Principal probe, school fires, and budget tug-of-war unpacked
The Gauteng Department of Education (GDE) has continued to address matters surrounding school function transfers, disciplinary processes, and fire safety in schools.
On Monday, the department addressed a series of concerns, including allegations of teacher posts being sold at Unity Secondary School, the fire incident at Riverlea High School, and funding challenges for Schools of Specialisation.
Additionally, GDE on Tuesday formally transferred the responsibility of paying municipal accounts back to schools in Eldorado Park.
Schools regain control of municipal payments
This comes after the department temporarily assumed the function in April 2024 due to 'poor financial management' by some School Governing Bodies (SGBs).
According to the department, the transfer was in line with the South African Schools Act.
'The six fee-paying schools in Eldorado Park were formally informed in 2023 that the responsibility […] would be returned to them. The nine no-fee schools received similar notification in 2025,' it said.
The department clarified that, legally, the Head of Department (HOD) may withdraw or reinstate such functions without consultation.
'Section 21 of the Schools Act allows for schools to apply for additional functions; it does not require consultation before such functions are reinstated or withdrawn,' the statement read.
Schools are now encouraged to improve their financial management systems and 'raise additional funds under Section 36 of the Act' to meet their obligations.
ALSO READ: Education minister calls on all roleplayers to help stop kids bullying
Principal of Hoërskool Waterkloof under investigation
The department also confirmed that the principal of Hoërskool Waterkloof is facing a disciplinary process following allegations of improper conduct.
The principal was placed on precautionary transfer to the district office on 12 September 2024, with the measure lifted on 12 December 2024.
'Due to the sensitivity of the matter and the disciplinary hearing still being pending, full details of the allegations […] cannot be disclosed at this time,' the Department stated.
The hearing is being managed by the Education Labour Relations Council (ELRC).
The principal has since returned to the school, and no official complaints of victimisation have been reported.
The GDE added that clear grievance procedures are in place and that it is 'monitoring this case closely'.
ALSO READ: KZN Education welcomes arrest of alleged serial school rapist
Fire safety remains a concern in Gauteng schools
Between the 2021/22 and 2025/26 financial years, 29 fire incidents were recorded across Gauteng schools.
The GDE reported that six schools were repaired at a cost of R9.3 million, while ten others received support through insurance or donations.
13 schools are yet to be repaired, with their cases referred to the Gauteng Department of Infrastructure Development for assessment.
The GDE noted that many schools 'have limited fire safety infrastructure,' though firefighting equipment has been provided to high-risk institutions.
'Firefighting and emergency response training is provided to learners and educators through accredited programmes,' the department said.
However, inspections show that many schools still lack functional fire alarms and proper firefighting equipment.
'The department remains committed to expanding safety training and infrastructure… to ensure that all schools meet minimum Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) standards,' the statement concluded.
NOW READ: Jobs for cash, missing millions and fire chaos: Gauteng education responds to school scandals
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Illegal land grabs prompt a rethink of the Pie Act
A piece of legislation introduced in the post-apartheid years to prevent eviction abuses is now being weaponised against property owners. There's righteous indignation about the impact of the Expropriation Act's enfeeblement of property rights in SA, but far more damaging is the Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act from and Unlawful Occupation of Land (Pie) Act, initially introduced in 1998 to prevent the kind of eviction abuses so prevalent under apartheid. That same legislation has been weaponised against property owners, including the state, by making it difficult, sometimes impossible, to evict unlawful occupiers. Eviction proceedings can drag on for years and cost hundreds of thousands of rands, often leaving property owners with steep rehabilitation expenses. Many simply give up. In some instances, illegal occupiers have been in place for more than a decade with the blessing of the courts. The Joburg High Court in January 2024 refused to evict illegal occupiers in the inner-city area of Doornfontein despite evidence that the buildings were a fire hazard. The court ruled there was no imminent danger to the properties, nor was the City of Joburg able to offer the occupants alternative accommodation, as required under the Pie Act. The illegal occupiers have been in the buildings since 2001, successfully resisting eviction attempts which commenced in 2011. The above court decision came