'Assam's Muslim Population Will Reach 50% In Coming Years': Chief Minister
Assam Chief Minister Himanta today said indigenous Assamese people face the threat of becoming minority in their own state due to what the BJP has been claiming "population explosion" of illegal immigrants of Bengali Muslim-origin from Bangladesh.
Mr Sarma said that based on empirical data and past census records, the minority population in the state is projected to reach nearly 50 per cent in the coming years.
Citing the 2011 census, Mr Sarma said minorities currently constitute 34 per cent of Assam's population.
Excluding the 3 per cent indigenous Assamese Muslims, he said the figure of Muslims who migrated to the state stands at 31 per cent.
"If you project that on the basis of 2021 and trends seen in 2031, you arrive at an almost 50-50 population position. This is not my take. I am just stating what is in the statistical census report," the chief minister said.
To a question by the media on Wednesday, Mr Sarma said that despite his best efforts, to the point where his "life will end", it would not be easy to clear large hectares of encroached land in Assam. He referred to the state government's drive against encroachment of government, forest and satra lands in the state.
"29 lakhs bighas (9 lakh acres) of land were encroached upon in Assam till today. My life will finish, but it will not get vacated. An eviction drive will soon begin at Uriamghat in Golaghat. Encroached land will be clear in eastern Assam," He said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
13 minutes ago
- The Print
Malegaon blast probe politics will simmer till Maharashtra polls
A trial court in Mumbai gave its judgment on the case Thursday, acquitting all seven accused, including former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Pragya Singh Thakur, saying there was strong suspicion, but not enough evidence to convict them. And, the most unfortunate part is that nobody seems to be interested in finding out, least of all the government. An explosive went off during the holy month of Ramadan in Maharashtra's Malegaon in 2008. Six people died. Almost a hundred others were injured. It's been 17 years, but in the eyes of the judiciary, there are still no answers as to who was responsible for the attack. The court ordered compensation of Rs 2 lakh to the families of those who died in the attack, and Rs 50,000 for the families of those injured. But it is too little, too late. The Malegaon blast case has, after all, been a victim of politics, and justice or closure has been the biggest casualty. For this reason, the Malegaon blast verdict is ThePrint's 'Newsmaker of the Week.' 'Saffron terror' politics The Malegaon case has been in the public discourse for 17 years, more for the politics surrounding it than for any significant details regarding the investigation process. The probe in the immediate aftermath of the blasts, under the Maharashtra Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS) and its former chief Hemant Karkare, had led to the arrests of a bunch of Hindutva activists, including Pragya Singh Thakur, as well as Lt Colonel Prasad Purohit, an Army officer. The accused were said to be linked to a Hindu fundamentalist group, Abhinav Bharat. India had seen a fair number of terror attacks across the country in 2008, raising questions on the efficiency of the home ministry under the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. The initial revelations in the Malegaon probe gave a political opportunity to the Congress to turn the narrative. The party raised red flags on terrorism allegedly sponsored by Hindutva organisations, with some senior leaders such as P Chidambaram, Digvijaya Singh, and Sushilkumar Shinde using the word 'saffron terror'. They blamed the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) for allegedly encouraging such fringe Hindutva groups. These strong statements had at the time sparked a debate on how the term 'saffron terror' defames the entire Hindu religion and how terror should not be seen through the lens of any religious colour. The BJP and RSS, meanwhile, slammed the Congress for allegedly trying to appease the minorities. Karkare was killed in the 2008 Mumbai attacks. His death too became politically controversial as the Union Minority Affairs Minister AR Antulay, a Congressman from Maharashtra, suggested that there could be a larger controversy behind the IPS officer's death. Thursday's verdict came as vindication for the BJP's political narrative, with party leaders blaming the Congress for allegedly casting Hindus in a bad light, asking for an apology. It was ironic. The government's law enforcement agency had lost a case. It had failed to show sufficient evidence to get a conviction, despite having 17 years, over ten of which were under a BJP-led government at the Centre. And yet, those in power were celebrating. Also read: Fauja Singh's death shows Indian roads remain a national emergency—474 lives lost every day Opposition busy trying to get script right After the verdict, several Congress leaders asked if Pragya Singh Thakur and others are now acquitted, then who was behind the blast? However, the question was blunted by their more emphatic attempts at distancing the Congress from the term 'saffron terror'. Talking about 'saffron terror' in a Hindu-majority democracy had hurt the Congress even back then. In today's scenario, where the BJP has been working with every small spiritual and religious outfit on the ground to consolidate the Hindutva voter base, the consequences could be even worse. So, one after the other, leaders of the Congress tried to make all the right noises, loudly speaking about how they had never coined the term 'saffron terror,' how terror has no religion, and how Congress condemns all acts of