Fetterman takes swipe at AOC: 'We kept our government open. Deal with it'
Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., took a swipe at Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., in a tweet on Friday."We need a Democratic Party that fights harder for us too," the congresswoman said during speeches on Thursday."Fight 'harder'—a stunt that would have harmed millions and plunged us into chaos," Fetterman wrote when sharing a screenshot featuring a quotation of Ocasio-Cortez's comment. "We kept our government open. Deal with it."NETANYAHU GIFTS FETTERMAN A SILVER-PLATED BEEPER AFTER HE PRAISED ISRAEL'S LEBANON PAGER OPERATIONFox News Digital reached out to Ocasio-Cortez's office on Friday to request a comment from the congresswoman, but did not receive a response by the time of publication.Fetterman and other Democrats — including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — voted last week to overcome a procedural hurdle, which cleared the way for the chamber to vote on a government funding measure to avoid a partial government shutdown.FETTERMAN CALLS OUT DEMS' 'UNHINGED PETULANCE' AFTER TRUMP SPEECH: 'WE'RE BECOMING THE METAPHORICAL CAR ALARM'But after that cloture vote, Fetterman, Schumer, and most other Democrats voted against passing the actual funding measure, which ultimately passed anyway.Ocasio-Cortez had urged senators to vote against cloture and against the measure.AOC FIRES BACK AT FETTERMAN, ACCUSES HIM OF 'BLEAK DUNK ATTEMPT'CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP"It should be very clear to every Senate Democrat that any vote for Cloture will also be considered a vote for the bill. People aren't going to be tricked with procedural games. They know exactly what is going on. Defend Medicaid. Vote NO on Cloture. NO on bill," she had declared in a tweet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
24 minutes ago
- UPI
GOP Senator Thom Tillis announces he will not seek re-election
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-NC, pictured during a Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee hearing in February, announced Sunday that he will not seek re-election in 2026. File photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo June 29 (UPI) -- Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C, said Sunday that he would not seek re-election, opening up a seat in a state that was already considered a battleground in the 2026 midterm elections. Tillis made the announcement after voting against a procedural measure Saturday night to clear the way for debate on the Senate version of the Trump administration's budget reconciliation bill. "As many of my colleagues have noticed over the last year, and at times even joked about, I haven't exactly been excited about running for another term." Tillis said in a statement sent to media outlets. "That is true since the choice is between spending another six years in Washington or spending that time with the love of my life Susan, our two children, three beautiful grandchildren, and the rest of our extended family back home. It's not a hard choice and I will not be seeking re-election." President Donald Trump threatened Tillis with a primary challenge in N.C. in the 2026 midterms following the GOP Senator's vote against moving the budget bill to the Senate floor for debate. Trump took to social media to criticize Tillis. "Thom Tillis is making a BIG MISTAKE for America, and the Wonderful People of North Carolina!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social account Saturday night. In a statement following the vote Saturday night, Tillis said he was putting the interests of his constituents above party politics. "I did my homework on behalf of North Carolinians, and I cannot support this bill in its current form," Tillis wrote. "It would result in tens of billions of dollars in funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities." Tillis also noted that proposed cuts would impact rural hospitals and fall squarely on Medicaid recipients who rely on the program as their only source of medical insurance.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Democrats accuse GOP of nuking Senate rules to pass Trump megabill
Senate Democrats on Sunday accused Republicans of 'going nuclear' to blow up the Senate rules so they can make President Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent. The heated moment on the Senate floor came as Democrats made several parliamentary inquiries of the Senate's presiding chair to lay the groundwork to challenge Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) use of a 'current policy' budget baseline to score the extension of the 2017 tax cuts as not adding to the deficit. 'This is the nuclear option. It's just hidden behind a whole lot of Washington, D.C., lingo,' Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, declared on the Senate floor. Republicans pushed back on that claim. Graham argued that Democrats have previously used current-policy baselines to score bills. He pointed to former Senate Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad's (D-N.D.) use of a current policy baseline to pass a farm bill. Democrats, however, say that was done on a bipartisan basis and not for something as monumental as extending trillions of dollars' worth of tax breaks. