
Expert Insights: Q&A with FCAI chief executive Tony Weber
The NVES officially began on January 1 and there's now less than a month to go before auto brands start accruing financial penalties for exceeding increasingly stringent CO2 limits determined by vehicle type from July 1.
Intended to reduce the CO2 emissions of Australia's new-vehicle market overall by incentivising the uptake of more efficient vehicles, the scheme will also award credits to automakers that sell zero- and low-emissions vehicles, creating somewhat of a carbon trading system for the local auto industry.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Needless to say this has caused significant friction in the industry, between brands that sell only electric vehicles (EVs) such as Tesla and Polestar, which are members of the Electric Vehicle Council (EVC), and brands that do not.
In this exclusive interview with the chief executive of the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI), Tony Weber, the head of the organisation that represents most auto brands in Australia, outlines several problems with the NVES.
These include the potential for higher prices for some new vehicles, which the FCAI says could throttle sales, force owners to keep their existing vehicles for longer and slow the total emissions reduction of the 'carpark' of vehicles currently on our roads.
The NVES is a policy that aims to reduce emissions from Australia's light vehicle fleet by setting emissions targets for new vehicle sales.
Manufacturers that exceed the targets must pay penalties or adjust their model mix to meet future targets.
The FCAI has long advocated for an emissions reduction scheme that is ambitious in scope. The scheme must recognise current and projected consumer demand, as well as the unpredictable nature of future technological breakthroughs. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
The NVES provides the impetus to supply low-emission vehicles to the Australian market. The great unknown is consumer demand for these products.
But the NVES, an extremely ambitious scheme, could result in a lower-than-anticipated uptake of low-emission technologies, which could encourage consumers to hold onto older vehicles for longer.
This could have the opposite effect of increasing emissions rather than achieving the policy objective of reducing emissions, while making new cars more expensive.
The NVES has already led to the withdrawal of certain internal combustion engine (ICE) models. At the same time, several new market entrants have entered the market in 2024 and 2025, lifting the number of EV models to more than 90. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
We expect brands to continue reviewing their product lineups in light of NVES targets and consumer demand.
Brands will consider the most efficient mix of low-emissions technologies, including hybrid, plug-in hybrid (PHEV), and battery electric vehicle (EV) offerings.
Most important is the Australian consumer's ability to continue accessing the vehicle models and powertrains they want at prices they can afford.
It will be up to individual OEMs [automakers] to make decisions on how they manage the cost of compliance across their fleets. This includes adjusting their model mix, purchasing credits, or factoring in the risk of penalties.
Many consumers rely on vehicle segments that lack practical EV options and will hold onto their existing vehicles for longer. The large commercial vehicle, large SUV and small vehicle segments are examples where the range of pure battery-electric or plug-in hybrid versions is still limited.
The model was produced as an indication of the potential impact of the proposed NVES at that time in 2024. It assumed that if 2023 sales were replicated in 2025 and the out years under the proposed government scenario, there was the potential for significant penalties to apply. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Since that model was produced, legislation was changed and passed in May 2024. OEMs are responding to the NVES by increasing the number of zero- and low-emission vehicles in the market.
Given the current level of consumer demand for EVs and their limited availability in a number of vehicle segments, we are concerned about upward price pressures on vehicles as fines accrue under the NVES.
Price is just one element buyers consider when purchasing a vehicle. Buyers correctly examine the total cost of ownership (TCO) when buying a car. The TCO includes purchase price, fuel costs, insurance, maintenance and resale residuals.
As the scheme commences on July 1, 2025, the need for modelling will be offset by sales data, which will provide real-time information about the scheme, including the accrual of credits and fines.
EV ownership costs are predicated on several factors, including fuel costs, purchase price, residual value, insurance costs, and maintenance. Focusing solely on potential savings from fuel costs is misleading.
It's too early to predict how credit trading will impact the market, as the decisions of individual OEMs will ultimately drive it. However, given the current demand for EVs among consumers, it's unlikely that sufficient credits will be generated to offset the accumulated debits over the years of the scheme from 2025 to 2029.
While there's an increasing number of EV models available in Australia, several segments including large SUVs, LCVs and some small vehicles still have limited EV options. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Without suitable models, consumers may hold onto older vehicles longer, delaying overall emissions reductions.
A more balanced transition is necessary to allow technology to catch up, ideally incorporating all forms of zero and low-emission vehicle options.
Recent sales data indicate that consumers are increasingly turning to hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles as a transitional step toward full battery electric vehicles.
Still, these vehicles are unlikely to meet NVES targets after the initial stages of the scheme.
In general, the FCAI advocates a technology-neutral approach to transport sector decarbonisation, allowing the market to determine the most efficient and effective method of achieving the government's ambitious carbon dioxide reduction goals.
Emissions reduction targets should be approached by engaging all forms of emissions reduction technology. Based on prior analysis by our independent global expert, we expected EVs to account for around 11 per cent of new vehicle sales in 2024.
However, the actual result was around 7.0 per cent. Despite the increased availability of EVs, this level of EV penetration is not likely to meet the NVES targets.
Many Australians remain unconvinced about the suitability of EVs due to range limitations, charging concerns, and concerns about the total cost of ownership. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Australia's public charging network is underdeveloped, particularly in regional areas, creating range anxiety.
In general, EVs remain more expensive than ICE vehicles.
There are few options in key segments like utes, 4WDs and small vehicles.
There is pressure on residual values, which can be a significant concern for private and fleet buyers. This might be a positive for potential buyers of second-hand EVs but an issue for buyers of new cars, which in turn reduces the number of vehicles entering the Australian market.
Increased EV adoption will require significant [electricity grid] upgrades to ensure sustainability.
