logo
Children's Promise Act dies in MS Senate, thanks in part to Republicans. See why

Children's Promise Act dies in MS Senate, thanks in part to Republicans. See why

Yahoo21-03-2025
If anyone was wondering where the Mississippi Senate, as a body, stood on expanding school choice, the chamber may have tipped its hand toward any future votes on expanding public funding for private education.
On Tuesday and Wednesday, a bipartisan group of lawmakers defeated House Bill 1902, which could be the last legislation standing from a volley of school-choice-related bills that previously passed the House but died in the Senate.
"The only issue that I've heard from other senators, Democrats and Republicans, is that this is a program that allows people to instead of paying their taxes, to donate money to private schools with almost no oversight whatsoever," said Sen. David Blount, D-Jackson, who spoke against the bill.
HB 1902 was first voted on by the Senate on Tuesday before a vote to consider Senate leadership's tax reform package, which among other things, would seek to fully eliminate the state income tax.
Some senators who voted against HB 1902 said that was part of the reason for voting against the measure, citing it would be in poor taste to pass one bill raising state spending and another cutting state funding.
The bill was first defeated Tuesday 26-23 but held on a motion to reconsider. On Wednesday, when Senate Finance Chairman Josh Harkins, R-Flowood, tried to bring the bill back up, it was defeated by an even larger margin.
"We were just trying to make it more available for people to allow them to donate funds to (certain tax credit programs in the bill) and that was really the effort there," Harkins said. "We will have to work on it next year."
The bill, which featured the Children's Promise Act, has been tied to school choice, a loaded term for legislation seeking to expand education options for students in both the public and private sector.
School choice: Mississippi House kills bill to allow students to more easily move between school districts
This year, that effort has taken the shape of establishing programs to put public money directly into private schools, allowing students to more easily move between school districts, expanding charter schools and via the Children's Promise Act, a tax credit program that already puts some public dollars toward private education. All of those efforts have been killed this year.
The state also already has another school-choice program, an Education Savings Account program for disabled children. There was previously an effort in both the House and Senate to expand that program, but it died by a deadline.
If passed, HB 1902 would have likely gone up for further negotiation with the House, known as conference, where House negotiators would have pushed to increase funding for the Children's Promise Act tax credit program.
That program allows people to donate funds to private schools and have half of it taken off of their property taxes. The program also allows people to receive tax credits for donating to foster care facilities, and the program's funding, $18 million, can only go to certain "charitable organizations" such as those listed above.
School choice bills: School choice in MS House lives by in-house rule, not Democratic principle. See details
Only half of that funding can go toward private schools, which have to be approved of by the Mississippi Department of Revenue based on criteria such as enrolling students with certain disabilities and having been accredited by a state-recognized firm.
Once that certification is given, schools need not reapply for seven years, and the state has no method to ensure those schools are either spending "donations" on education, or if the school even enrolls those students that make the institution eligible for the program beyond the accreditor's initial findings, which includes an audit.
House Ways and Means Chairman Trey Lamar, R-Senatobia, told the Clarion Ledger his goal was to increase the program's fundings because it is annually maxed out, and he thinks the program, despite political opposition to it, serves to help some of the state's most needy children.
Lamar also accused Jackson-based The Parents Campaign, a nonprofit lead by Nancy Loome, of spreading lies about HB 1902 being a school-choice bill and that it would send public education dollars toward private education.
"I think it has been extremely popular, and that it doesn't hurt public education at all," Lamar said. "There's no reason we can't have great public schools and great independent schools across our state, and the Children's Promise Act recognizes that."
Loome told the Clarion Ledger she never tried to communicate the bill as anything but a tax-credit program that sends public dollars toward private schools with no oversight and little guardrails in place to ensure those tax dollars were being spent appropriately.
"We have never said that the Children's Promise Act is a school-choice bill, because it isn't," Loome said. "It has nothing to do with anybody choosing or enrolling their child in a different school. This is simply money going to private schools. It's not tied to tuition or a child moving from one place to another, but it has the same effect financially as a voucher in that it moves public money into private schools."
Several high-ranking Senate Republicans told the Clarion Ledger they either voted against the measure because constituents called asking them to vote it down, they did not support school-choice-related legislation or thought it was poor timing.
Of the Senate Republicans, at least nine voted against the Children's Promise Act. Two voted "present."
"I had more constituents call me and ask me not to support it," Sen. Chad McMahan, R-Tupelo, said. "We are currently providing public funds to private individuals in terms of ESA for special needs education, and there are some students in the state that have such specialized needs that some public schools are unable to secure the expertise to meet their needs."
Two of them, Sens. Nicole Boyd of Oxford and Sen. Walter Michel of Ridgeland, declined to comment.
Sens. Mike McLendon of Hernando and Daniel Sparks of Belmont both noted that sending public dollars toward private education is unconstitutional in Mississippi. Sparks also said he had other questions related to the running of the program and did not feel comfortable voting on it.
"I think public tax dollars should be spent on public education, and (if) a person has the ability to go to a private school, then so be it," McLendon said. "I just believe that public money should go to public."
Grant McLaughlin covers the Legislature and state government for the Clarion Ledger. He can be reached at gmclaughlin@gannett.com or 972-571-2335.
This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: School choice-related bill dies in MS Senate
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's praise for Sweeney ad sends American Eagle stock surging
Trump's praise for Sweeney ad sends American Eagle stock surging

