logo
BCG Revaccination Fails to Prevent Sustained TB Infection

BCG Revaccination Fails to Prevent Sustained TB Infection

Medscapea day ago
TOPLINE:
Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) revaccination showed no efficacy in preventing sustained Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection compared with placebo in adolescents, with similar rates of QuantiFERON-TB (QFT) test conversion from negative to positive.
METHODOLOGY:
In a previous trial, BCG revaccination did not prevent primary M tuberculosis infection but did reduce the risk for sustained infections, prompting further study in a wider population.
Researchers conducted a phase 2b, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy of BCG revaccination for the prevention of sustained M tuberculosis infection in South Africa.
A total of 1836 adolescents (age, 10-18 years), who tested negative for HIV and had negative QFT test results at screening, were randomly assigned to receive either the BCG vaccine or placebo and were followed up for a median of 30 months.
A sustained M tuberculosis infection was defined as a sustained QFT test conversion from negative to positive (≥ 0.35 IU/mL interferon gamma), occurring any time after the first negative QFT test, followed by positive tests confirmed at 3 and 6 months.
The primary endpoint was sustained QFT test conversion, and the secondary endpoints were the safety and reactogenicity of BCG revaccination.
TAKEAWAY:
BCG revaccination showed no protective effect against sustained M tuberculosis infection, with similar QFT test conversion rates in the vaccine and placebo groups (hazard ratio, 1.04; P = .58), with a vaccine efficacy of -3.8% (95% CI, -48.3 to 27.4).
The frequencies of antigen-specific CD4 T cells expressing various cytokines were higher in the BCG revaccination group than in the placebo group, and they remained higher than those at baseline even 6 months postvaccination.
Most adverse events were mild to moderate. Serious adverse events occurred in 0.3% of participants in each group and were unrelated to the vaccine or placebo, with no deaths or treatment discontinuations.
IN PRACTICE:
'Although this trial does not allow us to draw firm conclusions on the efficacy of BCG revaccination for the prevention of disease, the lack of vaccine efficacy with respect to prevention of infection probably decreases the likelihood of BCG revaccination conferring protection against disease,' the study authors wrote.
SOURCE:
The study was led by Alexander Schmidt, MD, Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts. It was published online on May 7, 2025, in The New England Journal of Medicine.
LIMITATIONS:
Enrollment was paused for 4 months due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have contributed to a lower incidence of QFT test conversions.
DISCLOSURES:
The study was supported by the Gates Foundation. One author reported being an employee of the Gates Medical Research Institute. Some authors reported being employees of pharmaceutical companies such as GSK, Pfizer, and Third Rock Ventures, LLC, and owning stocks in these companies.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chronic but not powerless, why your estate plan deserves a seat at the doctor's office
Chronic but not powerless, why your estate plan deserves a seat at the doctor's office

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Chronic but not powerless, why your estate plan deserves a seat at the doctor's office

