of where they are in the rotation after an exhibition game and a scrimmage. So if you have five years, you have a little bit more leeway there.' SEC assistant: 'You got five years to play five. Don't care how you do it, no more redshirt, no more blueshirt, no more all the shirts.' Atlantic 10 head coach: 'It gets rid of any waiver, any BS. Everybody knows you got five years. It takes out an injury unless you have two injuries. You get five years to play however many years you can. NCAA needs as few things that they can get sued on as possible.' Conference USA assistant: 'I'm OK with it, because it's a money-maker for those (fifth-year) players. It keeps NBA-fringe guys here, in the states, longer, instead of going overseas.' ACC head coach: 'I don't like it. I'd rather still have the option to redshirt, but the fact that we're giving kids five seasons now, I think, is ridiculous.' ACC assistant: 'Everything kind of got screwed up with the COVID year; obviously, a lot of guys got fifth years — and sometimes sixth years — so it appeared we were going away from the traditional way. I think now is the time for us to get back to that, and I like that. Obviously, if it weren't for NIL, from the player standpoint, there wouldn't be this push to stay in college for as long. So we're seeing one affect the other.' Advertisement Big 12 head coach: 'Where does it stop? I mean, if you get a fifth, then what's a sixth? I don't even know where the end comes. It makes sense if we could figure out how to not be more than five, but to me, if it's five, then it keeps going.' Big 12 assistant: 'I just hate seeing 26- and 27-year-olds playing college basketball. I wish they would change it that if your coach left, then sure, you got 45 days or whatever to transfer, but a one-time transfer rule where you play right away or else you got to sit out a year so that it's not just free agency every year like it is now.' SEC head coach: 'They talk about coaches having workarounds and finding workarounds; I think players, families, agents are gonna find workarounds to try to extend their length of college because the majority of them are gonna make way more money in college than they are after college.' West Coast Conference head coach: 'I think the old model of five years to play four worked so well, and you had that extra year in case they got hurt. The academic piece has been totally lost in this. There are guys who have gotten a sixth or seven year with so many waivers. It's crazy. Also, if we gave everyone five years, what's going to happen to all the records we value so much? Then again, maybe if everyone is transferring every year or two, we don't need to worry about records being broken.' (Photo of Tyran Stokes: Chris Day / The Commercial Appeal / USA Today Network via Imagn Images)

Knock, knock. (Who is it?) Aaron Rodgers and DK Metcalf, who could transform Steelers
Knock, knock. (Who is it?) Aaron Rodgers and DK Metcalf, who could transform Steelers

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Knock, knock. (Who is it?) Aaron Rodgers and DK Metcalf, who could transform Steelers

LATROBE, Penn. – DK Metcalf heard a knock at the door shortly after he checked into his room at Rooney Hall earlier this week. 'I thought it was my front door, and it was actually my bathroom door,' Metcalf, the new Pittsburgh Steelers receiver, explained after the first training camp practice on Thursday. Surprise, surprise. Metcalf has a suite mate. And one who comes with big benefits. The knock came from Aaron Rodgers. 'He was like, 'Aw man, I was hoping it was you,'" Metcalf said. Of course, it is no mere coincidence that the legendary quarterback and big-play receiver are sharing a suite, their dorm rooms separated by a bathroom. The arrangement has Mike Tomlin's fingerprints all over it. The crafty Steelers coach has been known to sometimes assign stalls in the locker room while seeking to position new players near certain personalities, for one reason or another. So, why not in this case? That Rodgers and Metcalf will be in such close proximity during training camp – and this camp comes with the need for some serious bonding with several prominent new faces in tow – comes with the potential for all sorts of intangible benefits. 'We can talk about a lot of stuff that we see the same on the field, conversations that we might not get to talk about in the meeting room,' Metcalf said. 'He gets to listen to a lot of my music tastes or hear me yell at the video game sometimes. But it will be fun having him across the hall.' Aaron Rodgers went to Mike Tomlin's backyard cookout. There was chemistry (and good food) They will expedite the curve of getting to know each other, that's for sure. Metcalf, the seventh-year veteran obtained in a trade with the Seattle Seahawks, enjoys playing video games in his spare time. Rodgers caught wind of that on Wednesday as Metcalf played an NCAA-themed game on his console. 'He walked in my room yesterday and said, 'Oh, you're gaming!'" Metcalf said. 'And then he just walked out.' Rodgers, 41, has had a healthy share of roommates and suitemates during an NFL career that began 21 years ago in the Green Bay Packers camp at St. Norbert's College. Metcalf, it seems, fits the profile for an ideal suitemate in his mind for reasons that go beyond strengthening the connection with a go-to target. 'I was here Tuesday night and not many other guys were here other than the rookies, and when I got in the room and realized we were sharing something, I was secretly hoping it wasn't a big lineman or something,' Rodgers said. 'Maybe somebody who cared about their hygiene a little bit. So, when I walked in, I saw a standard suitcase. I said, 'Oh, I think it's going to be good. This is probably DK.'" Training camp clearly provides the setting to develop chemistry, and the Steelers' old-school setup – Pittsburgh is one of the few NFL teams that still goes away to a college campus for camp, at St. Vincent's College for the 58th year – amplifies that theme. In the case of Rodgers and Metcalf, though, this chemistry was launched months ago. In March, while Rodgers contemplated his future, Metcalf flew to Los Angeles and worked out with the quarterback at UCLA. It added fuel to the speculation that Rodgers would ultimately sign with the Steelers…and laid a foundation for the current prospects. 'We talked about a lot of football stuff,' Rodgers said. 'We FaceTime, we texted during the offseason after minicamp. So, we've got a good relationship. It's going to just keep on growing.' Metcalf: 'I'm going to try to soak up as much knowledge as I can. I'm going to listen to everything. Even the criticisms he has; I'm going to be really open, searching for those answers from him. He's had great receivers in the past. I'm just trying to be among them.' There is no denying that the bond that Metcalf and Rodgers develop as a go-to connection will be essential to the best-case scenario for the Steelers offense. Yet it's also evident that Rodgers, a newcomer assuming the ultimate leadership position for an established team, has made it a priority to quickly try developing bonds throughout the team. Will Howard, the rookie quarterback, said that he's been struck by Rodgers' tendency to mingle with a wide range of players at every position. That might address one of the questions floated about Rodgers as he went through the process of committing to play this season. Some wondered whether the time he did not spend with the team during the offseason would be a hindrance. Since signing just before the team's mandatory minicamp in June, though, Rodgers has tried to make up for lost time. In the window before training camp, he hosted skill-positioned players for workouts in Malibu, Calif., where he has a home. Steelers' star pass rusher T.J. Watt got his megadeal. Now comes the hard part Also, on the day he signed his one-year contract in June, Rodgers attended a cookout at Tomlin's house and spent several hours mingling with members of the coaching staff. The next day, he went to a cookout that veteran defensive end Cam Heyward hosted at his house for players. And the day after that, Rodgers showed up at Heyward's charity golf tournament. The effort to mesh with his new team was surely noticed. 'I know it wasn't on everybody's time frame for when things were supposed to happen, but I can only speak to the man I met,' Heyward told USA TODAY Sports. 'When a guy comes to my golf outing or comes to my house and interacts with my family, with me and my teammates, that's all I can ask for. I think that's a good start.' How it ends remains to be seen for a team hoping to become a legitimate contender. Yet Rodgers seems to be all-in for the bonding – and his new suitemate can vouch for that. Contact Jarrett Bell at jbell@ or follow on social media: On X: @JarrettBell On Bluesky: This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Aaron Rodgers and DK Metcalf are Steelers training camp suitemates

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store