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) pointed out that President Obama's budget office in 2012 argued that the extension of the expiring Bush tax cuts should be scored as a continuation of current policy and as not adding to the deficit. Democrats say that Congress has never before used a current policy baseline to score tax cuts in budget reconciliation package as not adding to future deficits. They are pushing for the bill to be scored on a 'current law' baseline. Under current law, the 2017 Trump tax cuts would expire at the end of 2025. The Congressional Budget Office scores the extension of Trump tax cuts as adding to the deficit under a current-law baseline. But under a current-policy baseline, which Republicans are using for the bill, the CBO scores the extension of the Trump tax cuts as not exceeding the bill's reconciliation instructions or adding to federal deficits after 2034. If extending the Trump tax cuts is scored as budget neutral, then the bill complies with the Senate's Byrd Rule, which determines what legislation can pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote. If Democrats win the procedural argument, the bill would have to be rewritten and the 2017 Trump tax cuts would have to be offset with huge additional spending cuts to comply with the Senate's Byrd Rule. If Republicans win the procedural argument, then they will be able to make the expiring portions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent — a major policy victory. Wyden, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and other senior Democrats made parliamentarian inquiries on the floor Sunday afternoon to set up a later challenge to the Republican baseline. Merkley asked the presiding chair, who was freshman Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio), if the House reconciliation bill used current law as the operative baseline when it was first laid before the Senate. The chair answered 'yes.' Then Schumer asked if the Senate had ever used a baseline other than current law for a reconciliation measure, and the chair responded 'no.' Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the ranking member of the Appropriations Committee, asked if the nine titles of the Senate bill other than the Finance Committee's portion, used current-law baselines. Moreno answered 'Yes.' Wyden then asked if the Finance title of the legislation relied on two different budgetary baselines, both current-law and current-policy baselines, and the chair acknowledged that is true. Those answers prompted Murray, the longest serving Democratic member of the Budget panel, to accuse Republicans of 'ignoring precedent, process and the parliamentarian.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump's Iran strikes threaten to roil elections in Michigan
The U.S.'s military intervention in Iran could roil next year's House and Senate races in Michigan, a key battleground state that saw Democratic tensions play out last cycle over the war in Gaza. Democratic candidates in particular there will be forced to navigate a political minefield when it comes to President Trump's involvement in Iran, a conflict that is linked to Israel's ongoing war in Gaza, which proved to be a major liability for Michigan Democrats during last year's election. But the conflict also raises questions for Republicans, who will need to win over Arab, Muslim and Jewish Americans statewide while navigating the Trump administration's position on the broader conflict. 'The races next year should be really interesting, because in some ways, they're going to be a referendum on some of the key questions of who the Democratic Party is and who it will become,' said Abbas Alawieh, a senior Democratic strategist who was one of the leaders of the Uncommitted Movement last year, which sought to pressure then-President Biden over his stance on the war in Gaza. That conflict became a flashpoint during the 2024 election, nowhere more so than in Michigan, which has a Jewish population of more than 100,000 while the Arab and Muslim American population is estimated to be about several hundred thousand in the state. 'The Middle Eastern vote, the Muslim vote in particular, has been moving slightly to the right over the last couple of elections and clearly Trump capitalized on it,' said Jason Cabel Roe, a Michigan-based Republican strategist. 'It remains to be seen that Muslim Americans, while they might not love Israel and may even hate Israel, they don't necessarily love Iran,' he added. 'And I do think that everyone recognizes that Iran has been for nearly 50 years the primary disruptive force in the region.' The Uncommitted Movement — in which Arab, Muslim and progressive voters urged Democrats to vote 'uncommitted' in the primary against Biden — notably started out in the Midwestern state, and then later spread across the country, in reaction to the war. After replacing Biden on the ticket, Vice President Kamala Harris lost the state by more than 1 point, fairing only better in Wisconsin among the seven battleground states. The Arab and Muslim 'community here in Michigan … can no longer be taken for granted as just lining up with the Democratic candidate,' Alawieh said. 