Juggling modern families, demanding careers, shifting politics, doctors' appointments, insurance paperwork, and copays, and everything society throws at us is already a full-time job. Add a chronic condition — like HIV, cancer, multiple sclerosis, or anything that requires ongoing care — and the balancing act becomes something closer to running the gauntlet. It's a lot. And most people don't get it, especially when your condition is invisible. Or stigmatized. Or both. But here's the truth I've learned from working with clients living with chronic illness: The strongest among us don't just "push through." They take control — not just of their health, but of their financial and estate plans. Because the minute life gets complicated, the cost of not planning skyrockets. I've worked with people who've beaten cancer, who live with HIV, juggle therapy appointments and their kids' soccer schedule, all while trying to make sense of their financial goals and dreams. What they have in common isn't just resilience. It's that quiet, sobering moment when they realize: "I need a plan." That moment doesn't happen in every financial advisor's or lawyer's office. Sometimes it hits when a hospital intake form asks, "Do you have a healthcare power of attorney?" Or when someone close to them ends up in a medical crisis with no documents and no clarity. That's when the gravity sinks in: chronic illness doesn't wait for your financial life to be in order. And here's the thing most financial professionals won't say out loud: if you're living with a chronic condition, you can't afford not to plan. Not out of fear, but out of self-respect, love for the people in your life, and power over your own story. Let's start with the part everyone dreads: estate planning. Most people avoid it because it feels like preparing for death. But if you're living with a chronic condition, it's not about dying — it's about protecting your autonomy while you're alive. If your health situation could ever leave you unable to speak for yourself, you need documents that do the talking: Healthcare Power of Attorney: Choose someone you trust (really trust) to make medical decisions on your behalf. Living Will or Advance Directive: Spell out your wishes clearly. Whether it's aggressive treatment or comfort-focused care, this is where your voice lives if you can't speak. HIPAA Authorization: Make sure the right people — especially your partner or chosen family — can access your medical information. Durable Financial Power of Attorney: Someone has to pay the rent and manage your finances if you're in the hospital. Choose wisely. (No offense to your cousin with 13 credit cards and a sneaker reselling habit.) Revocable Living Trust: If you own assets — especially if you're unmarried or estranged from family — this helps ensure your belongings go where you want them to, without court interference. For many in the LGBTQ+ community, chosen family plays a bigger role than blood relatives. But without legal documentation, the system doesn't care who actually showed up for you when it mattered. That's why these documents aren't just "recommended." They're essential. And emotionally? This work can be heavy. For those who have faced rejection from family or institutions, it can resurface painful memories. But it's also one of the most potent acts of self-advocacy you can make. This is about saying: This is who I trust. This is who I love. This is who gets a say. This isn't about doomsday prepping. It's about giving yourself options, control, and flexibility — so your health doesn't dictate your financial future more than it has to. Emergency Funds & Cash Flow Even with insurance, chronic conditions come with unpredictable costs, including copays, travel expenses, and lost income due to time off work. Plan to have: 6–12 months of essential expenses saved Short- and long-term disability coverage (through work or individually) A clear understanding of what your insurance does — and doesn't — cover This isn't paranoia. It's confidence. Insurance (Yes, It's Still Worth Talking About) Most people think life insurance is obvious, but disability insurance is also critical if you rely on your income, and most of us do. But if you're managing a chronic condition, you may face exclusions or outright denials. That's frustrating, but not a dead end. There are still pathways to protecting your family: Group disability coverage through your employer or professional associations may not require medical underwriting. Employer-sponsored life insurance — often guaranteed issue and a great base layer. Life Insurance – many carriers now offer coverage for people living with conditions such as HIV, with recent advancements in treatment. Survivorship policies if you're partnered and one partner is uninsurable alone. Leaning on your partner's benefits, primarily if they work for an inclusive employer that allows domestic partner enrollment, even if not legally married. One HR form could mean access to coverage you wouldn't qualify for on your own. Rethinking Retirement Chronic illness can shift your timeline. Maybe you want to retire early. Perhaps you need more liquidity. Maybe you want the flexibility to work part-time at 50 and focus on advocacy, art, or your own damn peace. Traditional retirement accounts still matter and serve as the foundation. But if you're living with a chronic condition, you might want more flexibility than a standard 401(k) offers. That's where diversification comes in. Think beyond just one type of account. Many of my clients benefit from having a mix of Roth, taxable brokerage accounts, and yes, even the trusty 401(k). The goal is to create options. Because life doesn't always follow a textbook timeline, and your money shouldn't be stuck in one either. For individuals managing chronic conditions, the Health Savings Account (HSA) is the real MVP — or, to be honest, the GOAT. If you qualify for one, an HSA is more than just a savings account. It's a triple-threat: money goes in tax-deductible, grows tax-free, and comes out tax-free when used for medical expenses. It's like having a backstage pass to cover the healthcare costs you already know are on the way. And here's the bonus: after age 65, you can even use it for non-medical expenses without penalty. That flexibility makes it one of the most powerful tools in your financial toolkit, especially if healthcare will always be a line item in your budget. Many clients I work with want to give back to the communities and causes that have helped them, including HIV research, mental health access, LGBTQ+ rights, hospice care, and housing justice. That legacy can also be part of your financial plan. Name a nonprofit as a beneficiary on a life insurance policy, IRA, or 401(k) Use a donor-advised fund to give strategically during your lifetime Include charitable bequests in your will or trust This isn't just about reducing taxes. It's about using your resources to reflect your values. To say: This mattered to me. And I want it to continue. Planning = Peace Here's what I've seen over and over again: once the plan is in place, people breathe differently. There's a lightness. A quiet confidence. A sense of relief that your care, your finances, and your legacy won't be dictated by courts, chaos, or people who don't actually know you. If you're living with a chronic condition, you deserve more than just medical care. You deserve a plan that sees the whole you — your relationships, your resilience, and your right to decide what comes next. So go ahead. Schedule the meeting. Sign the documents. Set the plan in motion. Then? Rest. Enjoy what makes you happy. Travel without "what-ifs." Live with confidence. Because now — finally — you have a plan. Voices is dedicated to featuring a wide range of inspiring personal stories and impactful opinions from the LGBTQ+ community and its allies. Visit to learn more about submission guidelines. Views expressed in Voices stories are those of the guest writers, columnists, and editors, and do not directly represent the views of The Advocate or our parent company, equalpride. This article originally appeared on Advocate: Chronic but not powerless, why your estate plan deserves a seat at the doctor's office

Decline of Nonrecommended HIV Care in Medicare
Decline of Nonrecommended HIV Care in Medicare

