Kharge asks Shah to quit: Clear that intel failure led to terror attack in Pahalgam
He also questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'silence' on US President Donald Trump's repeated claims that he mediated a ceasefire between India and Pakistan during the military conflict following the Pahalgam attack.
Speaking immediately after Defence Minister Rajnath Singh opened the House discussion on Operation Sindoor, Kharge raised questions over the Home Minister's statement in April about the terror infrastructure being crippled in J&K. Kharge asked why did the PM cancel his scheduled trip to J&K three days before the April 22 Pahalgam attack and if the government had intelligence inputs about a terror strike.
Pointing to past terror attacks such as Uri (2016), Pathankot (2016) and Pulawama (2019), Kharge said: 'In all these attacks, one thing is clear, there is failure in intelligence and you will have to accept this. I want to ask the Home Minister, who is responsible for this… if you are then you should vacate your seat. If not, then what action is the Prime Minister taking?' he said.
Quoting J&K Lt Governor Manoj Sinha's comments during an interview that the Pahalgam attack was undoubtedly due to a security failure, Kharge said, 'If the LG has accepted this as a security failure, when will accountability get fixed, did he say this to save the Home Minister? Only you can tell us.'
He also asked the Government if there was third-party mediation involved in the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, and whether trade was a factor. US President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed he used trade as leverage to end the military conflict.
'I am seeking answers from the PM. Why has he not condemned it (Trump's claims)? Did the US interfere in this, and on whose bidding? What were the conditions? Did the US President mediate the ceasefire, and were there threats on trade to announce the ceasefire? We never entertain third party mediation, this is our policy,' Kharge said.
An award-winning journalist with 14 years of experience, Nikhil Ghanekar is an Assistant Editor with the National Bureau [Government] of The Indian Express in New Delhi. He primarily covers environmental policy matters which involve tracking key decisions and inner workings of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. He also covers the functioning of the National Green Tribunal and writes on the impact of environmental policies on wildlife conservation, forestry issues and climate change.
Nikhil joined The Indian Express in 2024. Originally from Mumbai, he has worked in publications such as Tehelka, Hindustan Times, DNA Newspaper, News18 and Indiaspend. In the past 14 years, he has written on a range of subjects such as sports, current affairs, civic issues, city centric environment news, central government policies and politics. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
35 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Kharge writes to RS deputy chair on CISF officers blocking protests by MPs
Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge on Friday wrote to deputy chairman Harivansh, saying that he was 'shocked' at the manner in which Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) personnel were made to enter the Well of the House during a protest, and pointed out that the situation did not warrant such security measures. Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge said that he was 'shocked' at the manner in which Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) personnel were made to enter the Well of the House during a protest (PTI) 'We are astonished and shocked at the manner in which CISF personnel are made to run into the Well of the House when the members were exercising their democratic right of protest,' the Congress president said in the letter. He added: We saw this yesterday and we saw this today as well. Has our Parliament been reduced to such a level? This is most objectionable and we condemn it unequivocally.' The letter came hours after some MPs of TMC and DMK tried to enter the Well during a protest against the special intensive revision (SIR) in poll-bound Bihar, but were blocked by security personnel at the entry point. However, as some MPs sneaked into the Well and raised slogans, six CISF personnel entered the Rajya Sabha to form a human chain in front of the Chair, leading to outrage of protesting leaders. According to eyewitnesses, on Thursday too, three personnel formed a group in front of protesting Opposition leaders in Parliament. The CISF took charge of security of the Parliament complex in May last year in the backdrop of a breach on December 13, 2023. Until that day, the security of Parliament was jointly managed by Delhi police, Parliamentary Security Service (PSS) and Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). 'Marshal are posted right at the gates of the House and come inside only if the speaker asks them to come inside. This season, CISF personnel are on marshal duty too. The new marshals entered the house only after they were called by officials. As is the norm, the officials pressed the bell and called the new marshals inside. The earlier marshals who were part of PSS had worked in the Parliament House for years and were recognised by everyone. The new marshals who entered the house after being summoned weren't recognised and that created the confusion,' an official aware of the matter said.
