Nadine Menendez, wife of disgraced NJ Sen. Bob Menendez, found guilty in sweeping bribery case
Jurors, who got the case Friday, convicted Nadine of 18 counts, including conspiracy to commit bribery, conspiracy to commit honest services fraud, conspiracy to commit extortion, and obstruction of justice. The conviction carries a potential decades-long term.
The 58-year-old, known as Nadine Arslanian before she wed the embattled former lawmaker in 2020, was indicted alongside her husband in September 2023 on charges alleging she arranged a series of deals between her husband and a trio of New Jersey businessmen from 2018 through 2023, putting a price on his power as a senator and as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Last July Menendez was found guilty of acting as a foreign agent, bribery, and other offenses and in January was sentenced to 11 years in prison, a term he's set to begin serving on June 6 after reporting to the Bureau of Prisons.
The ex-senator raked in almost half a million dollars in cash, $150,000 worth of gold bars, a luxury convertible for Nadine, designer watches, and Formula 1 tickets from his corrupt benefactors in exchange for pulling strings for them behind the scenes, jurors at both trials heard. The couple's co-defendants, Wael Hana, 41, who ran a Halal certification business, and real estate developer Fred Daibes, 67, were also found guilty of related charges alongside Bob Menendez at his 2024 trial. The third co-conspirator, N.J. businessman Jose Uribe, cooperated in exchange for leniency.
Among other actions, Menendez coerced the highest levels of New Jersey state law enforcement to squash a criminal probe into Uribe and an associate, took bribes from Daibes to meddle in a pending federal prosecution against him in the Garden State, and pocketed bribes from Hana to pressure the U.S. Department of Agriculture to let him maintain an exclusive monopoly over U.S. exports of Halal products to Egypt.
The fraud came to light after FBI agents searched the couple's Englewood Cliffs, N.J., home in the summer of 2022 and turned up more than $100,000 worth of gold bars and over $480,000 in cash stashed away in closets, jackets embroidered with Menendez's name, and envelopes bearing Menendez and Daibes' fingerprints, according to trial evidence.
At Nadine's trial, the feds argued she played a crucial role in the scheme, acting as a go-between by keeping him in the loop and urging him to carry out the businessmen's requests. Her case was delayed while she underwent treatment for breast cancer, undergoing a double mastectomy while her husband went on trial last year.
_____
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
29 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Supreme Court to decide if federal law bars transgender athletes from women's teams
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to weigh in on the growing controversy over transgender athletes and decide if federal law bars transgender girls from women's school sports teams. 'Biological boys should not compete on girls' athletics teams,' West Virginia's attorney general said in an appeal the court voted to hear. The appeal had the backing of 26 other Republican-led states as well as President Trump. In recent weeks, Trump threatened to cut off education funds to California because a transgender athlete participated in a women's track and field competition. Four years ago, West Virginia adopted its Save Women's Sports Act but the measure has been blocked as discriminatory by the 4th Circuit Court in 2-1 decision. Idaho filed a similar appeal after their laws were blocked by the 9th Circuit Court in San Francisco. The court said it would hear that case together with the West Virginia case. At issue is the meaning of Title IX, the federal education law which has been credited with opening the door for the vast expansion of women's sports. Schools and colleges were told they must give girls equal opportunities in athletics by providing them with separate sports teams. In the past decade, however, states and their schools divided on the question of who can participate on the girls team. Is it only those who were girls at birth or can it also include those whose gender identity is female? West Virginia told the court its 'legislature concluded that biological boys should compete on boys' and co-ed teams but not girls' teams. This separation made sense, the legislature found, because of the 'inherent physical differences between biological males and biological females'.' California and most Democratic states allow transgender girls to compete in sports competitions for women. In 2013, the Legislature said a student 'shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic teams and with his or her gender identity.' The Supreme Court had put off a decision on this issue while the divide among the states grew. Two years ago, the justices turned down a fast-track appeal from West Virginia's lawyers on a 7-2 vote and allowed a 12-year old transgender girl to run on the girls' cross country team. Becky Pepper-Jackson and her mother sued after the school principal said she was barred by the state's law from competing on the girls' teams at her middle school in Bridgeport, W. Va. She 'has lived as a girl in all aspects of her life for years and receives puberty-delaying treatment and estrogen hormone therapy, so has not experienced (and will not experience) endogenous puberty,' her mother said in support of their lawsuit. ACLU lawyers said then the court should stand aside. They said B.P.J. was eager to participate in sports but was 'too slow to compete in the track events' on the girls team. Last year, West Virginia tried again and urged the Supreme Court to review the 4th Circuit's decision and uphold its restrictions on transgender athletes. The state attorneys also said the would-be middle school athlete had become a track star. 'This spring, B.P.J. placed top three in every track event B.P.J. competed in, winning most. B.P.J. beat over 100 girls, displacing them over 250 times while denying multiple girls spots and medals in the conference championship. B.P.J. won the shot put by more than three feet while placing second in discus,' they told the court. Last year, the court opted to rule first in a Tennessee case to decide if states may prohibit puberty blockers, hormones and other medical treatments for young teens who are diagnosed with gender dysphoria. On June 18, the court's conservative majority said state lawmakers had the authority to restrict medical treatments for adolescents who were diagnosed with gender dysphoria, noting the ongoing debate over the long-term risks and benefits. The ruling turned aside the contention that law reflected unconstitutional sex discrimination. On Thursday, the justices released their final orders list before their summer recess granting review of new cases to be heard in the fall. Included were the cases of West Virginia vs. BJP and Little vs. Hecox. In response to the appeals, ACLU lawyers accused the state of seeking to 'create a false sense of national emergency' based on a legal 'challenge by one transgender girl.' The lawsuit said the state measure was 'part of a concerted nationwide effort to target transgender youth for unequal treatment.' The suit contended the law violated Title IX and was unconstitutional because it discriminated against student athletes based on their gender identity. West Virginia's lawyers saw a threat to Title IX and women's sports. They said the rulings upholding transgender rights 'took a law designed to ensure meaningful competitive opportunities for women and girls—based on biological differences—and fashioned it into a lever for males to force their way onto girls' sports teams based on identity, destroying the very opportunities Title IX was meant to protect.'
