logo
Judicial activism shouldn't turn into judicial terrorism or adventurism: CJI Gavai

Judicial activism shouldn't turn into judicial terrorism or adventurism: CJI Gavai

Time of India4 hours ago

1
2
3
Nagpur: Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan Gavai on Thursday cautioned against judicial overreach, stressing that though judicial activism is bound to stay, but it should not be allowed to turn into judicial adventurism or judicial terrorism.
Speaking at a grand felicitation by the District Bar Association (DBA) on the premises of the District and Sessions Court in Nagpur, Gavai emphasised the importance of maintaining constitutional boundaries between the three organs of democracy.
"Every institution must function within the limits drawn by the Constitution. Parliament frames laws, the executive implements them, and the judiciary ensures they comply with constitutional principles.
When the Parliament or assemblies enact laws that violate the Constitution of India, the judiciary can step in. But if the judiciary tries to interfere unnecessarily in the functioning of the other two pillars, that must be avoided," he said.
The event was graced by Supreme Court justices Dipankar Datta, Prasanna Varale, and Atul Chandurkar, along with Bombay high court chief justice Alok Aradhe, senior administrative judge of Nagpur bench Nitin Sambre, senior judge Anil Kilor, and others.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed!
IC Markets
Start Now
Undo
Justice Gavai's mother Kamaltai and wife Tejaswini also shared the dais.
Recalling several milestones of his career, Gavai recounted his early reluctance to practise law and how the teachings of Dr BR Ambedkar and his father RS Gavai, a stalwart in social and political spheres, shaped his life. "From my childhood, I was exposed to Dr Ambedkar's ideals. My father would often say that one day his son would be the CJI, but sadly, he isn't here to see it.
I am grateful that my mother is alive to witness this moment," he said emotionally.
Paying rich tributes to Dr Ambedkar, he called the Indian Constitution a unique document. "It ensures social, financial, and political justice, along with liberty of thought and equality. I have always said that whatever I am today, it is because of the Constitution and Dr Ambedkar's vision," he said.
Gavai also recalled unveiling Dr Ambedkar's statue and portrait at the Nagpur bench when he was the administrative judge.
"But more than his portrait, what we need are his thoughts. They must guide us," he remarked.
Describing the Nagpur bar as a secular and inclusive institution, he lauded DBA for never discriminating on the basis of caste and religion. He congratulated DBA secretary Manish Randive, and president Roshan Bagade, recalling how the latter became the association's first backward-class president. "Many small communities have produced lawyers today.
I'm proud to be a member of this bar," he said.
Gavai revisited significant cases, including a PIL he filed on behalf of a student from the Mehtar community in 1985, which led to a landmark high court decision allowing the student's admission — a moment he termed more satisfying than any financial gain. He also recalled being part of a plea that saved lakhs of slum dwellers from eviction in Mumbai after securing a stay in the Supreme Court within eight days.
Highlighting the judiciary's constructive role, he credited public interest litigations (PILs) at the Nagpur bench for facilitating the new district court building and helping regulate slum settlements on zudpi jungle lands, safeguarding the right to livelihood. "Directive Principles and Fundamental Rights were carefully considered in these decisions," he noted.
Gavai also fondly remembered his days as a DBA member, sharing anecdotes with justice Sambre and others during bar elections.
He acknowledged legal luminaries from Nagpur like ex CJI Mohammed Hidayatullah, Bhausaheb Bobde, and VR Manohar, calling them 'legal eagles' and 'gifts from Nagpur to the judiciary'. "Like justice Datta said, my natural choice should be politics, but it was till 1990 before I decided to take up the legal profession," he said.
"My father once told me, 'You can earn money as a lawyer, but as a judge, you can fulfill Babasaheb Ambedkar's dream of social and economic upliftment'," said the CJI, reflecting on his journey. Gavai, who credits his late father, veteran leader Dadasaheb Gavai, for shaping his path, also acknowledged the personal cost of his public role.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can babies be stateless in the US? What the Supreme Court's ruling means for birthright citizenship
Can babies be stateless in the US? What the Supreme Court's ruling means for birthright citizenship

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Can babies be stateless in the US? What the Supreme Court's ruling means for birthright citizenship

