Trump's Approval Rating Spikes With Millennials—Polls
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump's approval rating took a sharp U-turn this week with millennials after weeks of sliding, a new poll from The Economist and YouGov on Tuesday shows.
Why It Matters
Trump has routinely touted positive approval ratings and polling at news conferences and campaign rallies throughout his political career. Slipping in polls could ultimately hinder his political clout in an already highly polarized climate and potentially hurt Republican chances in the coming 2026 midterms.
When Trump returned to the White House in January, he coasted in with positive numbers. The reversal came after a series of months marked by declining support and mounting discontent tied to economic and political concerns—like the president's tariff policies.
Parallel efforts by both Trump and former Vice President Kamala Harris to reach millennials via podcasts and digital media emerged as a key feature of the 2024 campaign cycle, seeking to engage a generation that expresses more skepticism toward legacy media and traditional political messaging.
Millennials are defined generally as people born from 1981 to 1996. The generation has overtaken the baby boomers as the largest age demographic, according to the Pew Research Center.
What To Know
In the new poll released on Tuesday, the president has a 42 percent approval rating with the voting bloc. The survey was taken from June 27 to June 30 among 1,648 U.S. adult citizens, with a 3.3 percent margin of error.
The previous week, the president's approval rating with millennials was 36 percent. That survey was taken from June 20 to June 23 among 1,590 U.S. adult citizens, with a 3.5 percent margin of error.
Trump's approval rating coming into office for his second term with the voting bloc was 44 percent and his highest with the pollster was 48 percent in both February and June polls.
Before Tuesday's poll, the president saw sliding numbers with the key group, as he hit his lowest rating in over two months.
President Donald Trump arrives at Huis ten Bosch Palace for a dinner during the NATO Summit 2025 on June 24 in The Hague, Netherlands. (Photo by Patrick)
President Donald Trump arrives at Huis ten Bosch Palace for a dinner during the NATO Summit 2025 on June 24 in The Hague, Netherlands. (Photo by Patrick)
What People Are Saying
Political analyst Craig Agranoff, to Newsweek via text message Tuesday: "The 6-point surge in Trump's approval rating among millennials, as reported in recent polls, is a notable shift for a demographic that's now the largest voting bloc, outpacing baby boomers.
"I wouldn't call it a definitive win for Trump, as millennials remain a volatile and diverse group, often skeptical of his broader agenda," Agranoff added. "This uptick likely reflects targeted messaging or economic optimism resonating with younger voters, but it's too early to deem it a lasting trend."
Concluding, Agranoff said: "As for prioritizing millennials, Trump's political strategy has historically leaned on energizing his core base, often older, more conservative voters, rather than tailoring policies to younger demographics. His focus seems more about dominating the broader narrative than catering specifically to this age group's public opinion."
What Happens Next
Polling trends suggest Trump's approval among millennials may continue fluctuating amid foreign and domestic policy announcements and upcoming midterm elections.
Both major parties will likely expand direct-to-voter media efforts through podcasts and alternative platforms in an effort to shore up support within this pivotal demographic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
18 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Orange County congresswoman targeted by protests over Trump megabill, cuts to healthcare
Protestors railed on Tuesday against an Orange County congresswoman who could be a critical vote on President Trump's proposal to cut more than $1 trillion in federal dollars that helped pay for healthcare for those in need and extend tax cuts for millions of Americans. Trump's proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' narrowly passed the U.S. Senate hours before hundreds ofpeople gathered in a cul-de-sac outside of the Anaheim field office of Republican Rep. Young Kim to protest those cuts. The legislation still needs to be voted on by the U.S. House of Representatives, which could happen before the end of the week. 'I don't know why they call it beautiful, because there's nothing about it that's beautiful. It's harmful, it's reckless, and it's cruel, and it's going to hurt people,' said Melody Mendenhall, a nurse at UCLA who is active with the California Nurses Assn., which was among the groups that organized the protest. 'Rep. Young Kim, hear our cry, hear our voices. We need our Medicaid. We cannot afford this type of reckless cuts and behavior.' A security guard blocked the parking lot to Kim's office and at least a half-dozen Anaheim police officers watched the protest unfold. Several people who appeared to be Kim staffers watched the demonstration from outside the building before they dashed inside when protestors marched to the building, unsuccessfully sought to enter it and then began chanting 'Shame! Shame!' In a statement, Kim said that her door was always open to Californians in her district. 'I understand some of my constituents are concerned and know how important Medicaid services are for many in my community, which is why I voted to protect and strengthen Medicaid services for our most vulnerable citizens who truly need it,' Kim said. 