&w=3840&q=100)
US migrant detention hits record 59,000 as Trump ramps up arrests
The United States is holding a record number of migrants in immigration detention, as President Donald Trump's second administration accelerates mass arrests across the country.
By June 23, 2025, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was detaining around 59,000 people—far above the 41,500-bed limit set by Congress and the highest figure in US immigration history, according to internal data obtained by CBS News.
Just under half of those currently held—about 47%—have no criminal record at all, and fewer than 30% have been convicted of crimes.
In June so far, ICE has averaged 1,200 arrests per day, peaking above 2,000 on two occasions. That's nearly double the average during the early months of Trump's second term, but still short of the 3,000 daily target reportedly set by White House adviser Stephen Miller.
The current detainee count surpasses the previous high of around 55,000 recorded in 2019, during Trump's first term. Two former ICE officials told CBS they had never seen the agency detain so many people at once.
Who is being detained?
According to government figures:
47% of detainees have no criminal record
Fewer than 30% have criminal convictions
Many were arrested in workplace raids or during targeted operations across major cities
While ICE has the authority to detain anyone suspected of immigration violations, the broadening scope of arrests now includes individuals with no prior offences.
Official messaging stresses violent crime
Despite these numbers, Trump administration officials continue to link the detention drive with public safety.
'In LA, what we have been going after is the worst of the worst,' said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in an interview with Fox News. 'They are murderers. They are people who have been perpetuating assault and trafficking human beings.'
DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said, 'ICE targets the worst of the worst—including gang members, murderers, and rapists. In President Trump's first 100 days, 75 per cent of ICE arrests were criminal illegal aliens with convictions or pending charges.'
A recent press release from DHS highlighted 11 individuals arrested in Los Angeles—10 of whom had records involving violent or drug-related crimes.
Pressure from the White House for mass arrests
Internal discussions suggest that the White House is pushing for a sharp increase in arrests. Top adviser Stephen Miller and Secretary Noem have reportedly asked ICE to arrest 3,000 individuals a day—three times the average daily arrest rate in Trump's early second term, according to a cable made public earlier this month.
To support this surge, the administration is seeking $147 billion in immigration-related funding over the next decade and has signed contracts to expand detention centre capacity. It has also revived the 287(G) programme, which allows state and local police to enforce immigration laws.
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said at a press conference, 'We are committed to aggressively and efficiently removing illegal aliens from the United States, and ensuring our law enforcement officers have the resources necessary to do so. The safety of the American people depends upon it.'
Interior arrests replacing border detentions
With border crossings at historic lows, the focus has shifted from the border to the interior. Data from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) shows that ICE made around 65,000 deportations in the first 100 days of Trump's second term, up from a daily average of 759 during President Biden's final year.
The administration has also petitioned the US Supreme Court to overturn a Massachusetts court ruling that requires a 10-day notice before deporting migrants to third countries. The filing follows a dispute over attempts to deport individuals convicted of crimes to South Sudan.
What to do if approached by ICE
Abhisha Parikh, a US-based immigration attorney, posted a list of precautions on Instagram for people approached by ICE:
• Stay calm and don't run
• Ask if you are free to leave—if yes, walk away
• Ask to see badges; ICE officers often wear 'Police' on uniforms
• Remain silent if questioned
• Don't resist or reach for items suddenly
• You can refuse searches of your car, phone or home unless there's a judge's warrant
• Never present false documents or lie
• If undocumented, say you wish to remain silent and want a lawyer
• Don't sign anything before speaking with a legal adviser
Few legal pathways for undocumented
Legal recourse is limited for undocumented Indians in the US, especially those with criminal convictions.