High interest rates and cost-of-living pressures limit consumer purchasing power.
Inconsistent federal and state policies create uncertainty for manufacturers.
MORE: Australian Government set to make crucial change to emissions regulationsMORE: EV brand urges Australian Government to 'stay the course' on new emissions rules MORE: Customers to wear the cost of new emissions laws
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
26 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Australia holds onto 10 per cent tariff rate from the US
The Albanese government is claiming victory after US President Donald Trump's deadline passed. The Australian government has secured rare certainty, locking in a 10 per cent tariff rate from the US. Countries who failed to strike a deal with Washington ahead of the negotiation deadline are facing significant tariffs, such as India and Taiwan, which received levies of 20 per cent and above. Israel, Japan, and the EU have been slapped with a 15 per cent tariff rate. The government maintains it doesn't want to stop here, arguing Australia should be trading under a reciprocal rate of zero. Tariffs are likely to disrupt global supply chains, leading to less spending, particularly on investment.

News.com.au
26 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Tesla ordered to pay $US242 million in Autopilot death
A Florida jury on Friday ordered Tesla to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to plaintiffs who blamed a deadly 2019 crash on the company's 'Autopilot' driver assistance technology. The jury found Tesla's system partly responsible for a crash in Key Largo that killed Naibel Benavides Leon and injured her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, according to attorney Darren Jeffrey Rousso, a partner at the law firm that represented Angulo and Leon's family. The plaintiffs had alleged that Autopilot was to blame when driver George McGee's Tesla careened into a Chevrolet sport utility vehicle, killing Leon and injuring Angulo. The jury awarded $US200 million ($309 million) in punitive damages, plus $US59 million ($91 million) in compensatory damages to Leon's family and $US70 million ($108 million) in damages to Angulo, according to court records. Since the jury assigned one-third of the blame to Tesla, the compensatory damages will be reduced, Rousso said, with the total impact of the jury award totalling $US242 million ($374 million) after these reductions. 'Justice was done,' Mr Rousso said. 'The jury heard all the evidence and came up with a fair and just verdict on behalf of our clients.' Tesla will appeal the decision, according to its defense attorneys. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeapordise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology,' Tesla said through its legal team. 'The evidence has always shown that this driver was solely at fault because he was speeding, with his foot on the accelerator — which overrode Autopilot — as he rummaged for his dropped phone without his eyes on the road. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash. This was never about Autopilot.'


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Markets plummet as Trump issues more steep tariffs
US President Donald Trump's latest wave of tariffs on exports from dozens of trading partners sent global stock markets tumbling and countries and companies scrambling to seek ways to strike better deals. As Trump presses ahead with plans to reorder the global economy with the highest tariff rates since the early 1930s, Switzerland, "stunned" by 39 per cent tariffs, sought more talks, as did India, hit with a 25 per cent rate. New tariffs announced on Friday also included a 35 per cent duty on many goods from Canada, 50 per cent for Brazil, 20 per cent for Taiwan, which said its rate was "temporary" and it expected to reach a lower figure. The presidential order listed higher import duty rates of 10 per cent to 41 per cent starting in a week's time for 69 trading partners, taking the US effective tariff rate to about 18 per cent, from 2.3 per cent last year, according to analysts at Capital Economics. US stocks took a hit. By afternoon on Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had dropped 1.46 per cent to 43,486.45, the S&P 500 1.8 per cent to 6,225.55 and the Nasdaq Composite 2.42 per cent to 20,610.91. Markets were also reacting to a disappointing jobs report. Data showed US job growth slowed more than expected in July while the prior month's data was revised sharply lower, pointing to a slowdown in the labour market. Global shares stumbled, with Europe's STOXX 600 tumbling 1.89 per cent on the day. Trump's new tariffs have created yet more uncertainty, with many details unclear. They are set to take effect on August 7, a White House official said. Trump administration officials defended the president's approach saying the uncertainty was "critical" for him to be able to leverage a better deal. "The trade deals we've seen over the last few weeks... have been nothing short of monumental," Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran said on CNBC. Trump's tariff rollout also comes amid evidence they have begun driving up prices of home furnishings and household equipment. Australian products could become more competitive in the US market, helping businesses boost exports, Trade Minister Don Farrell said, after Trump kept the minimum tariff rate of 10 per cent for Australia. The European Union, which struck a framework deal with Trump on Sunday, is still awaiting more Trump orders to deliver on agreed carve-outs, including on cars and aircraft, EU officials said, saying the latest executive orders did not cover that. Switzerland said it would push for a "negotiated solution" with the US, with industry insiders saying they were "stunned" by the 39 per cent tariffs. South Africa's Trade Minister Parks Tau said he was seeking "real, practical interventions" to defend jobs and the economy against the 30 per cent US tariff it faces. Southeast Asian countries largely breathed a sigh of relief after the US tariffs on their exports that were lower than threatened and leveled the playing field with a rate of about 19 per cent across the region's biggest economies. Thailand's finance minister said a reduction from 36 per cent to 19 per cent would help his country's economy. While India is in talks after being slapped with a 25 per cent tariff, which could impact about $US40 billion ($A62 billion) worth of its exports. Trump issued a separate order for Canada that raises the rate on Canadian goods subject to fentanyl-related tariffs to 35 per cent, from 25 per cent previously, saying Canada had "failed to cooperate" in curbing illicit narcotics flows into the US. This is contrast to his decision to allow Mexico a 90-day reprieve from higher tariffs to allow time to negotiate. Businesses and analysts said the impact of Trump's new trade regime would not be positive for economic growth. "No real winners in trade conflicts," said Thomas Rupf, co-head Singapore and CIO Asia at VP Bank. "Despite some countries securing better terms, the overall impact is negative."