just months after a fire at the five-storey Usindiso building in Marshalltown, Joburg, killed 77 people. A few months before that, a fire broke out in the Florence Nightingale building in Hillbrow, killing two children who had been locked up in a room with no means of escape. ALSO READ: 90 families in Madibeng face imminent eviction In both these cases, criminals had hijacked the buildings and rented out rooms to some of the city's most desperate people. They are the pawns in a high-octane tussle between property owners and criminal gangs who have learned to game the Pie Act, often egged on by political agitators keen to grab attention whenever the cameras are around. Property associations have for years criticised the Pie Act for its perverse consequences, saying it protects criminals who sell other people's land and makes evictions extremely difficult, if not impossible. Municipalities struggling to provide basic water and lights can simply not contend with the demands of the Pie Act by providing alternative accommodation to illegal occupiers. The City of Joburg suspended its obligations to provide temporary emergency accommodation to illegal occupiers during the Covid lockdowns. It has just 11 temporary emergency accommodation facilities, all of which are full, with a need for a further 1 500 beds. It will take years and massive budget allocations, which the city does not have, just to provide these extra beds. ALSO READ: 'Illegal occupation': Standerton residents turn to ConCourt to stop evictions Tygerberg Raceway story A recent documentary, The Tygerberg Raceway story, explains how criminals took advantage of the Covid shutdowns to incite a mass land invasion of the Tygerberg Raceway, knowing that the police were overstretched and the courts were in lockdown. Just this year, police and correctional officers were caught selling other people's land in Fort Jackson near East London at R50 000 a plot. Farmers across the country have had to beef up security to prevent fallow land turning into an overnight settlement. All of this comes at a cost which is difficult to quantify. The better-run municipalities have security units dedicated to snuffing out illegal shack developments the moment they appear. A delay of a day or two allows the occupants to invoke tenant rights under the Pie Act. Then you are in for a drawn-out court battle at a considerable cost, with no guarantee of a successful eviction. Moneyweb previously reported on SA's best-run municipality, Midvaal, which has outsourced the patrolling of its municipal areas to the Red Ants. Criminals have attempted to infiltrate and occupy land, but these attempts have been successfully defended. Other municipalities with sufficient resources have been forced to adopt similar defensive measures. ALSO READ: Mogale landowners push council to use its eviction by-law against land invasions An amendment on its way? The Democratic Alliance (DA) has proposed an amendment to the Pie Act that would criminalise the incitement and organisation of unlawful occupations, even where no payment is received or solicited. This will combat instances where land grabs are orchestrated to further political agendas. Under the proposed amendments, courts will be required to consider the financial means of the illegal occupiers. They must specify the duration for which alternative accommodation or land must be provided in line with available resources. This, says the DA, will end municipalities' indefinite obligation to provide alternative housing. It should also expedite the eviction process. The Referendum Party in the Western Cape has taken a different approach to the same problem by proposing a Provincial Prevention of Illegal Evictions Bill, restricted to the Western Cape, which will draw a clear legal distinction between persons who took up residence legally and those who did so illegally. 'It would allow local and provincial government and private landowners to remove persons from their property where those persons have not at any point had permission or the legal authority to occupy that land,' says the party's website. ALSO READ: Eviction looms for long-time Emalahleni informal settlement residents Constitutional rights The courts have extended Constitutional rights not to be arbitrarily evicted from your lawful home to include those who have no such legal rights to your property. This proposed bill would clarify the definition of a home as a structure occupied by someone with the landowner's permission. If not, the illegal occupier can be removed without a court order and without the municipality having to provide alternative accommodation. The Department of Human Settlements appears to support some of the DA's proposed reforms and has committed to a full review of the existing act with a view to a department-led amendment bill by March 2026. If it succeeds, that would be a milestone in restoring at least some property rights in SA. Comments Greg Vermaak of law firm VMW Inc, which deals with numerous cases of illegal occupation: 'Pie is largely procedural, so an amendment to the act is unlikely to have much impact. If I'm a landowner and people grab land belonging to me, the state allows this to happen because there's nowhere to rehouse the illegal occupants, and that's a conscious decision. I now believe it's deliberate. It's a usurpation of land which the state could but won't fix.' This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