terror. The question that should have been the loudest of all—who committed the crime—came out barely as a whimper. The Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) questioned the failure of the government's law enforcement agencies with two back-to-back acquittals in terror cases—first the 2006 Mumbai train blasts and now the 2008 Malegaon blast. However, it stopped short of asking or even suggesting that the National Investigation Agency (NIA) should appeal against the trial court's decision in a higher court. After all, back in 2008, when the Shiv Sena was still undivided under Bal Thackeray's leadership and was a BJP ally, it had openly supported the Malegaon blast accused. On one occasion, party workers had even showered flower petals over the accused outside a Nashik courtroom. Last month, after the Bombay High Court tore into the Maharashtra ATS over the 2006 Mumbai train blasts probe and acquitted all 12 accused, all of whom were Muslims, the Maharashtra government promptly appealed in the Supreme Court. Now that an NIA trial court has done the same in the Malegaon blast case, neither the government nor the agency has shown any urgency in appealing to a higher court. The NIA has said it will decide whether to appeal after studying the order. The political pandemonium will continue as Maharashtra gears up for urban and rural local body polls sometime next year. For the victims and their families, any closure still seems to be a long way off. (Edited by Ratan Priya)
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Judgement in Malegaon blast case highlights contradictions in probe by NIA and ATS
Mumbai: The special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court, in its acquittal order in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, has highlighted a running battle between the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) and the NIA, pointing out stark contradictions in their probe. (Shutterstock) The Maharashtra ATS, which probed the case from 2008 to 2011, alleged that Lt Col Prasad Purohit and the other accused formed Abhinav Bharat as a terror outfit to attack Muslims, and invoked the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). The ATS claimed that meetings to plan the blast were held in Bhopal and Nashik, and that Purohit had sourced RDX from Kashmir, assembled the bomb at his residence in Pune and handed it over to an absconding accused who fitted it on a motorcycle. The NIA, which took over the investigation in April 2011, dropped the MCOCA charges, sought discharge of several accused, and introduced significant doubts about the ATS's timeline, witness credibility, and evidence collection. It also did not support key ATS allegations regarding conspiracy, ideology, and explosive procurement. For instance, the NIA claimed that the bomb was fitted to the two-wheeler in Indore, and it was then brought to Malegaon, the 1,000-page order pointed out. 'Two parallel investigations cannot proceed on divergent foundational premises,' the court said. 'The contradiction between the approaches of the ATS and the NIA creates serious doubt on the prosecution's reliability and coherence.' The court criticised the NIA for failing to prosecute hostile witnesses for perjury and not rectifying defects in the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) sanction process. 'The NIA, despite having ample opportunity, did not take any steps against the hostile witnesses for giving false evidence before the court. This inaction raises serious questions on the commitment to secure justice,' the court observed. The lack of harmony between the two premier investigative agencies had 'made the entire case speculative,' the court concluded.
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Among issues debated in Madhya Pradesh assembly – why a swimming pool has been unused since 2011
A swimming pool constructed at a cost of over Rs 1.5 crore in Madhya Pradesh's Burhanpur remains unused years after its inauguration due to flawed site selection and poor planning, Urban Development and Housing Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya told the state Assembly. In response to a question raised by BJP MLA Archana Chitnis, the minister confirmed that the project was approved in 2011 under the Backward Regions Grant Fund and the School Education Department. The total approved cost was Rs 1.35 crore, which rose to Rs 1.49 crore after the tender. The actual expenditure incurred was over Rs 1.51 crore. However, the facility has never been used. In his written reply, Vijayvargiya said, 'The swimming pool has not been used from the date of inauguration… It has not been used due to leakage in the pool tank…' MLA Archana Chitnis raised a series of questions, including whether the contractor was experienced, why a site without water was approved, and whether the conditions of the tender were altered. 'How can a swimming pool be operated without a water source? Who is responsible for such a short-sighted decision?' she asked, demanding a thorough investigation and accountability. The minister said the location selected for the swimming pool had no permanent source of water. 'In order to determine the responsibility for the said mistake, an inquiry committee has been constituted by the Directorate of Urban Administration and Development,' he said. The committee, formed on March 27 this year, is chaired by the Superintendent Engineer of the Ujjain Division. However, delays in submitting the report have led to a show cause notice being issued to officials. 'A show cause notice has been issued to the concerned persons and to the Commissioner of Municipal Corporation Burhanpur, letter dated 22.07.2025, regarding not taking action against the responsible persons within the time limit,' the minister said.