Los Angeles Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump's praise for Sweeney ad sends American Eagle stock surging

American Eagle Outfitters saw its stock price surge more than 20% on Monday, after President Trump praised the retailer's controversial marketing campaign featuring actress Sydney Sweeney on his Truth Social platform. 'Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there. It's for American Eagle, and the jeans are 'flying off the shelves.' Go get 'em Sydney!' Trump wrote Monday morning, sparking the rally in shares that began after markets opened. The president's endorsement comes amid a firestorm of criticism over the campaign. The controversy centers on a promotional video featuring Sweeney that was posted to American Eagle's social media channels. The video has since been removed. In the teaser, the 'Euphoria' actress discusses hereditary traits in a sultry voice, stating: 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color. My jeans are blue.' As she speaks, the video shows Sweeney zipping up her jeans before the camera pans up her body and focuses on her face and blue eyes, framed by blonde hair. The visual emphasis on Sweeney's features prompted backlash from critics on the internet who were quick to accuse the ad of promoting eugenics and aligning with white nationalist messaging. Pittsburgh-based American Eagle defended the campaign in a statement it posted to Instagram last Friday, saying it 'is and always was about the jeans.' Trump used the opportunity to criticize what he called 'woke' advertising, citing examples like Jaguar's recent rebrand and Bud Light's partnership with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney in 2023. 'The market cap destruction has been unprecedented, with BILLIONS OF DOLLARS SO FOOLISHLY LOST,' he wrote, contrasting those campaigns with American Eagle's approach. The stock surge represents the latest chapter in what has become a meme-driven rally for American Eagle, which initially jumped last month when retail traders piled into the stock following the campaign's debut. American Eagle has faced significant financial challenges in recent months. In May, the retailer withdrew its full-year guidance and announced a $75-million write-off of spring and summer merchandise due to slow sales, steep discounting and difficult market conditions. The company reported a first-quarter net revenue of $1.1 billion, down 5% from the prior year, with comparable sales falling 3%. Several prominent Republicans, including Vice President JD Vance and Sen. Ted Cruz, have also defended Sweeney and the campaign against criticism. The actress herself has not publicly addressed the controversy surrounding the advertisements. American Eagle shares closed at $13.28 on Monday, up 24%.

Texas Dems vow to continue battle after Abbott orders their arrests
Texas Dems vow to continue battle after Abbott orders their arrests

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Texas Dems vow to continue battle after Abbott orders their arrests