The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump welcomes reports India may halt Russian oil imports, calls it a 'good step'
U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday (August 1, 2025) expressed cautious optimism over reports that India may be ending its purchases of Russian oil, calling it a 'good step' while addressing reporters before departing the White House. 'I understand India no longer is going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not, but that's a good step,' Mr. Trump said during an impromptu press gaggle on the South Lawn. His remarks come amid growing American scrutiny of India's continued energy and defence ties with Russia, especially in the context of the ongoing war in Ukraine and broader U.S. efforts to isolate the Kremlin economically. While there has been no official confirmation from New Delhi regarding such a move, Mr. Trump's comments mark the first public acknowledgement from the U.S. administration of a potential policy shift by India. Mr. Trump has maintained a firm stance against countries maintaining close commercial ties with Moscow. His administration has already imposed a 25% tariff on Indian imports, citing both trade imbalances and India's longstanding energy relationship with Russia. In his remarks, Mr. Trump did not elaborate on whether the reported change in India's oil policy would impact those tariffs or future negotiations. 'We'll see what happens,' he said. The issue of India's energy imports from Russia has been a point of contention between Washington and New Delhi, with previous administrations urging India to reduce its reliance on Russian crude in the wake of the Ukraine conflict. India has so far defended its purchases as essential for energy security and economic stability. Mr. Trump's tone on Friday, however, suggested an openness to engage with India if the reported shift holds. 'That's a good step,' he repeated, signalling potential diplomatic movement should the reports prove accurate. Officials in New Delhi have historically avoided commenting on energy policy decisions until after implementation. Mr. Trump's brief but pointed remarks come as part of a broader foreign policy strategy to pressure both adversaries and allies into realigning their global partnerships in accordance with US strategic interests. Russia remains under sweeping U.S. sanctions, and energy exports have been a critical lifeline for the Kremlin amid ongoing war-related expenditures. (This article is published in an arrangement with 5WH.)
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Both Houses of Parliament adjourn amid Opposition ruckus over SIR in Bihar
New Delhi, Aug 1 (UNI) Both Houses of Parliament adjourned for the day today following persistent protests by Opposition over Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar. Lok Sabha witnessed two adjournments while Rajya Sabha one. Lok Sabha was first adjourned upto 2pm shortly after it assembled for the day. After the Lok Sabha convened at 2 PM, Presiding Officer Krishna Prasad Tenneti called for the proceedings of the House. However, the Opposition members trooped into the Well of the House shouting slogans like "SIR pe charcha ho (hold discussion on SIR), Loktantra ki hatya band karo (Stop murder of democracy), SIR wapas lo (withdraw SIR). Some members were even holding placards with slogans written on them. Objecting to their actions, the Presiding Officer reiterated, "We've repeatedly told you not to bring placards or disrupt the House in this manner. You are not following the rules. I once again urge you to return to your seats." Tenneti said, "The Representation of Scheduled Tribes in Assembly Constituencies of the State of Goa Bill, 2024, has been pending for a long time. Twice I have requested for a discussion". Meanwhile, Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal said that the bill aimed at enhancing representation for tribal communities in Goa. Addressing the Opposition, he questioned, 'By obstructing proceedings, are you opposing the bill? Are you against the tribals?' The presiding officer again requested, "This is a very important Bill. we are talking about the tribals of Goa. There is no representation of tribals and don't you want this discussion?" However, the commotion continued. The Chair then adjourned the house to meet again on August 4, (Monday) at 11 AM. As soon as the House met for the day, Speaker Om Birla called for the question hour. Opposition members immediately entered the well of the House holding placards and raising slogans. The Speaker objected to their actions and urged the agitating members to allow the House proceedings to continue. The sloganeering persisted as the protesting members ignored the Speaker's repeated appeals. The Opposition continued with sloganeering and Birla adjourned the House till 2 PM. Meanwhile, similar scenes were witnessed in the Rajya Sabha. As soon as the Upper House convened for the day, Opposition members raised slogans demanding an urgent discussion on the alleged irregularities in the Bihar voter list revision. The uproar led to an early adjournment till 12 noon. When the House reassembled, the protests resumed, prompting Deputy Chairman Harivansh to adjourn proceedings for the day. Harivansh informed the House that he had received 30 notices from members across party lines under Rule 267 seeking suspension of business to allow discussions on a range of issues. Among them were Prof Manoj Jha (RJD), Tiruchi Siva (DMK), Neeraj Dangi, Rajni Patil, and Renuka Chowdhury (Congress), Sagarika Ghosh (Trinamool Congress), and John Brittas (CPI-M), all of whom sought debate on the Bihar SIR. Additional notices were submitted by members on diverse issues: rising violence against women in Odisha (BJD members Niranjan Bishi, Sultadevi, Sasmit Patra), alleged discrimination against Bengali workers in other states (Trinamool MPs Sameerul Islam and Mausam Noor), the arrest of two nuns in Chhattisgarh (AA Rahim, CPI-M), US tariffs on Indian products (Sanjay Singh, AAP and Ramjilal Suman, SP), and layoffs in the IT sector (V. Sivadasan, CPI-M). The Deputy Chairman clarified that none of the notices met the procedural requirements and were therefore disallowed. As Ashok Kumar Mittal (AAP) was called to speak during zero hour, Opposition members stormed the well of the House, raising slogans such as 'Stop Vote Theft' and 'Raise Your Voice on SIR'. Harivansh appealed for order, reiterating that the Election Commission is a constitutional authority and the matter is sub judice before the Supreme Court. 'The conduct of the House is governed by rules, and the nation is watching,' he remarked, before adjourning the session. UNI RBE AJ RB