Medscape

time4 hours ago

  • Medscape

Decline of Nonrecommended HIV Care in Medicare

TOPLINE: Among Medicare beneficiaries with HIV, the proportion receiving at least one nonrecommended antiviral prescription decreased substantially from 5.1% in 2013 to 0.1% in 2021. METHODOLOGY: Clinical guidelines in 2017 recommended discontinuing older, more toxic antivirals in people with HIV. However, some people continue to take them due to several barriers to switching. This cross-sectional study used a 20% random sample of traditional Medicare beneficiaries with Part-D coverage from 2013 to 2021 and categorized prescribed antivirals as nonrecommended — based on drug toxicity and the availability of more effective alternatives — the remaining being classified as preferred. The analysis examined the proportion of beneficiaries with HIV who received at least one nonrecommended antiviral vs those who received only preferred antivirals. TAKEAWAY: Of the total Medicare beneficiaries with HIV, 1052 (74.1% aged < 65 years; 74.9% men) received at least one nonrecommended antiviral prescription, and 28,019 (75.9% aged < 65 years; 74.4% men) received only preferred antivirals. Compared with beneficiaries who received only preferred antivirals, those who received nonrecommended antivirals were more likely to be from the South (45.6% vs 50.5%; standardized mean difference, 0.10). Didanosine and nelfinavir emerged as the most frequently prescribed nonrecommended antivirals, accounting for 27.5% and 25.3% of prescriptions, respectively. The proportion of beneficiaries receiving nonrecommended antivirals substantially declined from 5.1% in 2013 to 0.1% in 2021. IN PRACTICE: 'Further research should assess how many beneficiaries switched to less toxic antivirals over time (rather than being censored), characteristics associated with switching to safer alternatives, alternative antivirals prescribed instead, and how more recent ART [antiretroviral therapy] guideline recommendations may influence future prescription patterns,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Jose F. Figueroa, MD, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston. It was published online on May 1, 2025, in JAMA Network Open. LIMITATIONS: The study focused exclusively on traditional Medicare beneficiaries living with HIV, possibly limiting the generalizability of the findings to individuals with HIV covered by commercial insurance, Medicaid, or Medicare Advantage plans. HIV diagnoses relied on claims data. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging, the Harvard Center for AIDS Research, and the Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally program. Some authors reported having financial ties with multiple foundations and pharmaceutical organizations. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Teens Oversleeping Post-Concussion May Have Worse Recovery
Teens Oversleeping Post-Concussion May Have Worse Recovery

Medscape

time4 hours ago

  • Medscape

Teens Oversleeping Post-Concussion May Have Worse Recovery

TOPLINE: Kids and teens sleeping longer, even as little as an hour more, during the first week after a concussion were more likely to have worse cognitive and somatic symptoms. Sleeping longer was also linked to persistent symptoms and slower recovery. METHODOLOGY: Researchers used data from a randomized clinical trial that took place across three emergency pediatric departments in Ontario, Canada, over a 2-year period beginning in March 2017. The study included 291 kids and teens between the ages of 10 and 18 years (median age, 13.2 years; 44% female) who received treatment for a concussion within 48 hours of injury. Each patient wore an accelerometer on their waist 24 hours a day for 2 weeks and completed sleep logs to monitor sleep patterns. Symptoms were tracked using the Health and Behavior Inventory (HBI), a questionnaire that measures cognitive and somatic symptoms at 1 , 2 , and 4 weeks following their concussion. Symptom change was measured using conservative (z score ≥ 1.65) and liberal (z score ≥ 1.28) cutoffs; estimates were measured in HBI units. TAKEAWAY: Kids and teens who slept 10.5 vs 9.5 hours per night during the first week after a concussion had higher symptom scores at 1 week (estimate, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.25-2.28). Longer sleep duration was linked to higher odds of persisting symptoms at 4 weeks (conservative: odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% CI, 0.91-3.26; liberal: OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.07-3.47). Teens who slept 10.9 vs 9.9 hours were more likely to have increased symptoms at 4 weeks (estimate, 2.2; 95% CI, 0.85-3.47). IN PRACTICE: 'Long sleep duration may be associated with increased odds of being reliably symptomatic at 4 weeks, therefore a greater risk of PSAC [persisting symptoms after a concussion],' the study authors wrote. 'Clinicians should monitor youths' sleep after concussion.' SOURCE: This study was led by Lauren Butterfield, MSc, of the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute in Ottawa, Canada. It was published online on June 18 in JAMA Network Open. LIMITATIONS: The HBI used for symptom assessment is not validated for youths older than 16.99 years, and 16 participants were older than 17 years. Recruitment from three Canadian pediatric emergency departments may have introduced sampling bias. DISCLOSURES: Various study authors reported receiving stipend support, research grants, and travel awards from the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Canadian Concussion Network, among others. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store