Fintechs urge Reeves to incentivise floats to boost flagging London market
Sky News has learnt that Rachel Reeves met executives from companies including Atom Bank, Clearbank, Revolut and Zilch on Wednesday morning to discuss the launch of the Treasury's financial services growth and competitiveness strategy.
Sources briefed on the meeting said the chancellor was pressed to consider allowing investors in newly listed companies to benefit from stamp duty holidays or capital gains tax cuts as a way of encouraging fast-growing businesses to float in the UK.
One said that had "listened" to the suggestions from industry executives, but had not expressed an opinion on them.
The pleas came days after data was published showing the London Stock Exchange had had the worst start to a year by volume of funds raised through initial public offerings in at least three decades.
Ms Reeves plans to restrict the amount that can be saved in cash ISAs in an attempt to draw more capital into public markets - although that decision too is facing stiff opposition from some quarters.
Some of Britain's leading fintechs, such as digital bank Monzo - which was fined more than £20m for anti-money laundering failures this week - are considering floating in London or New York.
Revolut and Zilch are also expected to consider both listing venues seriously when they decide the time is right to go public.
A Treasury spokesperson said: "Fintech is the future of financial services.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
12 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK regulator drops cases against Libor scandal traders after court ruling
July 25 (Reuters) - Britain's financial regulator said on Friday that it was dropping proceedings against Tom Hayes and revoking Carlo Palombo's ban from the financial service industry, after the country's top court overturned convictions of both former traders. Hayes, the first trader ever jailed for interest rate rigging, became the face of the global Libor scandal. He challenged his conviction at the Supreme Court, along with Palombo, a former Barclays trader (BARC.L), opens new tab who was found guilty in 2019 of manipulating Euribor, Libor's euro equivalent. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said it would take no further action against either individual.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
The stunning coastal area with highest proportion of homeowners in the UK
The area with highest proportion of homeowners in the UK has been revealed in newly-released figures. Nearly half of properties in North Norfolk are owned outright by their occupants, a higher proportion than any other local authority in England. The thin strip of East Anglia coastline, which includes the seaside towns of Cromer and Sheringham, has for several years been the area of England with the largest percentage of population aged 65 and over. The data has been published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) as part of its latest estimates of household tenure, which also includes figures for accommodation that is rented or owned with a mortgage or loan. North Norfolk tops the list for the highest percentage of properties owned outright by occupants (49.8 per cent), followed by Rother in East Sussex (48.7 per cent), Staffordshire Moorlands (48.2 per cent), Derbyshire Dales (48.2 per cent) and East Lindsey in Lincolnshire (47.4 per cent). Three of these five – North Norfolk, Rother and East Lindsey – are also the local authorities where people aged 65 and over account for the largest share of the population. The areas with the greatest proportion of homes owned outright by occupants tend to be in coastal regions or away from cities, the ONS said. The top five with the lowest percentage of outright ownership are all in London: Tower Hamlets (8.4 per cent), Hackney (10.0 per cent), Southwark (10.8 per cent), Islington (11.8 per cent) and Lambeth (12.1 per cent). However, the trend is reversed for properties that are privately rented. Here the top five areas with the highest proportion are all in the capital: City of London (51.8 per cent), Westminster (47.9 per cent), Kensington & Chelsea (42.8 per cent), Newham (41.1 per cent) and Tower Hamlets (41.0 per cent). The bottom five are outside cities and away from heavily built-up areas: North East Derbyshire (10.3 per cent), South Staffordshire (10.6 per cent), Rochford in Essex (10.6 per cent), Bromsgrove in Worcestershire (10.7 per cent) and Maldon in Essex (11.7 per cent). The ONS figures are for 2023 and suggest there were a total of 23.7 million households in England living in 25.4 million dwellings. Of this total, 8.3 million dwellings (32.6 per cent) were owned outright, 7.6 million (29.8 per cent) were owned with a mortgage or a loan, 5.3 million (20.8 per cent) were privately rented and 4.2 million (16.7 per cent) were socially rented, mainly from housing associations and local authorities. Wokingham in Berkshire has the highest proportion of properties owned with a mortgage or loan (42.3 per cent), followed by Dartford in Kent (41.4 per cent), Hart in Hampshire (39.5 per cent), Bracknell Forest in Berkshire (39.4 per cent) and Reigate & Banstead in Surrey (39.0 per cent). The areas with the lowest proportion are again all in London: Westminster (13.3 per cent), Kensington & Chelsea (13.8 per cent), Camden (14.9 per cent), City of London (15.1 per cent) and Islington (17.1 per cent). For properties that are socially rented, the top five areas are in the capital: Islington (38.9 per cent), Southwark (38.5 per cent), Hackney (38.5 per cent), Lambeth (33.4 per cent) and Camden (31.7 per cent). The bottom five are Castle Point in Essex (5.3 per cent), Wokingham (7.1 per cent), Medway in Kent (7.3 per cent), Wyre in Lancashire (7.6 per cent) and Ribble Valley in Lancashire (7.8 per cent).
Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Nationwide boss's £7m pay deal ‘not about greed', says chairman
Nationwide has defended a £7m pay deal for its boss Dame Debbie Crosbie saying the windfall is not about 'personal greed' after it was approved by members. Kevin Parry, the chairman of the building society, told Nationwide's annual meeting on Friday that the pay plan was 'fair' compared to the salaries at rivals – despite one Nationwide member labelling it 'an obscenity'. The mutual has come in for fierce criticism in recent months amid concerns that the building society is adopting similar practices to the shareholder-owned banks. Nationwide is Britain's largest building society, with 16m members who each take a share of its profits as mutual owners of the building society. Mr Parry told Nationwide's annual meeting, which was held online, that the directors including Dame Debbie were motivated by factors other than money. 'For the avoidance of doubt, I'm very confident in saying this is not about personal greed. This is about equity with people that do similar jobs elsewhere. I don't think that money is the primary motivation. And it's not the case that they have themselves asked for more money,' he said. Alongside the pay deal, Dame Debbie's acquisition of Virgin Money last year and the lack of members on the board has led to a campaign from some quarters against her leadership. Since joining from TSB two years ago, the Scottish chief executive has cemented Nationwide's status in the upper echelons of British finance, and it now ranks number two to Lloyds Bank in the mortgage market. However a Nationwide member, who identified herself as Dr Standon, used the meeting to accuse the board of being driven by money because of its aggressive growth. She said: 'Your remuneration policy and your explanation for it, including in this meeting, suggests that unfortunately, your executive team are primarily motivated by money.' Dr Standon branded it an 'obscenity' that Nationwide had decided to increase the pay, adding: 'One would expect the Nationwide to set an example to others'. Tracey Graham, the chairman of Nationwide's remuneration committee, said that the pay packages were needed to prevent top executives from leaving the building society, citing Lloyds Bank's pay deal for Charlie Nunn, its chief executive, which is 25pc greater than Dame Debbie's pay. 'I have never had any pressure or any requests from any member of the executive or senior leadership team about their pay. What we do as a committee is stand back. We look at all of the market data, including that is banks and building societies,' she said. The pay deal was backed by members, with only 5pc voting against the new pay policy.