New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
Jeffries Has His Moment in Hourslong Speech Opposing Trump's Policy Bill
Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the Democratic leader, passed the four-hour mark on Thursday morning in a marathon speech in the House opposing Republicans' signature legislation carrying out President Trump's domestic agenda. Beginning his remarks before dawn, Mr. Jeffries said that he was 'planning to take my sweet time' with his speech. It was not a filibuster, the Senate tactic that allows a member to speechify for unlimited time, delaying action indefinitely. But Mr. Jeffries was making use of his prerogative as a leader to stretch his allotted 60 seconds of speaking time for far longer, in a House tradition known as a 'magic minute.' In doing so, he was attempting to seize a pivotal moment for Democrats — who have toiled to find a cohesive strategy, message and messenger for countering Mr. Trump — to make a forceful case against the president and his agenda. The speech was the final Democratic delay standing in the way of passing the G.O.P. bill to extend tax cuts and slash social safety net programs, which Mr. Trump has said he wants to sign by July 4. But it had no chance of stopping it. Mocking the name Republicans have bestowed on the bill — the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — Mr. Jeffries said, 'Republicans are trying to jam this one, big, ugly bill down the throats of the American people,' and urged lawmakers to vote against it. The speech mainly focused on the ramifications of spending cuts to social safety programs, laying out stories of vulnerable Americans who might be hurt by its reductions to Medicaid and SNAP food assistance. 'Leadership requires courage, conviction, compassion — and yet what we have seen from this administration and co-conspirators on the Republican side of the aisle is cruelty, chaos and corruption,' he said, adding that the bill was 'an extraordinary assault on the health care of the American people.' Mr. Jeffries, who spoke deliberately and frequently referred to a large binder of notes, addressed a mostly empty House chamber, though some Democratic colleagues clustered behind him and applauded at key points in a show of encouragement. Speaker Mike Johnson was likely to address the chamber once Mr. Jeffries finished. He also has unlimited time, in theory, but he told reporters earlier on Thursday that he expected his speech would be significantly shorter than that of the Democratic leader. A vote on the bill was expected soon after Mr. Johnson's remarks conclude.
Axios
35 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump escalates attacks on Zohran Mamdani
President Trump is ramping up his attacks on one of the GOP's newest targets, New York City's progressive mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. The big picture: The 33-year-old Democratic primary winner in the NYC mayoral primary has been hit with a barrage of attacks from the right ever since his win, with Trump and others attempting to frame him as a new face of " radical" Democrats. In social media posts after former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo conceded the race to Mamdani — who electrified a young, multiracial coalition in the primary — Trump blasted him as "a 100% Communist Lunatic" and "our future Communist Mayor of New York City." Mamdani has said he is "Donald Trump's worst nightmare" — and the president's barrage of attacks does little to dispute that. Driving the news: In a vague Truth Social post Wednesday, Trump vowed he would not" let this Communist Lunatic destroy New York," saying he holds "all the levers" and "all the cards." He continued, "I'll save New York City, and make it "Hot" and "Great" again, just like I did with the Good Ol' USA!" Trump on Tuesday said he would arrest Mamdani if he doesn't allow federal immigration officials to arrest immigrants in the city. Mamdani vowed in a speech after his historic victory to "stop masked ICE agents from deporting our neighbors." Asked for his response, Trump replied, "Well then, we'll have to arrest him." He also baselessly questioned Mamdani's citizenship status on Tuesday, saying, "A lot of people are saying he's here illegally." Mamdani was born in Uganda and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2018. In an interview aired Sunday on Fox News ' "Sunday Morning Futures," Trump doubled down on his prior assertion that Mamdani is a communist (which Mamdani has denied) and said the Democratic nominee must "do the right thing" if he's elected or he'll withhold federal funding. The other side: Trump's war of words and threats have been mostly one-sided, though Mamdani has pushed back. Responding to Trump's threat to arrest him, Mamdani said the president wants to "distract from what I fight for." "I fight for working people," he said. "I fight for the very people that have been priced out of this city, and I fight for the same people that he said he was fighting for." In a statement shared to X, Mamdani wrote, "We will not accept this intimidation." Zoom out: Mamdani's win prompted an avalanche of Islamophobic rhetoric, including from GOP lawmakers, one of whom called for Mamdani to be denaturalized and deported. His surprise victory also shook the Democratic establishment, while others see him as a breath of fresh air juxtaposed with the party's old guard. Mamdani, who has denounced antisemitism and has promised to be a mayor for all New Yorkers, told MSNBC that he sees his win as "an opportunity for me to introduce the fact that being Muslim is like being a member of any other faith."