The South African
2 days ago
- The South African
Return of corporal punishment? Minister of Education responds
Pieter Groenewald's suggestion to reintegrate corporal punishment into the system has been shot down by the Minister of Education, Siviwe Gwarube. The Minister of Correctional Services made the controversial claim whilst discussing how to curb overcrowding in prisons. In 1996, corporal punishment was officially abolished in South African schools. Delivering his budget vote at the National Assembly on Tuesday, 1 July, Minister of Correctional Services Pieter Groenewald discussed several challenges within his department. They included overcrowding, particularly of offenders who could not afford to pay their bail for petty offences. Some of them included minors, as young as 10 years old, who were jailed for stealing loaves of bread. Groenewald then suggested a debate on reintroducing corporal punishment, which was abolished in South African schools in 1996 under the Corporal Punishment Act, and later the South African Schools Act, specifically Section 10. In his speech, he said, 'If you look at our criminal justice system, we must start a debate about whether we should bring back corporal punishment.' 'A young person who steals 10 loaves of bread sits in prison and waits about three years for sentencing. Think about whether we should bring back corporal punishment.' Groenewald added: 'We must consider the costs. Keeping each of these individuals in custody costs the taxpayer R463 per person each day'. Although Pieter Groenewald's suggestion was met with strong opposition, ACDP leader, Dr Kenneth Meshoe, agreed with the minister's stance, claiming that the 1996 corporal punishment ban had 'fuelled lawlessness in schools' He said: 'We have seen a number of children acting foolishly. Bullying has increased in schools, rape is taking place in schools much more than before the banning of corporal punishment. 'Many teachers need protection from their own students. Students have learned to attack teachers, some even attack their parents at home. Now these children end up in prisons because there are parents who are brave enough to lay charges against their own children.' Meshoe added to the National Assembly: 'There's a difference between abuse and correctional discipline. I know that there are some parents out of frustration, who have gone to extremes and used corporal punishment where they shouldn't have used it.' Although Pieter Groenwald did not specifically indicate that corporal punishment should be reintegrated into schools, Minister of Education Siviwe Gwarube has already firmly rejected the idea. She simply posted 'No', responding to the fellow minister's suggestion. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Eyewitness News
2 days ago
- Eyewitness News
Hoërskool Waterkloof parents want principal reinstated despite serious allegations against him
PRETORIA - The principal of Hoërskool Waterkloof in Pretoria is at the centre of a heated stand-off as parents call for his reinstatement while serious allegations continue to loom over him. Chris Denysschen was temporarily removed from his post last year and is currently the subject of an ongoing disciplinary process managed by the Education Labour Relations Council. The Gauteng Education Department said the action taken against him followed claims of improper conduct, but supporters of the principal argued that the matter was being dragged out unfairly, without any formal finding. Denysschen was last week transferred to the Tshwane South district office after fresh concerns were raised about possible interference with witnesses. While details remain limited due to the sensitive nature of the complaints, which allegedly involve minors, legal representatives confirmed that legislation such as the Children's Act and Sexual Offences Act had been referenced during the hearing, as part of the broader arbitration process. To date, no formal criminal charges have been brought, and the principal, through his legal team, has denied any wrongdoing. The department has described the allegations as serious, but the closed hearing has been delayed multiple times, with no timeline for a final outcome. In the meantime, over 1,400 parents have rallied behind Denysschen in a WhatsApp group, praising his contributions to the school and demanding his return. On Wednesday, the complainants' lawyer held a media briefing, criticising what they called an unclear and unfair process. "It might be that we are not happy with the proceedings that's happening now and how it is carrying on. But we have to give this thing a chance to be ventilated during the arbitration and seeing where it goes from there." Meanwhile, parents in support of the principal pointed to Waterkloof's academic success under his leadership, including last year's matric results, which saw the school earn the most distinctions of any public school in the country.