'I think Democrats are going to have to work harder for that vote.' The Trump administration's decision to bomb several nuclear facilities in Iran last week has only magnified the issue heading into 2026, with Trump on Friday leaving open the possibility to further strikes. Some members of Michigan's Arab and Muslim communities who spoke with The Hill believe that conflict could impact key elections or be an important issue next year again, particularly in the Senate race. The Democratic primary has positioned Rep. Haley Stevens (Mich.), a pro-Israel Democrat who's previously received backing from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), against state Sen. Mallory McMorrow and former Wayne County Health Director Abdul El-Sayed. Stevens noted the need for congressional approval for the strikes and demanded that the administration brief Congress on the matter. 'Like most Michiganders, I believe the last thing our country needs is to be involved in another foreign war,' Stevens said. 'I intend to use my power as a member of Congress to ensure that this president and this administration do not continue to abuse the system of checks and balances we have in this country.' McMorrow said in her own statement following the strikes that the U.S. 'cannot be dragged back into a forever war.' 'The U.S. could have prevented Iran from developing a nuclear weapon through diplomacy. Trump's actions have now put U.S. troops in danger and made us all less safe,' McMorrow said. In an interview with The Hill, El-Sayed equated the issue of foreign intervention to affordability. 'You don't have to be from the Middle East, you have to be from Michigan to know that this is a waste of taxpayer dollars,' El-Sayed said. 'This seems totally removed from the affordability crisis that they're living through. It doesn't increase the access that they have to affordable groceries or reduce the price of eggs.' 'I don't think everyday folks are asking what's Iran up to; I think they're asking am I going to be able to afford my life tomorrow?' Michigan GOP Senate candidate and former Rep. Mike Rogers (Mich.) said in an interview that members of the state's Middle Eastern community he has spoken to see the endgame when it comes to Trump's strikes on Iran. 'What I'm sensing is nobody likes it, the fact that they had to do it, but they all support the outcome because they believe that this is going to get us one step closer to peace,' said Rogers, who has a law enforcement and intelligence background. 'People are nervous,' he continued. 'They don't want to see a bigger, wider-spread war. Neither does the president, and I think they're with him on that.' Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-Mich.), who told reporters Thursday that he was 'seriously exploring' a Senate bid himself, suggested Saudi Arabia and other nations along the Persian Gulf privately 'are very nervous about a nuclear Iran as well.' In addition to the Senate race, Alawieh suggested the issue could play out in the primary for Stevens's House seat, Rep. John James's (R-Mich.) seat and in the Democratic primary between Rep. Shri Thanedar (Mich.) and state Rep. Donavan McKinney, who's backed by progressives. 'Very important,' said Osama Siblani, publisher of The Arab American News, when asked how candidates' positions on the military intervention in Iran and the broader global conflict would affect how he votes next year. 'Because, remember, we are a community that has relatives overseas.' At the same time, Siblani — who declined to endorse Trump or Harris last cycle — noted domestic issues were also extremely important to him. Why are Trump and Republicans 'doing what they're doing in the … campuses, arresting people, deporting them, not giving them the due process?' Siblani asked. 'The country that I came to in 1976 is not the same country that I live in today,' he added. One national Republican strategist said the Israel-Hamas war would likely play a bigger role in the state's campaign discourse than Iran's conflict with Israel. 'It's always going to be an issue when the Middle East comes up regarding politics,' the strategist said. 'The bigger issue will still continue to be more of Israel's war eliminating Hamas.' While a global conflict is looming over the country, some lawmakers caution it's too soon to know how the U.S. intervention in Iran could impact Michigan next year or express ambivalence that it will be as much of a lightning-rod issue. 'Let's see how it all plays out. We haven't even gotten the facts,' Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) said Tuesday. Michigan state Rep. Noah Arbit (D), who founded the Michigan Democratic Jewish Caucus, was not convinced it would be a major issue next year. He suggested what would motivate voters would be anticipated cuts to Medicaid from Trump's megabill and tax cuts that wealthy Americans would benefit off of. Rogers noted that if the conflict were to break down into a broader war and enflame other parts of the Middle East 'then it becomes something very different.' But the Michigan Republican is betting most voters will side with Trump over the issue when it's over. 'I just don't see it happening,' he said. 'I think this is going to be a huge positive.'