Members of the Texas state House vowed to continue their fight against Republicans' efforts to redraw the congressional district map after Gov. Greg Abbott (R) ordered their arrests for leaving the state to deny the chamber quorum. A group of state House members and Texas Democrats in the U.S. House gathered for a press conference on Monday after the state legislators left the Lone Star State to prevent the GOP from voting on a measure that would enact mid-decade redistricting and could help them pick up seats in next year's midterm elections. Although the state House members who are still in Texas came together earlier in the day for the special legislative session that Abbott called, they were unable to conduct any business because of the lack of quorum, which requires two-thirds of the members to be present. While Democrats are a significant minority in the body, more than 50 of them left the state for Illinois, New York or Massachusetts. Those who went to Illinois slammed the proposed map as 'blatant racism' during the press conference, arguing it would dilute the political power of Hispanic and Black communities through gerrymandering. State Rep. Ana-María Rodríguez Ramos (D), who is the chair of the Texas Legislative Progressive Caucus, said Republicans should be focusing on affordability and health care, but they're pushing the 'racist radical redistricting map' instead. If passed, the new map could allow the GOP to pick up five currently Democratic-held seats in the U.S. House. Rodríguez Ramos said more than 60 percent of Texans are Hispanic, African American or Asian. 'But they want to silence our voice,' she said. 'This is nothing short of blatant racism.' State Rep. John Bucy (D) said he didn't run for office to walk out of the state Capitol, but Democrats' actions were necessary. He said Democrats broke quorum because upholding their oath of office sometimes means refusing to play along in a 'rigged game.' He said the special legislative session that Abbott called was originally supposed to be about aid after significant flooding in Texas that cost more than 100 lives, but President Trump and Abbott held hearings on the redistricting plan instead. 'We're not running away,' Busey said. 'We're running into the fight.' 'This isn't political theater — it's survival,' he added. 'Because if we lose the power to choose our leaders, we lose everything.' The press conference also featured U.S. House members who could lose their seats if the new map goes through. Rep. Julie Johnson (D-Texas), who previously served in the state House, encouraged Democratic-led states to respond with similar measures if Texas ultimately approves the map. Various Democratic governors like California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul have expressed interest in redrawing their own states' lines if Texas does it first. Johnson said Democrats should declare 'gloves are off' and if Republicans do it in Texas, they'll respond in their own states. 'Democrats are no longer going to sit by, handcuffed,' she said. 'This is an all-out war. Everything is on the table.' Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), whose seat is also at risk, argued that if Republicans in Texas succeed in redrawing the map, the GOP will try it in other states as well. He said the courage of the state House members should be 'commended.' 'It's not just Texas,' he said. 'It really is the United States of America because if they succeed in Texas, they will take this to other states. They will take this to the county court level. They will take this to the commissioners, to the school boards. They will take this across… the country, but they'll do it if only we stand by and watch them.' The decision by the state House members to leave the state to deny quorum and Abbott to call for their arrests has stoked tensions even further as the increasingly national conversation over redistricting spreads to more states. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) said on Sunday that his state would protect the Texas House members from the threat of arrest while they're in Illinois. The move will at least delay plans from the GOP to pass the new map, but whether they will ultimately be able to affect the result is unclear.

Alaska Sen. Murkowski toys with bid for governor, defends vote supporting Trump's tax breaks package
Alaska Sen. Murkowski toys with bid for governor, defends vote supporting Trump's tax breaks package

Associated Press

time5 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Alaska Sen. Murkowski toys with bid for governor, defends vote supporting Trump's tax breaks package

JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — Republican U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, speaking with Alaska reporters Monday, toyed with the idea of running for governor and defended her recent high-profile decision to vote in support of President Donald Trump's tax breaks and spending cuts bill. Murkowski, speaking from Anchorage, said 'sure' when asked if she has considered or is considering a run for governor. She later said her response was 'a little bit flippant' because she gets asked that question so often. 'Would I love to come home? I have to tell you, of course I would love to come home,' she said. 'I am not making any decisions about anything, because my responsibility to Alaskans is my job in the Senate right now.' Several Republicans already have announced plans to run in next year's governor's race, including Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom. Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy is not eligible to seek a third consecutive term. Alaska has an open primary system and ranked choice voting in general elections. Murkowski is not up for reelection until 2028. A centrist, Murkowski has become a closely watched figure in a sharply divided Congress. She has at times been at odds with her party in her criticism of Trump and blasted by some GOP voters as a 'Republican in name only.' But her decision to support Trump's signature bill last month also frustrated others in a state where independents comprise the largest number of registered voters. She previously described her decision-making process around the bill as 'agonizing.' On Monday, she said it was clear to her the bill was not only a priority of Trump's but also that it was going to pass, so it became important to her to help make it as advantageous to the state as she could. 'So I did everything within my power — as one lawmaker from Alaska — to try to make sure that the most vulnerable in our state would not be negatively impacted,' she said. 'And I had a hard choice to make, and I think I made the right choice for Alaskans.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store