&w=3840&q=100)
Pak social media handles unblocked in India months after Pahalgam attack
The channels that were blocked included major news channels like Dawn News, Samaa TV, ARY News, Bol News, Raftar, Geo News, Suno News, and The Pakistan Experience. Apart from these, the Centre also blocked several independent YouTube channels, including Wasay Habib, Arzoo Kazmi, Syed Muzammil Shah, cricketer Shoaib Akhtar, and journalists such as Irshad Bhatti, Asma Shirazi, Umar Cheema, and Muneeb Farooq. Instagram accounts of Hania Aamir, Mawrah Hocane, Fawad Khan, Ali Zafar, and others were also blocked for Indian users.
The decision to block YouTube channels came after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, which claimed the lives of 26 people, mostly tourists.
The Instagram accounts of Mawrah Hocane, Abida Parveen, Yumna Zaidi, Ahad Raza Mir, and Danish Taimoor can now be viewed by Indian users. However, accounts of some actors such as Hania Aamir, Fawad Khan, Mahira Khan, and Ali Zafar remain inaccessible. While there has been no official word from the government so far, speculations over the ban being lifted are now being raised.
Some of the YouTube channels that are now once again available in India include those of Shoaib Akhtar, Arzoo Kazmi, and Asma Shirazi. However, Wasay Habib's channel is among those that are still blocked in India.
Pahalgam attack and its aftermath
After the Pahalgam terror attack, diplomatic ties between India and Pakistan were downgraded, with visas granted to Pakistani nationals under the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES) being revoked, thereby asking Pakistani nationals to leave India. A series of punitive measures were announced from both sides, including the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty and the 1972 Simla Agreement, and the closure of the Kartarpur Corridor.
Following these measures, the Indian armed forces launched Operation Sindoor on May 7 and targeted terror launch pads at nine locations in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). The conflict between the two nuclear-armed neighbours escalated and what followed was four days of cross-border drone and missile strikes, until an understanding was reached on May 10 to stop all firing and military actions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Fewer foreign trips, protocol lapses upset Dhankhar; former Vice President felt he had a diminished role
Former Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar, in his 35-month-long tenure, travelled abroad only four times for bilateral visits, and his office often had complained to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) over protocol issues, official sources told The Hindu. The differences over his MEA assignments were amongst the reasons for the discord between the former Vice-President and the government, and a source of grievance for Mr. Dhankhar, who felt his role, especially on foreign policy issues, was less than that of his predecessors. According to the MEA's website, Mr. Dhankhar's four visits included two that came shortly after he took over as Vice-President in August 2022, and subsequently the frequency of these visits tapered off. In comparison, his immediate predecessor Venkaiah Naidu had 13 foreign tours during his tenure between August 2017-2022, and Hamid Ansari represented India on 28 tours abroad during his decade-long tenure from 2007-2017. Mr. Dhankhar went to Cambodia (November 11-13, 2022), Qatar (November 20-21, 2022), U.K. (May 5-6, 2023) and Iran (May 2024). He was not scheduled for any tours this year, although sources said the MEA had proposed two visits abroad, in February and in June, which were turned down due to health reasons. According to the sources, Mr. Dhankhar had complained about what he saw as several protocol violations to several Opposition leaders over the past few months. One point of contention was that the Vice-President believed he received fewer visits from foreign dignitaries than in the past. The Vice-President's office was reportedly unhappy over his visit to Tehran, where he represented India at the funeral of President Ebrahim Raisi, who had died in a helicopter crash. The Iranian government's protocol officials were apparently overstretched as more than 40 high-level dignitaries attended the ceremonies, and the sources said Mr. Dhankhar was uneasy with the arrangements at Tehran's Parsian Azadi hotel during his day-long trip. Mr. Dhankhar's absence from the official banquet during U.S. Vice-President J.D. Vance's trip in April this year also raised several eyebrows. On April 21, when Mr. Vance landed in Delhi, Mr. Dhankhar was on board a flight to Jaipur and returned to the Capital only after Mr. Vance had left. However, officials privy to the exchanges said that the Vice-President's office had not been informed of the programme of the U.S. Vice-President in advance, nor was he included in the programme. At the time, The Hindu had reported that a meeting between the two Vice-Presidents was not scheduled, as officials said it was not mandated by protocol due to differences in the Indian and U.S. government structure. Sources in the Vice-President's office said that despite the issues and his own health problems, Mr. Dhankhar carried out his diplomatic assignments to the full extent he was required to, pointing out where he felt there were gaps. On May 19, speaking at an event in Delhi, he referred to a protocol lapse in the reception line-up for Chief Justice B.R. Gavai, and said 'I too am a sufferer'. He pointed out that his photograph had not been kept in government offices alongside those of the President and Prime Minister, as he said they should be. 'Once I demit office, I'll ensure that my successor has a photograph,' he said, adding that when such complaints were made, they were 'not personal, but for the position held'.
