Kathy Hochul's only slowing down the suffering from her green-energy lunacy
The climate law demands the state achieve 100% zero-emission electricity by 2040, but it's still burning as much carbon as ever; its faltering (but hugely expensive) alternative-energy gains aren't even enough to keep up with expected increases in demand.
The gov is making the smallest possible concession to reality, while dodging as much blame as she can: 'We cannot accomplish what those objectives were back in before I became governor in a time frame that's not going to hurt ratepayers,' she announced this month. 'So, we're slowing things down.'
Mind you, she's burning ever-more of your dollars (via taxes and utility bills) on costly offshore wind projects, still blocking new pipelines, still preventing new-home natural-gas hookups and making non-electric vehicles more expensive.
She's simply admitting that it's not remotely enough, even though it keeps driving New York electricity costs through the roof. (Even roofs with solar panels on top!)
Yet the gov isn't actually slowing down the 'green transition,' just (barely) admitting the fantasy isn't possible at the moment — and that closing down any more carbon-fueled power plant will mean rolling blackouts and send even more employers fleeing out of state.
Whereas her economic-development (reelection) plans hinge on attracting high-paying but energy-intensive industries (chip-makers; AI server farms, etc.) that can't run on sunshine and intermittent breezes.
Plus, the battery tech to store power (since wind and solar plants can never be 24/7) isn't remotely where the 'transition' needs it to be — and ever more communities resist building the massive battery plants required.
Yet Hochul's simply recognizing that 'climate action' produces the opposite of 'affordability,' a driving issue for voters — and if she wins in 2026, she'll never again have to care what the voters think.
Don't forget how she 'paused' congestion-pricing last year until Democrats were able to win several House seats in November, then promptly lowered the boom.
There's no 'come to Jesus' moment here; as soon as it's politically safe, Hochul will be back to sacrificing New York jobs, hopes and dreams to please greenies. And the saddest part of all? All the pain she imposes won't move the needle on climate one bit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
30 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
A Soap Opera of Trade Deals
'Asian Allies Seek Wiggle Room on Tariffs' (U.S. News, July 9) shows how tangled trade policy has become. For American companies working in Asia, the soap opera of President Trump's trade deals isn't merely a diplomatic sideshow; it's changing the way companies operate on the ground. U.S. multinationals face a growing backlash in Asia, sometimes explicitly in reciprocal tariff arrangements, but also more subtly implied through future regulatory or market-access decisions. At the same time, for every overture U.S. executives make to their Asian stakeholders, they're required to reassert their commitment to the White House and American jobs. Every decision—from where to invest to how to price products—risks upsetting someone.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Blame New York Democrats — not Washington — for new state budget crisis
The federal tax and spending changes signed by President Donald Trump on July 4 will have significant implications for New York. The most immediate: to reveal Albany's short-sighted fiscal decisions and long-ignored abuses — something criticisms of the changes conceal. The state spending deal reached in May by Gov. Kathy Hochul and legislative Democrats hiked outlays by 9.3%, three times faster than inflation. A big part of that growth was in Medicaid, the joint state-federal program ostensibly for the poor and disabled whose enrollment has roughly tripled since 2000. Today it and related programs cover a majority of New York City residents. In the last budget, Hochul and the Legislature hiked Medicaid spending by $6.2 billion (16%). That helped the state juice more federal money from the program, but it also painted a bulls-eye for DC fiscal hawks concerned about the $36 trillion national debt. Federal aid and borrowing aside, New York state government this year will spend $18 billion more than it would have if it had kept pace with the consumer price index since 2018. This profligacy was built on assumptions that New York's tax receipts would keep going up. That's more of a gamble than ever, because the state is more reliant than ever on a relatively small group of high earners who pay significantly higher state income-tax rates — and could pay no state income tax if they moved to a growing number of places outside New York. And it requires ignoring the signs of tax-base erosion that New York has already suffered since its 2021 tax hikes made the top combined state-local income-tax rates in New York City the nation's highest. Albany's bet that the good times would continue culminated in rosy revenue forecasts issued in February. But those outlooks stopped being worth the paper they were written on in April, after Trump's tariffs doused markets in uncertainty. Albany nonetheless marched ahead. The state's lethargic Republicans, fearful of upsetting various special interests, didn't much rock the boat. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! The first dose of reality came in June, after state budget officials slashed their economic growth forecasts. They estimated that tax receipts will be about $4 billion, starting next year, lower than previously expected. That, along with newly agreed-upon spending increases, means Hochul must address a $7 billion mismatch between revenues and faster-growing expenses in the budget she presents in January (a gap that gets wider each year). While turbulence in federal trade policy jostled markets, that overreliance on volatile tax receipts meant the state was facing a fiscal crunch even before Congress acted. This was the first of two bad bets by Albany. The second was that Congress would keep ignoring the bloat and distortions in New York's health-care apparatus. As the Empire Center's Bill Hammond has diligently chronicled, New York for a decade used a little-known provision in the Affordable Care Act to get federal taxpayers to pick up virtually the entire cost of a no-premium health-care system known as the Essential Plan. Originally created in part to cover immigrants who were ineligible for Medicaid, it now covers about 1.4 million New Yorkers, many of whom are well above the traditional Medicaid eligibility level. The eligibility threshold is so high that one health-care union appears to have jettisoned some of its lower-paid members from their union health coverage to sign up on the taxpayer-funded Essential Plan instead. The federal rules were so generous that the state wound up accumulating almost $10 billion in Essential Plan reserves because Washington sent Albany more than it could spend. Congress, under both parties, failed to do anything about it. Albany officials ultimately used a portion of the windfall to boost payment rates, subsidizing other parts of the health-care system. The GOP bill has cut off some, but not all, of that federal money. That will force the state to consider long-prevented reforms that address the high cost of both care and insurance coverage in the Empire State. New York in many respects is getting off easy: Its generation-long scam of taxing hospitals and health-care providers, then overpaying them to compensate and pulling down extra federal Medicaid cash in the process, will largely continue. Calls for a special legislative session, and demands for higher taxes, are inevitable. But the reasonably good health of the state's reserve funds (which Hochul has diligently guarded) means there's no real need for immediate action. Instead, Hochul needs to start making the case for the overdue structural reforms that would help Albany live within its means — and worry less about Washington. Ken Girardin is a fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Noem defends conditions at ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention facility
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the conditions at the 'Alligator Alcatraz' facility in Florida after Democrats made claims of 'inhumane' treatment of the detained migrants. In an interview on NBC News's 'Meet the Press,' moderator Kristen Welker asked Noem about claims from Democrats that, in the facility, more than 30 people are 'stuffed into a jail cell' and that the detainees 'get their drinking water and they brush their teeth from the same place where they go to the bathroom.' 'Our detention centers at the federal level are held to a higher standard than most local or state centers and even federal prisons. The standards are extremely high,' Noem responded, noting the facility is 'state run.' Noem also pushed back on the term 'jail cells,' calling them, instead, 'secure facilities' that are 'held to the highest levels of what the federal government requires for detention facilities.' Noem suggested there is a double standard in the way Democrats react to the facilities under the Trump administration and under past Democratic administrations. 'I wish they would have said that back during the Biden administration and back when Democrats were in the White House and they were piling people on top of each other on cement floors and literally didn't have two feet to move,' Noem said about claims that the migrants are in 'cages' in the facility. 'They never did that, and that's why this politics has to end.' Noem said she would take cameras in the facility to 'show people what these facilities look like.' 'Because if you compare them to what happened under the Biden administration and under the Obama administration, these centers are at the highest levels,' she continued. 'And they're even higher than what our federal prison standards are or state or local often are.'