'I have met with many of these local healthcare advocates in recent months.' Trump's proposal would dramatically overhaul the nation's tax code by making cuts approved during the president's first term permanent, a major benefit the the corporations and the nation's wealthy, while slashing funding for historic federal safety-net programs including Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which helps provide food to low-income Americans. Roughly 15 million Californians, more than a third of the state, are on Medi-Cal, the state's version of Medicaid, with some of the highest percentages in rural counties that supported Trump in the November election. More than half of California children receive healthcare coverage through Medi-Cal. A version of the Republican bill was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives with Kim's support. The U.S. Senate narrowly approved an amended version of the bill on Tuesday. The defection of three GOP senators meant Vice President J.D. Vance had to cast the tie-breaking vote for it to pass in that chamber. The House and Senate will now work to reconcile their two different versions of the bill. This week was a district work week for members of Congress, but House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) ordered members back to Washington, D.C., for votes on the bill that could occur Wednesday or Thursday. Republicans hope to get the legislation to President Trump's desk for his signature by Friday, Independence Day, though there is some concern among its members about whether they will have enough votes to pass the bill because of potential defections and the united Democratic opposition. An analysis released by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office on Sunday estimated that the Senate version of the proposal would increase the national deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034 and would result in 11.8 million Americans losing healthcare insurance in less than a decade. Trump praised the passage of the bill on social media and urged House Republicans to support the Senate plan. The proposal has caused a rift within the GOP, with and some House members have expressed reservations about the measure because of the amount it would add to the nation's deficit and its impact on their constituents. 'I've been clear from the start that I will not support a final reconciliation bill that makes harmful cuts to Medicaid, puts critical funding at risk, or threatens the stability of healthcare providers' in his congressional district, Rep. David Valadao (R-Hanford) wrote on the social media site X on Sunday. He represents more than a half million Central Valley residents who rely on Medicaid – the most of any congressional district in California, according to the UC Berkeley Labor Center. A spokesperson for Valadao on Tuesday didn't respond to a question about how the congressman planned to vote. Kim's Orange County district is more affluent than Valadao's, but roughly one in five of her constituents rely on Medicaid. The congresswoman was en route to Washington, D.C., at the time of the protest, according to a spokesperson. Outside her Anaheim field office, protestor after protestor described how the bill would impact vulnerable Californians, such as disabled children, the elderly, veterans and those who would lose access to reproductive healthcare. 'The stakes have never been higher. We are living in a time when our rights are under attack,' said Emily Escobar, a public advocacy manager for Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties. She said that federal funds do not pay for abortions, but help pay for other vital healthcare, such as cancer screenings, preventative care, testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections and access to contraception. More than one-third of Planned Parenthood's patients nationwide reside in California. These cuts will result in clinics being shut down, effectively reducing access to abortion, Escobar said. 'Let me make this clear, this bill is a backdoor abortion ban,' she said. Shari Home, 73, said she and her husband were weighing how to divide their Social Security income on food, medication and medical supplies after her husband, who suffers several chronic health conditions, fell last year. 'The hospitalizations were so expensive, so we applied for and got Medi-Cal in January and food assistance, and it's been such a lifesaver,' said the Laguna Woods resident. 'Without Medi-Cal, I don't know what we would do. Our lives would not be good. We would not have the medications that he needs.' Michelle Del Rosario, 57, wore a button picturing her son William, 25, on her blouse. The Orange resident, one of Kim's constituents who has previously voted for her, is the primary caregiver for her son, who has autism, epilepsy and does not speak. Her son relies on his Medi-Cal coverage for his $5,000-a-month seizure medicine, as well as the home health support he receives, she said. 'He lives at home. He has desires, at some point, to live independently, to work, but he needs' these support services for that to happen, Del Rosario said.
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
Senate Passes One Big Beautiful Bill Despite One Big Not-So-Beautiful Price Tag
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 1: Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) pauses while speaking to reporters off the Senate floor after the Senate passes President Donald Trump's so-called "One, Big, Beautiful Bill," Act at the U.S. Capitol Building on July 1, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by) Getty Images Senate Republicans narrowly passed President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' with a 51-50 vote after three Republicans—(Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Rand Paul (Ky.), and Thom Tillis (N.C.)—joined Democrats in voting no. Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaker vote. The tax provisions in the Senate would make permanent a number of the expiring tax cuts contained in Trump's signature 2017 tax legislation— the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). According to the Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWB Model), a nonpartisan, research-based initiative that provides an economic analysis of public policy's fiscal impact, making those cuts permanent would increase the deficit by $4.3 trillion over 10 years. These changes would be partly offset by spending cuts of $1.460 trillion for a total conventional cost of $3.104 trillion. The PWB Model analysis scored the legislation against a current law baseline. That's also how the Joint Committee on Taxation originally scored the bill. The baseline impacts how the cost of extending tax cuts is calculated (that's called scoring) and how it impacts the overall budget. As you know from past bills, including the Bush tax cuts, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act, it has long been the case that bills are scored based on the cost to move forward based on current law (so, in all of those examples, any provisions that were set to expire are reset to zero while those previously made permanent are ignored). Senate Republicans had requested that the JCT rescore it