The Wire
16 minutes ago
- The Wire
At UNSC, India Hits Back After Pakistan Raises Kashmir, Indus Waters Treaty
New Delhi: India on Tuesday (July 22) pushed back against Pakistan at the UN Security Council after Pakistani foreign minister Ishaq Dar used a high-level debate on peaceful dispute resolution to raise the Kashmir issue and criticise the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, describing Pakistan as 'steeped in fanaticism and terrorism' and a 'serial borrower from the IMF'. Dar, who chaired the meeting as part of Pakistan's rotating presidency of the Security Council, alleged that India has been violating UN resolutions and international law. He also accused New Delhi of unilaterally disrupting long-standing water-sharing arrangements under the Indus Waters Treaty, and reiterated Pakistan's demand for the implementation of UN Security Council resolutions on Kashmir. Responding later in the meeting, India's permanent representative to the UN, P. Harish, dismissed Pakistan's comments. 'On the one hand, there is India which is a mature democracy, a surging economy and a pluralistic and inclusive society. At the other extreme is Pakistan, steeped in fanaticism and terrorism, and a serial borrower from the IMF,' Harish said. Without naming Pakistan initially, Harish argued that the council must take a firm position on cross-border terrorism. 'It ill-behoves a member of the council to offer homilies while indulging in practices that are unacceptable to the international community,' he said. Harish defended India's recent military action under the aegis of 'Operation Sindoor' carried out in the wake of the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam. He said that India's strikes targeted terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, and were 'focused, measured and non-escalatory'. He added that India halted operations once its objectives were met, 'at the request of Pakistan'. The Indian envoy argued that there must be 'serious cost to states who violate the spirit of good neighbourliness and international relations by fomenting cross-border terrorism'. India had put the World Bank-brokered Indus Waters Treaty 'in abeyance' a day after the Pahalgam terror attack. India has maintained that Jammu and Kashmir is an internal matter, and that bilateral issues with Pakistan must be addressed without third-party interference. However, New Delhi has grown increasingly uneasy with US President Donald Trump's repeated public statements claiming a role in brokering the ceasefire following the four-day escalation between the two countries earlier this year. India has maintained that the cessation of hostilities was the result of direct communication between military leaderships. Harish reaffirmed India's commitment to peaceful dispute resolution under the UN Charter, but insisted that 'national ownership and consent' must remain central to any peace process. He also called for urgent reforms of the UN Security Council to address growing doubts about its representativeness and effectiveness. 'The continuing UN Security Council impasse also shows the increasing challenges to its functioning,' Harish said In his broader remarks, Harish noted that the nature of conflicts has changed in recent decades, with the rise of non-state actors backed by state sponsors, and the spread of radical ideologies facilitated by digital platforms. There were new pressures on UN peacekeeping operations, he said, adding that peacebuilding has also acquired greater salience. At the start of the meeting, the 15-member body adopted the Pakistan-drafted resolution for strengthening mechanisms for the peaceful settlement of disputes. It also called on member states to make full use of diplomatic tools such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration to resolve disputes peacefully.
India.com
16 minutes ago
- India.com
Pakistan, China, or US; who is India's biggest enemy? Report reveals 41% Indians..., answer will shock you
(File) The recent India-Pakistan conflict laid bare the reality of India's alliances with various countries, and exposed those who had earlier maintained the facade of friendly ties with our nation. During Operation Sindoor, Pakistan received explicit support from China, Turkey, and Azerbaijan, while countries like the United States, a strategic ally of New Delhi, leaned more towards the Pakistani narrative, while merely issuing a token condemnation of the Pahalgam terror attack. While India tries to maintain cordial relations with every country on the planet, the recent conflict with Pakistan was a sour experience for Indian citizens, as they realised which countries are friendly towards India, and which ones are their enemies. But who among Pakistan, China, and the US are considered India's biggest enemy by Indians? Let us find out. Who is India's biggest enemy? According to a recent survey by US-based Pew Research Center, around two percent of Indians consider the US as India's biggest enemy, while 33 percent believe China is the prime nemesis, and an overwhelming 41 percent are of the opinion that Pakistan is biggest foe India is faced with. This means that a combined 74 percent of Indian population considers Pakistan and its 'all-weather ally' China as the ultimate threat for the country. Why Indians consider China and Pakistan as enemies? The feeling of hatred and animosity for Pakistan and China among Indians stems from historical incidents of deceit, war, and terrorism, that Beijing and Islamabad have perpetrated against India since 1947. India has fought four wars with Pakistan and one with China since independence as both countries maintain claim on territories within our nation. Additionally, Pakistan supports, arms and fund cross-border terrorism that has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives in India in innumerable terror attacks over the last five decades. China, a close ally of Pakistan, often defends Pakistan's stance on global forums like the United Nations, and has repeatedly used its veto in the UN Security Council to prevent sanctions on dreaded Pakistan-based terrorist leaders who are wanted by Indian law enforcement agencies.