The Supreme Court has permitted President Trump's order on birthright citizenship to advance in 28 states. A 30-day delay is in place. Legal challenges are ongoing. States like California and New York are exempt for now. Class-action lawsuits are being pursued. Experts warn of potential statelessness for some children. Mixed-status families may face complications. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What the Supreme Court's Decision Means for Birthright Citizenship Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In a key decision, the Supreme Court has allowed President Donald Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants and temporary visa holders to proceed in 28 states. While the court did not rule on the constitutionality of the order, it struck down nationwide injunctions that had blocked its enforcement. A 30-day delay has been set before the order takes effect, giving legal challengers time to including California, New York, and Maryland—part of a group of 22 states that had sued the federal government—will not see immediate enforcement due to existing court blocks. Lawyers representing those states are now moving quickly to convert their cases into class-action lawsuits to preserve broader Yale-Loehr, immigration scholar at Cornell Law School, said as told to The New York Times:'The court decision today means that unless a court certifies a class action within the next 30 days, the Trump administration can start to implement its repeal of birthright citizenship.'With the 30-day window now active, immigration lawyers and civil rights groups are racing to block enforcement before it begins. The constitutional question of who qualifies as an American citizen remains unresolved and is likely headed for another round in the The court imposed a 30-day delay. The order may be implemented only in the 28 states that did not file legal challenges. In states that did, earlier court rulings remain in place, pending further have filed for class-action status, which would allow affected individuals across all states to be represented collectively. The Supreme Court left open this legal path. Federal judges will need to certify these classes quickly for them to have legal Mays, legal director at Democracy Defenders Fund, said to The New York Times:'The Constitution guarantees birthright citizenship, and no procedural ruling will stop us from fighting to uphold that promise.'Yes. In enforcement states, babies born to undocumented immigrants may not receive US citizenship. While many will inherit citizenship from their parents' home countries, some may not, depending on each country's nationality say deportation would depend on the parents' immigration status. Cristina Rodriguez, a professor at Yale Law School, told The New York Times:'What will matter is the status of the parents, in which case there is no bar for removing the babies along with parents.'Under the executive order, children born to individuals on temporary visas—such as H-1B workers or student visa holders—would not automatically receive citizenship. These children may inherit temporary status but would lack the rights tied to added:'They just won't get birth certificates.'Children born during enforcement might gain retroactive citizenship if courts eventually invalidate the order. However, this would require a formal process and could delay access to healthcare, education, and legal warned:'Practically, it could be a gigantic hassle, and there could be significant consequences.'If a family has children born before and after the order, citizenship status could differ among siblings. This may lead to complications in accessing benefits or remaining in the told The New York Times:'The practical problems of ending birthright citizenship are both huge and unpredictable.'

‘Mask has come off': Rahul Gandhi on RSS calling for review of words in Preamble to Constitution
‘Mask has come off': Rahul Gandhi on RSS calling for review of words in Preamble to Constitution

Scroll.in

timean hour ago

  • Scroll.in

‘Mask has come off': Rahul Gandhi on RSS calling for review of words in Preamble to Constitution

Criticising the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh for calling for a review of words in the Preamble to the Constitution, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Friday said that the Hindutva organisation's ' mask had come off again '. The RSS is the parent organisation of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. The Constitution hurts the RSS because it talks about equality, secularism and justice, Gandhi said on social media. 'RSS-BJP does not want the Constitution, but Manusmriti,' said the leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha. 'They want to enslave the marginalised and the poor again by snatching their rights. Their real agenda is to snatch away a powerful weapon like the Constitution from them.' Gandhi added: 'RSS should stop dreaming like this – we will never let them succeed. Every patriotic Indian will protect the Constitution till the last breath.' The Congress leader's comments came a day after the RSS on Thursday said that the inclusion of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' in the Preamble to the Constitution should be reviewed. 'The words were added during [the] Emergency, when fundamental rights were suspended, Parliament did not function, and the judiciary became lame,' said RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale. He added: 'So, whether they should remain in the Preamble should be considered. The Preamble is eternal. Are the thoughts of socialism as an ideology eternal for India?' Hosabale made the statements while speaking at an event marking 50 years since the Emergency was declared by former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's government in 1975. The words 'socialist' and 'secular' were not part of the Constitution adopted in 1950 and were added in 1976 through the 42nd constitutional amendment. In November, the Supreme Court rejected a batch of petitions seeking the deletion of the two terms from the Preamble to the Constitution. The court said there was no legitimate justification for challenging the constitutional amendment several decades later. The Communist Party of India (Marxist) said on Friday that the 'proposal' made by the Hindutva organisation ' exposes the RSS' long-standing objective of subverting the Constitution and its intent to transform India into a Hindu Rashtra, in pursuit of its Hindutva project.' The Congress had on Thursday night criticised Hosabale's remarks, saying that the RSS and the BJP's ideology stood in ' direct opposition ' to the Constitution. The remarks were not merely a suggestion, but a 'deliberate assault on the soul of our Constitution', alleged the Opposition party. 'It is part of a long-standing conspiracy to dismantle Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar's vision for a just, inclusive and democratic India – something the RSS-BJP has always been plotting,' the party alleged. In 2015, a controversy erupted after the BJP-led Union government's newspaper advertisements on Republic Day featured a Preamble with the two words omitted. In September 2023, Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury claimed that the two words were missing from the Preamble in the copies of the Constitution distributed to the MPs in the new Parliament building.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store