using a new approach called a current policy baseline. With a current policy baseline, extending provisions that are set to expire are scored as having zero cost. The Parliamentarian ruled that the new approach breaks the rules—this is consistent with precedent. With a current law baseline, the cost of the extensions is fully counted. Senate Committees According to the PWB Model analysis, increases in spending under the Armed Services, Judiciary, and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committees would add $290 billion to the deficit. While other committees proposed net spending cuts or revenue increases, the savings amount to only $1.5 trillion, offsetting less than one-third of the $4.6 trillion increase in deficits from tax cuts and spending increases. You can see how those costs are expected to play out here: Penn Wharton Budget Model Analysis, Senate Bill Kelly Phillips Erb (You can read more about the TCJA extensions as they originally appeared in the House version of the bill here.) Major Spending Cuts The Senate bill includes changes to health programs, including Medicaid. Notably, it would cut Medicaid spending by imposing work requirements, restricting state-level taxes on healthcare providers that receive federal matching funds, increasing the frequency of eligibility checks, changing Medicaid eligibility requirements based on immigration status, and phasing down state-directed payments to providers to align with Medicare rates. Overall, cuts to Medicaid would reduce the federal deficit by more than $900 billion. The bill also reduces spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, also known as food stamps) by $186 billion over ten years. The cost doesn't just disappear—it shifts the responsibility for payment to the states with a new cost-sharing formula. It would also create additional work documentation requirements, shift administrative costs to states, and make other changes to reduce federal SNAP costs. The Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee eliminates subsidized and income-driven loan repayment plans, imposes new limits on student borrowing, and tightens the eligibility requirements for Pell Grants. Altogether, it would reduce spending by $350 billion over the budget window. Impact To The Federal Debt Overall, the PWB Model analysis predicts that the bill would increase debt by 7.6% over 10 years and decrease gross domestic product (GDP) by 0.3% over the same period. That's different than the impact to the federal deficit. Here's the quick difference between deficit and debt: The federal deficit is the excess of expenditures over revenue in a fiscal year. In simple terms, if we spend more than we take in, we have a deficit. If we spend exactly what we take in, we achieve a balanced budget. If we take in more than we spend, we have a surplus. The deficit is recalculated annually based on the shortfall or surplus each month. If there is a deficit, the Treasury borrows money to make up the difference. The Treasury accomplishes this by selling securities like T-bills, notes, and savings bonds. The federal debt is essentially the total of the deficits. So, if we owe $800 million one year and it's not repaid, and in another year we owe $500 million that is also not repaid, we accumulate a debt of $1.3 billion. Make sense? Since this amount represents borrowed money, we also pay interest on it, causing it to continue growing even if we are not actively adding to it. Next Steps Now that the bill has passed the Senate, it moves back to the House. Speaker Mike Johnson can only afford to lose three votes—the last iteration in the House passed 215-214. The versions passed in the House and Senate must match exactly for the bill to become law. Forbes What's Comes Next For The One Big Beautiful Bill Act By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes As The Byrd Bath Continues, Here's A Look At What Will Likely Be Out Of The One Big Beautiful Bill (Updated) By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes House Passes Trump Tax Bill After Marathon Session, Now It Moves To The Senate By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes A Guide To The Tax Cuts In (And Out) Of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' By Kelly Phillips Erb
New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Total border encounters last month were less than ‘a single day under Biden,' Tom Homan says
Federal authorities encountered fewer migrants attempting to illegally enter the US last month than what officials faced daily during the Biden administration, border czar Tom Homan revealed Tuesday. 'Total Border Patrol encounters for the entire month of June 2025 was 6,070,' according to Homan, who noted in an X post that the figure is 'less than a single day under Biden.' 'As a matter of fact, the total number of encounters is less than half of a single day under Biden on many days,' the Trump administration official said, adding that 'none of the 6,070 were released into the US. ZERO.' Advertisement 3 Homan attributed the sharp decline in illegal border-crossings to 'The Trump Effect.' Getty Images The total released by Homan marks a 93.1% drop in nationwide Border Patrol encounters from June 2024, when 87,606 migrants were nabbed trying to enter the country illegally. It's also a 94% and 97% decline from June 2023 and June 2022, when, respectively, 100,606 and 193,027 migrants were encountered by Border Patrol. Advertisement In June 2022, the average daily total of migrant encounters was about 6,434 per day. Last month, Border Patrol reported encountering just over 10,000 migrants nationwide. Homan attributed the massive reduction in border-crossings to President Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration, calling it, 'The Trump Effect.' 3 Trump has deployed thousands of US troops to the southern border in an effort to combat illegal immigration. AP Advertisement 3 Monthly migrant encounters are massivly lower than they were under former President Joe Biden. Anadolu via Getty Images 'President Trump has created the most secure border in the history of the nation and the data proves it,' the border czar asserted. 'We have never seen numbers this low. Never.' 'God bless the men and women of the US Border Patrol and God bless the men and women of ICE,' Homan continued. 'The interior arrests and consequences help to drive down illegal immigration.' 'The TRUMP EFFECT keeps America winning.'