Ajay Sharma, founder of Abhinav Immigration Services told Business Standard, 'There are not many legal pathways for those on illegal status, especially the ones with criminal records. Even those without criminal records who try to file in any permitted category must leave the country once to get new status validated, and the probability of being denied re-entry is still very high.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill sparks panic among MAGA voters: ‘We'd lose everything'
President Trump's proposed $3.8 trillion tax cut bill, dubbed his "big, beautiful bill," is sparking alarm among his supporters due to potential Medicaid cuts. These cuts, estimated to impact millions, could jeopardize healthcare access for vulnerable populations, including children and individuals with disabilities. Concerns are mounting as families fear losing essential support for life-saving treatments. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Voters Who Re-Elected Donald Trump Now Sound the Alarm A Missouri Mother's Plea: 'This Isn't a Luxury' Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads CBO Warns That Cuts Could Impact Millions Some Republicans Express Quiet Concern FAQs As US president Donald Trump champions his latest legislative push, a sweeping $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, he calls his 'big, beautiful bill', now panic is quietly taking hold in the very communities that helped re-elect him in 2024 election, as per a of the main concerns is deep cuts to Medicaid that many Trump voters say could cost them their homes, their health care, and even their loved ones, according to the Stitch Snitches those voicing out their concerns is Courtney Leader, a 36-year-old mother from Missouri, a deep-red state where Trump defeated former vice president Kamala Harris by 18 points, according to the report. Leader isn't a political operative or an activist, but she's just a mom trying to keep her daughter, Cyrina, alive, as per the Stitch Snitches READ: California's AB5 Law under fire, nail techs sue state over worker classification – what the law states? She explained that, 'This is not a luxury,' adding, 'I do not have my daughter enrolled on Medicaid so we can have fancy things. I have her enrolled so we can keep her alive and keep her at home, which I think is the best option for her,' as quoted in the relies on a specialised feeding formula that costs over $1,500 a month, which is more than the family's mortgage and grocery bills combined, and without Medicaid, Leader says there's no way they could cover the cost, according to the Stitch Snitches asked, 'Who's going to protect us when they can't get paperwork done in time and we lose coverage for a month or two?," and added, "I'm worried that the red tape is going to affect our Medicaid because of just the oversight burdens. And that as a result, I'm going to lose my daughter, because she's lost coverage before,' as quoted in the has even written a letter to communicated about her concerns to Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), a Trump supporter and key defender of the bill, she pleaded with him to consider the human cost, saying, 'Without Medicaid, we would lose everything — our home, our vehicles, and eventually, our daughter,' quoted Stitch READ: Pokrovsk in peril? Tensions surge as 111,000 Russian troops gather near Ukraine's frontline hotspot The concern comes as the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that Trump's proposed bill could push 16 million Americans off Medicaid by 2034, according to the report. While Trump and Republican leaders insist the cuts only target 'waste, fraud, and abuse,' the CBO's analysis highlighted that the vulnerable populations—including children, seniors, and people with disabilities, will be directly impacted if the bill becomes law in its current form, according to the to the Stitch Snitches report, the proposed Medicaid cuts have also led to concern among some GOP senators, who fear that millions of constituents could lose a $3.8 trillion tax cut package that also includes significant cuts to programmes like Medicaid and food families, especially those with children, elderly, or disabled members, depend on Medicaid for life-saving care. Cuts could mean losing coverage or access to services, as per the report.
Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
G-7 countries agree to the ‘Side by Side' tax deal for US companies: Here's what it means
The US and fellow Group of Seven nations have reached an agreement aimed to prevent a global tax war, by establishing a 'side-by-side' tax system. This new arrangement would exempt US companies from some elements of an existing global agreement. A key component of this deal involved the US officials agreeing to remove Section 899 from President Donald Trump's tax-cut bill, This provision, often referred to as the 'revenge tax' would have increased taxes on the US income of non-US-based businesses and individuals from countries whose tax policies Washington deems discriminatory. The side-by-side system could 'provide greater stability and certainty in the international tax system moving forward,' the G-7 advanced economies said Saturday in a statement. As part of the agreement, the other G-7 members will support the US's stance in ongoing negotiations with the Group of 20 countries and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which has been hosting global talks on corporate taxes, with some proposals drawing opposition from the US. Officials from the G-7 said they look forward to coming up with a solution that is 'acceptable and implementable to all,' according to the statement. While some progress has been made, the issue of 'digital services taxes,' remains only partially addressed. Some countries currently levy these taxes on the profits of US-based technology companies including Meta Platforms Inc. and Inc. The effort to establish a side-by-side system will include a 'constructive dialogue on the taxation of the digital economy and on preserving the tax sovereignty of all countries,' according to the G-7 statement. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday that he had asked Senate and House leadership to remove Section 899 from the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act after securing G-7 backing for the side-by-side system. Senate Republicans deleted the section in the latest version of the tax bill.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Rwanda, DR Congo sign peace deal in U.S. after rebel sweep
Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo signed a peace agreement on Friday (June 27, 2025) in Washington to end fighting that has killed thousands, with the two countries pledging to pull back support for guerrillas — and U.S. President Donald Trump boasting of securing mineral wealth. "Today, the violence and destruction comes to an end, and the entire region begins a new chapter of hope and opportunity," Mr. Trump said as he welcomed the two nations' Foreign Ministers to the White House. "This is a wonderful day." The agreement comes after the M23, an ethnic Tutsi rebel force linked to Rwanda, sprinted across the mineral-rich east of the DRC this year, seizing vast territory including the key city of Goma. The deal — negotiated through Qatar since before Mr. Trump took office — does not explicitly address the gains of the M23 in the area torn by decades of on-off war but calls for Rwanda to end "defensive measures" it has taken. Rwanda has denied directly supporting the M23 but has demanded an end to another armed group, the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), which was established by ethnic Hutus linked to the massacres of Tutsis in the 1994 Rwanda genocide. The agreement calls for the "neutralisation" of the FDLR, with Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe saying the "irreversible and verifiable end to state support" to the Hutu militants should be the "first order of business." The process would be "accompanied by a lifting of Rwanda's defensive measures," Nduhungirehe said at a signing ceremony at the State Department. But he added, "We must acknowledge that there is a great deal of uncertainty in our region, and beyond, because many previous agreements have not been implemented." His Congolese counterpart, Therese Kayikwamba Wagner, highlighted the agreement's call for respecting state sovereignty. "It offers a rare chance to turn the page, not just with words but with real change on the ground. Some wounds will heal, but they will never fully disappear," she said. The agreement also sets up a joint security coordination body to monitor progress and calls vaguely for a "regional economic integration framework" within three months. Trump takes credit Mr. Trump has trumpeted the diplomacy that led to the deal, and started his White House event by bringing up a journalist who said he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. Speaking to reporters earlier on Friday (June 27, 2025), Mr. Trump said the United States will be able to secure "a lot of mineral rights from the Congo." The DRC has enormous mineral reserves that include lithium and cobalt, vital in electric vehicles and other advanced technologies, with U.S. rival China now a key player in securing the resources. Mr. Trump said he had been unfamiliar with the conflict as he appeared to allude to the horrors of the 1994 Rwanda genocide, in which hundreds of thousands of people, mostly Tutsis, were killed in just 100 days. "I'm a little out of my league on that one because I didn't know too much about it. I knew one thing — they were going at it for many years with machetes," Mr. Trump said. The agreement drew wide but not universal praise. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called the deal "a significant step towards de-escalation, peace and stability" in the eastern DRC and the Great Lakes region. "I urge the parties to honour in full the commitments they have undertaken in the Peace Agreement... including the cessation of hostilities and all other agreed measures," Mr. Guterres said in a statement. The landmark agreement was also praised by the chairman of the African Union Commission. Mahmoud Ali Youssouf, who witnessed the signing of the deal in Washington, "welcomed this significant milestone and commended all efforts aimed at advancing peace, stability, & reconciliation in the region," a statement said. But Denis Mukwege, a gynecologist who shared the 2018 Nobel Peace Prize for his work to end the DRC's epidemic of sexual violence in war, voiced alarm about the agreement, saying it effectively benefited Rwanda and the United States. The deal "would amount to granting a reward for aggression, legitimizing the plundering of Congolese natural resources, and forcing the victim to alienate their national heritage by sacrificing justice in order to ensure a precarious and fragile peace," he said in a statement ahead of the signing. Physicians for Human Rights, which has worked in the DRC, welcomed the de-escalation but said the agreement had "major omissions," including accountability for rights violations.
